III. Public Transport Terminology

Similar documents
Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

The Roots of Curiosity: Being a Bus Driver

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

MTA New York City Transit Service Guidelines Manual

Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Downtown Transit Plan

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT. CAPITAL and METRO LINES

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

MTA New York City Transit and MTA Bus Company System-wide Service Standards

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

The capital cost estimates do not include allowances for: ROW acquisition. Third-party mitigation works. Hazardous materials handling.

Executive Summary October 2013

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour

Click to edit Master title style

Dr. K. Gunasekaran Associate Professor Division of Transportation Engineering Anna University Chennai

9. Downtown Transit Plan

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

MOVE ACHIEVE SUCCEED. Sustainable Development Report 2012

Parking Management Strategies

Allocation of Buses to Depots : A Case Study

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

Istanbul METROBUS BRT. Adapted from Presentations by World Resources Institute/EMBARQ s Sibel Koyluoglu and Dario Hidalgo

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

TBARTA USF to Wesley Chapel Express Bus Service Operating Plan. Draft 3/25/2014

Wellington City Bus Review. What are we going to do this evening? The Review so far. Welcome. Draft Timetable Presentation April & May 2013

Impact of the North South Line Project

McNICOLL BUS GARAGE. Public Open House June 12, 2017 Mary Ward Catholic School

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Halifax Commuter Rail: A Fresh Concept

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

METRO TRANSIT a n n ua l re p o r t. madison, wisconsin // mymetrobus.com

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

ScoreCard November 2013 [Oct 13 Data] Ridership

Branch Edmonton Transit

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

ScoreCard Jun 2014 [May 14 Data] Ridership

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

ScoreCard February 2014 [Jan 14 Data] Ridership

MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and MTA Metro-North Railroad (MNR) System-wide Service Standards

City of Ellensburg Transit Development Plan

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

A Rider s View. Presented By Stuart Spina. A Summary of Recommendations. To Improve MBTA Bus Service

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

MAT Paratransit for Persons with Disabilities

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Case Study Congestion Charges in Singapore

Use of Passenger Count Data to provide Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fixed-Route Cluster Operations Helping Agencies Do More with Less

Central Transportation Paratransit Policies

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

JOINT FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION. ART and APS Bus Parking Informational Session July 27, :30 pm

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

UC Santa Cruz TAPS 3-Year Fee & Fare Proposal, through

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT

Light rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form.

SPARTA Ridership Satisfaction Study

Kitimat Transit handydart. User Guide

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Transcription:

III. Public Transport Terminology Public Transport Service Planning and Regulation: An Introduction III-1

Planning and Analysis Building Blocks Cost Analysis Schedule Building Demand/Revenue Analysis Performance Analysis Measures & Standards Service Design Service Monitoring Fare Setting Physical Environment Market Factors Focus of Discussion III-2

Basic Public Transport Terms Service Route Alignment Terminal (Route) Garage (Parking and Maintenance) Span of Service Interval (Frequency) Time Running Terminal Cycle Bus (Train) Requirements Cost Capital Operating Life-Cycle Avoidable Output Ridership Commercial Hours/KM Dead Hours/KM Vehicle Hours/KM Occupancy Factor Capacity Utilization Passengers at Maximum Load Point III-3

Comments on Terminology Public transport systems sometimes use different terms to define the same operating concepts This presentation: Uses common terminology found in many countries Is generally consistent with: Molinero, Angel. Transporte Público: Planeación, Diseño, Operación y Administración, Quinta del Agua Ediciones,2003, México. III-4

Route Alignment Path Over Which the Bus Travels Balance between coverage and directness Maybe different alignments based on time of day Some systems give new route name to each separate alignment and/or direction BMTC III-5

Terminal The end of a route May be shared by several routes May also be served by different modes Intercity bus or feeder Bus stations often provided at major terminals BMTC KSB Station III-6

Garage (Parking and Maintenance) Operating facility Functions (more added as number of buses increases) Parking Daily, routine servicing Vehicle repair Driver assignment Can also be called patio BMTC III-7

Start 5 am Span of Service End 11pm Total Clock Hours Over Which Public Transport Service is Operated Common spans of service Work days All day (covers both peak commuting periods) AM, PM peak commuting hours only Owl (early morning) service Saturday service Sunday and holiday service III-8

Interval (Frequency) Time in Minutes Between Two Arrivals (or Departures) of Buses or Trains e.g., At an interval of 10 minutes, a bus or train departs every 10 minutes Interval is the inverse measure of service frequency (60/interval) = Buses/Hour Interval III-9

Running Time Travel Time From One Terminal to the Other Terminal e.g., The running time for a bus that leaves Terminal A at 7:00 AM and arrives at Terminal B at 7:50 AM is 50 minutes A B Running times often vary by direction and time of day, so monitoring is important: Efficient scheduling of vehicles Good passenger information III-10

Terminal Time Time scheduled for a respective vehicle between when it arrives at a terminal and when it departs for its next trip e.g., A bus arrives at Terminal B at 7:50 AM and departs on its next trip at 8:00 AM. The terminal time is 10 minutes Reasons for terminal time Time to get back on schedule if the trip arrives late at terminal A rest break for the driver Often 12-18% of running time Requires space at terminal for parking the bus III-11

Cycle Time Total Time Required for a Vehicle to Make a Complete Round Trip on a Route Cycle Time = Round Trip Running Time + Terminal Time e.g., One-Way Running Time = 50 minutes each direction Terminal Time = 10 minutes at each terminal Cycle Time = (50 minutes X 2) + (10 minutes X 2) = 120 Minutes III-12

Bus Requirements Number of buses (vehicles) required to operate a transport route for a given interval Buses in service = Cycle time/interval e.g., Cycle time = 120 minutes Interval = 10 minutes Buses in service = 120/10 = 12 The number must be an integer (whole number) III-13

The Planner s Dilemma: Required Number of Buses Is Not An Integer Problem Cycle Time = 72; Interval = 11 Buses in Service = 72/11 = 6.5 Solution 1: Add additional terminal time Buses in Service = (72 + 5)/11 = 7 Solution 2: Reduce interval Buses in Service = (72)/9 = 8 Solution 3: Stretch interval Buses in Service = (72)/12 = 6 III-14

Costs Capital (acquisition of assets such as vehicles, stops, terminals, and garages) Operating/Maintenance (e.g., wages, benefits, fuel, and parts) III-15

Life-Cycle and Immediate Costing Life-Cycle Costing considers both operating and capital expenses over the lives of assets Funds for eventual bus or infrastructure replacement are included Short Term Immediate Costing considers only operating/ maintenance expenses (immediate) Funds for eventual bus or infrastructure replacement are not included Financial Sustainability Depends On Life-Cycle Costing III-16

Ridership Number of Passengers Boarding Passengers Counted each time a passenger boards a vehicle Most common measure of ridership Person (Origin-Destination) Trips BMTC Counted once for each origin-to-destination journey, irrespective of transfers Smaller number than boarding passengers III-17

Boarding Passengers and Person Trips Route 5 One passenger travels from home to work Boards Route 5, transfers to Route 33, and gets off at work Boarding passengers = 2 Route 33 Person trips = 1 III-18

Commercial Hours and Kilometers Hours and Kilometers Operated When Transport Vehicles Available to Public Includes: Running time Terminal time Sometimes called effective hours or kilometers III-19

Dead Hours and Kilometers Hours and Kilometers Traveled By Transport Vehicle When Not In Revenue Service Includes hours (KM) that a vehicle travels between either The garage and route or Two routes when the vehicle changes routes III-20

Vehicle Hours and Kilometers Hours and Kilometers Traveled From Pull- Out from Garage to Pull-In Includes Commercial time Dead time Does not include other KM/hours such as training III-21

Occupancy (Load) Factor Passengers onboard expressed as a percent of available seats e.g., Number of Passengers on the Bus = 120 Number of Seats on the Bus = 48 Occupancy Factor =120/48 = 2.2 or 220% Occupancy factors among public transport companies/operators vary Seating configurations Policies regarding standing passengers BMTC BMTC III-22

Capacity Utilization Percent of vehicle capacity used Capacity = Number of seats + Number of Permitted Standees e.g., Number of Passengers on the Bus = 120 Vehicle Capacity = 160 Capacity Utilization = 120/160 = 0.75 or 75% The number of standees depends on local policies Area per standee (crowding) Length of trip times III-23

Importance of Capacity Utilization (Occupancy Factor) Key input for scheduling vehicles to adequately serve passenger demand Reflects policies impacting quality of service Portion of vehicle space devoted to seating and standing Degree of crowding (area/user) Maximum standing times III-24

Passengers at the Maximum Load Point BMTC Number of Passengers On-Board a Transit Vehicle as It Passes the Location on the Route with the Maximum Passengers On- Board Typically on the edge of downtown for routes serving the center city Used for scheduling vehicles to meet occupancy (load) factor standards or maximum allowed capacity III-25

Passenger Demand Profile for Radial Route Passengers Onboard Leaving Stop 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Electronic City Kudlu Gate Madiwala Maharanis College City Market Stops III-26

Summary Defined 20 key public transport terms Remember, using common transport terms makes it easier to: Communicate with transport professionals, Learn from other transport systems, and Compare performance results III-27