The role of rail in a transport system to limit the impact of global warming 26 November 213 Gerard Drew, Beyond Zero Emissions Tilo Schumann, German Aerospace Centre (DLR)
Overview CONTEXT Character of Australian transport Options for reducing emissions METHOD Australian transport system Simulations RESULTS Change in travel activity Potential for rail services
Average increase of 1.7% p.a. despite improvements in technological efficiency CONTEXT Trend of transport emissions $AU 212 (billion) Passenger km (billion) 2, 15, 1, 5,, 3 25 2 15 1 Annual Infrastructure Investment 5 Roads 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 21 23 25 27 29 211 Passenger Travel by Mode Automobile Buses Rail Air 19 19 19 19 19 2 2 2 2 2 2 Tonnes CO2e (miilion) 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % -2% -4% -6% -8% 1 8 6 4 2 Australian Transport Emissions 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 199 1995 2 25 21 Car emissions Aviation emissions Car emissions intensity Aviation emissions intensity [BITRE, 212] [National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 213]
Regional passenger travel 25 CONTEXT Tonnes CO2e (million) 2 15 1 5 43.4%.4%.3% 55.9% GHG emissions
CONTEXT Automobiles Battery electric vehicle performance Battery range a limiting factor for regional travel Current range typically 16km, modeled to increase to 22km Range covers 86% of all current car journeys but only 49% of Pkm Recharging becomes a considerable time burden beyond this point (2kW fast charging rates applied in model) Car journeys (million) 4 3 2 1 1% 75% 5% 25% % 2 4 6 8 Trip length (km) Car Rail Cumulative pas EV range 212 Car Cumulative Pkm 6 12 18 24 3 36 42 48 54 6 66 72 78 84 9 96 >1 1 12 14 Bus Air Cumulative Pkm >15 1% 75% 5% 25% % Distance (km)
CATS CONTEXT Aircraft Climate compatible Air Transport System (CATS) Combustion emissions at cruise altitude have double the warming impact as at sea level Response to change in altitude and cruise speed have been simulated [Koch, A., et al., 211] Optimised conditions indicate >5% reductions to Atmospheric Temperature Response (ATR) Position modeled corresponding to 5% reduction (red), eliminating the multiplier effect This results in a 22% increase in Direct Operating Cost (DOC) and a cruise speed of Ma=.52 which increases travel times [Figures from Koch, A., et al., 211]
Development of a transport simulation model METHOD Network model Regional transport network model created for all modes Necessary for determination of travel time, distance and accomplishment of assignments Focus on trunk routes, because only long-distance traffic will be calculated 49 3 km road 88 flight routes 15 7 km rail Population: 17.8 Mio inhabitants included in the model
Development of a transport simulation model METHOD Traffic data Data about national traffic gathered from National Census for commuter data and National and International Visitor Survey 29-11 for business and other purposes Forecast of population, economy and price data Population will grow to 28.1 Mio in 23, 9% of them will live in urban areas Sydney and Melbourne both will have almost 5 Mio inhabitants Increase of GDP per capita during the forecast period Moderate increase of fuel price Passenger km (billion) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Pkm Distance Classes (21) Air 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1, 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2, 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 >2,5 Journey range (km) Rai l Bus Car
Development of a transport simulation model Fare (Air) +2% HSR Pkm METHOD Modal split analysis Approach with Generalized Cost (GC), which consists of Real price and Time Cost Value of Time (VoT): 3-4 times higher for Business travel (6 8 $/hour) Higher for car, lower for rail and HSR (time can be used) Use of multinomial logit model High Oil Case (EIA) Time (Air) +2% Time (Car) +2% Fare (Car) +2% Value of Time (Other) +2% Value of Time (Business) +2% Vehicle Occupancy +2% Time (HSR) +2% Fare (HSR) +2% 23 212-4% -2% % 2% 4%
Development of a transport simulation model METHOD Trip generation and distribution Using modified gravity model of the Australian Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics [BITRE, 29] 31% of relations (OD pairs) of the NVS data included, but 84% of journeys Relation Melbourne Sydney 21 Pax (million) 23 Pax with HSR (million) Increase 23 HSR share (of all) 21 GC Air Business 23 GC Air Business 23 GC HSR Business 7.8 14.1 + 81% 58 % $ 697 $ 751 $ 527 Sydney Brisbane Sydney - Canberra Melbourne - Brisbane 4.1 7.7 + 88 % 62 % $ 712 $ 767 $537 4.2 6.8 + 62% 32 % $ 483 $ 53 $ 27 2.2 3.5 + 59% 8 % $ 95 $ 969 $ 955
High Speed System for Australia METHOD Mode share: High Speed Rail / Air Calibration of HSR not possible, because mode doesn t exist yet Approach with comparison of Generalized Cost for HSR and Air Blue graph indicates a rational decision, evidence with time-based analysis from Europe [Jorritsma, 29] Fare only (green): poor results, time plays a significant role for mode choice Time only (red): demand overstated for Other purposes Generalized Cost with Time Sensitivity: good matching of results with blue curve
High Speed System for Australia METHOD Operational concept Development of train routes with minimized changing necessity and maximized average speed But: at least one train/hour everywhere Special regional high speed services to Central Coast, Newcastle and Gold Coast
Scenarios modelled METHOD 1. 212 BAU baseline 2. 23 BAU projection 3. 23 HSR(base) Melbourne to Brisbane network 4. 23 HSR(full) Adelaide to Cairns network 5. 23 EV & CATS no HSR 6. 23 EV & CATS + Rail includes HSR(full) network and upgrades of classic rail network
RESULTS Scenarios 1 2 212 Baseline PAX: 489 million Pkm: 127 billion CO2e 2.5 MT 23 EV + CATS 23 BAU PAX: 72 million Pkm: 192 billion CO2e 31.6 MT 5 6 PAX: 729 million Pkm: 17 billion CO2e.3 MT (7.1 MT without aviation biofuel) 35 3 Passenger km (billion) 25 2 15 1 5 35 3 Passenger km (billion) 25 2 15 1 5 Air Rai l Bus 1 3 5 7 9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,5 Journey range (km) Air Rai l Bus 35 3 Passenger km (billion) 25 2 15 1 5 35 3 Passenger km (billion) 25 2 15 1 5 Air Rai l Bus 1 3 5 7 9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,5 Journey range (km) 23 EV + CATS + Rail Air HSR Rail Bus Car 51.1% Pkm increase PAX: 744 million Pkm: 178 billion CO2e.1 MT (5.3 MT without aviation biofuel) 33.8% Pkm increase 1 3 5 7 9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1 2,3 Journey range (km) 2,5 1 3 5 7 9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9 2,1 2,3 Journey range (km) 2,5 4.2% Pkm increase
Change in travel activity RESULTS Change in Air and Car travel from 212 Baseline to Scenario 5 Change in Air and Car travel from 23 BAU to Scenario 5
Rail system potential Modal passenger density RESULTS 6 Scenario 23 EV + CATS + Rail
Rail system potential Rail passenger density RESULTS 6 Scenario 23 EV + CATS + Rail
Conclusions Continuing trend will lead to increasing emissions Solutions are available to make significant reductions Taking measures to reduce emissions of existing transport system will increase travel friction across regional Australia Investment in rail will reduce this travel friction Demographic development and topography justify HSR in the southeast of Australia
References Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics, Australian infrastructure statistics Yearbook, 212, Canberra, http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/212/stats_2.aspx. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, Available from: http://ageis.climatechange.gov.au/, [accessed: 29 June 213]. Koch A., et al., Climate impact assessment of varying cruise flight altitudes applying the CATS simulation approach, 3rd CEAS Air&Space Conference, Venice, Italy, 211. Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics, National road network intercity traffic projections to 23. 29: Canberra, Australia. Jorritsma P., Substitution Opportunities of High Speed Train for Air Transport, 29, Aerlines Magazine, [accessed: 2 November 212]; Available from: http://aerlinesmagazine.wordpress.com/29/5/1/substitutionopportunities-of-high-speed-train-for-air-transport/.