LCN ACN-PCN

Similar documents
LCN ACN-PCN

7.0 PAVEMENT DATA. 7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

MD-11 AIRPLANE CHARACTERISTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING

This Advisory Circular (AC) provides guidance to Aerodrome operators on the standards method for reporting aerodrome pavement strength.

Chapter 10 Parametric Studies

@AIRBUS A /-600 AIRPLANE CHARACTERISTICS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING

Skukuza Airport Airfield side Flexible Pavements: PCN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

@AIRBUS A318 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

ETSO-C62d Date :

Small Fixed Wing Aircraft Operational Weight and Balance Computations

White Paper. Phone: Fax: Advance Lifts, Inc. All rights reserved.

ATPL Workbook. ATPL Advanced Aerodynamics, Performance and Systems Knowledge (Aeroplane)

PRESENTED FOR THE 2002 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER CONFERENCE 05/02

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET No. A50NM

AC 150/5320-6E and FAARFIELD

UNIT-1 PART:A. 3. (i) What are the requirements of an ideal highway alignment? Discuss briefly.

Australian Government

European Aviation Safety Agency

CHAPTER 10. WEIGHT AND BALANCE

@AIRBUS A321 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

@AIRBUS A319 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

European Aviation Safety Agency

4.1 General Information. 4.2 Turning Radii. 4.3 Clearance Radii. 4.4 Visibility From Cockpit in Static Position. 4.5 Runway and Taxiway Turn Paths

AIRCRAFT BRAKE TESTING

@AIRBUS A320 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A33EU

MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BERHAD WEIGHT AND BALANCE CONTROL AND LOADING MANUAL

787-8 LAN AIRLINES S.A. WEIGHT AND BALANCE CONTROL AND LOADING MANUAL

@AIRBUS A321 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

@AIRBUS A319 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

ERF LOADAIR CARGO WEIGHT AND BALANCE CONTROL AND LOADING MANUAL. Export controlled by EAR99

Runway Grooving and Skid Resistance

SECTION VI WEIGHT AND BALANCE/ EQUIPMENT LIST TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Aviation Safety Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET A18SW. San Antonio, Texas

BRAKE SYSTEM DESIGN AND THEORY

Standard Practice for Conversion of Kinematic Viscosity to Saybolt Universal Viscosity or to Saybolt Furol Viscosity 1

Runway Surface Condition Assessment and Reporting. History Behind FAA Friction Level Classifications. Federal Aviation Administration

Depth of Bury Tables 9B-5. A. General. B. Rigid Pipe Assumptions. Design Manual Chapter 9 - Utilities 9B - Trench Design

SECTION 6 WEIGHT & BALANCE/EQUIPMENT LIST

Pavement Thickness Design Parameter Impacts

European Aviation Safety Agency

Final Report. October 2009 (Revised 9/22/10) Sponsored by the Mack Blackwell Transportation Center

Airglas, Inc. Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Including Installation, Maintenance and Service Instructions MANUAL NO.

Advanced Design of Flexible Aircraft Pavements

FRONTAL OFF SET COLLISION

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Landing on Slippery Runways. Boeing is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright 2006 The Boeing Company. All rights reserved.

European Aviation Safety Agency

Hamilton. Hamilton. Jet A/A1 (See Approved Flight Manual for additional fuels) Engine Limits: Gas Gen RPM % Ng (2006)

Optimizing haul road design a challenge for resource development in Northern Canada

REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A094

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Part 11: Wheelchairs. Test dummies

CDC Table for Calculated Body Mass Index Values for Selected Heights and Weights for Ages 2 to 20 Years

Introduction to the ICAO Engine Emissions Databank

Capital Improvement Program

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Fokker 50 - Limitations GENERAL LIMITATIONS MASS LIMITATIONS. Page 1. Minimum crew. Maximum number of passenger seats.

Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. P.O. Box 992 CH Stans SWITZERLAND

SECTION 6 WEIGHT & BALANCE/EQUIPMENT LIST

AIR TRACTOR, INC. OLNEY, TEXAS

European Aviation Safety Agency

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

Type Acceptance Report

F SAMPLE MANUAL WEIGHT AND BALANCE CONTROL AND LOADING MANUAL

FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING (1) MASS AND BALANCE

Design Aids For Structural Welded Wire Reinforcement (Metric Units for WWR/Rebar Comparison Tables)

EARTH RESISTANCE DET24C

DESIGN AND COMPARISION OF FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENTS

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOTS LICENSE ( FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING)

Functional Design Principles Applied to Amphibious Aircraft

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

European Aviation Safety Agency

European Aviation Safety Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A13CE

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Design Project ENAE 483 Fall 2012

BEECHJET 400A TOWING AND TAXIING

AGSF GUIDANCE SIGNS. FAA Incandescent Airfield Guidance Sign. Features. Compliance with Standards. Uses. Sign Legends

European Aviation Safety Agency

European Aviation Safety Agency

TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

European Aviation Safety Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A16EA

Headlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I)

CHAPTER 4 AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS

Fastener Identification And Torque Data

TCDS NUMBER E00078NE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REVISION: 3 DATE: April 12, 2011

Type Acceptance Report

White Paper: The Physics of Braking Systems

P I L O T A I R C R A F T G U I D E S. Robinson R44 Guide. Graeme Cash

ME scope Application Note 29 FEA Model Updating of an Aluminum Plate

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET EASA.A.060. Ae 270

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Transcription:

7.0 PAVEMENT DATA 7.1 General Information 7.2 Footprint 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement 7.5 Flexible Pavement Requirements 7.6 Flexible Pavement Requirements, LCN Conversion 7.7 Rigid Pavement Requirements 7.8 Rigid Pavement Requirements, LCN Conversion 7.9 ACN-PCN Reporting System: Flexible and Rigid Pavements

This page intentionally left blank

7.0 PAVEMENT DATA 7.1 General Information A brief description of the following pavement charts will be helpful in their use for airport planning. Each airplane configuration is shown with a minimum range of five loads imposed on the main landing gear to aid in interpolation between the discrete values shown. All curves for any single chart represent data based on rated loads and tire pressures considered normal and acceptable by current aircraft tire manufacturer's standards. Section 7.2 presents basic data on the landing gear footprint configuration, maximum design taxi loads, and tire sizes and pressures. Maximum pavement loads for certain critical conditions at the tire-ground interfaces are shown in Section 7.3. Pavement requirements for commercial airplanes are customarily derived from the static analysis of loads imposed on the main landing gear struts. The chart in Section 7.4 is provided in order to determine these loads throughout the stability limits of the airplane at rest on the pavement. These main landing gear loads are used as the point of entry to the pavement design charts, interpolating load values where necessary. The flexible pavement design curves (Section 7.5) are based on procedures set forth in Instruction Report No. S-77-1, "Procedures for Development of CBR Design Curves," dated June 1977, and as modified according to the methods described in FAA Advisory Circular 150/53-6D, "Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation," dated July 7, 1995. Instruction Report No. S-77-1 was prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Soils and Pavements Laboratory, Vicksburg, Mississippi. The line showing 10,000 coverages is used to calculate Aircraft Classification Number (ACN). The following procedure is used to develop the flexible pavement curves: 1. Having established the scale for pavement depth at the bottom and the scale for CBR at the top, an arbitrary line is drawn representing 6,000 annual departures. 2. Values of the aircraft gross weight are then plotted. 3. Additional annual departure lines are drawn based on the load lines of the aircraft gross weights already established. 4. An additional line representing 10,000 coverages (used to calculate the Aircraft Classification Number) is also placed. 7 1

Rigid pavement design curves (Section 7.7) have been prepared with the use of the Westergaard equation in general accordance with the relationships outlined in the 1955 Edition of "Design of Concrete-Airport Pavement" published by the Portland Cement Association, 33 W. Grand Ave., Chicago, Illinois, but modified to the new format described in the 1968 Portland Cement Association publication, "Computer Program for Airport Pavement Design" (Program PDILB) by Robert G. Packard. The following procedure is used to develop the rigid pavement design curves such as that shown in Section 7.7: 1. Having established the scale for pavement thickness to the left and the scale for allowable working stress to the right, an arbitrary load line is drawn representing the main landing gear maximum weight to be shown. 2. All values of the subgrade modulus (k-values) are then plotted. 3. Additional load lines for the incremental values of weight on the main landing gear are then established on the basis of the curve for k = 300, already established. All Load Classification Number (LCN) curves (Sections 7.6 and 7.8) have been plotted from data in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Document 7290-AN/865/2, Aerodrome Manual, Part 2, "Aerodrome Physical Characteristics," 2nd Edition, 1965. On the same charts showing LCN versus equivalent single wheel load, there are load plots for airplane Model MD-90-30 showing equivalent single wheel load versus pavement thickness for flexible pavements and versus radius of relative stiffness for rigid pavements. Procedures and curves provided in the ICAO Aerodrome Manual Part 2, Chapter 4 are used to determine equivalent single wheel loads for use in making LCN conversion of rigid pavement requirements. Note: Pavement requirements are presented for loads, tires and tire pressures presently certified for commercial usage. All curves represent data at a constant specified tire pressure. The ACN-PCN system (Section 7.9) as referenced in ICAO Annex 14, Aerodromes, 3rd Edition, July 1999, provides a standardized international airplane/pavement rating system replacing the various S, T, TT, LCN, AUW, ISWL, etc., rating systems used throughout the world. ACN is the Aircraft Classification Number and PCN is the corresponding Pavement Classification Number. An aircraft having an ACN equal to or less than the PCN can operate without restriction on the pavement. Numerically, the ACN is two times the derived single wheel load expressed in thousands of kilograms, where the derived single wheel load is defined as the load on a single tire inflated to 1.25 MPa (181 psi) that would have the same pavement requirements as the aircraft. Computationally, the ACN-PCN system uses PCA program PDILB for rigid pavements and S-77-1 for flexible pavements to calculate ACN values. The method of pavement evaluation is left up to the airport with the results of its evaluation presented as follows: 7 2

PCN PAVEMENT CLASSIFI- CATION NUMBER CODE PAVEMENT TYPE CODE SUBGRADE CATEGORY CODE TIRE PRESSURE CATEGORY CODE EVALUATION METHOD (s) (BEARING STRENGTH FOR UN- RESTRICTED OPERATIONS) R F RIGID FLEXIBLE A B C D HIGH (k = 150 MN/M 3 ) (OR CBR = 15) MEDIUM (k = 80 MN/M 3 ) (OR CBR = 10) LOW (k = MN/M 3 ) (OR CBR = 6) ULTRA LOW (K = MN/M 3 ) (OR CBR = 3) W X Y Z HIGH (NO LIMIT) MEDIUM (LIMITED TO 1.5 MPa) LOW (LIMITED TO 1.0 MPa) VERY LOW (LIMITED TO 0.5 MPa) T U TECHNICAL USING AIRCRAFT This document has been partially revised to incorporate key information for the MD-90-30ER with a maximum ramp weight of 168,500 lbs (76,430 kgs). Due to the fact that there were only two aircraft delivered in this higher weight configuration when production of the model ceased, only limited charts in this section have been revised for the MD-90-30ER. The modified/new charts are limited to the following: 7.2 Footprint 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement 7.9.3 Aircraft Classification Number - Flexible Pavement (168,500 lbs) 7.9.4 Aircraft Classification Number - Rigid Pavement (168,500 lbs) Contact Airport Technology for any additional data needed for this high weight model at: Attention: Airport Technology Telephone: 425-237-0126 Fax: 425-237-8281 Email: AirportTechnology@Boeing.com Website: www.boeing.com/airports 7 3

MD-90-30 MD-90-30ER MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT PERCENT OF WEIGHT ON MAIN GEAR 157,000 LB (71,214 KG) 168,500 LB (76,430 KG) SEE SECTION 7.4 SEE SECTION 7.4 NOSE TIRE SIZE NOSE TIRE PRESSURE 26 x 6.6 12 PR 2 160 PSI (11.3 KG/CM ) 26 x 6.6 12 PR 2 170 PSI (11.9 KG/CM ) MAIN GEAR TIRE SIZE MAIN GEAR TIRE PRESSURE H 44.5 x 16.5 21 26 PR 2 190 PSI (13.4 KG/CM ) H 44.5 x 16.5 21 26 PR 2 193 PSI (13.6 KG/CM ).6 IN. (52.3 CM) 28.1 IN. (71.4 CM) FT 4.8 IN. (6.22 M) 16 FT 8.2 IN. (5.09 M) 77 FT 2 IN. (23.5 M) 14.0 IN. (35.6 CM) 7.2 FOOTPRINT MODEL MD-90-30/-30ER 7 4

LEGEND: V NG = MAXIMUM VERTICAL NOSEGEAR GROUND LOAD AT MOST FORWARD C.G. V MG = MAXIMUM VERTICAL MAIN GEAR GROUND LOAD AT MOST AFT C.G. H = MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL GROUND LOAD FROM BRAKING NOTE: ALL LOADS CALCULATED USING AIRPLANE MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT V NG H VMG MODEL MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT STATIC AT MOST FORWARD C.G. V NG STATIS + BREAKING 2 10 FT/SEC DECLERATION VMG PER STRUT (2) AFT C.G. MAXIMUM LOAD OCCURRING AT STATIC AFT C.G. AT STEADY BRAKING 2 10 FT/SEC DECELERATION H PER STRUT (2) AT INSTANTANEOUS BRAKING (COEFF. OF FRICTION 0.8) LB LB KG LB KG LB KG LB KG LB KG MD-90-30 157,000 14,710 6,670,230 9,180 75,7 34,360 24,0 11,070 56,050 25,4 MD-90-30ER 168,500 15,328 6,952 21,5 9,618 79,167 35,909 26,168 11,870 63,334 28,728 7.3 MAXIMUM PAVEMENT LOADS MODEL MD-90-30/-30ER 7 5

7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement To obtain the airplane weight on the following pavement charts, an equivalent main landing gear weight must be determined. In the example shown for the MD-90-30 in Section 7.4.1, for a gross weight of 105,000 lb at 96.48% weight on main gear, the equivalent weight on the main landing gear is 101,0 lb. 7 6

NOTE: UNSHADED AREAS REPRESENT OPERATIONAL LIMITS 10 5 0 5 10 15 25 30 35 160 150 1 PERCENT MAC MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT 157,000 LB 160 150 1 70 130 130 60 WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (1,000 LB) 1 110 100 90 1 110 100 90 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT (1,000 LB) 50 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT (1,000 KG) 80 C.G. FOR ACN CALCULATIONS 80 70 96.48 70 30 60 80 85 90 95 100 PERCENT OF WEIGHT ON MAIN GEAR 60 7.4.1 LANDING GEAR LOADING ON PAVEMENT MODEL MD-90-30 7 7

NOTE: UNSHADED AREAS REPRESENT OPERATIONAL LIMITS -10-5 0 5 10 15 25 30 170 PERCENT MAC 170 160 150 MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT 168,500 LB 160 150 75 70 WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (1,000 LB) 1 130 1 1 130 1 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT (1,000 LB) 65 60 55 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT (1,000 KG) 110 C.G. FOR ACN CALCULATIONS 110 50 100 93.96 100 45 90 80 85 90 95 100 90 PERCENT OF WEIGHT ON MAIN GEAR 7.4.2 LANDING GEAR LOADING ON PAVEMENT MODEL MD-90-30ER 7 8

7.5 Flexible Pavement Requirements -- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Method (S-77-1) The following flexible-pavement design chart presents data for 5 incremental main-gear weights at a constant main-gear tire pressure of 0 psi (14.1 kg/cm 2). In the example shown for the MD-90-30, for a CBR of 7.0, a main-gear load of 100,000 lb, and an annual departure level of 6,000, the required pavement thickness is 24.5 inches. The line showing 10,000 coverages is used for ACN calculations (see section 7.9). The FAA design method uses a similar procedure using total airplane weight instead of weight on main landing gear. The equivalent main gear loads for a given airplane weight can be calculated from Section 7.4. 7 9

NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5 21, 26 PR TIRES 2 TIRE PRESSURE CONSTANT AT 0 PSI (14.1 KG/CM ) SUBGRADE STRENGTH (CBR) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 25 30 50 WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (SEE SECTION 7.4) LB (KG) 151,500 (68,7) 1,000 (63,500) 1,000 (54,0) 100,000 (45,0) 80,000 (36,300) MAX POSSIBLE MAIN GEAR LOAD AT MAX DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT AND AFT C.G.4 10,000 COVERAGES (USED FOR ACN CALCULATIONS) ANNUAL DEPARTURES 1,0 3,000 6,000 15,000 25,000 * -YEAR PAVEMENT LIFE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 25 30 50 INCHES 10 15 25 30 50 60 80 100 1 (CENTIMETERS) FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT THICKNESS 7.5.1 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT REQUIREMENTS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS/FAA DESIGN METHOD MODEL MD-90-30 7 10

7.6 Flexible Pavement Requirements, LCN Conversion To determine the airplane weight that can be accommodated on a particular flexible airport pavement, both the LCN of the pavement and the thickness (h) of the pavement must be known. In the example shown for the MD-90-30, the flexible pavement thickness is 30 inches and the LCN is 70. For these conditions, the weight on the main landing gear is 110,000 pounds. Note: If the resulting aircraft LCN is not more than 10 percent above the published pavement LCN, the bearing strength of the pavement can be considered sufficient for unlimited use by the airplane. The figure of 10 percent has been chosen as representing the lowest degree of variation in LCN which is significant. (Reference: ICAO Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2, "Aerodrome Physical Characteristics," Chpt. 4, Para. 4.1.5.7v, 2nd Edition, 1965.) 7 11

EQUIVALENT SINGLE WHEEL LOAD (1,000 KG) NOTE: EQUIVALENT SINGLE WHEEL LOADS ARE DERIVED BY METHODS SHOWN IN ICAO AERODROME MANUAL, PART 2, PARA. 4.1.3. H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 0 PSI 100 90 80 70 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE MAIN GEAR LOAD AT MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT AND AFT C.G. WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (SEE SECTION 7.4) LB (KG) 151,500 1,000 (68,7) (63,500) 60 1,000 (54,0) 50 100,000 (45,0) 80,000 (36,300) 30 10 10 15 INCHES 30 50 60 70 15 30 50 60 70 80 90 100 LOAD CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (LCN) 30 50 60 80 100 1 1 160 (CENTIMETERS) FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT THICKNESS 7.6.1 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT REQUIREMENTS, LCN CONVERSION MODEL MD-90-30 30 10 5 EQUIVALENT SINGLE WHEEL LOAD (1,000 KG) 7 12

7.7 Rigid Pavement Requirements, Portland Cement Association Design Method The following rigid-pavement design chart presents data for 5 incremental main-gear weights at a constant main-gear tire pressure of 0 psi (14.1 kg/cm 2). In the example shown for the MD-90-30, for an allowable working stress of 0 psi, a main-gear load of 127,000 lb, and a subgrade strength k of 150, the required rigid-pavement thickness is 12 inches. 7 13

NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5 21, 26 PR TIRES TIRE PRESSURE CONSTANT AT 0 PSI (14.1 KG/CM 2) (CM) IN. PSI (KG/CM 2) 50 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE MAIN GEAR LOAD AT MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT AND AFT C.G. 900 60 45 18 800 35 30 PAVEMENT THICKNESS 16 14 12 k = 75 k = 150 k = 300 k = 550 WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (SEE SECTION 7.4) LB (KG) 151,500 (68,7) 1,000 (63,500) 1,000 (54,0) 100,000 (45,0) 80,000 (36,300) 700 600 500 ALLOWABLE WORKING STRESS 50 30 25 10 0 8 300 6 0 NOTE: REF: THE VALUES OBTAINED BY USING THE MAX LOAD REFERENCE LINE AND ANY VALUES OF k ARE EXACT. FOR LOADS LESS THAN MAXIMUM, THE CURVES ARE EXACT FOR k = 300, BUT DEVIATE SLIGHTLY FOR OTHER VALUES OF k. DESIGN OF CONCRETE AIRPORT PAVEMENT" AND "COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR AIRPORT PAVEMENT DESIGN -- PROGRAM PDILB," PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION. 7.7.1 RIGID PAVEMENT REQUIREMENTS, PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION DESIGN METHOD MODEL MD-90-30 7 14

7.8 Rigid Pavement Requirements, LCN Conversion To determine the airplane weight that can be accommodated on a particular rigid airport pavement, both the LCN of the pavement and the radius of relative stiffness must be known. In the example shown in section 7.8.2, the rigid pavement radius of relative stiffness is 35 inches and the LCN is 70. For these conditions, the weight on the main landing gear is 115,000 pounds. Note: If the resulting aircraft LCN is not more than 10 percent above the published pavement LCN, the bearing strength of the pavement can be considered sufficient for unlimited use by the airplane. The figure of 10 percent has been chosen as representing the lowest degree of variation in LCN which is significant. (Reference: ICAO Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2, Aerodrome Physical Characteristics, Chpt. 4, Para. 4.1.5.7v, 2nd Edition, 1965.) 7 15

RADIUS OF RELATIVE STIFFNESS ( ) VALUES IN INCHES l l = 4 Ed 3 12(1- µ 2 )k = 24.1652 4 d 3 k WHERE: E = YOUNG S MODULUS = 4 x 10 6 PSI k = SUBGRADE MODULUS, LB/IN. 3 d = RIGID-PAVEMENT THICKNESS, IN. µ = POISSON S RATIO = 0.15 d (IN.) k = 75 k = 100 k = 150 k = 0 k = 250 k = 300 k = 350 k = 0 k = 500 k = 550 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 31.48 33.43 35.34 37.22 29.30 31.11 32.89 34.63 26.47 28.11 29.72 31.29 24.63 26.16 27.65 29.12 23.30 24.74 26.15 27.54 22.26 23.64 24.99 26.32 21.42 22.74 24.04 25.32.72 22.00 23.25 24.49 19.59.80 21.99 23.16 19.13.31 21.47 22.61 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 39.06.88 42.67 44.43 36.35 38.04 39.71 41.35 32.85 34.37 35.88 37.36 30.57 31.99 33.39 34.77 28.91 30.25 31.58 32.89 27.62 28.91 30.17 31.42 26.58 27.81 29.03 30.23 25.70 26.90 28.08 29.24 24.31 25.44 26.55 27.65 23.74 24.84 25.93 27.00 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 46.18 47.90 49.60 51.28 42.97 44.57 46.16 47.72 38.83.28 41.71 43.12 36.14 37.48 38.81.13 34.17 35.45 36.71 37.95 32.65 33.87 35.07 36.26 31.42 32.59 33.75 34.89 30.39 31.52 32.64 33.74 28.74 29.81 30.87 31.91 28.06 29.11 30.14 31.16 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 52.94 54.59 56.22 57.83 49.27 50.80 52.32 53.82 44.52 45.90 47.27 48.63 41.43 42.72 43.99 45.26 39.18. 41.61 42.80 37.44 38.60 39.75.89 36.02 37.14 38.25 39.35 34.84 35.92 36.99 38.06 32.95 33.97 34.99 35.99 32.17 33.17 34.16 35.14 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 59.43 61.02 62.59 64.15 55.31 56.78 58.25 59.70 49.98 51.31 52.63 53.94 46.51 47.75 48.98 50. 43.98 45.16 46.32 47.47 42.02 43.15 44.26 45.36.44 41.51 42.58 43.64 39.11.15 41.19 42.21 36.99 37.97 38.95 39.92 36.12 37.08 38.03 38.98 16.0 16.5 17.0 17.5 65.69 67.23 68.75 70.26 61.13 62.56 63.98 65.38 55.24 56.53 57.81 59.08 51.41 52.61 53.80 54.98 48.62 49.75 50.88 52.00 46.45 47.54 48.61 49.68 44.70 45.74 46.77 47.80 43.23 44.24 45.24 46.23.88 41.84 42.78 43.72 39.92.85 41.78 42.70 18.0 19.0.0 21.0 71.76 74.73 77.66 80.55 66.78 69.54 72.27 74.96 60.34 62.84 65.30 67.74 56.16 58.48 60.77 63.04 53.11 55.31 57.47 59.62 50.74 52.84 54.91 56.96 48.82 50.84 52.84 54.81 47.22 49.17 51.10 53.01 44.66 46.51 48.33 50.13 43.61 45.41 47.19 48.95 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 83.41 86.24 89.04 91.81 77.63 80.26 82.86 85.44 70.14 72.52 74.87 77. 65.28 67.49 69.68 71.84 61.73 63.83 65.90 67.95 58.98 60.98 62.96 64.92 56.75 58.68 60.58 62.46 54.89 56.75 58.59 60.41 51.91 53.67 55.41 57.14 50.69 52.41 54.11 55.79 7.8.1 RADIUS OF RELATIVE STIFFNESS (REFERENCE: PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION) 7 16

EQUIVALENT SINGLE WHEEL LOAD (1,000 KG) NOTE: EQUIVALENT SINGLE WHEEL LOADS ARE DERIVED BY METHODS SHOWN IN ICAO AERODROME MANUAL, PART 2, PARA. 4.1.3. H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 0 PSI 100 90 80 70 60 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE MAIN GEAR LOAD AT MAXIMUM DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT AND AFT C.G. WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (SEE SECTION 7.4) LB (KG) 151,500 1,000 (68,7) (63,500) 30 50 1,000 (54,0) 100,000 (45,0) 30 80,000 (36,300) 10 10 30 INCHES 50 60 70 80 30 50 60 70 80 90 100 5 50 60 80 100 1 150 0 LOAD CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (LCN) (CENTIMETERS) RADIUM OF RELATIVE STIFFNESS ( l ) 7.8.2 RIGID PAVEMENT REQUIREMENTS, LCN CONVERSION MODEL MD-90-30 EQUIVALENT SINGLE WHEEL LOAD (1,000 LB) 7 17

7.8.3 Radius of Relative Stiffness (Other values of E and l ) The chart of Section 7.8.1 presents l -values based on Young's modulus (E) of 4,000,000 psi and Poisson's ratio (µ of 0.15). For convenience in finding l -values based on other values of E and µ, the curves of Section 7.8 are included. For example, to find an l -value based on an E of 3,000,000 psi, the "E" factor of 0.931 is multiplied by the l -value found in the table of Section 7.8.1. The effect of variations of µ on the l -value is treated in a similar manner. 7 18

1.10 1.05 EFFECT OF E ON l -VALUES 1.00 0.95 E FACTOR 0.90 0.85 0.80 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 E, YOUNG S MODULUS (106, PSI) 1.015 1.010 EFFECT OF µ ON l -VALUES µ 1.005 FACTOR 1.000 0.995 0 0 0.05 0. 0.25 µ POISSON'S RATIO NOTE: BOTH CURVES ON THIS PAGE ARE USED TO ADJUST THE l -VALUES OF TABLE 7.8.1 7.8.4 EFFECT OF E AND µ ON l -VALUES 7 19

7.9 ACN-PCN Reporting System: Flexible and Rigid Pavements To determine the ACN of an aircraft on flexible or rigid pavement, both the aircraft gross weight and the subgrade strength category must be known. As an example, referring to Section 7.9.1, for an aircraft gross weight of 130,000 pounds and low subgrade strength, the ACN for flexible pavement is 39. Referring to Section 7.9.3, for the same gross weight and subgrade strength, the ACN for rigid pavement is 43. Note: An aircraft with an ACN equal to or less than the reported PCN can operate on the pavement subject to any limitations on the tire pressure. (Reference: ICAO Annex 14, Aerodromes, 3rd Edition, July 1999.) The following table provides ACN data in tabular format similar to the one used by ICAO in the "Aerodrome Design Manual Part 3, Pavements". ACN FOR RIGID PAVEMENT SUBBRADES -- MN/m 3 ACN FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SUBGRADES -- CBR AIRCRAFT TYPE ALL-UP MASS/ OPERATING MASS EMPTY LB (KG) ON ONE MAIN GEAR LEG (%) TIRE PRESSURE PSI (MPa) HIGH 150 MEDIUM 80 LOW ULTRA LOW HIGH 15 MEDIUM 10 LOW 6 ULTRA LOW 3 MD-90-30 157,000 (71,214) 88,171 (39,994) 48.24 0 (1.4) 49 25 51 26 53 27 55 28 42 21 46 22 50 24 53 28 MD-90-30ER 168,500 (76,430) 89,059 (,396) 46.98 193 (1.33) 51 24 53 25 55 26 57 44 27 48 21 52 24 55 27 7

60 50 30 10 NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES 2 TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 0 PSI (14.1 KG/CM ) SUBGRADE CLASS D - ULTRA LOW C - LOW B - MEDIUM A - HIGH (CBR = 3) (CBR = 6) (CBR = 10) (CBR = 15) NOTES: ACN WAS DETERMINED AS REFERENCED IN ICAO ANNEX 14, "AERODROMES," 3RD EDITION, JULY 1999 TO DETERMINE MAIN-GEAR LOADING, SEE SECTION 7.4 90 100 110 1 130 1 150 160 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT, 1,000 POUNDS 45 50 55 60 65 70 (1,000 KILOGRAMS) 7.9.1 AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER -- FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT (157,000 LBS) MODEL MD-90-30 AIRPLANE CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) 7 21

NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES 2 TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 193 PSI (13.6 KG/CM ) 60 50 SUBGRADE CLASS D - ULTRA LOW C - LOW B - MEDIUM A - HIGH (CBR = 3) (CBR = 6) (CBR = 10) (CBR = 15) 30 NOTES: ACN WAS DETERMINED AS REFERENCED IN ICAO ANNEX 14, "AERODROMES," 3RD EDITION, JULY 1999 TO DETERMINE MAIN-GEAR LOADING, SEE SECTION 7.4 PERCENT WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR: 93.96 10 90 100 110 1 130 1 150 160 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT, 1,000 POUNDS 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 (1,000 KILOGRAMS) 7.9.2 AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER -- FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT (168,500 LBS) MODEL MD-90-30ER 170 AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) 7 22

60 50 30 10 NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES 2 TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 0 PSI (14.1 KG/CM ) SUBGRADE CLASS D - ULTRA LOW C - LOW B - MEDIUM A - HIGH (k = 75) (k = 150) (k = 300) (k = 550) NOTES: ACN WAS DETERMINED AS REFERENCED IN ICAO ANNEX 14, "AERODROMES," 3RD EDITION, JULY 1999 TO DETERMINE MAIN-GEAR LOADING, SEE SECTION 7.4 90 100 110 1 130 1 150 160 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT, 1,000 POUNDS 45 50 55 60 65 70 (1,000 KILOGRAMS) 7.9.3 AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER -- RIGID PAVEMENT (157,000 LBS) MODEL MD-90-30 AIRPLANE CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) 7 23

NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES 2 TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 193 PSI (13.6 KG/CM ) 60 50 SUBGRADE CLASS D - ULTRA LOW C - LOW B - MEDIUM A - HIGH (k = 75) (k = 150) (k = 300) (k = 550) 30 NOTES: ACN WAS DETERMINED AS REFERENCED IN ICAO ANNEX 14, "AERODROMES," 3RD EDITION, JULY 1999 TO DETERMINE MAIN-GEAR LOADING, SEE SECTION 7.4 PERCENT WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR: 93.96 10 90 100 110 1 130 1 150 160 AIRPLANE GROSS WEIGHT, 1,000 POUNDS 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 (1,000 KILOGRAMS) 7.9.4 AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER -- RIGID PAVEMENT (168,500 LBS) MODEL MD-90-30ER 170 AIRPLANE CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) 7-24

7.9.5 Development of ACN Charts The ACN charts for flexible and rigid pavements were developed by methods referenced in ICAO Annex 14, "Aerodromes," 3rd Edition, July 1999. The procedures used to develop these charts are also described below. The following procedure is used to develop the flexible-pavement ACN charts such as that shown in Section 7.9.1: 1. Determine the percentage of weight on the main gear to be used below in Steps 2, 3, and 4, below. The maximum aft center-of-gravity position yields the critical loading on the critical gear (see Section 7.4). This center-of-gravity position is used to determine main gear loads at all gross weights of the model being considered. 2. Establish a flexible-pavement requirements chart using the S-77-1 design method, such as shown on the right side of Section 7.9.6. Use standard subgrade strengths of CBR 3, 6, 10, and 15 percent and 10,000 coverages. This chart provides the same thickness values as those of Section 7.5.1, but is presented here in a different format. 3. Determine reference thickness values from the pavement requirements chart of Step 2 for each standard subgrade strength and gear loading. 4. Enter the reference thickness values into the ACN flexible-pavement conversion chart shown on the left side of Figure 7.9.6 to determine ACN. This chart was developed using the S-77-1 design method with a single tire inflated to 1.25 MPa (181 psi) pressure and 10,000 coverages. The ACN is two times the derived single-wheel load expressed in thousands of kilograms. These values of ACN are then plotted as functions of aircraft gross weight, as shown in Section 7.9.1. The following procedure is used to develop the rigid-pavement ACN charts such as that shown in Section 7.9.2: 1. Determine the percentage of weight on the main gear to be used in Steps 2, 3, and 4, below. The maximum aft center-of-gravity position yields the critical loading on the critical gear (see. Section 7.4). This center-of-gravity position is used to determinemain gear loads at all gross weights of the model being considered. 2. Establish a rigid-pavement requirements chart using the PCA computer program PDILB, such as shown on the right side of Section 7.9.7. Use standard subgrade strengths of k = 75, 150, 300, and 550 lb/in. 3 (nominal values for k =,, 80, and 15 MN/M 3). This chart provides the same thickness values as those of Section 7.7.1. 7 25

3 Determine reference thickness values from the pavement requirements chart of Step 2 for each standard subgrade strength and gear loading at 0 psi working stress (nominal value for 2.75 MPa working stress). 4. Enter the reference thickness values into the ACN rigid-pavement conversion chart shown on the left side of Section 7.9.7 to determine ACN. This chart was developed using the PCA computer program PDILB with a single tire inflated to 1.25 MPa (181 psi) pressure and a working stress of 2.75 MPa (0 psi.) The ACN is two times the derived single-wheel load expressed in thousands of kilograms. These values of ACN were plotted as functions of aircraft gross weight, as already shown in Section 7.9.2. 7 26

ALLOWABLE WORKING STRESS (PSI) NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES 2 TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 0 PSI (14.1 KG/CM ) AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) 15 30 50 0 0 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE MAIN GEAR LOAD AT MAX DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT AND AFT C.G. WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (SEE SECTION 7.4) 10 10 LB (KG) 151,500 (68,7) 1,000 (63,500) 1,000 (54,0) 100,000 (45,0) 80,000 (36,300) CBR 15 REFERENCE THICKNESS, INCHES CBR 10 CBR 6 30 CBR 3 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT REQUIREMENTS CHART 10,000 COVERAGES S-77-1 DESIGN METHOD ACN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CONVERSION CHART 50 50 3 6 10 15 SUBGRADE STRENGTH, CBR 7.9.6 DEVELOPMENT OF AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) - FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT MODEL MD-90-30 7 27

ALLOWABLE WORKING STRESS (PSI) AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) NOTES: H44.5 x 16.5-21, 26 PR TIRES TIRE PRESSURE CONSTRAINT AT 0 PSI (14.1 KG/CM 2 ) 80 60 0 900 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE MAIN GEAR LOAD AT MAX DESIGN TAXI WEIGHT AND AFT C.G. 800 18 18 WEIGHT ON MAIN LANDING GEAR (SEE SECTION 7.4) 700 LB (KG) 151,500 (68,7) 1,000 (63,500) 1,000 (54,0) 100,000 (45,0) 80,000 (36,300) 16 16 k = 75 k = 150 k = 300 k = 550 600 14 14 500 12 12 k = 75 k = 150 k = 300 k = 550 0 10 10 REFERENCE THICKNESS, INCHES 300 8 8 RIGID PAVEMENT REQUIREMENTS CHART PCA PROGRAM PDLB ACN RIGID PAVEMENT CONVERSION CHART 0 6 6 7.9.7 DEVELOPMENT OF AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBER (ACN) - RIGID PAVEMENT MODEL MD-90-30 7 28