Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

Similar documents
American Driving Survey,

Food-Labeling Poll 2008

Seat Belt Survey. Q1. When travelling in a car, do you wear your seat belt all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or never?

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Driver Travel New Zealand Household Travel Survey May 2014

September 2014 Data Release

April 2014 Data Release

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA

KANSAS Occupant Protection Observational Survey Supplementary Analyses Summer Study

OmniWeb With Knowledge Panel

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS -- FINAL TOPLINE --

ECONOMIC SURVEY STATISTICAL APPENDIX

SJTPO TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS 2005: OCCUPANTS. TRENDS IN OCCUPANT FATALITIES Seatbelt Use; Occupant Ejected

Households Inflation Expectations Survey

Unemployment Rates - November 2011

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

2018 AER Social Research Report

LRT Preferred to Subway in Scarborough

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION: 2016

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t Decembe r 2013 Page 1

Wyoming Drivers Survey, 2014

Global Status Report on Road Safety: Respondents' Questionnaire

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t July Page 1

[Report Title] [Report Tag Line]

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

Unemployment Rates January 2011

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t Au gust Page 1

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Overview Data

The U.S. Auto Industry, Washington and New Priorities:

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t Ap ril Page 1

DOT HS April 2013

Non-standard motorcycle helmets in low and middleincome

Unemployment Rates August 2010

2018 Municipal Census RESULTS CENSUS2018

2017 Hunter Harvest Survey Results

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2013 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2012 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey

Motorcycling. New Zealand Household Travel Survey October 2015

Chapter 1 POPULATION

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Evaluation of an Electric Bike Pilot Project at Three Employment Campuses in Portland, Oregon

NON-FATAL ELECTRICAL INJURIES AT WORK

ROAD SAFETY MONITOR 2014: KNOWLEDGE OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES IN CANADA. The knowledge source for safe driving

FIGURE 23 Average Annual Age-Adjusted Incidence and Mortality Rates* by Sex and Race, Pennsylvania Residents,

Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Department of Labor

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Impaired Driving and Ignition Interlocks

Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard

Relating your PIRA and PUMA test marks to the national standard

Investigation of Relationship between Fuel Economy and Owner Satisfaction

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION

Table AC5. Average Consumption for Air-Conditioning by Equipment Type, 2005 kwh per Household

Public Transit in America:

Young drivers. Drivers involved in fatal or injury crashes. Drivers involved in fatal/injury crashes per 100. per licence holders (lines)

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

CANCER of the PANCREAS

Rates of Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age, United States,

2018 Automotive Fuel Economy Survey Report

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

American Driving Survey: Methodology and Year One Results, May 2013 May Saving lives through research and education.

TRANSPORT SA EVALUATION OF COMPETENCY-BASED DRIVER TRAINING & ASSESSMENT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

2005 Canadian Consumer Tire Attitude Study Highlights

New Zealand Transport Outlook. VKT/Vehicle Numbers Model. November 2017

About Half View Tim s image as positive, overall

CANCER of the KIDNEY and RENAL PELVIS

Recommended Weight and Body Fat Contents

GDP. Total Domestic demand External balance 1)

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices

Statistics and Facts About Distracted Driving

I.11Tc1ER.S Eagleton nstitute PoIitcs New Bruriswck Ne s Jersey : C[Lic 4ar-ICbgCr/EAGLETON POLL

Statistical Snapshot of Lawyers in Ontario

Chapter 2 HEALTH. Women & Men In India

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 2014 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2013 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Nebraska Teen Driving Experiences Survey Four-Year Trend Report

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, FRIDAY, JANUARY 30, 2015 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2014 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Public attitudes to road safety

201 SOUTH MARY STREET Sunnyvale, CA

Statistics South Africa CENSUS Census in brief

Pole Side Impact GTR: Assessment of Safety Need: Updated Data Collection

FIGURE 5 Average Annual Age-Adjusted Incidence and Mortality Rates* by Sex and Race, Pennsylvania Residents,

OLYMPIC GATEWAY PLAZA

IMPACT OF GASOLINE PRICES ON LAS VEGAS VISITATION FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AND LAS VEGAS LOCALS

Teaching English to Foreigners: 2008

Effect of Sample Size and Method of Sampling Pig Weights on the Accuracy of Estimating the Mean Weight of the Population 1

Seat Belt Law and Road Traffic Injuries in Delhi, India

Gold Saskatchewan Provincial Economic Accounts. January 2018 Edition. Saskatchewan Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance

Liberals Lead in Ontario

Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes on Indian Reservations

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

Ministry of Infrastructure and Watermanagement

Canadians charged up about electric vehicle incentives, but price point still causes buyers to lose the spark

GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY PROGRAMME CLINICAL / RESEARCH BULLETIN NUMBER 16

Traffic Safety Facts

2008 Canadian. Vehicle Survey. Update Report

GREENE COUNTY SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS REPORT APRIL 12, 2017

Alcohol interlocks in Finland. 22 April 2015, Lisbon

Wyoming Drivers Survey, 2016

Trend Report on Competition and Consumer Confidence in the Energy Market Second half of 2011

Transcription:

Facts on Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region June 2017 Highlights In 2013/2014, 85 per cent of Durham Region residents 12 and older always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger in a car, truck or van. Rates for both Durham Region and Ontario increased since 2003. Among the 36 Ontario public health units, the proportion of respondents who always wore their seat belt as a passenger ranged from 80 per cent to 95 per cent. Adults 65 and older and females were most likely to always wear their seat belt. Trend over time Figure 1. Percentage who always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger, Durham Region and Ontario, 2000/2001 to 2013/2014, ages 12 and older Place of residence 2003 2009/10 2013/14 Durham 82% 87% 85% 95 per cent CI (Durham) 80-84% 84-90% 82-88% Ontario 75% 83% 85% 95 per cent CI (Ontario) 75-76% 82-83% 84-85% In 2013/2014, 85 per cent of Durham Region residents aged 12 and older always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger. This rate is similar to the rate observed for Ontario of 85 per cent. Figure 1 shows that rates for both Durham Region and Ontario have increased since 2003. 1

Provincial Comparison Figure 2. Percentage who always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger, by public health unit, 2013/2014, ages 12 and older For 2013/2014, the proportion of respondents who always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger ranged by public health unit from 80 per cent to 95 per cent. The rate for Durham Region was in the lower end of this range at 85 per cent (see Figure 2 above). 2

Passenger seat belt use and the determinants of health Figure 3. Percentage who always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger by age, Durham Region and Ontario, 2013/2014, ages 12 and older Association between age groups and seat belt use is significant for both Durham Region and Ontario. Figure 3 shows an increase in seat belt use with increasing age. Adults aged 18 to 24 were least likely to always wear their seat belt when riding as a passenger. Both Durham Region and Ontario observed this pattern of seat belt use. Figure 4. Percentage who always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger by sex, Durham Region and Ontario, 2013/2014, ages 12 and older Association between sex and seat belt use is significant for both Durham Region and Ontario. As shown in figure 4, females were more likely than males to always wear their seat belt when riding as a passenger. Both Durham Region and Ontario observed this pattern. 3

Figure 5. Percentage who always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger by household income, Durham Region and Ontario, 2013/2014, ages 12 and older Association between household income group and seat belt use is significant for Ontario only. In 2013/2014, household income was associated with passenger seat belt use for Ontario, but not for Durham Region. Figure 6. Percentage who always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger by education level, Durham Region and Ontario, 2013/2014, ages 12 and older Education level was not associated with passenger seat belt use for Durham Region or Ontario. 4

Data Notes Data Source: The Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) is a cross-sectional survey that collects information related to health status, health care utilization and health determinants for the Canadian population. It surveys a large sample of respondents and is designed to provide reliable estimates at the health region level. Since 2007, data are collected on an ongoing basis with annual releases, rather than every two years as was the case prior to 2007. The CCHS data are collected from persons aged 12 and over living in private dwellings, excluding individuals living on Indian Reserves and on Crown Lands, institutional residents, full-time members of the Canadian Forces, and residents of certain remote regions. Interviews are conducted using computer assisted interviewing, either in person or over the telephone. Definitions and Survey Questions: Percentage of respondents 12 and older that always fastened their seat belt when riding as a front seat or back seat passenger in a car, truck or van. Data Analysis: The analysis used the CCHS share file obtained from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. SAS version 9.4 was used to analyze the data. The final CCHS sampling weight formed the estimates. Error bars in the graphs represent the 95% confidence interval (CI) around the estimate. The true or actual estimate falls within the range of values 95 out of 100 times. All analyses excluded response options of refusal, don't know, not stated and not applicable, unless otherwise stated. Passenger seat belt use and the determinants of health analysis used the CCHS 2013/2014 dataset. A chi-square test with a p-value less than 0.05 determined statistical significance. A statistically significant difference between groups means that the association is not likely due to chance. The income categories of low, middle and high came from a CCHS derived variable. The categories took into account total household income, the low income cut-off, household and community size. Low income groups the lowest 30 per cent, middle groups the middle 40 per cent, and high groups the highest 30 per cent of earners. 5