Tier II Group Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan

Similar documents
Asset Class 2019 Target 2020 Target 2021 Target 2022 Target 2023 Target REVENUE VEHICLES AB - Articulated Bus N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Asset Class 2019 Target 2020 Target 2021 Target 2022 Target 2023 Target REVENUE VEHICLES AB Articulated Bus AO Automobile BR Over the road Bus

Transit Asset Management Plan for the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Toronto Parking Authority Fleet Vehicle Replacement

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Approval Page. (Insert Resolution) Ozark Regional Transit Asset Management Plan

Approval Page. Razorback Transit Asset Management Plan

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement to Purchase Compressed Natural Gas Articulated Buses. Staff Report

Asset Management Plan

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Fleet Management & Planning

Group Transit Asset Management Plan FY 2018/ /22 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Regional Priority Ranking Recommendations for WSDOT Consolidated Grant Program

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

THAT the Contracts for the purchase of vehicles BE AWARDED to the following dealerships:

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

INVENTORY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

AGENDA INTERCITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION January 20, :30 P.M. 1) APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1 min.

Chapter 6 - Capital Improvement Program

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

San Diego Auto Outlook

Alternatives to an Open Competitive Commercial Collection Program Presented by Robert Craggs RAM/SWANA Conference

Item #14. DATE October 12, GCTD Board of Directors. Reed C. Caldwell Director of Engineering & Construction

TRANSIT DRIVES PENNSYLVANIA MOBILITY FACT SHEET

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

comscore Automotive Targets for Tier C

NEW YORK January 2019

Solano County Transit

2017 DieselWise Indiana Solicitation for Projects. Shawn Seals DieselWise Indiana Administrator

'08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18* Years Historical data source: IHS

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Canada s Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations for Model Years

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

'08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18* Years Historical data source: IHS Markit

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Agenda Item No. 6b June 24, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

NADA Winter 2018 Dealer Attitude Survey Aid

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Decision on Merced Irrigation District Transition Agreement

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Green California Summit & Exposition April 7,2008. Green Fleets: Kicking Tires & Crunching Numbers The 1992 Federal Energy Policy Act (EPAct)

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

STOCK # YEAR MAKE MODEL MILEAGE

Feasibility of Establishing an E85 Fuelling Station in Oshawa

'08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18* Years Historical data source: IHS Markit

Office of House Republican Whip, Stan Saylor

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

California Auto Outlook Comprehensive information on the California vehicle market Volume 14, Number 2 Released May 2018 Covering First Quarter 2018

Data Analytics in the Connected Vehicle Future to Revolutionize Safety, Emissions, and Funding

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Zero Emissions Airport Vehicle and Infrastructure Pilot Program Webinar

U S Postal Service Fleet Planning and Management. GovEnergy 2007

Experian Automotive Quarterly Briefing First quarter 2014 automotive market share trends and registrations

7000 Series Railcar Program Overview

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Fleet Safety Initiative Status Summary

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

Bus The Case for the Bus

Parking Management Element

January 8, ATTN: VW Settlement. Dear Mr. Phillips:

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

SYSTEM SAFETY, SECURITY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE JULY 17, 2014 PURCHASE OF HYBRID SEDANS APPROVE CONTRACT AWARD ACTION: RECOMMENDATION

FY 2012 PROPOSED BUDGET MOTOR POOL FUND SUMMARY

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. August 2017

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

Clean Diesel Funding. Clean Airport Fleets Workshop June 14, 2011

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Fleet Options. Information and Comparison

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

** View our inventory every week at ** Join our mailing list to get our inventory every week! Text PremierPAA to 22828

Fleet Department. 1 P a g e

Alternative Fuels Corridor Implementation. MARAMA Workshop Mark Hand, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection March 20, 2019

Technology and Regulation Fuel Efficiency: Regulatory Options Monopsony buying (taxes) Minimum mileage

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS TRANSIT FLEET UPDATE

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

2010 Model Year Carolinas Green Vehicle Guide

Ex-Ante Evaluation (for Japanese ODA Loan)

The Regional Municipality of York. Purchase of Six Battery Electric Buses

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE REVISED FISCAL IMPACT (replaces fiscal note dated March 21, 2013)

Presentation to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Infrastructure Investment: Ensuring an Effective Economic Recovery Program

Regional Transportation District. Dave Genova Interim General Manager and CEO August 21, 2015

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Advancing Electric Vehicles in Edmonton SPARK Conference November 8, 2017

ALABAMA January 2019

Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program. Advisory Committee Meeting

PREFACE 2015 CALSTART

18/10/2018. Mr Peter Adams General Manager, Wholesale Markets Australian Energy Regulator. By

Background Information for MPRB Community Advisory Committee for 2010 Southwest Light Rail Transit Project DEIS Comment Letter Section 2

Transcription:

Tier II Group Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan September 2018

Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Performance Targets & Measures... 3 Capital Asset Inventory... 4 Asset Inventory Summary... 4 Condition Assessment... 4 Asset Condition Summary... 4 Decision Support... 5 Investment Prioritization... 5 Decision Support Tools... 6 Proposed Investments... 7 Fleet Replacement Targets... 7 Appendix A: Asset Inventory and Condition Data... 8 Appendix B: Proposed Investment List... 23

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan Mark Policinski, Accountable Executive Introduction The Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI) is a council of local governments, business organizations and community groups committed to developing collaborative strategies to improve the quality of life and the economic vitality of the region. Formed in 1964, OKI has spent 50 years cultivating partnerships and alliances that range from the federal government to local councils. Its 118 members represent governmental, social and civic groups from nearly 200 communities in the eight-county, three-state region. OKI works collaboratively with stakeholders to solve interstate dilemmas, create far-reaching development plans, break through political bureaucracy, provide services to the public and advocate for federal funding. OKI has final authority over all federal dollars spent on surface transportation in the region. Each year, OKI approves roughly $40 million in funding for projects in the region. As the Group TAM sponsor for the region, OKI has compiled data about the assets owned by Tier II agencies throughout the Greater Cincinnati region. This data has been collected with the intent of informing future investment priorities for the Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) program. OKI has also set performance targets for the region, which are as follows: Performance Targets & Measures Asset Category - Performance Measure Asset Class 2019 Target REVENUE VEHICLES Age - % of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that have met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) 2020 Target 2021 Target 2022 Target CU - Cutaway Bus 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 2023 Target MV - Mini-van 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% VN - Van 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% EQUIPMENT Age - % of vehicles that have met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) Non-/Service Trucks and other Rubber Tire 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 3 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Capital Asset Inventory Please see Appendix A (Asset Inventory and Condition Data) for the asset inventory listing. Agencies in the OKI Group TAM Plan have a total of 223 assets, of which 190 are revenue vehicles and 33 are equipment. A summary is included below. Asset Inventory Summary Asset Category/Class Total Number Average Age Average Mileage 190 4.5 71,700 $48,215.79 CU - Cutaway Bus 62 4.1 58,448 $58,145.16 MV - Mini-van 69 3.6 65,484 $40,000.00 VN - Van 59 5.7 94,860 $48,000.00 33 5.8 41,048 $30,125.00 Non-/Service Trucks and other Rubber Tire 26 4.7 44,237 $24,192.31 7 9.9 28,294 $55,833.33 Average Value/Replacement Cost Condition Assessment Please see Appendix A (Asset Inventory and Condition Data) for individual asset condition listing. Overall 12% of revenue vehicles and 33% of equipment meet or exceed the Useful Life Benefit. A summary is included below. Asset Condition Summary Asset Category/Class Total Number Average Age Average Mileage Average Value/Replacement Cost 190 4.5 71,700 $48,215.79 12% CU - Cutaway Bus 62 4.1 58,448 $58,145.16 5% MV - Mini-van 69 3.6 65,484 $40,000.00 13% VN - Van 59 5.7 94,860 $48,000.00 27% 33 5.8 41,048 $30,125.00 33% Non-/Service Trucks and other Rubber Tire 26 4.7 44,237 $24,192.31 27% % At or Past ULB 7 9.9 28,294 $55,833.33 57% 4 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Decision Support Investment Prioritization Achieving the performance targets of this plan will rely upon efforts made by the transportation providers included in this TAM plan and serving clients in the OKI region. Priorities for implementation include projects or programs that help sustain the performance targets identified by the plan. It is expected that many of the efforts undertaken to achieve the targets of this plan will rely, at least in part, on federal funding available through the Federal Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) program. The OKI Coordinated Public Transit Human Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) is targeted to serving the populations served by this federal program and is the basis for awarding federal funding for them in most of the Cincinnati urbanized area. A description of the competitive selection process for Section 5310 program funds is provided in Appendix A of the Coordinated Plan. While the competitive selection process information in Appendix A provides more detail, the following general evaluation criteria is used for project selection and are consistent with the federal Program Guidance and Application Instructions, which include selecting projects that: 1. address gaps in current service provisions for targeted communities as defined in the local coordinated plan; 2. make use of available resources and leverage resources to the extent possible; 3. coordinate with other Federal programs (e.g., coordinated services, financial partnerships); 4. can be achieved with the given technical capacity of the project sponsor; and 5. demonstrate evidence of broad solicitation for input (coordinated planning process). Additional Considerations Applications for 5310 funding are also evaluated based on how the project addresses the following considerations: Service to targeted populations - Targeted populations include elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities for Section 5310. Applicants must provide a description of how their project will provide service to the identified targeted populations. Elimination or reduction of duplication in services - To ensure appropriate levels of communication have occurred with other agencies providing similar services, the applicant is asked to describe efforts taken to help eliminate or reduce duplication in services and to indicate other agencies contacted and the results of such efforts, including any letters, agreements, or contracts. Sustainability - Once a project has been initiated, it is important that the project sustain itself. The low-income or disabled population may become dependent upon the services, and applicants need to take precautions so that these services can be continued should the federal funds become unavailable in the future. Applicants in the Cincinnati urbanized area indicate how their projects will be sustained after the funding period is complete; accordingly, projects that demonstrate contingency planning for alternate funding sources will be stronger and receive higher priority. 5 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Decision Support Tools OKI 5310 Oversight Team: The project selection process involves the 5310 Oversight Team working with OKI to evaluate applications for funding. The expertise and involvement of the 5310 Oversight Team provides additional and valuable perspective from providers and advocates of transportation services for target populations. OKI Group TAM Performance Targets and Investment Priorities: The Group TAM Plan Performance Targets for each vehicle type will be considered as funding requests are made by agencies for vehicles. Cutaway and minivan vehicles are preferred for service by most agencies in the region and will be the highest priority for replacement followed by vans. Non-revenue/service automobiles and other vehicles not directly providing service to clients are low priorities for replacement. Mileage of agency fleet vehicles providing service will also be considered when prioritizing replacements. The TAM Plan Performance Targets are based solely on vehicle age. Some agencies reach FTA ULB mileage standards long before reaching the TAM age threshold. To prevent fleet maintenance costs from burdening these agencies, consideration will be made based upon mileage. TAM Plan Performance Targets will also be secondary to the Coordinated Plan considerations described above. that serve more individuals in larger portions of the region will rank higher priority than those serving less people or in smaller portions of the region. 6 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Proposed Investments The following table shows the fleet replacement targets for each vehicle type in order to meet the TAM target for each year through 2023. For a breakdown of proposed investments and associated estimated costs, see Appendix B (Proposed Investment List). Fleet Replacement Targets Cutaway Bus 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Quantity Exceeding ULB (10 Year) 9 12 18 23 27 Percent Exceeding ULB Without Replacement 15% 19% 29% 37% 44% TAM Target 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Replacement Quantity to Maintain TAM Target 6 3 6 5 4 Minivan 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Quantity Exceeding ULB (8 Year) 11 15 23 24 39 Percent Exceeding ULB Without Replacement 16% 22% 33% 35% 57% TAM Target 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Replacement Quantity to Maintain TAM Target 5 4 8 1 15 Van 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Quantity Exceeding ULB (8 Year) 19 28 33 41 52 Percent Exceeding ULB Without Replacement 32% 47% 56% 69% 88% TAM Target 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Replacement Quantity to Maintain TAM Target 5 9 5 8 11 Non-/Service 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Quantity Exceeding ULB (8 Year) 7 9 14 15 17 Percent Exceeding ULB Without Replacement 27% 35% 54% 58% 65% TAM Target 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Replacement Quantity to Maintain TAM Target 1 1 6 1 2 Trucks and other Rubber Tire 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Quantity Exceeding ULB (8 Year) 4 6 7 7 7 Percent Exceeding ULB Without Replacement 57% 86% 100% 100% 100% TAM Target 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Replacement Quantity to Maintain TAM Target 2 2 0 0 0 7 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Appendix A: Asset Inventory and Condition Data Asset Category Asset Class Make Model Asset Owner Acquisition Year Age Vehicle Mileage Replacement Cost/Value Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) Past ULB? VN - Van Ford Econoline Abilities First Foundation 2012 6 102,974 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Econoline Abilities First 2013 5 62,000 $48,000.00 8 NO Foundation MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan BAWAC 2016 2 49,846 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Mobility MV-1 BAWAC 2016 2 43,309 $40,000.00 8 NO Ventures MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2015 3 90,000 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2015 3 99,700 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2015 3 115,000 $40,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Econoline BAWAC 2014 4 76,000 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 70,245 $48,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2013 5 104,000 $40,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 80,600 $48,000.00 8 NO CU - Cutaway Bus Ford E 350 BAWAC 2014 4 86,000 $85,000.00 10 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 105,000 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 81,000 $48,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Minivan BAWAC 2015 3 86,575 $40,000.00 8 NO 8 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 87,500 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 86,000 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 88,000 $48,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2015 3 87,100 $40,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 79,200 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Econoline BAWAC 2014 4 86,000 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 98,300 $48,000.00 8 NO CU - Cutaway Bus Ford E 350 BAWAC 2016 2 66,000 $85,000.00 10 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2017 1 34,250 $48,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van GM MV1 BAWAC 2016 2 43,310 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2017 1 49,850 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2017 1 15,590 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2017 1 20,430 $40,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2017 1 13,000 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2018 0 11,700 $48,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2017 1 7,000 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2017 1 12,600 $4,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Ford Connect BAWAC 2018 0 9,200 $40,000.00 8 NO 9 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

MV - Mini-van Ford Connect BAWAC 2018 0 10,000 $40,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2017 1 4,400 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2018 0 5,000 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2018 0 300 $48,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford Transit BAWAC 2015 3 88,500 $48,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2017 1 24,000 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Caravan BAWAC 2017 1 28,000 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Catholic Charities of SW Ohio VN - Van GMC 3500 Central Connections Non /Service Buick Lucerne Central Connections VN - Van Ford E-350 Central Connections CU - Cutaway Bus Ford E-350 Central Connections CU - Cutaway Bus Ford E-Series Central Connections CU - Cutaway Bus Ford E-Series Central Connections MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Central Connections MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Central Connections MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Central Connections CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior 2010 8 154,979 $40,000.00 8 YES 2013 5 48,919 $48,000.00 8 NO 2009 9 126,644 $30,000.00 8 YES 2008 10 163,734 $48,000.00 8 YES 2013 5 79,475 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 30,325 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 25,068 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 51,348 $40,000.00 8 NO 2014 4 84,679 $40,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 105,811 $40,000.00 8 NO 2009 9 136,607 $55,000.00 10 NO 10 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Cincinnati Area Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Clermont County Board of Developmental Disabilities MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior 2011 7 125,854 $55,000.00 10 NO 2011 7 131,957 $55,000.00 10 NO 2011 7 95,440 $55,000.00 10 NO 2012 6 87,700 $55,000.00 10 NO 2013 5 72,800 $55,000.00 10 NO 2013 5 74,590 $55,000.00 10 NO 2014 4 69,600 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 27,800 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 25,560 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 18,235 $55,000.00 10 NO 2008 10 52,030 $55,000.00 10 YES 2011 7 199,911 $55,000.00 10 NO 2001 17 187,542 $55,000.00 10 YES 2012 6 172,955 $40,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 163,844 $40,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 143,210 $40,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 141,153 $40,000.00 8 NO 11 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Clermont Senior 2012 6 175,839 $55,000.00 10 NO 2013 5 150,162 $55,000.00 10 NO 2014 4 130,792 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 68,960 $40,000.00 8 NO 2016 2 53,046 $40,000.00 8 NO 2018 0 343 $40,000.00 8 NO 2016 2 58,034 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 55,571 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 58,533 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 46,105 $55,000.00 10 NO 2015 3 92,386 $40,000.00 8 NO 2017 1 28,540 $40,000.00 8 NO 2017 1 14,557 $40,000.00 8 NO 2017 1 23,845 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 26,880 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 32,014 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 39,116 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 39,349 $55,000.00 10 NO 12 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Easter Seals CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Easter Seals CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Easter Seals CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Easter Seals CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Chevrolet Express Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Econoline Easter Seals 2017 1 34,040 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 30,080 $55,000.00 10 NO 2017 1 20,003 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 43,379 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 32,618 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 42,390 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 45,443 $55,000.00 10 NO 2010 8 134,245 $55,000.00 10 NO 2005 13 236,769 $48,000.00 8 YES 2006 12 216,175 $48,000.00 8 YES 2007 11 204,538 $48,000.00 8 YES 2012 6 156,280 $48,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 163,986 $48,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 173,682 $48,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 102,351 $48,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 94,845 $48,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 119,322 $48,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 100,840 $48,000.00 8 NO 13 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

VN - Van Chevrolet Express Easter Seals VN - Van Ford Transit Easter Seals CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Episcopal Retirement CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Episcopal Retirement CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline KNOLLS OF OXFORD MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan KNOLLS OF OXFORD CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline KNOLLS OF OXFORD MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan MAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES VN - Van Ford Econoline Maple Knoll Communities dba Sycamore Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Maple Knoll Communities dba Sycamore Senior MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Maple Knoll Communities dba Sycamore Senior VN - Van Ford Econoline Maple Knoll Communities dba Sycamore Senior CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Maple Knoll Communities, 2014 4 104,026 $48,000.00 8 NO 2014 4 36,120 $48,000.00 8 NO 2018 0 2,351 $55,000.00 10 NO 2018 0 1,480 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 11,776 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 20,000 $40,000.00 8 NO 2009 9 52,328 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 31,118 $40,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 67,505 $48,000.00 8 NO 2009 9 117,546 $55,000.00 10 NO 2005 13 177,228 $40,000.00 8 YES 2009 9 135,686 $48,000.00 8 YES 2010 8 47,723 $55,000.00 10 NO 14 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Inc.- Maple Knoll Village CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Maple Knoll 2011 7 14,278 $55,000.00 10 NO Communities, Inc.- Maple Knoll Village MV - Mini-van Toyota Sienna Marielders, Inc. 2018 0 23,129 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Chrysler Town & Country CU - Cutaway Bus Chevrolet Collins Express G3500 CU - Cutaway Bus Ford STARCRAFT- E450 Marielders, Inc. 2008 10 78,977 $40,000.00 8 YES Mayerson Jewish Mayerson Jewish CU - Cutaway Bus Chevrolet Collins Express Mayerson Jewish VN - Van Ford Transit Connect Wagon VN - Van Ford Transit Connect Wagon VN - Van Ford Transit Connect Wagon Trucks and other Rubber Tire Mayerson Jewish Mayerson Jewish Mayerson Jewish Chevrolet Silverado Mayerson Jewish CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Mayerson Jewish CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Mayerson Jewish 2009 9 24,000 $55,000.00 10 NO 2011 7 34,000 $55,000.00 10 NO 2009 9 23,000 $55,000.00 10 NO 2014 4 12,000 $48,000.00 8 NO 2014 4 18,000 $48,000.00 8 NO 2016 2 24,000 $48,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 5,000 $38,000.00 8 NO 2018 0 1,324 $55,000.00 10 NO 2012 6 69,483 $55,000.00 10 NO 15 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

VN - Van Ford Econoline Mayerson Jewish 2005 13 117,832 $48,000.00 8 YES CU - Cutaway Bus Goshen Coach Mercy Health 2017 1 3,529 $55,000.00 10 NO West Park MV - Mini-van Mobility MV-1 Mercy Health 2016 2 15,731 $40,000.00 8 NO Ventures West Park VN - Van Ford Econoline Mercy Health 2006 12 65,303 $48,000.00 8 YES West Park Non /Service Ford Flex Mercy Health 2013 5 70,092 $34,000.00 8 NO West Park Trucks and other Ford F250 Mercy Health 2008 10 37,677 $37,000.00 8 YES Rubber Tire West Park CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Mercy Health 2009 9 56,617 $55,000.00 10 NO West Park MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Oxford Senior 2015 3 24,405 $40,000.00 8 NO Citizens, Inc. MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Oxford Senior 2015 3 32,699 $40,000.00 8 NO Citizens, Inc. MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Oxford Senior 2017 1 17,930 $40,000.00 8 NO Citizens, Inc. CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Oxford Senior 2010 8 30,063 $55,000.00 10 NO Citizens, Inc. MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Oxford Senior 2012 6 58,117 $40,000.00 8 NO Citizens, Inc. VN - Van Ford Econoline Oxford Senior 2014 4 52,078 $48,000.00 8 NO Citizens, Inc. MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2011 7 83,677 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2011 7 90,998 $40,000.00 8 NO CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Partners in Prime 2012 6 42,490 $55,000.00 10 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2013 5 95,559 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2015 3 65,520 $40,000.00 8 NO 16 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2017 1 23,063 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2017 1 22,722 $40,000.00 8 NO CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Partners in Prime 2017 1 6,598 $85,000.00 10 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2016 2 39,820 $40,000.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Partners in Prime 2016 2 43,793 $40,000.00 8 NO CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Partners in Prime 2017 1 9,150 $85,000.00 10 NO Non /Service Subaru Forester (AWD) Partners in Prime 2017 1 22,706 $26,000.00 8 NO Non /Service Subaru Forester (AWD) Partners in Prime 2017 1 28,723 $26,000.00 8 NO Non /Service GMC Acadia SLE Partners in Prime 2017 1 12,242 $32,000.00 8 NO VN - Van Ford E-150 Partners in Prime 2010 8 117,238 $48,000.00 8 YES VN - Van Ford E-150 Partners in Prime 2011 7 87,436 $48,000.00 8 NO Non /Service CU - Cutaway Bus Non /Service Non /Service Non /Service Non /Service Non /Service Chevy Impala Partners in Prime 2014 4 93,785 $30,500.00 8 NO Internationa HC 310 Partners in Prime 2008 10 59,580 $130,000.00 10 YES l Nissan Altima Partners in Prime 2015 3 43,193 $25,000.00 8 NO Nissan Altima Partners in Prime 2015 3 36,021 $25,000.00 8 NO Nissan Versa Note Partners in Prime 2016 2 22,330 $17,000.00 8 NO Nissan Versa Note Partners in Prime 2016 2 21,889 $17,000.00 8 NO Chevrolet HHR Partners in Prime 2009 9 65,459 $25,000.00 8 YES 17 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Non /Service Nissan Versa Note Partners in Prime 2016 2 18,480 $17,000.00 8 NO Non /Service Nissan Versa Note Partners in Prime 2016 2 12,820 $17,000.00 8 NO Non /Service Kia Soul Partners in Prime 2017 1 4,878 $24,500.00 8 NO Non /Service Kia Soul Partners in Prime 2017 1 8,995 $24,500.00 8 NO MV - Mini-van Dodge Braun (GC) Partners in Prime 2010 8 137,779 $40,000.00 8 YES MV - Mini-van Dodge Braun (GC) Partners in Prime 2010 8 150,239 $40,000.00 8 YES Non /Service Chevy Impala Partners in Prime 2009 9 119,528 $30,500.00 8 YES VN - Van Chevy Astro Partners in Prime 2001 17 142,371 $48,000.00 8 YES Trucks and other Rubber Tire Isuzu NPR (Gas) Partners in Prime 2005 13 42,853 $45,000.00 8 YES Trucks and other Isuzu NTR (Diesel) Partners in Prime 2007 11 27,647 $45,000.00 8 YES Rubber Tire CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline SEM Villa 2017 1 3,424 $55,000.00 10 NO CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Volunteers of America CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Volunteers of America MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Volunteers of America VN - Van Ford Econoline Volunteers of America VN - Van Dodge Ram Promaster Volunteers of 2500 America MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Volunteers of America MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Volunteers of America 2018 0 1,069 $55,000.00 10 NO 2018 0 721 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 15,274 $40,000.00 8 NO 2007 11 75,149 $48,000.00 8 YES 2015 3 8,385 $48,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 29,436 $40,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 28,511 $40,000.00 8 NO 18 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Volunteers of America CU - Cutaway Bus Ford Econoline Warren County MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Warren County MV - Mini-van Mobility MV-1 Warren County Ventures MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Warren County VN - Van Ford Econoline Warren County MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Warren County MV - Mini-van Chevrolet Uplander Warren County MV - Mini-van Chevrolet Uplander Warren County MV - Mini-van Dodge Grand Caravan Warren County VN - Van Ford Econoline Warren County MV - Mini-van Mobility Ventures MV-1 Wesley 2013 5 27,220 $40,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 200,289 $55,000.00 10 NO 2016 2 26,003 $40,000.00 8 NO 2016 2 29,073 $40,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 77,675 $40,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 33,934 $48,000.00 8 NO 2008 10 140,684 $40,000.00 8 YES 2008 10 132,032 $40,000.00 8 YES 2009 9 116,523 $40,000.00 8 YES 2010 8 124,868 $40,000.00 8 YES 2007 11 94,333 $48,000.00 8 YES 2015 3 58,501 $40,000.00 8 NO 19 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

MV - Mini-van MV - Mini-van MV - Mini-van MV - Mini-van MV - Mini-van Mobility Ventures Mobility Ventures Mobility Ventures Mobility Ventures Mobility Ventures MV-1 MV-1 MV-1 MV-1 MV-1 Wesley Wesley Wesley Wesley Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley Trucks and other Rubber Tire Non /Service Freightliner Wesley Ford Focus Wesley 2015 3 64,810 $40,000.00 8 NO 2015 3 48,728 $40,000.00 8 NO 2015 3 57,692 $40,000.00 8 NO 2015 3 67,562 $40,000.00 8 NO 2015 3 69,975 $40,000.00 8 NO 2014 4 118,850 $48,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 129,693 $48,000.00 8 NO 2011 7 252,728 $48,000.00 8 NO 2010 8 205,331 $48,000.00 8 YES 2012 6 183,005 $48,000.00 8 NO 2000 18 10 YES 2009 9 $20,000.00 8 YES 20 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Non /Service Non /Service Non /Service Ford Focus Wesley Ford Focus Wesley Ford Focus Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley Non /Service Non /Service Ford Focus Wesley Ford Focus Wesley VN - Van Ford Econoline Wesley Trucks and other Rubber Tire Trucks and other Rubber Tire Ford Econoline Wesley Ford Econoline Wesley 2009 9 $20,000.00 8 YES 2010 8 $20,000.00 8 YES 2010 8 $20,000.00 8 YES 2010 8 $48,000.00 8 YES 2010 8 $48,000.00 8 YES 2010 8 $48,000.00 8 YES 2009 9 $48,000.00 8 YES 2012 6 $20,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 $20,000.00 8 NO 2010 8 $48,000.00 8 YES 2012 6 $85,000.00 8 NO 2012 6 $85,000.00 8 NO 21 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Non /Service Non /Service Non /Service Non /Service Ford C-Max Wesley Ford C-Max Wesley Ford C-Max Wesley Ford C-Max Wesley 2013 5 $27,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 $27,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 $27,000.00 8 NO 2013 5 $27,000.00 8 NO 22 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n

Appendix B: Proposed Investment List In creating our proposed investment list it was assumed that the costs for vehicles would be equal to the current model rounded up to the nearest thousand plus 10% contingency. Therefore, $55,000 was used for cutaway buses, $40,000 for mini-vans, $48,000 for vans, $30,000 for non-revenue/service vehicles, and $45,000 for trucks and other rubber tire vehicles. All figures are listed in 2018 dollars. Priority High Cutaway Bus Replacement Investment to Maintain TAM Target 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ 6 $330,000 3 $165,000 6 $330,000 5 $275,000 4 $220,000 High Minivan Replacement Investment to Maintain TAM Target 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ 5 $200,000 4 $160,000 8 $320,000 1 $40,000 15 $600,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Medium Van Replacement Investment to Maintain TAM Target Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ 5 $240,000 9 $432,000 5 $240,000 8 $384,000 11 $528,000 Low Non-/Service Replacement Investment to Maintain TAM Target 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ 1 $30,000 1 $30,000 6 $180,000 1 $30,000 2 $60,000 Low Trucks and other Rubber Tire Replacement Investment to Maintain TAM Target 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ Number Cost in 2018 $ 2 $90,000 2 $90,000 0-0 - 0 - Total Investment 2018 $ 2019 $ 890,000 2020 $ 877,000 2021 $1,070,000 2022 $729,000 2023 $1,408,000 23 O K I T r a n s i t A s s e t M a n a g e m e n t P l a n