MagneMotion Maglev Demonstration on ODU Guideway

Similar documents
FTA Low Speed Magnetic Levitation Program

GA Electromagnetic Projects. Maglev and Linear Motors for Goods Movement. California-Nevada. FTA Urban Maglev. High-Speed Maglev

Evaluation of the Fatigue Life of Aluminum Bogie Structures for the Urban Maglev

Independent cart technology. Linear Motors provide magnetic propulsion and control of multiple carts

Inductive Power Supply (IPS ) for the Transrapid

Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Great Lakes Community February 11, 2016

Dr. Jozsef Rohacs - Dr. Daniel Rohacs Rea-Tech Ltd. Hungary

MAGNETIC LEVITATION TRAIN TECHNOLOGY II

General Atomics Urban Maglev: Moving Towards Demonstration

Technology Comparison: High Speed Ground Transportation. Transrapid Superspeed Maglev and Bombardier JetTrain

The Deployable Gage Restraint Measurement System - Description and Operational Performance

The Transrapid Guideway Switch Test and Verifikation

HOW MAGLEV TRAINS OPERATE

APPLICATION NOTE QuickStick 100 Power Cable Sizing and Selection

Train traffic control system on the Yamanashi Maglev test line

Final Report. LED Streetlights Market Assessment Study

APPLICATION NOTE Electrostatic Discharge Protection on QuickStick Systems

Trial 3 Bus Demonstration. Spring 2018

Maglev in China Experience and Development

Clement A. Skalski, Ph.D., P.E.

ALCOA Project Design Engineering Design 009 Team 7 12/16/13 Submitted to Wallace Catanach

AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

FACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview

IFPAC 2003 Dr. Berthold Andres

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

TR15: Public Outreach

QuickStick Repeatability Analysis

Development of a High Efficiency Induction Motor and the Estimation of Energy Conservation Effect

Needs and Community Characteristics

Water Train. A better way to transport water JESSE POWELL WATER TRAIN GROUP

National Road Safety Action Plan in China

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL FOR THE NEXT GENERATION PATCO High Speed Line Power Infrastructure Renewal

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

A study on the vibration analysis of a maglev vehicle A theoretical investigation of the effect of magnetic damping on a vibration control system

PROPOSAL OF HIGH CAPACITY URBANAUT PUGET SOUND REGIONAL MONORAIL MASTERPLAN WASHINGTON STATE, USA

Offshore Application of the Flywheel Energy Storage. Final report

California University of Pennsylvania (CALU) Maglev Sky Shuttle

Final Administrative Decision

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate Principal Subject

Minnesota Mileage-Based User Fee Test Results. Ray Starr Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Minnesota Department of Transportation

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Development of Motor-Assisted Hybrid Traction System

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Transportation Demand Management Element

Review and update on MAGLEV

DC Arc-Free Circuit Breaker for Utility-Grid Battery Storage System

Connor Needham Roger Williams University Bristol, RI, United States. Jeremy Kacher Roger Williams University Bristol, RI, United States

Design and Hardware Implementation of a Supervisory Controller for a Wind Power Turbine

Electric Vehicle Simulation and Animation

ACCEL. Fostering urban mobility

Maglev and Linear Motors for Southern California Transportation

MagneMotion Maglev M3

THE HUMAN ELEMENT Motorcycle Rider Training and Education

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Battery Electric Bus Technology Review. Victoria Regional Transit Commission September 19, 2017 Aaron Lamb

Study on the Servo Drive of PM-LSM to Be Used in Parallel Synchronous Drive

BAE Systems V2C2 Program

Solano County Transit

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Survey Report Informatica PowerCenter Express. Right-Sized Data Integration for the Smaller Project

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)

Development of CNG Market Using Flared Gas. Masami KOJIMA Oil, Gas and Mining Policy Division The World Bank

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Distribution Uniformity of Multi Stream Multi Trajectory Rotary Nozzles Spaced Below Recommended Distance

Encapsulated Piezo Actuators for Use at High Power Levels and / or within Harsh Environmental Conditions.

APTA Sustainability Conference August 8, 2017

MAGNA DRIVETRAIN FORUM 2018

Dynamic and Decoupling Analysis of the Bogie with Single EMS Modules for Low-speed Maglev Train

The 15th Shanghai International Automobile Industry Exhibition is. The 15th Shanghai International Automobile Industry Exhibition (Auto

Zero Emission Truck Commercialization Summary of the I-710 Project Zero-Emission Truck Commercialization Study Draft Report

Advanced Vehicle Performance by Replacing Conventional Vehicle Wheel with a Carbon Fiber Reinforcement Composite Wheel

Improvement the Possibilities of Capacitive Energy Storage in Metro Railcar by Simulation

Transient Analysis of Offset Stator Double Sided Short Rotor Linear Induction Motor Accelerator

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

Personal Rapid Transit as an Alternative to Bus Service in Two Communities

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

CIF # City of Barrie. Large Curbside Containers. Final Report. Final Project Report, September City of Barrie. CIF Project # 801.

ENERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWERTRAIN AND CHASSIS INTEGRATED SIMULATION ON A MILITARY DUTY CYCLE

Pomona Rotary December 19, 2017

Level of Service Classification for Urban Heterogeneous Traffic: A Case Study of Kanapur Metropolis

MOTION NO. M Light Rail Vehicle Oil-less Rotary Scroll Air Compressor Upgrade PROPOSED ACTION

Maglev Energy Storage and The Grid

Special edition paper

Energy Efficiency and Economics of Maglev Transport* by James Powell and Gordon Danby

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Accelerated Testing of Advanced Battery Technologies in PHEV Applications

1/7. The series hybrid permits the internal combustion engine to operate at optimal speed for any given power requirement.

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

Noise and Vibration Comparison Steel Lining versus Rubber Lining. Charles Hillmann

Armature Reaction and Saturation Effect

How to: Test & Evaluate Motors in Your Application

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

Sample Geographic Information System (GIS) Staffing and Response Time Report Virtual County Fire Department GIS Analysis

HYPERLOOP IJNRD Volume 3, Issue 10 October 2018 ISSN:

Heating Comparison of Radial and Bias-Ply Tires on a B-727 Aircraft

Conventional Approach

Transcription:

MagneMotion Maglev Demonstration on ODU Guideway SUMMARY MagneMotion and Old Dominion University undertook a cooperative agreement to demonstrate the MagneMotion M3 urban maglev technology on an existing elevated guideway on the ODU campus in Norfolk VA. M3 was designed for urban applications with speeds up to 100 mph, acceleration up to 1.6 m/s 2, and a 60 foot turn radius. Figure 1 shows the sled vehicle on the ODU guideway. This vehicle was weighted to simulate the operation of one section of an operational vehicle. This project involved constructing and testing the suspension and propulsion system with the objective of demonstrating M3 is a viable alternative for urban transport, both in performance and cost. Historically, maglev was viewed as an alternative to high speed rail, but this project was based on the premise that maglev has advantages for lower speed urban applications because of the reduced noise, energy consumption, and passenger travel time. MagneMotion s proposal was accepted and FTA provided cost shared funding for both an initial study and a follow on project to construct a reduced scale vehicle. Operation of this first vehicle was successful and led to a desire for higher speed testing of a full-scale model, and this led to a cooperative effort with Old Dominion University to use their existing maglev guideway. ODU has an elevated guideway, shown in Figure 2, constructed for an urban maglev design that was never able to operate because of interactions between the vehicle and the guideway causing beam resonances. Figure 1. M3 vehicle on the ODU guideway BACKGROUND Starting in 2001, FTA funded an Urban Maglev project with the objective of exploring the potential of maglev to provide an alternative to more conventional wheel based urban transit. Figure 2. Existing ODU guideway

M3 uses a permanent magnet suspension and Linear Synchronous Motor propulsion. The design uses lightweight vehicles and a wide gap (20 mm) suspension so it could operate successfully on the existing guideway. The M3 design was first tested on an indoor guideway at MagneMotion in Devens, MA using beams designed to replicate the ones used at ODU. Figure 3 shows the test vehicle operating on the Devens guideway. Figure 3. Test sled on guideway in Devens, MA those requirements, perform a risk reduction build in Devens MA, and execute a test plan. 2. Demonstrate M3 technology on the existing outdoor elevated guideway at Old Dominion University in Norfolk Virginia. Both phases involved extensive testing of performance parameters, noise, and ride quality. An important part of the project was to develop a cost effective method of constructing the LSM and suspension components and installing them on the guideway beams. This was achieved by constructing 12 meter long sub-assemblies in Devens MA and shipping them to ODU via truck. The assemblies were then lifted by a crane and installed on a guideway that had been prepared to receive them. Figure 4 shows the crane lifting one sub-assembly, Figure 5 shows the guideway before the LSM and suspension components were installed, and Figure 6 shows the guideway after the LSM and suspension components were installed. OBJECTIVES The objective was to prove that M3 design could propel an urban transit vehicle on a relatively lightweight guideway. Tests of noise and ride quality were designed to show that the design has better ride quality and lower noise than conventional wheel based transit, important criteria for operation in an urban area. It was also important to develop a cost effective way to construct the LSM stator and suspension rail components and then install them on an elevated guideway. METHODS Figure 4. Crane lifting stator and rail module This project was organized in two phases: 1. Established system requirements with ODU and FTA, complete the design to meet 2 P age

The Devens and ODU installations have, together, allowed testing for over one thousand hours of operation and travel of over six thousand kilometers. Figure 5. Guideway before installation Figure 6. Guideway after installation RESULTS All of the objectives were realized. The Devens test facility was used to develop and demonstrate the key elements of suspension control and propulsion, and the ODU installation demonstrated operation on an outdoor elevated guideway at higher speeds. Following are a few of the test results, all of which exceeded the goals of the Project. Track length 78 m Speed 10.5 m/s Acceleration 2 m/s 2 Total mass 4.5 Mg Lateral force 15 kn MMI also measured ambient sound levels using a sound level meter. With the vehicle traveling overhead it was difficult to sense any increase above 50 to 52 db ambient noise. It was noted that a campus HVAC system several hundred feet away dominated the background noise and that the M3 noise was indistinguishable from background low noise is an important advantage of urban maglev as compared with any other suspension system. Ride quality was estimated by measuring vibration in all six degrees of freedom. We could not operate at a high enough speed to determine ride quality under anticipated operating conditions, but at the speeds we did operate ride quality was excellent. The use of a secondary suspension in the vehicle will contribute to improved ride quality. The testing showed that M3 could operate successfully on the ODU guideway, but the beams used for this guideway were not designed for the M3 system. We believe that beams with about the same size and cost can provide better ride quality, particularly at higher speeds. It is expected that for a fully developed commercial system the ride quality will be significantly better than for any other suspension system. CONCLUSIONS The M3 design operated successfully on the ODU guideway with acceleration up to 2 m/s 2 and a speed up to 10.5 m/s (23 mph), limited only by the length of the section of the guideway populated with LSM stators and suspension. FUTURE ACTION The M3 Urban Maglev system has been demonstrated to the point that there is little technical risk in continuing the development, but 3 P age

before commercial installation is possible a number of developments must be completed, including: Construction of a horizontal curve, vertical curve, and switch. Construction of a passenger carrying vehicle. Development of a source for onboard power for HVAC, possibly using inductive transfer suspension power is negligible because of the use of permanent magnets. Demonstration of operation at higher speeds. Extensive testing with an emphasis on proving safety and reliability are suitable for commercial operation. MagneMotion is currently exploring ways to continue the development. One option is to complete installation on the entire 1 km ODU guideway and construct a commercial vehicle. This would allow testing at speeds up to at least 30 m/s (66 mph) and certification of safety and reliability. Another option is to complete a test facility near Devens that would allow completion of a design to the point it could be used for a commercial installation. With relatively minor changes we believe the M3 could operate at speeds substantially higher than the design speed of 45 m/s (101 mph). This higher speed operation could be used as an alternative to high speed rail. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dr. Thomas Alberts, Dr. Colin Britcher, and Jeremy Roadcap of ODU provided important support this project. Marcel Belanger and Walter Kulyk of the FTA and Roger Hoopengardner of SAIC provided sustained support and FTA coordination. CONTACT Lisa Lanzilotti MagneMotion Inc. 139 Barnum Road Devens, MA 01434 info@magnemotion.com LLanzilotti@magnemotion.com Dr. Thomas Alberts Old Dominion University 4750 Elkhorn Ave. Suite 1300 Norfolk, VA 23529 (757) 683-3736 talberts@odu.edu KEYWORDS Maglev, linear motor, urban transportation, linear synchronous motor, M3 4 P age

Social Media Posting Social Media Accounts: Facebook: Twitter: YouTube: facebook/usdotfra twitter/usdotfra youtube/usdotfra Would you like to share this report on FRA s social media pages? YES Please provide the following: 1) For a Facebook post: 2 3 sentences about the report, along with any images, pictures, graphs, or charts that support the content. MagneMotion has successfully completed testing of its M3 urban maglev system at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, VA. The system was tested on a 78 meter track and reached a speed up to 10.5 meters per second. The results support M3 as a faster, quieter and more cost effective alternative to traditional transportation systems. www.magnemotion.com 2) For a Twitter tweet: 140 characters or less on the subject of the report. MagneMotion completes testing of M3 urban maglev at ODU proving a faster, quieter, more cost effective transportation system 3) Who is the target audience for this report? (e.g., railroaders, management, policy makers, etc.) State and Federal transportation agencies, maglev developers, urban transportation developer 4) Why is it important to distribute information about this report on social media? 5 P age

To increase awareness of MagneMotion s M3 maglev technology. NO Please provide a brief explanation for choosing not to share. (Insert info here) Samples: Facebook: Twitter: Contact the social media team at fra.socialmedia@dot.gov with any questions. 6 P age