Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Similar documents
5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

Click to edit Master title style

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

Draft Results and Open House

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Tier 2 Screening and Selection522. of the Short List Alternatives KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Troost Corridor Transit Study

ALIGN THE RAPID S TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT STUDY. Tech Memo #4: Phase 1 Project List. Prepared By:

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Draft Results and Recommendations

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

West Broadway Transit Study. Minnesota APA Conference Charles Carlson, Metro Transit Adele Hall, SRF Consulting September 24, 2015

Technology Evaluation Scorecard Suitability

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Multnomah County Commission December 15, 2016

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

Needs and Community Characteristics

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Informal Business Discussion Minutes Tuesday, May 3, :00 PM 1. Transportation

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GUIDE

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

ARTERIAL BRT OVERVIEW

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Attachment 5. High Speed Transit Planning Study REPORT SUMMARY. Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch. Stantec Consulting Ltd.

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Federal Way Link Extension

Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Great Lakes Community February 11, 2016

WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

CTA Blue Line Study Area

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Transit on the New NY Bridge

RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE REPORT

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Transcription:

Public Meeting City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development Funded by Regional Transportation Authority September 12, 2011 In partnership with

Presentation Agenda Review of Study Goals and Objectives Public Involvement to Date Screening of Ideas Development of Potential Projects Examples for Further Analysis Questions and Comments 1

Study Goals and Study Area 2 Goals Enhanced mobility/ access to jobs and services Promote economic vitality of communities in the study area Desired outcome Consensus on reasonable options for subsequent study Timeframe for study Completion early 2012

Study Tasks and Status Task Conduct demographic and travel market analysis Conduct inventory of transportation services and infrastructure Review prior studies, plans and proposals Analyze existing conditions and identify issue areas Conduct public meetings, community stakeholder interviews and other public outreach Identify and define opportunities for improvement Develop and evaluate transit investment and policy alternatives Complete Ongoing X X X X X X X 3

Public Involvement Public Advisory Committee» Provides advisory services throughout the study» Shapes and informs the final plan recommendations» Acts as a liaison to community stakeholders Public Open House Meetings Community Stakeholder Meetings» Aldermen» Community Leaders/Residents» Institutions» Developers & Businesses Information Sharing» Fact Sheet» Website» Dedicated Email Address: southlakefront@cityofchicago.org 4

Issues Identified by Community Stakeholders Safety/Security Concerns Lengthy Travel Times Key Linkages Other Than the Loop Customer Comfort 5 Frequency of Service Seamless Travel Knowledge of Services Economically Viable Neighborhoods

Ideas Screening Process Assembled, defined, and organized ideas Identified potential timeframe for each idea» Short-Medium = Less than 5 years» Medium = 5-10 years» Long = 10+ years» All depending on funding availability Conducted an assessment of each idea across multiple screening criteria Grouped best ideas into Potential Project packages for further study Majority of ideas retained 6

Types of Improvements Suggested 7 Improved frequency and longer service hours Better customer information More seamless fares and payment Repairs to eliminate CTA rail slow zones Enhancement of existing rail stations and station areas New or restored local and express bus routes New streetcar or bus rapid transit corridors New rail stations and extensions of CTA rail service Conversion of in-city Metra Electric District service to a CTA-type of service

Possible Improvements: Short-Medium Term South Lakefront Corridor Transit Study Possible Improvements Capital Cost Operating Cost Included in a Potential Project 1. Improve frequency of existing services o Off Peak and Peak at Metra Main Line In-City Stations (primarily using existing trains) o Off Peak Metra on South Chicago Branch o Bus routes that are overcrowded o East-west bus routes o Express bus routes 2. Longer service hours including more nighttime and weekend service to address non-traditional work hours and non-work travel needs 4. Marketing and user information improvements o Promote Bus Tracker, Train Tracker and GoRoo o Create local Metra route and schedule o Advertise any route and fare changes o Bus shelters with real time information displays 8. Local bus circulators, shuttles and other bus routes o Hyde Park/Washington Park/Oakland o Establish bus route on 83rd o Establish bus route on 31st 9. Express or limited stop bus routes to other destination areas o Stony Island/Cottage Grove/39th o To Midway (i.e., old X55) o To West Loop (i.e., old X28) CTA planners to address CTA planners to address CTA planners to address CTA planners to address 8 Capital Cost: Green = Less than $10M, Yellow = $10-$100M, Red = More than $100M

Possible Improvements: Medium Term 9 South Lakefront Corridor Transit Study Possible Improvements 3. Fare policy and fare media improvements o Special Metra-CTA arrangements for inter-service board transfers in study area (e.g., 10-ride Link-up type ticket ) 5. Rail station enhancements and associated pedestrian/bike/auto access, wayfinding,lighting, and security improvements o Metra Electric District (MED) Main Line stations (59th, 63rd, 75th, 79th, 83rd, 87th, 91st, 95th) o MED Main Line new 60 th Street entrance for 59 th Street Station Capital Cost Operating Cost rev loss Included in a Potential Project o CTA Stations (e.g., Red Line - 55th, 87th; Green Line Indiana, 43rd, 47th, 51st, Garfield, Cottage Grove) 6. New rail stations on existing rail lines o MED 35-37 th o Green Line station in the 20s 7. Red and Green Line track and structure repairs to eliminate slow zones 8. Local bus circulators, shuttles and other bus routes o Extend existing bus routes to Lakeside 10. New BRT service and Enhanced bus corridors o North South - Cottage Grove - Stony Island - King Drive - South Lake Shore Drive o East West (Garfield Boulevard and/or 79th Street) Capital Cost: Green = Less than $10M, Yellow = $10-$100M, Red = More than $100M

Possible Improvements: Long Term South Lakefront Corridor Transit Study Possible Improvements Capital Cost Operating Cost Included in a Potential Project 11. New Streetcar Lines o North South - Cottage Grove (northern) or Drexel to Loop - King Drive (northern) to Loop - Stony Island extension of above streetcar routes o East West - 35th - 55 th /Garfield 12. Extension of Green Line to Dorchester Ave. and Metra Electric District 13. Metra Electric District (MED) Conversion o Gray Line proposal for all urban Metra Electric District stations o Gold Line proposal for South Chicago Branch to downtown only o MED South Chicago Conversion to LRT Integrated with E-W LRT in Loop to Union Station o MED Conversion to CTA Rapid Transit via MED ROW or Green Line NO Capital Cost: Green = Less than $10M, Yellow = $10-$100M, Red = More than $100M 10

Projects Already Moving Forward Projects Underway» Jeffery Bus Rapid Transit» Bus shelter real-time arrival information» Metra Electric District 59 th and 63 rd Street station renovations including ADA accessibility In Planning Process» Red Line Extension (Recommended as priority in "Go To 2040" the Chicago region's transportation plan) Transit agencies continually pursue Federal funding for major projects to enhance service and ridership 11

Potential Projects Reflect Different Themes #1: Improvements to Existing CTA Bus Network #2: Improvements to Existing CTA Rail Network #3: New Express Bus, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) or Streetcar Lines along North-South Corridor Between Existing Rail Lines #4: New East-West Corridor Service (BRT or Limited-Stop Enhanced Bus) #5: Changes to Metra Electric District Rail Service 12

Potential Project 1: Improvements to CTA Bus Network 13 Examples» New crosstown bus route on 83 rd Street» Restore King Drive express bus service or other service improvement on CTA Route 3 Other Ideas» South Lake Shore Drive Bus Priority» Shelters and real time bus arrival information» Restore crosstown bus route on 31 st Street

Example New Bus Route on 83 rd Street Background:» Community stakeholders identified need for an 83 rd Street route Definition:» Typical CTA bus route» From South Shore to Stewart Ave. (Wal-Mart)» Deviation to Red Line Station at 87 th Street» Quarter-mile stop spacing» Service span: 6am to 10pm*» 15 minute headways* 14 *to be adjusted as warranted by demand

Example Enhanced Bus Service on King Drive Background:» X3 Express peak period limited-stop bus service cut in 2010 Definition:» Current Route 3 alignment» Express zone between Garfield & Roosevelt with stops every one-half mile» Supplemental local service to 63 rd Street 15

Potential Project 2: Improvements to CTA Rail Network Example» Rail station enhancements Other Ideas» Track and structure improvements to eliminate slow zones» Green Line extension to Dorchester» New CTA Green Line station at 26 th /27 th 16

Example Rail Station Enhancements Background:» Source: Community comments (Public Advisory Committee and Public) on station conditions» Rationale/Purpose: Improve stations to: Enhance rider experience Potentially improve ridership Support Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Definition:» CTA Rail Stations (Green and Red Line) in study area» Maintenance and repair of current station features (basics) and amenities (extras)» Introduction of additional information and amenities 17

Potential Project 3: North/South BRT and Streetcar Examples» Cottage Grove Streetcar» Cottage Grove BRT Other Ideas» Cottage Grove/Stony Island/Pershing express bus (short term option) 18

Example Cottage Grove Streetcar Background:» Rationale/Purpose Dense residential community without convenient rail access High development potential Better access to top two employment concentrations (Loop, University) Objectives: Customer comfort, Frequency, Seamless travel, Economically viable neighborhoods» Source of Idea Prior proposal National best practice 19

Example Cottage Grove Streetcar Operations» 10 minute peak» 15-20 minute off-peak Infrastructure» Potential for exclusive lanes in a street median to increase operating speed» Potential future extensions southward 20

Example Cottage Grove BRT Background:» Rationale: Improved transit travel time and reliability Definition:» 95 th to Loop» Dedicated lanes on Cottage Grove» Traffic signal priority» Significant stations» Half-mile spacing» Off-board fare collection» Low-floor buses» Service span: 14-16 hrs/day» Headways: 10 min. peak 15 min. off-peak 21

Example Cottage Grove BRT Route options from Pershing to the Loop» Via Lake Shore Drive» Via King Drive / Michigan Avenue 22

Potential Project 4: East/West Bus Rapid Transit/Enhanced Bus Examples» 55 th Bus Rapid Transit to Midway Airport» 79 th Enhanced Bus Corridor to Western Avenue Other Ideas» 35 th limited-stop enhanced bus from Cottage Grove/Lakefront to Illinois Medical District 23

Example Garfield/55 th BRT Background:» X55 Express peak period limitedstop service had been cut» Rationale: Improved transit travel time and reliability Definition: 24» Museum to Midway Airport» Dedicated lanes, Signal priority» Off-board fare collection» Significant stations; Half-mile spacing» Low-floor buses» Service span: 14-16 hrs/day or initially peak only» Headways: 10 min. peak, 15 min. off-peak

Example 79 th Street Enhanced Bus Background:» Local bus has slow travel speeds» Rationale: Improved transit travel time and reliability Definition: 25» South Shore Drive to Western Avenue; Local service to Ford City Mall» Traffic signal priority» Queue jumps at selected intersections» Off-board fare collection» Significant stations, Half-mile spacing» Low-floor buses» Service span: 14-16 hrs/day» Headways: 10 min. peak, 15 min. off-peak

Potential Project 5: Changes to Metra Electric District (MED) Rail Example» Gold Line Other Ideas» Fare integration between CTA and MED» Gray Line» Conversion of the South Chicago Branch to Light Rail 26

Example South Chicago Branch: Gold Line Background» Rationale / Purpose Enhance transit options Frequency Connectivity/Fare Coordination Coverage (35 th Street) Promote development / redevelopment Objectives» Source Customer comfort Seamless travel Economically viable neighborhoods Prior proposals Community stakeholder ideas 27

Example South Chicago Branch: Gold Line Definition» Headway 10 minute peak 15-20 minute off-peak» New Station 35th Street 28

Map of Project Examples 29

Next Steps Analysis» Project Examples Refine project definitions Estimate costs Estimate ridership and benefits Identify key challenges Assess potential for funding Evaluate potential transitoriented development opportunities» Other Ideas Descriptive information, rationale, challenges Review of Findings by: Technical Advisory Committee Public Advisory Committee Draft Recommendations Next Public Meeting: January 30