Modelling the impact of automated driving - Private autonomous vehicle scenarios for Germany and the US

Similar documents
Estimation of value of time for autonomous driving using revealed and stated preferences method

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

EVREST: Electric Vehicle with Range Extender as a Sustainable Technology.

P a t r i c k P l ö t z a n d Ti l l G n a n n, F r a u n h o f e r I S I, K a r l s r u h e. E V S 2 7 : , B a r c e l o n a.

DRP DER Growth Scenarios Workshop. DER Forecasts for Distribution Planning- Electric Vehicles. May 3, 2017

Carpooling and Carsharing in Switzerland: Stated Choice Experiments

ESTIMATION OF THE VALUE OF TIME FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING USING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS

microscopic activity based travel demand modelling in large scale simulations The application of

Rico Wittwer New mobility trends in urban travel behavior? Evidence of the 10th wave from the cross-sectional study Mobility in Cities SrV in Germany

State of the art in autonomous driving. German Aerospace Center DLR Institute of transportation systems

The role of rail in a transport system to limit the impact of global warming

Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit Values of Time and Operating Costs

Market integration of electric mobility: Analyzing economic efficiency and costs for consumers

IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS AND USER ACCEPTANCE OF SHARED AUTONOMOUS (ELECTRIC) VEHICLE FLEETS IN GERMAN CITIES. EE-54 I Lisa Kissmer I

Modelling disruptions in mobility a BP perspective BP p.l.c.

Integration of electric vehicles (EV) into the future energy supply system

The DLR Project Next Generation Train (NGT)

Technological Innovation, Environmentally Sustainable Transport, Travel Demand, Scenario Analysis, CO 2

Preferred citation style

Preferred citation style

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Assessment of Scenarios FFE (Madrid, Spain) 21 September 2017

Long-term trends in road safety in Finland - evaluation of scenarios towards 2020 and beyond

MULTIMODAL ACCESS TO TWIN. CITIES TRANSITWAYS Jacqueline Nowak. University of Minnesota FIRST UP CONSULTANTS. Source

TILL ACKERMANN. Head of Economy & Business (Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen)

Optimization of Electric Car Sharing Stations: Profit Maximization with Partial Demand Satisfaction

ESTIMATING ELASTICITIES OF HOUSEHOLD DEMAND FOR FUELS FROM CHOICE ELASTICITIES BASED ON STATED PREFERENCE

Press release (blocking period: , 6:00) Industry Study. E-Mobility 2019: An International Comparison of Important Automotive Markets.

The Electrification Futures Study: Transportation Electrification

Commercial Vehicles in a Change E-Mobility in Urban Environment. G. von Esebeck Braunschweig

Analysis of different sector coupling paths for CO 2 mitigation in the German Transport sector

Analysis of different sector coupling paths for CO 2 mitigation in the German energy system under consideration of. energy supply infrastructures

German mileage study 2014

Hot-spot Scenarios of Electric Vehicles on LV Grid including Statistics and Effect of Decentralized Battery Storage

An Innovative Approach

Bevorzugter Zitierstil für diesen Vortrag

The PLANET Model for Forecasting Transport Demand

Fabian Kley David Dallinger Martin Wietschel

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

AIR QUALITY DETERIORATION IN TEHRAN DUE TO MOTORCYCLES

Mobility2030. Mukarram Bhaiji Director, Global Strategy Group KPMG in the UK. 26 September Mobility [ ] #Mobility2030

Modelling Shared Mobility in City Planning How Transport Planning Software Needs to Change ptvgroup.com

CHANGE IN DRIVERS PARKING PREFERENCE AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF STRENGTHENED PARKING REGULATIONS

APPLICATION OF MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT MODELS FOR COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: TRAM REGION BERN STUDY

Fueling Savings: Higher Fuel Economy Standards Result In Big Savings for Consumers

DETERMINATION OF FUEL ECONOMY BASELINE IN GHANA, FINDINGS AND TRENDS

LEAFS Assessment of Electricity Storage System and Flexible Loads in the Distribution Grid

Intermediate results

The IAM in Pre-Selection of global automotive trends impacting the independent multi-brand aftermarket

Customer Expectations and Technical Solutions for Third Generation Electric Vehicles

Preferred citation style

Preferred citation style for this presentation

Presentation of the European Electricity Grid Initiative

Requirements for AMD Modeling A Behavioral Perspective

Early adopters of EVs in Germany unveiled

Thema der Arbeit. Discussion of IT-infrastructure for electric mobility. Bachelorarbeit. vorgelegt von. Patrick-Oliver Groß

Use of odometer readings in defining road traffic volumes and emissions

EnBW LIS Project» Largest public charging infrastructure in Germany: Experiences and challenges in Stuttgart and Stuttgart Area

Turning municipalities into focal points for electric mobility the 6SEK-model

IMAGE PROCESSING ANALYSIS OF MOTORCYCLE ORIENTED MIXED TRAFFIC FLOW IN VIETNAM

French - IFSTTAR activities

Second Generation of Pollutant Emission Models for SUMO

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts. ELToD Applications. SW 10 th Street. ELToD Future Enhancements

Well-to-Wheel Analysis of Electrified Drivetrains under Realistic Boundary Conditions and User Behaviour

Activity-Travel Behavior Impacts of Driverless Cars

Holistic Energy Analysis of Various Drivetrain Topologies Close to Reality

SOCIO-ECONOMIC and LAND USE DATA

Energy Saving Potential Study on Thailand s Road Sector:

Powertrain Technologies and Energy Carriers for Future Transport - a sectoral portfolio approach

Geneva, 67th SC.2 Session October 2013 High Speed Trains Master Plan

Electricity for Road-transport, Flexible Power Systems and Wind Power

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of contents. Page ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF TABLES TABLE OF FIGURES

Comparative Assessment of the Passive Safety of Passenger Cars

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

Support for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles

New Zealand Transport Outlook. VKT/Vehicle Numbers Model. November 2017

Head of Division for Road Traffic Technology; Road Infrastructure Safety; Routine Road Maintenance Management

Extended requirements on turbogenerators

Market observation for European inland navigation Report on the state of the economy 2 - October 2010 (Source : CCNR Secretariat 5 th October 2010)

Method for the estimation of the deformation frequency of passenger cars with the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS)

Autonomous taxicabs in Berlin a spatiotemporal analysis of service performance. Joschka Bischoff, M.Sc. Dr.-Ing. Michal Maciejewski

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

Applying Innovations in Advanced Driver- Assistance Systems to Material Handling

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Energy efficiency policies and measures in transport in the EU 27, Norway and Croatia

Traffic Emission modelling

The impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban mobility

Application of EMME3 and Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Estimation of Zonal Time Varying Population Density Distribution in

Research Collection. Which AV revolution? Presentation. ETH Library. Author(s): Axhausen, Kay W. Publication Date:

Introduction of car sharing into existing car fleets in microscopic travel demand modelling

Portfolio Assessment of Sustainability Interventions for Mobility using an Energetic Model of the Swiss Transportation Sector

Traffic Effects of Driver Assistance Systems The Approach within INVENT

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation

Effects of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Electrification on Infrastructure: The Case of Switzerland

PEVs, Charging Corridors, and DOE Analysis. Jacob Ward, Program Manager, Analysis U.S. Department of Energy

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Transitioning to zero-emission heavy-duty freight vehicles

CITY OF EDMONTON COMMERCIAL VEHICLE MODEL UPDATE USING A ROADSIDE TRUCK SURVEY

Transcription:

DLR.de Chart 1 Modelling the impact of automated driving - Private autonomous vehicle s for Germany and the US Lars Kröger, Tobias Kuhnimhof, Stefan Trommer European Transport Conference, 5 th October 2016

DLR.de Chart 2 Outline Introduction Model scheme Vehicle Technology Diffusion Model Travel Demand Model Results Conclusion and Outlook

DLR.de Chart 3 Introduction Motivation: Market entry of highly and fully automated vehicles (AVs) within next years AVs in private vehicle fleet and new mobility concepts (shared AVs) Impact of autonomous driving on travel demand (VoTTS, new user groups) Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 No automation Driver assistance Partial automation Conditional automation High automation Full automation Figure 1: Levels of automation (SAE n. d.)

DLR.de Chart 4 Introduction Topic of this study: Introduction of Level 4 and Level 5 vehicles into the private vehicle fleet, Impact on travel demand, comparison of two s in Germany and the US Basis for a subsequent study of new mobility concepts with shared AVs Diffusion of autonomous vehicles Private vehicle fleet Mode choice Distance choice New user groups Shared vehicle fleet New mode option Mode choice Distance choice New user groups

DLR.de Chart 5 Methodology: Overview AV diffusion rates for car segments Impact on travel demand Figure 2: Overview of model scheme

DLR.de Chart 6 Methodology: Vehicle Technology Diffusion Model Estimation of number of newly registered AVs per year Differentiated by car segments (specific for the national car market: Germany: small/compact/medium/large, US: small/pick-up/medium/large) s-shaped market-take-up Differentiation of initial diffusion rates, years of introduction and growth rates Number of newly registered AVs P t in year t : With: P a b t P t = P a bt maximal number of newly registered AVs (with the assumption of a maximum 95% rate of AVs); quotient of the initial rate of newly registered AVs in the year of introduction; factor of growth; number of years since introduction.

DLR.de Chart 7 Methodology: Aspatial Travel Demand Model Macroscopic and highly aggregated travel demand model (no traffic-analysis-zones) Input: NHTS (US) and MiD (Germany) data (household travel surveys) (household, person, trip, vehicle data sets) Socio-demographic forecasts, Studies of valuation-of-travel-time-savings Trip Generation Reweighting of data Trip distribution Distance Choice Mode Choice Multinomial logit-based model No traffic assignment No road infrastructure

DLR.de Chart 8 Methodology: Overview AV diffusion rates for car segments Impact on travel demand Trip tables (summarized weights) Mode/distance probabilities Figure 2: Overview of model scheme

DLR.de Chart 9 Methodology: Scenarios trend extreme Market introduction of AVs (differentiated by car segments) - Level 4 2025-2030 2022-2025 - Level 5 2030-2034 2025-2028 reduction of value-of-travel-time-savings reduction of 25% from the 11 th minute of driving on reduction of access and egress times to and from AVs reduction of access and egress time from 5 minutes (GER) resp. 4 minutes (U.S.) to 3 minutes car availability of mobility-impaired-people prioritized distribution of AVs to match the car-availability-ratio of non-mobility-impaired people car availabilty of other household members all household members can use a household-owned AV car availability of teenagers Table 1: Overview of assumptions minors from 14 years on can use a household-owned AV minors from 10 years on can use a household-owned AV Two s for US and Gemany Differentiated by AV diffusion rates and assumptions of user groups

DLR.de Chart 10 Results: Fleet size share of AVs - Trend Scenario 80% 70% share of AVs - Extreme Scenario new registrations Germany 60% 50% new registrations US 40% 30% fleet Germany 20% 10% 0% fleet US Figure 3: Share of AVs in the fleet and on newly registered vehicles (share as sum of Level 4 and Level 5 vehicles of all car segments) (own calculation) Higher AV share in the extreme and Higher AV share in Germany than in the US

DLR.de Chart 11 Results: Impact on travel demand US Germany Increase in vehicle mileage - change to reference reference trend extreme reference trend extreme +3.4% +8.6% +2.4% +8.6% Modal share car driver (based on number of trips) 65.6% 66.9% 69.4% 45.1% 46.1% 48.8% Change compared - Absolute +1.3% +3.8% +0.9% +3.7% to reference - Relative +2.0% +5.7% +2.1% +8.2% Modal share public transport (based on number of trips) 2.6% 2.4% 2.2% 8.6% 8.3% 7.7% Change compared - Absolute -0.2% -0.4% -0.2% -0.9% to reference - Relative -6.3% -17.6% -2.8% -10.6% Table 2: Overview of the impacts of private AVs on vehicle mileage and modal share Moderate increase in vehicle mileage due to new user groups, modal shifts and distance choice

DLR.de Chart 12 Results: Impact on travel demand 0 km <2 km Germany - relative increase of number of trips per distance band 2 km <4 km 4 km <8 km 8 km <16 km 16 km <32 km 32 km <64 km 64km 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% 0 km <2 km US - relative increase of number of trips per distance band 2 km <4 km 4 km <8 km 8 km <16 km 16 km <32 km 32 km <64 km 64km car driver trend public transport trend car driver extreme public transport extreme Figure 4: Increase of number of car driver and public transport trips differentiated for distance bands Higher increase of trips as car driver for very short and long distance trips High rate of decreasing public transport trips for very short and long distance trips Stronger effect to the distance travelled in the extreme

DLR.de Chart 13 Results: Sensitivity analysis trend US extreme Change compared to reference trend Germany extreme Change compared to reference Differentiation of the value-of-travel-time-savings VoTTS -0% +2.0% +2.6% +1.4% +4.9% VoTTS -25% (original value) +3.4% +8.6% +2.4% +8.6% VoTTS -50% +5.1% +15.7% +3.5% +12.7% Differentiation of the road traffic travel speed velocity +0% (original value) +3.4% +8.6% +2.4% +8.6% velocity +2% +4.2% +9.3% +3.3% +9.5% velocity +5% +5.4% +10.4% +4.6% +10.7% velocity +10% +7.2% +10.8% +6.6% +12.5% Table 3: Sensitivity analysis for the value-of-travel-time-savings (VoTTS) and for the differentiation of system velocity Uncertainty of decrease of VoTTS and capacity restraint effects Higher dependence on change of VoTTS in US than in Germany Higher dependence on change of system velocity in Germany than in US

DLR.de Chart 14 Conclusion and Outlook Aggregated models for vehicle technology diffusion and travel demand Combining of different models Introduction of AVs into the private vehicle fleet leads to a moderate impact on travel demand New user groups Mode shift Distance choice Next step: Modelling the introduction of new autonomous mobility concepts (autonomous car sharing & autonomous pooling) Estimation of fleet size, properties of supply and spatial differences Estimation of impact on travel behaviour, in particular mode choice

DLR.de Chart 15 References Axhausen, K. W. / I. Ehreke / A. Glemser / S. Hess / Ch. Jödden / K. Nagel / A. Sauer / C. Weis (2014): Ermittlung von Bewertungsansätzen für Reisezeiten und Zuverlässigkeit auf der Basis eines Modells für modale Verlagerungen im nicht-gewerblichen und gewerblichen Personenverkehr für die Bundesverkehrswegeplanung. Entwurf Schlussbericht. FE-Projekt-Nr. 96.996/2011. URL (last access September 04, 2016): https://www.bmvi.de/shareddocs/de/anlage/verkehrundmobilitaet/bvwp/bvwp-2015-zeitkostenpv.pdf? blob=publicationfile. BMVI (Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur) (n. d.): MiD 2008 Mobilität in Deutschland. Mikrodaten (Public Use File). Procurement from www.clearingstelle-verkehr.de. SAE SAE International (n. d.): Automated driving. Levels of driving automation are defined in new SAE International Standard J3016 URL (last access September 04, 2016): http://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/ automated_driving.pdf. USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation (2015): The Value of Travel Time Savings: Departmental Guidance for Conducting Economic Evaluations Revision 2 (2015 Update). USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation (n. d.): NHTS 2009 - National Household Travel Survey 2009. Downloads. URL (last access September 04, 2016): http://nhts.ornl.gov/download.shtml#2009.