Vanpool in Atlanta: Accommodating a 10% Mode Shift for Coca-Cola. Prepared for CEE 6625 by Calvin Clark Daejin Kim Yu Chen

Similar documents
2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

CTR Employer Survey Report

CTR Employer Survey Report

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

CTR Employer Survey Report

CTR Employer Survey Report

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

Welcome! Think carpool, then think bigger! Questions? Contact our Vanpool team!

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Transportation Demand Management Program

TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORT 2017

Parking Management Element

Transportation Demand Management Element

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

It s easy to understand why ridesharing is increasing in

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Emergency Ride Home Program Survey

Center for Energy Studies. Lauren Lee Stuart. Louisiana State University

Lauren Lee Stuart Center for Energy Studies Louisiana State University

Puget Sound Transportation Panel Factors in Daily Travel Choices September 1991

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

FINAL REPORT FORM 1 (Formerly titled Project Monitoring Form 1 - Ridesharing ) Total Project Cost: $

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

Parking Pricing As a TDM Strategy

Transit Oriented and City Center Development

APPROVE VANPOOL VEHICLE SUPPLIER BENCH CONTRACTS

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Parking & Transportation Services Virtual Parking Permits at Stanford Stanford Staffers Brown Bag Forum Kingscote Gardens, Room 140 November 8, 2018

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

5.6 ENERGY IMPACT DISCUSSION. No Build Alternative

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA


PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Organization. SDOT Date and Commute Seattle. Dave Sowers, Deputy Program Administrator

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

SFMTA Energy Use by Vehicle Type: Transit Investments vs Life Cycle Costs

Trip Generation and Parking Utilization Data Collection at Mini-Mart with Gas Station

DAILY TRAVEL AND CO 2 EMISSIONS FROM PASSENGER TRANSPORT: A COMPARISON OF GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Earth Day Report April 22, 2013

Streamlining the District s Nightlife Curbside Access. Managing High-Demand Curbside Passenger Loading Zones

Statewide Park & Ride Inventory and Usage Study, March 13, 2013 Liz McAdory, VDOT, Transportation & Mobility Planning Division

Rideshare and TDM Part of the Transportation System

Keeping Seattle Moving Seattle City Council February 2013

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

TR15: Public Outreach

Mercer Island Town Center Parking Study Joint Commission Presentation March 16, 2016

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

NCTCOG MOD Workshop Toyota Motor North America (TMNA) and Denton County Transit Authority (DCTA)

CHAPTER 9. PARKING SUPPLY

USF Tampa Campus Percent Mode Share 2010

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The TDM Plan for Fort Washington Office Park NOVEMBER 1 6, 2017 FORT WASHINGTON OFFICE PARK STAKEHOLDERS

Transportation Demand Management. Overview of Tools and Strategies

SHARED MOBILITY: FROM DEFINITIONS TO MARKET TRENDS & IMPACTS

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

3.17 Energy Resources

Regional Vanpool Program Guidelines

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Valley Metro Vanpool Program April 2011 Webinar. Eddie Caine

IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12

Long Bridge Park. Parking Analysis and Transportation Management Plan. Long Range Planning Committee of the Planning Commission Meeting

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Vanpool Incentive Program

2015/16 CTR Survey Data Overview

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Address Land Use Approximate GSF

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Driving a More Sustainable Future of Mobility OCTOBER 19, 2017

Trip and Parking Generation Data Collection at Grocery Store with Gas Station and Auto Repair

Draft Transportation Demand Management Program for the Oak Knoll Project

3.0 MULTI-MODAL PROGRAM AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Frequently Asked Questions Rideshare Program

WELCOME MAY FORT BELVOIR COMMUTER WORKSHOP 9:30 am 1:30 pm

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

CMAQ DETAILED PROJECT LISTING REPORT ( FY 2000 )

Best Route. Best Care. The Milwaukee Regional Medical Center s Alternative Transportation Program

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

Attachment A. BATA Resolution No. 128 BAY AREA TOLL AUTHORITY TOLL SCHEDULE FOR TOLL BRIDGES (EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2019)

Transcription:

Vanpool in Atlanta: Accommodating a 10% Mode Shift for Coca-Cola Prepared for CEE 6625 by Calvin Clark Daejin Kim Yu Chen

Outline Vanpool System Introduction Vanpool System in Atlanta Estimations for Coca-Cola Implementation Conclusion 2

Vanpool System Introduction Group of people Same Workplace Same Community Same pick-up location Van 7-15 passengers Operate weekdays Images from GeorgiaCommuteOptions (http://www.georgiacommuteoptions.org/) and LivableBuckhead (http://livablebuckhead.com/commute/commuter-programs/incentives/) 3

Vanpool System Introduction Types of Vanpool System Individual Operations Employees rent the van to operate Employer rent the van for employees Third-Party vanpool provider Assist individuals in finding an existing vanpool or starting their own 4

Vanpool System Introduction Benefits for Employer Cost Savings Reduce in traffic allowance Reduce in parking needs Stable Team Reduce employee absenteeism Reduce employee turnover 5

Vanpool System Introduction Benefits for Employee Cost Savings Reduce in gas, car maintenance Up to $3000 a year for an employee Time Savings Avoid heavy traffic in peak time HOV lanes may save 15 to 30 minutes each way Reduce in stress 6

Vanpool System in Atlanta Formally began in 1980 Organizers GBA (Georgia Building Authority) GRTA (Georgia Regional Transportation Authority) Individual Counties (Douglas and Cherokee) ARC (Atlanta Regional Commission) Vanpool Companies Enterprise Rideshare vride 478 vanpools in 2010 7

Vanpool System in Atlanta Source: Atlanta Regional Commission Regional Vanpool Assessment Report, April 2, 2013 8

Vanpool System in Atlanta Source: Atlanta Regional Commission Regional Vanpool Assessment Report, April 2, 2013 9

Coca-Cola Headquarters in Atlanta The Coca-Cola Headquarters is located in midtown Atlanta A 29-story, 403 foot (122.8 m) high structure called One Coca-Cola Plaza, built in 1979 Approximately 12,500 employees at Atlanta headquarters among around the total of 140,000 employees around the world 1 Goal: Shift 1,250 employees to Vanpool Image from Wikimedia 2 10 1 http://www.ajc.com/news/business/coke-to-layoff-as-many-as-1800/njjnn/ 2 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:coca-colahq.jpg Image from Wikimedia commons

Distribution of Coca-Cola headquarters employees Estimate the distribution of the employees home places by TAZs (transportation analysis zones) TAZ where Coca Cola headquarter located 11

Distribution of Coca-Cola headquarters employees Based on ARC travel demand model estimation results estimate the employees commute trips from home to the Atlanta Coca Cola headquarters Coca Cola Employees TAZ i = 12,500 Employees in TAZ i Total Employees in Georgia ARC travel demand Select commute trips from home to the headquarters Estimate Coca Cola employees commute trips proportionally Trips headquarters employees, TAZ i to j = Trips total commute trips, TAZ i to j Coca Cola Employees TAZ i Total Employees TAZ i 12

Distribution of Coca-Cola headquarters employees Distribution of the estimated employees in each TAZ in Georgia 13

Mode share of Coca-Cola employees' commute trips A large share of employees commutes by drive alone Estimated mode choice of Coca Cola employees for commuting Travel modes Employees (percent) Average distance to Coca Cola (miles) Drive alone 10,139 (81.11%) 13.00 Shared ride 1,181 (9.44%) 13.60 Walk 195 (1.56%) 1.06 Bike 39 (0.31%) 2.54 Transit 946 (7.57%) 11.44 14

Energy and emission analysis This study estimates fuel consumptions and emissions before and after implementing vanpools by using the average fuel and emission rates, number of trips and trip distances by modes Average fuel consumption and emission rates by modes Gal*/passenger-mile BTU**/passengermile CO2 g/passengermile Vanpool 0.0094 1,300 97 Car-1person 0.0358 4,939 368 CarPool-2person 0.0179 2,470 184 Passengers-miles by modes Transit*** 0.0125 1,729 200 15 Source: American Bus Association (2014) Updated Comparison of Energy Use & CO2 Emissions From Different Transportation Modes * Diesel equivalent gallon ** British thermal unit *** The rates of transit is the average of light rail and transit bus

Energy and emission analysis Assumptions Only forms a vanpool for commute trips One employee makes two commute trips per day Commute trips by driving alone, shared driving and transit will be shifted, not by walking and bicycling One employee commutes 4.5 days per week 1, 52.14 weeks a year Vanpoolers will be randomly distributed across the TAZs Travel modes Current trips Vanpool - Drive alone 20,278 Shared ride 2,361 Walk 391 Bike 78 Transit 1,892 Future trips 2,500 18,211 2,120 391 78 1,700 16 1 ARC (2013) Regional Vanpool Assessment Report

Energy and emission reduction from vanpooling Estimation results of before and after the vanpool implementation 8.6% reduction in weekday fuel consumptions and emissions Annual weekday energy consumption and emission rates by modes Gallon* (Thousand) BTU** (Billion) CO2*** (Thousand kilogram) Before After Before After Before After Vanpool - 211-29 - 2,168 Car-1person 13,306 11,976 1,834 1,650 136,619 122,957 CarPool-2person+ 809 728 112 101 8,321 7,489 Transit 432 389 60 54 4,144 3,729 Total 14,548 13,303 2,005 1,833 149,084 136,343 17 * Diesel equivalent gallon ** British thermal unit *** The rates of transit is the average of light rail and transit bus

Next Steps Identify structure (individual, employer/partnership, or third-party) It may not be feasible for Coke to do it all on their own Determine the number of vans needed to service 1,250 employees How many people will form a vanpool? Identify pickup locations Where will people be willing to form a vanpool? Who will shift to a vanpool (e.g. people driving alone?, transit users?) 18

Conclusion A vanpool can more economically transport several employees together Vanpools have been used in Atlanta, but not officially by Coke Coke has 12,500 employees in the Atlanta area A shift of 1,250 can result in major fuel and emission reductions This change requires the analysis of potential users' travel behavior, and may require cooperation between Coke and other large employers in Midtown 19