Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

Similar documents
November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation Engineers

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Appendix 3. Transportation Narrative and Supplements

Access Management Standards

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Proposed CVS/pharmacy

Construction Realty Co.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT MOUNT EDEN ROAD, MOUNT EDEN

Prepared for: Ontario Inc. CHICKADEE GROVE COMMUNITY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION OPINION LETTER

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s

Traffic Engineering Study

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

CAR 10-1 TRAFFIC CALMING CAR 10-1 OPR: Engineering 06/06

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

Ron Miiller & Asso ciates

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. for MILTON SQUARE

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE 630/650 SOUTH STREET RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WRENTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Existing Traffic Conditions

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

ORIGINAL AND REVISED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Traffic Impact Analysis

City of Janesville Rock County, Wisconsin September 25, 2017

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

TRAFFIC IMPACT DATA. Dillons #98 On-Site Relocation

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS Based on the 2012 edition of the International Fire Code

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

4131 Chain Bridge Road

Emergency Signal Warrant Evaluation: A Case Study in Anchorage, Alaska

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DPW) DRIVEWAY RULES AND PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT

December 5, Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701

144&176 John St. and 200 John St. & 588 Charlotte St. Hotel and Residential Subdivision Development

Technical Feasibility Report

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma.

11 October 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

Traffic Feasibility Study

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

One Harbor Point Residential

The remainder of this memorandum contains the details of our peer review findings.

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

Submittal Document II.G. D-bar-A Project, Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Bergmman Associates, dated November 3, 2015 ( Traffic Study )

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

East Stockton Boulevard (South Sacramento) Costco Gasoline Expansion Fuel Station Expansion Trip Generation Estimate

4/2/18 MP NORTHPOINT MALL GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB

54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale Proposed Residential / Commercial Development. Transportation Assessment Report. 30 April 2018

Transcription:

28-1932-03 November 28, 2016 Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801 Re: Traffic Impact Evaluation The Rose Farm Residential Development Exeter, New Hampshire Dear Todd: Tighe & Bond, Inc. has prepared this letter to summarize the anticipated transportation impacts associated with a proposed residential development to be located on The Rose Farm property at 1 Forest Street, 22 Oak Street, and 24 Oak Street Extension in Exeter, New Hampshire. The site currently contains 4 residential homes, 2 recently vacated residential homes, and 4 dilapidated residential homes. As proposed, the development consists of razing the existing structures and constructing 42 single-family homes. Access is provided and is proposed to remain via driveways on Forest Street; one across from Wadleigh Street and one across from Oak Street. This evaluation has been conducted to summarize the anticipated traffic impacts associated with the proposed residential development. Traffic Generation To determine the additional trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed project, tripgeneration rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 1 were researched. For the 4 existing residential homes and the proposed 42 residential homes, ITE Land Use Code 210 (Single-Family Detached Housing) was selected. The tripgeneration comparison is provided in Table 1 and the trip-generation calculations are attached to this letter. As shown in Table 1, the proposed residential development is expected to generate 29 additional vehicular trips (7 entering and 22 exiting) during the weekday AM peak hour, 38 additional vehicular trips (23 entering and 15 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour, and 35 additional vehicular trips (19 entering and 16 exiting) during the Saturday midday peak hour. These additional vehicular trips during the critical peak periods would result in negligible impacts along the adjacent roadway system with approximately 1 additional vehicle per 3.2 to 4.0 minutes (i.e., 15 to 19 vehicle trips). ITE methodologies state, In lieu of other locally preferred thresholds, it is suggested that a transportation impact study be conducted whenever a proposed development will generate 100 or more added (new) trips during the adjacent roadways peak hour or the development s peak hour. 2 Based on the additional site-generated trips shown in Table 1, the ITE guidelines suggest that further traffic evaluation is not required for the proposed project. 1 Trip Generation Manual. 9 th ed. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012. 2 Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2010. 177 Corporate Drive Portsmouth, NH 03801-6825 Tel 603.433.8818 www.tighebond.com

TABLE 1 Trip-Generation Comparison Peak Hour/Direction Existing Trips a Proposed Trips b Additional Trips c Weekday Daily 38 400 362 Weekday AM Peak Hour: Enter 1 8 7 Exit 2 24 22 Total 3 32 29 Weekday PM Peak Hour: Enter 3 26 23 Exit 1 16 15 Total 4 42 38 Saturday Midday Peak Hour: Enter 2 21 19 Exit 2 18 16 Total 4 39 35 a ITE Land Use Code 210 (Single-Family Detached Housing) for 4 dwelling units. b ITE Land Use Code 210 (Single-Family Detached Housing) for 42 dwelling units. c Proposed Trips minus Existing Trips. Site Roadways A driveway is provided on Forest Street across from Wadleigh Street. In addition, a secondary driveway is currently provided on Oak Street Extension for continued access to Forest Street across from Oak Street. As proposed, the two access ways would remai In accordance with American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guidelines for Low-Volume Roads, 3 the total roadway cross-section for Rural Minor Access Roads and for Rural Major Access Roads is 18.0 feet wide with speeds of 40 miles per hour (mph) or less. In addition, many Rural Minor Access Roads are cul-desacs or loop roads with no through continuity. Because their sole function is to provide access, such roads are used predominantly by familiar drivers Speeds are generally low for the local environment, given the purpose of the road and short trip lengths. A residential loop road is a local purpose road that serves land access to abutting properties and not mobility for through traffic. Contrary to cul-de-sacs that only have one end open for vehicular traffic with the other end terminated, residential loop roads have beginning and ending points on the same route. The site roadways have been designed in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Construction of Public Utilities in Exeter, New Hampshire (Section E.III.D). The proposed roadways have been designed to have a minimum pavement width of 24 feet, grades between 1% and 8%, and intersect Forest Street at angles close to 90 degrees and no less than 60 degrees. 3 Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads (ADT 400). Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2001. - 2 -

Sight Distances To identify potential safety concerns associated with site access and egress, sight distances have been evaluated at the proposed site roadway locations to determine if the available sight distances for vehicles exiting the site meet or exceed the minimum distances required for approaching vehicles to safely stop. Sight distance is the length of roadway ahead visible to the driver. The available sight distances were compared with minimum requirements, as established by AASHTO. 4 AASHTO is the national standard by which vehicle sight distance is calculated, measured, and reported. As proposed, available sight distances at the site roadway intersections exceed AASHTO s requirement of 200 feet (for speeds of 30 mph) and the Town of Exeter s requirement of 150 feet (for speeds 30 mph) for safe operatio To provide the safe and efficient flow of traffic to and from the site, proposed plantings, vegetation, landscaping, and signing along the site frontage are recommended to be kept low to the ground (less than 3.0 feet from street level) or set back sufficiently from the edge of the roadways so as not to inhibit the available sight lines. Exeter Spring Exeter Spring is located on Oak Street Extension north of Forest Street that is currently used by the public and has been identified to be an asset to the community. Observations of vehicular operations were conducted at Exeter Spring in November 2016 during the Weekday AM peak period (7:00 to 9:00 AM), the Weekday PM peak period (4:00 to 6:00 PM), and the Saturday Midday peak period (11:00 AM to 1:00 PM). The following provides a summary of these observations: Weekday AM Peak Period o A total of 3 vehicles were identified (average of 1.5 vehicles/hour), o A maximum queue of 1 vehicle, and o An average stopped time of 4 minutes and 5 seconds. Weekday PM Peak Period: o A total of 16 vehicles were identified (average of 8 vehicles/hour), o A maximum queue of 4 vehicles, and o An average stopped time of 6 minutes and 28 seconds. Saturday Midday Peak Period: o A total of 22 vehicles were identified (average of 11 vehicles/hour), o A maximum queue of 5 vehicles, and o An average stopped delay of 4 minutes and 56 seconds 4 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2004. - 3 -

In summary, ITE Trip Generation methodologies anticipate that the additional vehicular trips associated with the proposed residential project would have negligible impacts to the adjacent roadway system during the Weekday AM, Weekday PM, Saturday Midday peak hours. In addition, the site roadways have been designed in accordance with Town of Exeter and national guidelines. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free contact me at (603) 433-8818. Very truly yours, TIGHE & BOND, INC. Jason R. Plourde, P.E., PTP, NH LPA Project Manager Attachments J:\S\S1932 Baker Properties, LLC\03_Exeter, NH\Report\S1932-03 Traffic Evaluation Letter 112816.doc - 4 -

ATTACHMENTS Trip-Generation Calculations: Existing Use Trip-Generation Calculations: Proposed Use Exeter Spring Observations Tighe&Bond

Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Land Use Code (LUC) 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing Average Vehicle Trips Ends vs: Independent Variable (X): 4 Dwelling Units AVERAGE WEEKDAY DAILY T = 9.52 * (X) T = 9.52 * 4 T = 38.08 T = 38 vehicle trips with 50% ( 19 vpd) entering and 50% ( 19 vpd) exiting. WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC T = 0.75 * (X) T = 0.75 * 4 T = 3.00 T = 3 vehicle trips with 25% ( 1 vph) entering and 75% ( 2 vph) exiting. WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC T = 1.00 * (X) T = 1.00 * 4 T = 4.00 T = 4 vehicle trips with 63% ( 3 vph) entering and 37% ( 1 vph) exiting. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR OF GENERATOR T = 0.93 * (X) T = 0.93 * 4 T = 3.72 T = 4 vehicle trips with 54% ( 2 vph) entering and 46% ( 2 vph) exiting. Tighe & Bond, Inc. ITE LUC 210-4 units_rates

Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Land Use Code (LUC) 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing Average Vehicle Trips Ends vs: Independent Variable (X): 42 Dwelling Units AVERAGE WEEKDAY DAILY T = 9.52 * (X) T = 9.52 * 42 T = 399.84 T = 400 vehicle trips with 50% ( 200 vpd) entering and 50% ( 200 vpd) exiting. WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC T = 0.75 * (X) T = 0.75 * 42 T = 31.50 T = 32 vehicle trips with 25% ( 8 vph) entering and 75% ( 24 vph) exiting. WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC T = 1.00 * (X) T = 1.00 * 42 T = 42.00 T = 42 vehicle trips with 63% ( 26 vph) entering and 37% ( 16 vph) exiting. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR OF GENERATOR T = 0.93 * (X) T = 0.93 * 42 T = 39.06 T = 39 vehicle trips with 54% ( 21 vph) entering and 46% ( 18 vph) exiting. Tighe & Bond, Inc. ITE LUC 210-42 units_rates

Exeter Spring Observation Summary Average Stopped Time Time # Vehicles Seconds Min:Sec 7:25-7:40 AM 1 150 2:30 7:40-7:55 AM 1 348 5:48 7:55-8:32 AM 1 237 3:57 TOTAL 3 245 4:05 4:00-4:15 PM 2 426 7:06 4:15-4:30 PM 4 263.25 4:23 4:30-4:45 PM 1 504 8:24 4:45-5:00 PM 2 312.5 5:12 5:00-5:15 PM 4 475.5 7:56 5:15-5:30 PM 1 233 3:53 5:30-5:50 PM 2 505.5 8:26 TOTAL 16 388.54 6:28 11:00-11:15 AM 5 283 4:43 11:15-11:30 AM 3 224.7 3:45 11:30-11:45 AM 1 153 2:33 11:45 AM-12:00 PM 3 396.7 6:37 12:00-12:15 PM 1 72 1:12 12:15-12:30 PM 4 824.25 13:44 12:30-12:45 PM 1 81 1:21 12:45-1:00 PM 4 331.25 5:31 TOTAL 22 295.74 4:56

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282AM01 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/17/2016 Page No : 1 1 1 7:25:01 AM 7:27:31 AM 150 7:25:00 AM - 7:40:00 AM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 150.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 150 Average Queue: 0.99 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 150 1 2 7:46:45 AM 7:52:33 AM 348 7:40:00 AM - 7:55:00 AM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 348.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 348 Average Queue: 1.00 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 348 1 3 8:27:37 AM 8:31:34 AM 237

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282AM01 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/17/2016 Page No : 2 7:55:00 AM - 8:32:00 AM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 237.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 237 Average Queue: 1.00 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 237 7:25:00 AM - 8:32:00 AM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 3 Delayed Vehicle Count: 3 Average Stopped Time: 245.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 348 Average Queue: 0.18 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 0.18 Total Delay: 735

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282PM01 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/17/2016 Page No : 1 1 1 4:00:00 PM 4:07:05 PM 425 1 2 4:13:12 PM 4:20:19 PM 427 4:00:00 PM - 4:15:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 2 Delayed Vehicle Count: 2 Average Stopped Time: 426.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 427 Average Queue: 0.70 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 0.70 Total Delay: 852 1 3 4:20:14 PM 4:26:23 PM 369 1 4 4:26:19 PM 4:27:46 PM 87 1 5 4:26:25 PM 4:31:03 PM 278 1 6 4:29:05 PM 4:34:24 PM 319 4:15:00 PM - 4:30:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 4 Delayed Vehicle Count: 4 Average Stopped Time: 263.25 Maximum Stopped Time: 369 Average Queue: 1.24 Queue Density: 1.24 Maximum Queue: 2 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.24 Total Delay: 1053 1 7 4:31:17 PM 4:39:41 PM 504

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282PM01 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/17/2016 Page No : 2 4:30:00 PM - 4:45:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 504.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 504 Average Queue: 1.00 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 504 1 8 4:45:26 PM 4:47:18 PM 112 1 9 4:53:25 PM 5:01:58 PM 513 4:45:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 2 Delayed Vehicle Count: 2 Average Stopped Time: 312.50 Maximum Stopped Time: 513 Average Queue: 0.63 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 0.63 Total Delay: 625 1 10 5:05:35 PM 5:11:34 PM 359 1 11 5:06:53 PM 5:15:35 PM 522 1 12 5:09:40 PM 5:18:31 PM 531 1 13 5:13:26 PM 5:21:36 PM 490 5:00:00 PM - 5:15:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 4 Delayed Vehicle Count: 4 Average Stopped Time: 475.50

Maximum Stopped Time: 531 Average Queue: 1.98 Queue Density: 1.98 Maximum Queue: 3 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.98 Total Delay: 1902 1 14 5:21:43 PM 5:25:36 PM 233 5:15:00 PM - 5:30:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 233.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 233 Average Queue: 1.00 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 233 1 15 5:38:43 PM 5:45:24 PM 401 1 16 5:39:37 PM 5:49:47 PM 610 5:30:00 PM - 5:50:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 2 Delayed Vehicle Count: 2 Average Stopped Time: 505.50 Maximum Stopped Time: 610 Average Queue: 1.52 Queue Density: 1.52 Maximum Queue: 2 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.52 Total Delay: 1011

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282PM01 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/17/2016 Page No : 4 4:00:00 PM - 5:50:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 16 Delayed Vehicle Count: 16 Average Stopped Time: 386.25 Maximum Stopped Time: 610 Average Queue: 0.94 Queue Density: 1.37 Maximum Queue: 3 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 0.94 Total Delay: 6180

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282SAT1 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/19/2016 Page No : 1 1 1 11:00:01 AM 11:02:00 AM 119 1 2 11:00:21 AM 11:08:10 AM 469 1 3 11:04:32 AM 11:08:39 AM 247 1 4 11:05:43 AM 11:10:21 AM 278 1 5 11:07:31 AM 11:12:33 AM 302 11:00:00 AM - 11:15:00 AM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 5 Delayed Vehicle Count: 5 Average Stopped Time: 283.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 469 Average Queue: 1.88 Queue Density: 1.88 Maximum Queue: 4 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.88 Total Delay: 1415 1 6 11:21:12 AM 11:25:40 AM 268 1 7 11:28:24 AM 11:30:14 AM 110 1 8 11:29:41 AM 11:34:37 AM 296 11:15:00 AM - 11:30:00 AM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 3 Delayed Vehicle Count: 3 Average Stopped Time: 224.67 Maximum Stopped Time: 296 Average Queue: 0.84 Queue Density: 1.05 Maximum Queue: 2 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 0.84 Total Delay: 674 1 9 11:43:26 AM 11:45:59 AM 153

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282SAT1 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/19/2016 Page No : 2 11:30:00 AM - 11:45:00 AM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 153.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 153 Average Queue: 0.99 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 153 1 10 11:48:01 AM 11:52:36 AM 275 1 11 11:49:02 AM 11:57:05 AM 483 1 12 11:52:34 AM 11:59:46 AM 432 11:45:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 3 Delayed Vehicle Count: 3 Average Stopped Time: 396.67 Maximum Stopped Time: 483 Average Queue: 1.69 Queue Density: 1.69 Maximum Queue: 3 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.69 Total Delay: 1190 1 13 12:07:18 PM 12:08:30 PM 72 12:00:00 PM - 12:15:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 72.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 72

Average Queue: 0.99 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 72 1 14 12:16:57 PM 12:26:52 PM 595 1 15 12:18:38 PM 12:28:04 PM 566 1 16 12:19:31 PM 12:33:58 PM 867 1 17 12:24:57 PM 12:46:06 PM 1269 12:15:00 PM - 12:30:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 4 Delayed Vehicle Count: 4 Average Stopped Time: 824.25 Maximum Stopped Time: 1269 Average Queue: 1.88 Queue Density: 1.89 Maximum Queue: 4 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.89 Total Delay: 3297 1 18 12:44:53 PM 12:46:14 PM 81 12:30:00 PM - 12:45:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 1 Delayed Vehicle Count: 1 Average Stopped Time: 81.00 Maximum Stopped Time: 81 Average Queue: 0.99 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.00 Total Delay: 81 1 19 12:45:37 PM 12:50:35 PM 298 1 20 12:48:15 PM 12:52:48 PM 273 1 21 12:52:04 PM 12:57:24 PM 320 1 22 12:52:56 PM 1:00:10 PM 434

N/S Street : 9 Oak Street Extension E/W Street : City/State : Exeter, NH Weather : Clear File Name : 1282SAT1 Site Code : 12820001 Start Date : 11/19/2016 Page No : 4 12:45:00 PM - 1:01:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 4 Delayed Vehicle Count: 4 Average Stopped Time: 331.25 Maximum Stopped Time: 434 Average Queue: 1.52 Queue Density: 1.52 Maximum Queue: 2 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.52 Total Delay: 1325 11:00:00 AM - 1:01:00 PM Lane 1 Total Vehicle Count: 22 Delayed Vehicle Count: 22 Average Stopped Time: 373.05 Maximum Stopped Time: 1269 Average Queue: 1.14 Queue Density: 1.67 Maximum Queue: 4 Delay in Vehicle Hour: 1.14 Total Delay: 8207