MARITIME EMISSIONS TREATMENT SYSTEM (METS)

Similar documents
SHORE POWER ALTERNATIVES AAPA ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 JOSEPH HOWER, PE, DEE

California s Emission Reduction Plan for Ports and International Goods Movement

Assessing Ship Emissions Reduction Strategies. Pacific Ports Clean Air Collaborative Conference March 2018 San Pedro, California

Technology Advancement Program. Presented by: Heather Tomley, Port of Long Beach Kevin Maggay, Port of Los Angeles

Port of Long Beach. Diesel Emission Reduction Program

AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT

Emission controls for NOx compliance Challenges & Applications. Greener Shipping Summit November 2017

ECONOMICALLY IMPLEMENTING

SIHARBOR: The shore connection system for berthed ships Shore-side power supply for eco-friendly ports

EPA Tier 4 and the Electric Power Industry

AdBLUE. Better Parts. Good Prices. Alliance Truck Parts. ADBLUE

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

Internal Combustion Engines

Request for Information for Ocean Going Vessel At Berth Emissions Reduction Technologies for use at the Port of Long Beach and the Port of Los Angeles

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORT AUTHORITIES

EPA TIER 4 AND THE ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY. Tim Cresswell Tier 4 Product Definition Manager Electric Power Division

Advanced Maritime Emissions Control System (AMECS )

Leading the World in Emissions Solutions

Control of gaseous emissions and dust in a single-step solution

San Pedro Bay Ports. Port of Los Angeles 7.9 million TEUs Port of Long Beach 6.0 million TEUs. Total 13.9 million TEUs in 2011

3.1 Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO): as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions).

SIHARBOR: The shore connection system for berthed ships

Looking ahead to tier 4

FOR EVERYONE. and new-source performance standards that strictly regulated emissions of a new source (e.g., automobiles, factories) entering an area.

ELECTRICAL GENERATING STEAM BOILERS, REPLACEMENT UNITS AND NEW UNITS (Adopted 1/18/94; Rev. Adopted & Effective 12/12/95)

Christopher Cannon, Chief Sustainability Officer Port of Los Angeles AAPA Environmental Committee Meeting November 14/15, 2017

Ammonia measurement challenges in SCR units

Looking ahead to TIER 4

METHANOL AS A MARINE FUEL A SAFE, COST EFFECTIVE, CLEAN-BURNING, WIDELY AVAILABLE MARINE FUEL FOR TODAY AND THE FUTURE

IMPROVING SULFURIC ACID PLANT PERFORMANCE THROUGH NEW SHAPE & HIGHER ACTIVITY CATALYSTS

Spiracle Crankcase Filtration Technology

GLASSMAN EUROP CERCAT : A Technology for Air Pollution Control. Process, Construction & Performances

Cleaner liquid fuels and improved vehicular technologies

STATIONARY GAS TURBINE ENGINES - REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (Adopted & Effective 9/27/94) (Rev. Adopted & Effective 12/16/98)

What does Sustainability mean?

The Path To EPA Tier 4i - Preparing for. the 2011 transition

Emission Control Technology for Stationary Diesel Engines

Presented by. Navistar Education 2015

C C A. Combustion Components Associates, Inc.

The Premcor Refining Group, Inc. Delaware City Refinery 4550 Wrangle Hill Rd. EXHIBIT A Delaware City, DE 19706

Emission Control Technologies for Locomotive Diesel Engines

Module 6:Emission Control for CI Engines Lecture 31:Diesel Particulate Filters (contd.) The Lecture Contains: Passive/Catalytic Regeneration

PERFORMANCE AND EMISSION ANALYSIS OF DIESEL ENGINE BY INJECTING DIETHYL ETHER WITH AND WITHOUT EGR USING DPF

RESEARCH ON EXHAUST EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FROM LARGE MARINE DIESEL ENGINES

WRITTEN COMMENTS OF THE MANUFACTURERS OF EMISSION CONTROLS ASSOCIATION ON THE U.S. EPA-HQ-OAR

3. Operation of any applicable boiler on any amount of fuel oil shall be prohibited, except as provided in Subsection C.3.

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

The reference in sandblasting. DCM\DCM 3000 a DCM to series.

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

Global Emission Solution. Cool Particulate Regeneration (CPR )

Current Trends in the Development of Green Ports. APP 102 nd Annual Conference August 16-19, 2015 Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Fuel Borne Catalysts

CALIFORNIA S COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM FOR REDUCING HEAVY- DUTY VEHICLE EMISSIONS

This rule shall apply to any stationary source which is a major source of regulated air pollutants or of hazardous air pollutants.

EXAMINATION OF THE AMMONIA DOSE INFLUENCE ON NITRIC OXIDES TRANSFORMATIONS INTO COMBINED OXIDE-PLATINUM SCR CATALYST

Green Terminal Operations

Module 5:Emission Control for SI Engines Lecture 24:Lean de-nox Catalysts and Catalyst Poisoning. The Lecture Contains: Lean de-no x Catalysts

RULE STATIONARY GAS TURBINES Adopted (Amended , ) INDEX

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Internal Combustion Engines

Objectives. WP7: On-engine aftertreatment systems. WP Leader: Jukka Leinonen. Partners:

BERGER/CUMMINS WORLDWIDE POWER

BC control options reduction technologies

Lean and clean dredging for a better future

Faurecia Emissions Control Technologies Worldwide Leadership, Global Expertise. Shanghai (Minbei) R&D center (China) / Press Kit, April 12, 2011

New Technology Diesel Engines: Eliminating NOx Emissions from Higher Biodiesel Blends in Un-modified Diesel Engines

Review of the SMAQMD s Construction Mitigation Program Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices February 28, 2018, DRAFT for Outreach

MARINE VESSEL REPOWER APPLICATION

Challenges for sustainable freight transport Maritime transport. Elena Seco Gª Valdecasas Director Spanish Shipowners Association - ANAVE

Yanmar Showcases the comprehensive Diesel and. Gas Engine Line-up at BAUMA 2019

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Motor Vehicle Emissions and the Government Response

Powertrain Efficiency Technologies. Turbochargers

Pioneering MTU C&I diesel engines for U.S. EPA Tier 4

SHORE POWER RATE BC HYDRO 333 DUNSMUIR STREET VANCOUVER, BC

Scania at INTERMAT 2012 in Paris: Scania engines ready for Stage IV and Tier 4 final

Air Quality Mandates Affecting the Caltrans Fleet Caltrans Division of Equipment Sacramento, CA June, 2009

The Prime Glass DeNOx solutions in the present scenario of the glass industry NOx containment technologies

Office of the Mayor City of Los Angeles MAYOR VILLARAIGOSA LAUNCHES LANDMARK CLEAN TRUCK PROGRAM TO CLEAN LOS ANGELES' AIR

Objectives. WP7: On-engine aftertreatment systems. WP Leader: Jukka Leinonen. Partners:

Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines

ENGINE TECHNOLOGY. Bobcat Engine_B _ _EN_reworked.indd 1

DATE: MAY 3, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION

MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEWATERING APPLICATIONS ROTARY PRESS OPTIMUM-CV

Chemical decontamination in nuclear systems radiation protection issues during planning and realization

OIG-SR-17-01, OIG Special Report Department of Energy s Actions to Address Worker Concerns Regarding Vapor Exposures at the Hanford Tank Farms

Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines

Middle Harbor Project: Draft EIS/EIR LA Chamber of Commerce June 26, 2008, APM Maersk HQ Pier 400

[Author Name] [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] Green Fleet Policy

Catalytic Coatings for Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration

2485. Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling.

Rita Aiello/5 December 2016/Johnson Matthey, Stationary Emissions Control

Emission Reduction Technologies towards zero emissions

ESTIMATION OF NO X CONVERSION INTO OXIDE, PLATINUM AND COMBINED OXIDE PLATINUM SCR CATALYST

STATEMENT OF THE MANUFACTURERS OF EMISSION CONTROLS ASSOCIATION ON THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

m b e E M I S S I O N S E N G I N E

Pyrophoric Ignition Hazards in Typical Refinery Operations

February 28, Definition of Engines Covered Under the Rule

How does Exhaust Gas Recirculation work?

AMBER M. KLESGES BOARD SECRETARY. No.\w-Tm

Transcription:

MARITIME EMISSIONS TREATMENT SYSTEM (METS) ABSTRACT In January 2014, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) began enforcement of the Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Auxiliary Diesel Engines Operated on Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth in a California Port Regulation, commonly referred to as the At-Berth Regulation. Covering all six ports in California, the At-Berth Regulation requires a 50% reduction in emissions from auxiliary diesel engines of ships atberth. Through 2020, those reductions will be periodically increased to a maximum of 80%. Initially, the only available technology approved to comply with the At- Berth Regulation was the shore power option, AMP. All California ports have installed significant shore power infrastructure; however, cases exist in which an equivalent emissions reduction option will be required. Those would include ships and or berths that are not AMP capable. Clean Air Engineering Maritime (CAEM), in partnership with Tri-Mer Corporation, has developed the Maritime Emissions Treatment System (METS), a CARB certified alternative to achieve compliance with the At-Berth Regulation. A CARB-certified emissions treatment system is now available for ships and berths that are not AMP-capable The METS system is comprised of two components. First, the emissions capture device effectively transports the exhaust from the ship s exhaust stack to the treatment system. Second, the Catalytic Ceramic Filter (CCF) technology treats the emissions for diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) and NOx. Low density ceramic filters are embedded with catalyst that facilitates the selective catalytic reduction of NOx to harmless nitrogen and water vapor. Nitrogen is the most common gas in earth s atmosphere. The combination of these components constitutes a significant advance in treating large-scale diesel exhaust from ships.

The performance of the METS system is assessed by examining the system s capture efficiency and pollutant removal efficiencies: 91.0% for capture efficiency, 91.4% for NOx removal, and 99.5% for PM capture as demonstrated averages over multiple vessels. METS performance exceeds CARB requirements and has gained CARB approval for use at California ports. BACKGROUND In December 2007, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved the Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Auxiliary Diesel Engines Operated on Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth in a California Port Regulation (At-Berth Regulation). THE PARTNERSHIP CAEM, based in San Pedro, California is the principal development partner and operator of the Maritime Emissions Treatment System. With an in-depth knowledge of port protocol, operations and regulatory requirements, CAEM personnel have been involved with ports and shipping for over twenty years. The At-Berth Regulation aims to reduce emissions from diesel auxiliary engines on container ships, passenger ships, and refrigerated-cargo ships while berthing at any of California s six ports including the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco, and Hueneme. The pollutants targeted for reduction currently include both NOx and diesel particulate. Starting in January of 2014, the At-Berth Regulation requires vessel operators of fleet ships calling at any of California s six ports to achieve reductions of at least 50% of at-berth emissions from auxiliary diesel engines used for power generation. The requirements increase to 70% in 2017 and 80% in 2020. Initially, the only approved and available technology to comply with the At-Berth Regulation was the shore power option, or AMP. All six California ports have installed significant amounts of shore power infrastructure. In conjunction with the building of port infrastructure, vessel operators either built new ships or retrofitted existing ships to be able to plug into shore power. The cost of conversion for each ship can exceed several million dollars. Due to these high conversion costs, only ships meeting stringent criteria - such as age of the ship and the frequency and duration of port calls - are economically viable. While shore power access continues to expand today, there remain certain berths and terminals where shore power infrastructure will not be available in the short term, or may not be feasible due to construction restrictions, power availability, and cost issues. Additionally, there is a certain percentage of ships that are not AMP capable. In order to comply with future emissions reduction requirements, all ships will either have to be AMPed or use an equivalent emissions reduction option. Clean Air Engineering Maritime (CAEM) partnered with Tri-Mer Corporation to engineer and implement an innovative system that allows ships to meet the California Air Resources Board At-Berth regulation. Figure 1: CAEM crane and capture device

Tri-Mer Corporation, based in Owosso, Michigan, provides advanced pollution control technology, coupled with turnkey engineering and project delivery capabilities. Established in 1960, Tri-Mer is one of the leading air pollution control companies in the world. Known for innovation, Tri-Mer has delivered thousands of pollution control systems to customers worldwide. The combination of Tri-Mer s expertise in the air pollution control industry and CAEM s extensive port experience allowed for the design, construction, and implementation of the first generation Maritime Exhaust Treatment System (METS), which is the first alternative control technology approved by CARB. Figure 2: METS Flexible emissions capture device METS TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW Identifying a technology that can capture diesel particulate has been an on-going challenge for the pollution control industry for several decades. Traditional pollution control technologies were found to have operational barriers due to the nature of the diesel particulate and the unique operating environment of the port. These obstacles were complicated by the requirement for high levels of NOx removal at relatively low temperatures. When applied to ships, these challenges were further compounded by the need to effectively collect the diesel engine exhaust from auxiliary engine smokestacks and convey the exhaust to the treatment system without interrupting the loading/unloading and other operations of the ship at berth. Together, CAEM and Tri-Mer Corporation have surmounted these formidable scientific and engineering challenges. Figure 3: METS Catalytic Ceramic Filter (CCF) system The METS system is comprised of two components. The first component is a stack adaptor or flexible emissions capture device that connects the treatment system to the ship exhaust stack via a flexible pipe. It is placed by a crane that sits on the barge. (Figure 1). The specialized capture device connects to the stack in a manner which effectively collects the exhaust while minimizing fugitive outside air (Figure 2). The second component uses Catalytic Ceramic Filters (CCF) technology to remove the PM and NOx from the exhaust (Figure 3). Tri-Mer is the world s largest manufacturer of multi-pollutant systems employing Catalytic Ceramic Filters. A simplified flow diagram is shown in (Figure 4). Figure 4: Catalytic Ceramic Filter (CCF) System for both PM and NOX

CATALYTIC CERAMIC FILTER (CCF) TECHNOLOGY Ceramic filters have been used in pollution control for decades, however, the Catalytic Ceramic Filters in Tri-Mer systems are distinctive from any other ceramic filters in the industry. The filters start as a slurry of refractory fibers and are vacuum formed into tube shapes that are 10 feet long and six inches across. The filters are very lightweight, approximately 90% open with very low pressure drop, robust, self-supporting without any filter cages, and have a useful service life of 7 to 15 years. The filters have nano-bits of catalyst embedded in their 3/4-inch thick walls to facilitate the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 (Figure 5). The micronized catalyst offers a larger surface area for reaction than conventional catalyst block SCR reactors. In the filters, contact time between the gases and catalyst is not restricted by diffusion of the gases in and out of the catalyst block pores. Figure 5: NOx and NH 3 converted to N 2 and H 2 0 The result is a significant increase in the intrinsic catalytic activity. A combination of factors also allows the catalytic process to proceed at much lower temperatures than commonly seen in traditional catalyst block reactors. All catalysts can be severely compromised by blinding of the surface by particulate and chemical interactions on the surface with particulate. With the Tri-Mer CCF, particulate is captured on the surface of the filters, not inside the filter as in other glass media filters. The nano-catalyst is completely protected inside the filter, eliminating the particulate-type interactions and extending the catalyst life (Figure 6). Figure 6: Ceramic fiber filter tube protects catalyst. Tri-Mer CCF systems have the capability of removing particulate matter (PM), NOx, SO2, HCl, dioxins, and mercury in a single system. The CCF system has been installed and operational is a wide range of industrial applications.

trap and a conventional SCR to remove PM and NOx. The CCF technology is far more robust than diesel particulate trap technology. From the beginning, the CCF system was designed to handle very high PM and NOx loads and to operate on a continuous basis, as it does in many industrial applications. CCF takes advantage of lower catalyst activation temperatures to minimize any re-heat costs associated with NOx conversion. Other pollutants such as SOx that may be regulated in the future can also be treated by CCF. The METS design eliminates a number of operational issues that are typical for a diesel particulate trap + conventional SCR system. While the diesel particulate trap + conventional SCR system combination may be effective in removing pollutants, there are multiple operational and utility inefficiencies compared to CCF technology used by METS. Figure 7: Diesel Particulate Filtration Filtration Mechanism The CCF Technology filters diesel particulate with extremely high efficiency. Diesel particulate builds on the residual layer of the filter, without penetrating the filter media. This produces a cake of particulate on the filters that is periodically removed with a brief reverse pulse of air (Figure 7). The reverse pulse jet method sends a pulse of compressed air down the center of the tube, and cleans the accumulated PM from the outer surface of the tube. Filters are cleaned while on-line. Benefits to the utilization of CCF for PM and NOx removal include the ability to handle very high loading conditions with high removal efficiency. Additionally, there is negligible penetration of particulate through the filter, which significantly extends catalyst life when compared to conventional SCR methods. Contrasting Technologies Diesel particulate traps were developed for smaller engines and mobile diesel sources such as semi-trucks operating Tier 3 and Tier 4 engines. When adapted for ship usage, this equipment combines a diesel particulate The diesel particulate trap + conventional SCR combination has a high energy requirement for particulate incineration, increased complexity of operational and safety requirements, increased potential for catalyst poisoning and contamination, and a much greater service demand for catalyst replacement. METS operates continuously, ensuring uninterrupted compliance with regulations and can operate on any engine of any age, burning any fuel type at any load. The METS system is extremely versatile; if there is the need to remove SOx and other pollutants from the exhaust, the METS system can easily be configured to provide this capability. MARINE EMISSIONS TREATMENT SYSTEMS (METS) APPLICATIONS CAEM and Tri-Mer Corporation have successfully developed and deployed an innovative alternative to allow ships to reach compliance with At-Berth Regulations. CAEM currently has the first generation of a Marine Emissions Treatment System (METS) designed, constructed, certified by CARB, and in commercial operation. Multiple configurations are available that provide options for various terminal configurations and vessel berthing logistics. Barge-Mounted METS The first generation of METS is a barge mounted mobile emissions treatment system that can be deployed in a variety of applications where shore power is not available

Figure 8: Maritime Emissions Treatment System (METS-1) or where the ship is not equipped for connection to shore power (Figure 8). Once the ship is docked, the METS can quickly connect and capture emissions from the ship s existing auxiliary diesel power generator. No additional modifications either on shore or on the ship are necessary. Shore-Mounted METS CAEM/Tri-Mer offers a mobile shore-mounted version of the METS. Building upon the same highly efficient multipollutant capture technology as barge-mounted METS, the shore-mounted option will provide terminal operators the ability to move the emissions control system where it s needed, anywhere on the terminal berth. Ship-Mounted METS The ship-mounted design is an on-board, ship-mounted METS configuration that provides vessels operators ultimate flexibility during calls. Vessel location, berthing direction and other terminal logistics challenges are eliminated. The METS unit is permanently installed on-board the ship, is directly connected to the vessel s auxiliary engine exhaust system, and uses ship power for operation. As soon as the vessel is berthed, the auxiliary engine exhaust is automatically diverted through the onboard METS unit. With the ship-mounted METS, there are no shore power connections, no external attachments, and no interference with any berth-side activities. Compliance with the At- Berth Regulation begins within minutes. The availability of barge, shore, and ship-mounted METS configurations allows vessel and terminal operators an emissions control system to meet the vast majority of applications they are likely to encounter with any fleet ship calling at the port. For container ships, the barge-mounted METS will be effective to achieve compliance with At-Berth regulations. In the case where berth-side access is more desirable, the shore-mounted METS might be the best option. Ship-mounted systems are the best fit when maximum flexibility is desired.

METS PERFORMANCE RESULTS All METS Systems are comprised of two principal components: a stack adaptor or flexible emissions capture device, and a CCF system configured for treating PM and NOx. The performance of the adaptor or emissions capture device can be assessed by determining the capture efficiency, while the CCF system performance is assessed by determining removal efficiencies. Performance data is currently available for the first generation of METS. Capture Efficiency Capture efficiency is monitored continuously by the METS system. As part of the CARB verification process, capture efficiency was directly measured through the use of a method known as tracer gas dilution. A known quantity of inert tracer gas, perfluoro-1,2- dimethylcyclobutane is injected at a known mass rate into the stack of the auxiliary engine. The mass rate of the tracer gas is measured at the inlet of the treatment system and compared by mass balance to the inlet concentration of the stack in order to evaluate the capture efficiency of the system. Figure 9: METS-1 Capture Efficiency Sample of capture data for 5 vessel calls The capture efficiency of the METS system was demonstrated on a group of vessels over a 6 month period of time (Figure 9). The average capture during the CARB verification process was 91.0%. The METS is certified by CARB for 90% capture. NOx Performance The METS design includes Continuous Emission Monitoring data based on CARB Method 100 with all data being permanently logged and stored during operations. Instrument calibration and maintenance is based on CARB Method 100. NOx is measured on both the inlet and outlet along with volumetric flow rate and oxygen. The data was used to generate inlet and outlet mass emission rates in order to determine reduction efficiency. The METS system NOx performance was demonstrated on vessels over a 6 month period. (Figure 10). Figure 10: METS-1 NOx Performance - Sample of capture data for 7 vessel calls The average NOx removal during the CARB verification process was 91.4%. The METS is certified by CARB for 90% NOx removal. The average ammonia slip was less than 5 ppmv.

PM Performance Since there are no CARB approved methods for the continuous measurement of PM, CAEM developed an approach based on methods used for the determination of PM from ocean-going vessels. The measurement system produces a PM concentration for both the inlet and outlet, and is reported in mg/nm3. This concentration data is then combined with the flow rate measurements to generate mass based loads and emission rates which were used to determine reduction efficiency during in-use performance and durability testing. The performance of the METS system was demonstrated on multiple vessels across a 6 month period (Figure 11). The average PM removal efficiency during the CARB verification process was 99.5%. The METS-1 is certified by CARB for 90% PM removal. CONCLUSION The METS system is a technically advanced and economically superior alternative control technology, approved by CARB, and already being deployed and demonstrating consistent performance and compliance with regulations. METS removes both PM and NOx in a single, effective system that is straightforward and easy to operate. Unlike other emissions control technologies, METS is able to operate continuously, has lower re-heat costs due to lower CCF NOx activation temperature, and can be easily altered to provide the capability of SOx removal. Figure 11: METS-1 PM Performance - Sample of capture data for 6 vessel calls For more information, contact: Michael J. Shea, General Manager of Tri-Mer Marine Air Systems at (989) 627-8053 or by email at mshea@tri-mer.com With barge, shore, and ship-mounted configurations of METS, vessel and terminal operators will have technical options available to them to meet the vast majority of applications they encounter with any fleet ship calling at the port. While shore power will remain the preferred method for emissions reduction, the addition of METS will allow operators to effectively meet the At-Berth Regulation well past the 2020 reduction limits. The combination of CAEM s extensive experience in port protocol, operations and regulatory requirements, and Tri- Mer s expertise in advanced pollution control technology makes them the perfect professional team to provide CARB approved alternative control systems that ensure compliance with current and future regulations. A Division of Tri-Mer Corp.