DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB

Similar documents
800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Access Management Standards

DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION DS 3 STREETS

KENT COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

SECTION STREETS CITY OF LEE S SUMMIT, MISSOURI DESIGN CRITERIA

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

APPENDIX A Basis of Design and Design Criteria Memorandum

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF HIGHWAY TECHNICAL SERVICES DRIVEWAYS, BANNERS, AND PARADES ON AND OVER HIGHWAYS

M I D - C O A S T REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 166 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 201 ROCKLAND, ME (207)

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DPW) DRIVEWAY RULES AND PROCEDURES

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Town of Fuquay-Varina

DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 FLASHING YELLOW ARROW SIGNALS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

Parking Areas and Driveways for Single and Two Family Dwellings

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY NOTE 907B. Incentive/Disincentive Clause

DRIVEWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

The Design-Builder shall meet local road criteria provided by the local governing agencies.

CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

MOTOR VEHICLE ORIENTED BUSINESSES.

SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH STREET DESIGN DEVIATION REQUESTS

Theme: 1. BASIC CONCEPTS

La Paz County Public Works Standards Volume I

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD

STREETS AND ROADS DESIGN MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL... S-1

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

DIVISION 4: STREET. Improvement Design Standards City of Dundee Oregon. Division 4 : Street Page 1

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

Purpose: General Provisions:

Horizontal Sight Distance Considerations Freeway and Interchange Reconstruction

Title 12 STREETS, SIDEWALKS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC PLACES. Chapter TRACK VEHICLES

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

ARTICLE 8 OFF-STREET PARKING AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY STANDARDS

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Date: October 14 th, 2018 Project #: 1302 Project Name: Subject: Distribution:

Motorways Route in Thailand. Sustainable Highway Design

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

PART A: DRIVEWAY RULES CONTENTS

DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ZONE SPEED FINES DOUBLE. Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation. Infrastructure and Transportation. Traffic Engineering

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

PARAPETS / RAILS / MEDIANS / SIDEWALKS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 25

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

SECTION 4 STREETS. 4-1 STREET TYPES AND DESIGN WIDTHS The standard approved street types and design widths for Sutter County are as follows:

Fire Apparatus Access Roads in Marysville

Traffic Regulations Guidelines

ENGINEERING BEST PRACTICE BP2.2.1

PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION ON COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY: ACCESS DRIVEWAYS RESIDENTIAL

Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering GATES PERMITTING, DESIGN & INSPECTION GUIDE

ARTICLE 9 TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Subchapter 20 Transportation

Traffic Engineering Study

ARTICLE PARKING, LOADING AND DRIVEWAYS Effective May 6, 2009

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO INSTALL A DRIVEWAY ON A COUNTY TRUNK HIGHWAY

GUIDELINES FOR ADVERTISING SIGNS

Fire Department Access & Water Supply

CHAPTER 3. Driveways (Rev. 9/04, Ord )

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

Effect of Police Control on U-turn Saturation Flow at Different Median Widths

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

Jackson County Department of Transportation. Driveway Procedures. August 2017

BY-ELECTION SIGN GUIDELINES

DRIVEWAY/APPROACH PERMIT APPLICATION Applicant Type: Architect/Engineer Contractor Owner

APPLICATION FOR OBSTRUCTION PERMIT

Moraga-Orinda Fire District

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

3. Application Fees, Certificate Of Insurance & Performance Bond

CROW WING COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO ROADS UNDER COUNTY JURISDICTION CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION

POV SITE CIRCULATION AND PARKING

CITY OF FARMERSVILLE, TEXAS

City of Houston Fondren Road Paving and Drainage

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

Houston County Georgia

CEE 320. Fall Horizontal Alignment

DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES GENERAL. 1. Description

Interchange Ramp Characteristics (Selection and Design)

CHAPTER 19 PARKING TABLE OF CONTENTS

STANDARD DRAWING INDEX

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

DRIVEWAY GUIDE. Transportation, Engineering and Development (T.E.D.) Business Group

Letter of Transmittal

Transcription:

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB 20 (6m) 25 (7.5m) Desirable outline of parking area 10 (3m) 16 (4.8m) 50 (15 m) R 75 (23m) R Taper Alternate outline of 20 (6m) R parking area Pave shoulders between 22 driveways or match (6.6m) shoulder width 40 (12m) R 150 (46 m) Desirable See TYPICAL A - Applies to uncurbed state highways 8 (2.4m) or match shoulder width See TYPICAL A - Applies to uncurbed state highways Desirable outline of parking area 20 (6 m) 25 (7.5m) Alternate outline of 20 (6m) R 150 (45m) Desirable parking area Pave shoulders between 22 (6.6m) driveways or match shoulder width 10 (3m) Taper 25 (7.6m) R 22 (6.6m) 72 (22m) R 50 (15m) R 8 (2.4m) or match shoulder width GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE FOR Michigan Department of Transportation TRAFFIC AND SAFETY BY: ENGINEER OF DELIVERY COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS DRAWN BY: BY: CHECKED BY: IG/JAT ENGINEER OF DEVELOPMENT FILE: PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn REV. 06/03/2010 SHEET 01/20/2010 1 OF 6

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITH CURB 20 (6m) 25 (7.5m) 10 (3m) 16 (4.8m) 75 (23m) R 50 (15m) R 22 (6.6m) 40 (12m) R 10 (3m) 150 (46m) Desirable 2 (0.6m) MIN 20 (6m) 25 (7.5m) 150 (45m) Desirable 10 (3m) 22 (6.6m) 30 (9m) R 22 (6.6m) R 72 (22m) R 10 (3m) 2 (0.6m) MIN FILE: PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn 2 OF 6

CURB RETURN OFFSET DETAILS APPLIES TO UNCURBED STATE HIGHWAYS TYPICAL A 10 (3m) 3 (0.9m) Paved Shldr * 13.5 (4.1m) ALTERNATE TYPICAL A 10 (3m) 3 (0.9m) Paved Shldr * TYPICAL B 10 (3m) 5 (1.5m) R * See Note #9 on Sht #6 DIVIDED DRIVEWAYS ON HIGHWAY WITHOUT CURB 10 25 (7.5m) (3m) 22 16 (6.6m) (4.8m) 60 (18 m) Desirable 15 (4.6m) R Taper 5 (1.5m) R 40 (12m) R 20 (6m) R See TYPICAL B 8 (2.4m) or Match Shoulder Width DIVIDED DRIVEWAYS ON HIGHWAY WITH CURB 10 25 (7.5m) (3m) 22 (6.6m) 16 (4.8m) 60 (18m) Desirable 15 (4.6 m) R 25 (7.5m) R 5 (1.5m) R 40 (12m) R See TYPICAL B 8 (2.4 m) or Match Shoulder Width FILE: PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn 3 OF 6

40 (12m) R Min 22 (6.6m) Desirable 37 (11.3m) Desirable 30 (9m) Min (For Three Lanes, Width Should Be 39 (11.7m) Min) TWO-WAY DRIVEWAYS ON HIGHWAYS WITH CURB 35 (10.7m) R 35 (10.7m) R 22 (6.6m) Desirable 37 (11.3m) Desirable 30 (9m) Min TWO-WAY DRIVEWAYS ON HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB 10 (3m) 16 (4.8m) 10 (3m) 25 (7.5m) 16 (4.8m) 16 (4.8 m) 2 (0.6m) 2 (0.6m) 2 (0.6m) R Designed For Single Unit Vehicle (SU) "Width And Radii Should Be Modified To Accommodate Larger Vehicles" Designed For Semi Unit Vehicle (WB-65) "Width And Radii Should Be Modified To Accommodate Larger Vehicles" RIGHT-IN RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAYS WITH CURB FILE: PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn 4 OF 6

Optional Taper Spring Point Property Line Extended To \ Of Trunkline D* * Driveways For Each Property Including Radii, Must Be Located Within These Limits Unless Written Permission Of The Adjacent Property Owner Is Obtained HIGHWAY FRONTAGE Right-Turn Driveway Sidewalk Highway Lane Approach Driveway Spring Point Slope Same As Highway Cross Slope +1.5% Maximum +8% Maximum -4% Maximum Curb And Gutter COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PROFILE FOR MAJOR TRAFFIC GENERATORS Over (100) Peak Hour Directional Trips 8% Maximum Slope 10% Maximum Slope Sidewalk 2% Maximum Cross Slope 12% Maximum Change In Slope At 10 (3m) Intervals (Sag) Edge Of Pavement 10 (3m) Approximately 8% Maximum Change In Slope At 10 (3m) Intervals (Crest) When transverse slope is less than 1.5%, longitudinal drainage must be provided. See also R-29-. LOW VOLUME COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY SLOPES Top Of Driveway Warp sidewalk 4% or less SECTION - In urban areas the sidewalk shall be lowered at the edge of the driveway or lowered as shown in Section - whenever the maximum grades shown will be exceeded. See also R-28- when sidewalk ramps are required. SIDEWALK LOWERING DETAIL FILE: PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn 5 OF 6

NOTES: 1. The Region or TSC Traffic Engineer shall determine the necessary signing and pavement marking requirements to ensure that the driveway will operate safely and efficiently. The property owner shall erect and maintain all required signing and pavement markings as a condition of the driveway permit. 2. Consult the Region or TSC Traffic Engineer whenever: A. There is a question as to which type of driveway a commercial establishment should use. B. Operational conflicts with existing or anticipated future driveways across the highway may occur. 3. Suitable median crossovers may be required on divided highways as per Geometric Design Guide GEO-670-. 4. For dimensions not shown on this guide, refer to the document "Administrative Rules Regulating Driveways, Banners, and Parades On And Over Highways". 5. One-way driveways should be complemented with a well designed angle parking area to encourage one-way operation. 6. Driveway widths and radii shall be designed for the proper design vehicle. Where proper radii can not be provided, increase the drive throat width. 7. In urban areas a partial arc radius should be used when the distance from the edge of pavement to the sidewalks is between 5 (1.5m) and 20 (6m). When this distance is less than 5 (1.5m), consult the Region or TSC Traffic and Safety Engineer to determine the width and radii of the driveway. 8. See MDOT Construction Permit Manual. 9. Alternate Typical A may be used when construction and maintenance issues make the 13.5 (4.1m) curb setback undesirable. 2 10. For divided driveways, the desirable area of separating islands is 75ft 2 2 2 (7m ), preferably 100ft (9m ). The island width shall not be less than 4 (1.2m). 11. To eliminate left turns locking up from the cross street or driveways at unsignalized divided drives, the left turning vehicles should be headed up across from each other. 12. Current AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" and MDOT Guidelines should be used for sight distance requirements. 13. These design concepts are for new construction. Where modifications may be needed for retrofitting to existing road features, consult the Geometric Review and Congestion Analysis Unit, Division of Operations. FILE: PW RD TS Geo/mdot traf.dgn 6 OF 6