Memorandum. To: The Arlington County Board Date: June 29, 2018 From: Subject:

Similar documents
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 13, 2014

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TAXICAB OPERATIONS HERALD HENSLEY DIRECTOR OF PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION

Taxis and Accessible Services Division Medallion Reform Background May 1, 2018

M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S H I N G T O N A I R P O R T S A U T H O R I T Y

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S H I N G T O N A I R P O R T S A U T H O R I T Y

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

1160 Halston Avenue, Kamloops BC V2B 7L3 SANDHU, Jagwinder Singh

Martha s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority

Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

FasTracks News. RTD s Eagle P3 Transit Project Nears Halfway Mark to Opening Day EP3 will add three commuter rail lines to metro area in 2016

Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation First and Last Mile Connections TNC Partnership Study

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

7000 Series Railcar Program Overview

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

Contract Award for Rideshare Services to Supplement GoLink Service

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

2018 American Zero Emission Bus Conference INNOVATIVE CLEAN TRANSIT PROPOSED REGULATION

SFMTA PARATRANSIT TAXI PROGRAM San Francisco, California

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

At-A-Glance MEDIA INFORMATION GUIDE

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 16, 2016

Transit Access to the National Harbor

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

VEHICLE FLEET MANAGEMENT AT THE IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVl RONMENTAL LABORATORY

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility

Energy Technical Memorandum

Paratransit Overview O & O Presentation January 11, 2018

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

Executive Summary October 2013

Taxi Certificate Update. April 19, 2016

SUMMARY MINUTES BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2017

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

2019 New Transit Service Plan

ACTION: ESTABLISH LIFE-OF-PROJECT BUDGET FOR UP TO 100 NEW COMPO BUSES

Performance and Cost Data. residential refuse collection

UC Santa Cruz TAPS 3-Year Fee & Fare Proposal, through

Regulations vs. Impeding Innovation

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 24, 2018

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Is The Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project the answer?

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

MAX VIP Rider s Guide

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Cab Availability and Ridership in New York City,

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Regulation of Vehicles for Hire City Code Chapter 34, Article VI

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Implementing E-Hail for the SF Paratransit Program. TRB Demand Response Conference September 27, 2016 Breckenridge, Colorado

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT EXTENSION OF EXISTING DIAL-A-RIDE PILOT PROJECT AND STOCK TRANSPORTATION SCHOOL BUS CONTRACTS

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

High Quality Service through Continuous Improvement st Quarter Performance Report

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

SUBJECT: CONTRACT C080S, HOIST REPLACEMENT AT BUS MAINTENANCE DIVISIONS 3, 5, 9, 10, AND 18, PETERSON HYDRAULICS AND ROTARY LIFT, A JOINT VENTURE

Long Bridge Park. Parking Analysis and Transportation Management Plan. Long Range Planning Committee of the Planning Commission Meeting

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

JOINT FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION. ART and APS Bus Parking Informational Session July 27, :30 pm

Regional Priority Ranking Recommendations for WSDOT Consolidated Grant Program

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Georgetown Transit ADA Plan

Public Comment No public comments submitted, no speakers from the public.

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Rider Transit ADA Paratransit How to Ride Guide

SouthWest Transit s Microtransit Service 2018 APTA State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Wednesday, August 15 th

2012/2013 Convenience and Necessity

LEFT BEHIND. New York's For-Hire Vehicle Industry Continues to Exclude People With Disabilities. New York Lawyers For The Public Interest

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Transcription:

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 302, Arlington, VA 22201 TEL 703.228.3120 FAX 703.228.3218 TTY 703.228.4611 www.arlingtonva.us Memorandum To: The Arlington County Board Date: June 29, 2018 From: Subject: Mark Schwartz, County Manager 2018 Taxicab Certificate Determination Report County Manager s Recommendation I recommend that no additional taxicabs including wheelchair-accessible vehicles be authorized this year. Based on staff s quantitative evaluation there are sufficient bases to justify maintaining the existing number of taxicabs (640 vehicles and 39 wheelchair vehicles) authorized to operate in the County. This report provides a summary of the data that support this recommendation. Certificate Determination Process According to Section 25.1-4 of the Taxicab Ordinance (Chapter 25.1 of the County Code) the number of Taxicab Certificates is to be determined by the County Board biennially in evennumbered years. The determination process for the current year begins with this recommendation. This report states the number of taxicabs proposed to be authorized, if any, the rationale for such number and the general methodology used in arriving at a recommendation. A separate certificate-allocation process for deciding whether and to whom certificates (including specific numbers of taxicabs) are granted will begin after September 1, 2018, if applications are received. New applicants and existing certificate holders have the opportunity to present justification for the request of additional certificates during the certificate-allocation process as outlined below: Certificate-Allocation Process July 1 September 1, 2018: Applications may be submitted by current taxicab certificate holders requesting additional taxicabs as well by persons who do not at this time hold a certificate. If an applicant applies for a certificate, the issuance of which would authorize an increase in the number of taxicabs for such applicant or certificate-holder, and which increase would exceed the number of taxicabs determined by the County Manager, then the application must include relevant facts indicating the reasons that the applicant contends that the market change, industry performance, certificate-holder performance, competition, innovation and other specified factors are other than those determined by the County Manager. Prior to September 15 th : At the Transportation Commission meeting scheduled on September 4, 2018 all applications for new taxicabs will be presented to the current certificate holders and other taxi industry stakeholders.

Memorandum Page 2 of 9 Prior to October 15 th : The County Manager will provide a recommendation to the County Board regarding the number of additional taxicabs, if any, (to be authorized by Certificates) allocated to each applicant, including the number of wheelchair-accessible taxicabs. Prior to November 15: The Transportation Commission will provide allocation recommendations to the County Board. Prior to December 31: The County Board will hold a public hearing and take action on the applications before December 31, 2018. Certificate Determination According to Section 25.1-4 of the Taxicab Ordinance, in making his determination regarding the number of taxicabs, the County Manager shall consider for the immediately preceding two (2) years the following factors: (1) the percentage change in residents, taxicab and paratransit trips, and indicators of business activity, tourism, and public transportation use (jointly Market ) within Arlington County; (2) Taxicab industry and Certificate-holder performance indicators; (3) Competition, including consideration of the number of Taxicabs authorized to be operated by any Certificate-holder in relation to the total number of Taxicabs authorized to be operated under all Certificates; and (4) other factors having, in the reasonable opinion of the County Manager, specific relevance to the provision of taxicab service to the public. In order to provide this recommendation a combination of indicators were utilized by staff to assess whether there is a need for an alteration to the current number of taxicabs (679). Staff assembled and evaluated current data to provide an initial recommendation regarding the number of taxicabs. Staff considered it appropriate to begin at year 2016 since that was the last time certificates were awarded. Latest available data was obtained from different sources with varying reporting schedules and timeframes such as calendar and fiscal years. Staff compared current results to results recorded in the past as a factor in making our decisions. The historical data considered include the percentage change in the population of Arlington County; change in at-place employment; change in county hotel room occupancy levels; percentage change in airport taxi pick up trips; and change in overall transit passenger trips. These factors were evaluated to determine the demand for taxicabs in Arlington County and they are grouped into sections as follows: (1) Current Certificate Distribution, (2) Population Indicators, (3) Business Activity, (4) Transportation Indicators, (5) Tourism Indicators and (6) Taxicab Competition. (1) Current Certificate Number and Distribution There are currently a total of 679 taxicabs in Arlington County, which are operated by six (6) certificate holders. The current taxicab fleet includes 39 wheelchair-accessible taxicabs (6 of the entire fleet). The five companies that provide dispatch service total 607 taxicabs (90 of the entire fleet). The total number of taxicabs has changed from 2017 to 2018 from 847 to 679 vehicles. Two companies have ceased operations this year: All Access and envirocab companies. Two additional companies reduced the number of vehicles available to operate: Red Top reduced the number of vehicles from 355 to 300 and Arlington Yellow from 100 to 87. Table 1 provides the current and past distribution of taxicab certificates by company.

Memorandum Page 3 of 9 Table 1: Number of Taxicabs by Company (2017-2018) 2017 2018 Total Vehicles Wheelchair Total Vehicles Wheelchair All Access 50 50 - - Friendly* 39 39 Hess 35 35 Crown 37 37 Red Top* 355 28 300 20 Arlington Yellow* 100 87 Blue Top* 181 19 181 19 envirocab 50 - Total 847 97 679 39 *Taxicab companies that provide dispatch service (2) Population Indicators The growth or decline of Arlington County s population is one indicator of an increase or decrease in the supply of potential taxicab passengers. Table 2 shows that the population of Arlington County grew from 220,400 to 225,200 between the years 2016 and 2018, which is an increase of 4,800 residents (+2.2). Table 2: Arlington County Population (2016-2018) 2016 2017 2018 Difference Population 220,400 222,800 225,200 4,800 2.2 Source: Arlington County, CPHD, Planning Division, Urban Design and Research Section. As of January 1 of each year. (3) Business Activity Business activity is another indicator that was used to evaluate the state of the taxicab industry. At-place employment (the number of jobs in Arlington County) is a business activity indicator that provides a measure as to whether there was a change in the number of jobs within Arlington County. Thus, it provides a gauge for commuters entering Arlington County for workrelated purposes. Table 3 shows an increase in at-place employment from 211,000 to 224,200 between the years 2016 and 2018, which amounts to an increase of 13,200 jobs (6.3) inside Arlington County. Taxicabs also provide a guaranteed ride home to commuters who use alternative modes of transportation. For example, a taxi provides an option if a bus rider must return home in an emergency or a car pooler must stay at work later than expected. This addresses a common objective to the use of alternative modes by supplementing transit with an auxiliary transportation service. The factor used to measure business activity within the County is at-place employment.

Memorandum Page 4 of 9 Table 3: Arlington County At-Place Employment (2016-2018) 2016 2017 2018 Difference At-Place Employment 211,000 222,300 224,200 13,200 6.3 Source: Arlington County, CPHD, Planning Division, Urban Design and Research Section. As of January 1 of each year. According to the taxi model developed by Bruce Schaller (a noted expert on taxi systems in the United States), population and employment are not the only significant factors in determining demand. Additional factors are: number of visitors, subway commuters, hotel occupancy, senior and disabled transport programs, airport taxi trips and the number of weather related days. (4) Transportation Indicators Transportation indicators, including dispatch taxicab trips and transit ridership, provide evidence as to whether there is sufficient demand for an increase to the current number of taxicabs in Arlington County. Taxicab Trips Taxicab dispatch trips capture the amount of call-in service provided by dispatch taxicab certificate holders. Currently, dispatch trips are the most labor- and capital-intensive type of trip, requiring substantial call-center operations. Table 4 provides a comparison between the number of dispatch trips between 2015 and 2017. Table 4: Dispatch Taxi Trip Comparison (2015-2017) 2015 2016 2017 Difference Blue Top 337,260 249,174 199,425-137,835-41 Friendly Cab 80 73 96 16 20 Red Top 1,340,992 1,091,379 987,698-353,294-26 Arlington Yellow 21,630 0 0-21,630-100 Total 1,699,962 1,340,626 1,187,219-512,743-30 Source: Arlington County Dispatch Taxicab Certificate Holders There was a decrease in the total number of dispatch trips by 512,743 (-30) during that time period. Transit Usage Alternative methods of transportation are important to connect multimodal linked trips. Taxis support the use of alternative modes, such as ridesharing and transit use, by giving people who use those modes a fallback option in emergencies or during off-peak transit service hours. This also enables people to reduce their car use and ownership.

Memorandum Page 5 of 9 When taxis are coordinated with transit modes they can contribute to relatively large reductions in vehicle travel. Transit usage is a variable that provides an assessment of the number of bus, rail, and paratransit passengers within Arlington County. Table 5 indicates a decrease in overall transit ridership between 2015 to 2017 in Arlington County. Table 5: Annual Transit Ridership in Arlington County (FY2015-2017) FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 Difference VRE 829,137 821,016 868,097 38,960 4.70 Metro Rail 56,191,205 51,136,200 47,376,700-8,814,505-15.69 Metro Bus 14,274,548 13,431,125 12,125,361-2,149,187-15.06 ART 2,823,346 3,111,575 3,403,439 580,093 20.55 STAR 85,429 86,417 86,455 1,026 1.20 MetroAccess 18,634 17,076 18,630-4 -0.02 Total 74,222,299 68,603,409 63,878,682-10,343,617-13.94 Sources: Arlington County Division of Transportation; Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority; and Northern Virginia Regional Transportation Authority Overall there has been a decrease of over 10.3 million trips for transit modes within Arlington (- 13.9) between 2015 and 2017. Some of the reduction can be attributed to service changes related to Metrorail s SafeTrack rail improvement program and reduction of federal spending. ART has increased during this period due to new routes implemented and route schedule adjustments to improve on-time performance. (5) Tourism Indicators Tourism indicators, including airport taxi trips and hotel occupancy, provide additional evidence as to whether there is sufficient demand for an alteration to the current number of taxicabs in Arlington County. Airport Volumes Airport passenger volumes provide a measure for air travelers using taxicabs to provide an intermodal ground connection for flights. Taxicab airport pickups capture whether there is a change in the demand for taxicab service originating at the IAD (Dulles), DCA (Reagan National), and BWI (Baltimore/Washington International) airports. Table 6 shows an increase in airport passengers at DCA, IAD, and BWI of 516,000 passengers more (11.3) between the years 2016 and 2018.

Memorandum Page 6 of 9 Table 6: Airport Passengers (2016-2018) 2016 2017 2018 Difference DCA (Reagan National) 1,556,000 1,782,000 1,621,000 65,000 4.18 IAD (Dulles) 1,407,000 1,587,000 1,586,000 179,000 12.72 BWI 1,619,000 1,821,000 1,891,000 272,000 16.80 Total 4,582,000 5,190,000 5,098,000 516,000 11.26 Source: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and BWI Airport. As of January 1 of each year. Airport passenger arrival taxi trips include all surrounding jurisdiction taxicabs, thus providing a strong indication for potential taxicab use by arriving passengers. This does not include pickups of passengers who make their own arrangements to be picked up at the airport. That volume is captured within the total dispatch trips in Table 3. Trips from IAD are exclusively provided by the Washington Flyer, although trips to the airport can be provided by any cab company. DCA is served by a combination of taxi providers from across the region, including companies based in Arlington County. Table 7 shows a decrease of 394,693 (-12.84) passenger arrival taxi trips at IAD and DCA airports combined between the years 2015 and 2017. Table 7: Virginia Airport Passenger Arrival Taxi Trips (2015-2017) 2015 2016 2017 Difference DCA (Reagan National) 2,202,519 2,144,659 1,919,125-283,394-12.87 IAD (Dulles) 871,953 813,838 760,654-111,299-12.76 Total 3,074,472 2,958,497 2,679,779-394,693-12.84 Source: Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority. These are dispatch by airport officials. Hotel Occupancy A review of hotel occupancy indicates whether there was a change in the number of travelers staying within Arlington County. There are a total of forty-four (44) hotels providing 11,193 rooms located within Arlington County at the beginning of 2018. The fluctuation in visitors has an impact on taxicab trips generated from these locations. The vehicle trip generation of a hotel is dependent on various factors. Size, location, and type of hotel all contribute to trip generation. Table 8 shows an increase in the number of rooms available between 2015 and 2017. Also, during this period, approximately 236 more rooms were filled per day, which equates to 86,139 more rooms occupied over the course of the year. Table 8: Hotel Occupancy (2015-2017) 2015 2016 2017 Difference Rate of Occupancy 76.90 77.20 76.70-0.20-0.3 Number of Rooms 10,857 11,025 11,193 336 3.1 Rooms Occupied Daily 8,349 8,511 8,585 236 2.8 Rooms Occupied Annually 3,047,397 3,106,625 3,133,536 86,139 2.8 Sources: Arlington Economic Development

Memorandum Page 7 of 9 (6) Taxicab Competition As background information, competition among certificate holders is a factor within the Arlington County Taxicab Ordinance. Transportation, Inc. t/a Red Top Cab and Arlington Yellow Cab Co, Inc. have common ownership and management. Red Top Cab started in 1964 and has grown to 300 vehicles while operating as a full-service provider, including dispatched and wheelchairaccessible service in addition to traditional hail service. Yellow has been operated by them since 1970 and now has 87 vehicles. The company is supported by a dispatch service call center Blue Top Cab is the second-largest taxi company within Arlington County, with a total of 181 taxicabs (21.4 of the total fleet). Blue Top Cab was founded in 1984 and is the second-oldest taxi company in Arlington. Blue Top Cab currently staffs seven (7) phone operators to accommodate the call volumes for its existing fleet. Friendly Cab (39 taxicabs) started to offer dispatch service in 2014. They increased their fleet by 12 taxicabs in January 1, 2013 after the County Board awarded them with additional cabs. Hess Cab (35 taxicabs), and Crown Cab (37 taxicabs) do not currently provide dispatch service. These non-dispatch companies primarily rely on taxicab stands and pre-established customer relationships for their passenger business. Driver availability to their customers is based on the individual driver s preferred work schedule. These companies operate smaller fleets that may not be able to support a dispatch-oriented business model. They have a limited ability to serve the county s workers, residents, and travelers because of their size and business structure. Staff Observations Staff regularly meets with representatives from the taxicab companies, interviews drivers during taxicab inspections, observes taxi stand locations, and attends meetings with other jurisdictions taxicab regulators. Based on information gathered during these exchanges and the data collected as outlined above, staff has concluded that the amount of available taxicabs seems sufficient to support passenger business within Arlington County in general. For the past few years, the industry has been facing the existence of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) that operate in Arlington under Virginia s Department of Motor Vehicles authority. Currently, there are two companies, Lyft and Uber. These companies provide service on demand through an application to individuals. TNCs are creating a change in market conditions and continue to impact the taxicab industry. There is no data available to quantify the number of providers although it is believed to be significant. Existing Taxicab Certificate Holder Observations During meetings with existing certificate holders and various communications with drivers all have expressed their concerns about new transportation providers (Uber, Lyft and others) taking business away. These providers continue to change market conditions in the industry and are impacting the drivers and the companies.

Memorandum Page 8 of 9 Wheelchair-Accessible Taxicab Determination A separate wheelchair accessible taxicab determination was developed based on existing capacity and reported dispatch trips. Arlington has three wheelchair-accessible taxicab service providers: 1) Arlington s STAR program provides service using accessible taxicabs from the twenty (20) operated by Red Top Cab and fourteen (14) vehicles operated by Diamond Transportation; 2) MetroAccess provides service with WMATA-owned vehicles operated by contractors including Diamond Transportation in Virginia while trips not scheduled in MetroAccess vehicles are dispatched to Red Top Cab; and 3) private-pay users can obtain wheelchair-accessible taxi rides through Red Top s twenty (20) and Blue Top Cab s nine (9) wheelchair-accessible taxicabs. Table 9 shows an overall increase of 15.3 in wheelchair-accessible taxicab trips between 2015 and 2017. Table 9: Wheelchair-Accessible Taxi Trips (2015-2017) 2015 2016 2017 Difference Blue Top 3,812 3,899 3,948 136 3.6 Red Top 23,240 28,284 27,241 4,001 17.2 Total 27,052 32,183 31,189 4,137 15.3 Sources: Blue Top and Red Top companies Conclusion Upon completion and review of quantitative data, staff reached a conclusion for the 2018 Certificate Determination Report. Taxi Fleet Size & Certificate Recommendation The taxi industry is still adjusting to Transportation Network Companies (TNCs). During the period between 2015 to present the economic indicators presented in this document do not provide support for additional taxicabs given that TNCs exist and there is no data to quantify their use. It is important to note that taxicabs are an important and reliable mode of transportation for Arlington County, and served the community that do not have or rely on a smart phone, specifically senior citizens and low income customers. Also important to note that, TNCs are not subject to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance and, at the moment, only taxicabs are required to provide wheelchair accessible vehicles to customers that need them. The number of existing authorized taxicab vehicles has changed from 847 to 679 (including 97 to 39 wheelchair vehicles) from 2017 to 2018 reflecting a decrease of about 20 percent of total available vehicles (60 percent decrease for wheelchair vehicles). This business adjustment was made by two of the companies impacted by the drop of dispatch trips. Therefore, the recommendation is to maintain the number of taxicabs at 679 total vehicles which includes 39 wheelchair-accessible vehicles.

Memorandum Page 9 of 9 Based on all the information presented in this report, the County Manager recommends that there be no increase in the current number of taxicabs authorized by certificates. If an applicant applies for a certificate, the issuance of which would authorize an increase in the number of taxicabs for such applicant or certificate-holder, and which increase would exceed the number of taxicabs determined by the County Manager, then the application must include relevant facts indicating the reasons that the applicant contends that the market change, industry performance, certificate-holder performance, competition, innovation and other specified factors other than those determined by the County Manager.