EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

Similar documents
TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

EFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Weed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon.

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

Southern Illinois University

Alfalfa (06-7) Southern Illinois University. Roundup Ready Alfalfa Evaluation. Investigator: Bryan Young

Southern Illinois University

2018 Weed Control Update. Steve Li. Extension Specialist and Assistant Professor Auburn University

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

EVALUATION OF REDUCED RISK INSECTICIDES FOR CODLING MOTH MANAGEMENT IN ENGLISH WALNUTS 2005

August 22, DAT Dandelion White Clover percent control. 26 b-e 57 bc. 7 de 65 bc. 19 cde 86 ab. 34 a-d 86 ab. 34 a-d 52 c.

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

2009 Table Beet Weed Control Trials Methods: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2: Results: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2:

All treatments injured soybean on at least one evaluation. POST1 Synchrony STS plus Flexstar plus Assure II caused 15% injury on July 11.

University of GA Coop Ext Service

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Rescue Treatments in Roundup Ready Soybeans

Southern Illinois University. Trial Location

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Roundup GPA Test

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

Bromacil, Diuron, and Flumioxazin Combinations for Total Vegetation Control

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2010

Weed Control Trials in Onions

FIELD RESEARCH REPORT

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Tools for minimising laborious hand-weeding in row crops

(TURF1402) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service Poa annua Control in Overseeded 'Tifway' Bermudagrass.

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Postemergence Weed Control in Green Pea

Mini Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial Results 2018

Table 1. Bowie ground cover from various herbicides applied at seeding, 0WAE, or 2 WAE Description bowie bowie bowie. % % Number of Subsamples 1 1 1

2016 Cotton Insect Update

Equipment CHAPTER 21

High Plains Root-Knot Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016

Green section: Weed Control in Small Grains

(01-ASC-15) Date June 27

EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris. Abstract

Crop Stage at Each Application

Cooperative Research Project Dr. W. Douglas Gubler, U.C. Davis Dept. of Plant Pathology. Trial name... MBA Strawberry Fruit Rot Trial, 2006

(03 08 CRR-03 MAN Parallel Heavy South Pivot) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

Application Equipment and Techniques 1

Switchgrass plot following the 2011 harvest at Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, Streeter, ND.

Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas (903) FAX: (903) Crop Results

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

MSU Weed Science Research Program Comparison of bentazon formulations in dry edible beans

H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 10 FT BORDER FRONT

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Formulation and Tank Mix Test #1

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

Trial Report: Bell Pepper Variety Evaluation Spring 2017

in each of the trials conducted at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center (HTRC) in East

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Seed Treatment Division

2017 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

MSU Weed Science Research Program. General Trial Information. Personnel. Pest Description

(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Valor PRE Test

Cooperator/Landowner Cooperator: Mel Grove Organization: ISK Biosciences City: Houston State/Prov: TX

9/12/2009 (C8 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail, Waterhemp or Palmer Amaranth Control

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green

Crop Description. Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 17/Jun/2003

Application Description. Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics

Calibration of Chemical Applicators Used in Vegetables1

(Forage2-06) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service. Dogfennel Control in Pastures

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

factsheet Field Sprayer Calibration Introduction Pre-Calibration Checklist Using a Calibration Bottle

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Command Extra/Gauntlet Test

Control of Little Barley in No-Till Wheat.

Trial Report: Supersweet Corn Variety Evaluation Spring 2014

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Oct (16S-TPAC-CORN-16) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 13 Purdue Weed Science. One Pass vs. Two Pass Programs for Conventional Till Corn

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Herbicides and Weed Control. Jim Heiser

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

A spring broccoli variety trial was conducted in 2017 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION Joel Felix and Joey Ishida, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2015 Introduction Evaluation of recently registered herbicides for weed control in specialty crops is a necessary step before the product can be granted a label for use on the targeted crop. Herbicides are essential to control weeds in direct-seeded onion in order to realize acceptable size and bulb yield. Reflex was recently registered for use to control weeds in potato and bicyclopyrone is a new product on the market that is being evaluated for weed control in various crops. Reflex would fit well into onion production in the Treasure Valley because of its ability to suppress yellow nutsedge. There is an indication that bicyclopyrone might also suppress yellow nutsedge. Both products provide residual weed control and could reduce the amount of postemergence herbicides used in onion production. The objectives of this study were to evaluate onion tolerance of Reflex and bicyclopyrone and the herbicides weed efficacy under local conditions in a field free of yellow nutsedge. Materials and Methods A field study was conducted in 2015 at the Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, Oregon to evaluate onion response and weed control with Reflex and bicyclopyrone herbicide. The field, previously planted to wheat, was prepared in 2014 to create a seedbed suitable for onion production. Based on soil tests, fertilizer to supply 75 lb phosphorus/acre, 200 lb potassium/acre, 17 lb elemental sulfur/acre, 7 lb manganese/acre, and 3 lb boron/acre was applied and the field was ripped, moldboard plowed, and groundhogged. On October 31, 2014, the soil was fumigated using Vapam at 15 gal/acre and simultaneously bedded following local practices. Beds 22 inches wide were made to facilitate furrow irrigation. The beds were harrowed and flattened on March 10, 2015. Onion seeds of variety 'Vaquero' were planted on March 13 in double rows spaced 3.7 inches apart and 3.9 inches within the row on 22-inch beds. Lorsban 15G (Chlorpyrifos) was banded at 3.7 oz/1,000 ft of row (0.125 lb ai/acre) over the entire field on March 20 as a preventive measure against onion maggot. The study had a randomized complete block design with 4 replications of all herbicide treatments and individual plots were 7.33 ft wide (4 rows) by 27 ft long. Preemergence treatments were applied on March 19 while late preemergence treatments were applied on March 26. Plots for postemergence-applied Reflex or bicyclopyrone (except the untreated control) were sprayed with Prowl H 2 O at 2.1 pt/acre (pendimethalin at 1 lb ai/acre) on March 26. Postemergence treatments were applied on May 8 and 29 when onion plants were at the 2-leaf and 4- to 6-leaf stages, Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 69

respectively. Herbicide treatments and evaluated rates are contained within the results in Tables 1-5. All herbicide treatments were applied using a CO 2 pressurized backpack sprayer fitted with a boom equipped with four EVS8002 flat-fan nozzles at a spray volume of 20 gal/acre. The first irrigation was applied on April 13, 2015. All subsequent irrigations were scheduled based on six Watermark soil moisture sensors (Irrometer Co., Riverside, CA) connected to an AM400 data logger (M.K. Hansen Co., Wenatchee, WA) to prevent the soil at 8-inch depth from drying beyond 25 kpa soil water tension. Fertilizer was applied on June 11 to supply 170 lb nitrogen/acre. Plants were sprayed with Movento at 5 fl oz/acre (spirotetramat 1.25 oz ai/acre) on June 4 for thrips control. Subsequent sprayings for thrips control were delivered aerially based on local trap counts. Visual evaluations for onion injury and weed control were conducted on May 8 and June 18. Estimates were based on a 0-100% visual scale; where 0% = no injury or no weed control and 100% = total crop damage or complete weed control. Weeds in the two center rows were enumerated by species and removed on July 13. Onion plant tops were flailed and bulbs were lifted on September 9, 2015. Bulbs were hand-harvested from the two center beds on September 10 and graded on September 14. The bulbs were graded according to quality as follows: bulbs without blemishes (No. 1s), split bulbs (No. 2s), bulbs infected with the fungus Botrytis allii in the neck or side, bulbs infected with the fungus Fusarium oxysporum (plate rot), bulbs infected with the fungus Aspergillus niger (black mold), and bulbs infected with unidentified bacteria in the external scales. The No. 1 bulbs were graded according to diameter: small (<2¼ inches), medium (2¼-3 inches), jumbo (3-4 inches), colossal (4-4¼ inches), and supercolossal (>4¼ inches). Marketable yield consists of No.1 bulbs over 2¼ inches. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and means compared using the least significance difference (LSD, P = 0.05). Results Onion emergence started on April 6, 2015. Reflex and bicyclopyrone application timing affected onion emergence (Table 1). Reflex at 1 or 2 pt/acre (0.25 or 0.5 lb ai/acre) applied preemergence (PRE) resulted in fewer than 659 plants/acre compared to 116,384 plants/acre for the handweeded control. Plant stand in plots sprayed PRE with bicyclopyrone at 0.16 or 0.214 pt/acre (37.5 or 50 g ai/acre) was 38,355 and 77,150 plants/acre compared to 116,274 to 118,143 plants/acre for ProwlH 2 O applied late preemergence (LPRE). Onion injury for the surviving plants ranged from 90 to 100% for Reflex applied PRE and 60 to 84% for bicyclopyrone applied PRE. Onion injury in the other treatments was less than 5%. As expected, the number of harvested bulbs/acre reflected plant stand for each herbicide treatment. Evaluations at 14 days after the last herbicide application indicated that control of common lambsquarters ranged from 76 to 100% across herbicide treatments, with standalone Reflex at 1 pt/acre providing the least control (Table 2). Control for pigweed species ranged from 89 to 99% across treatments. Hairy nightshade control was estimated at 78 to 100%, kochia control was 97 to 100%, and spotted ladysthumb and grass weeds control were both greater than 95%. The number of weeds in the two center rows at 45 days after the last herbicide application is presented in Table 3. Postemergence application of Reflex at 1 pt/acre or bicyclopyrone at 0.16 or 0.214 pt/acre when onions were at the 2-leaf stage reduced the number of weeds/plot. Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 70

Standalone postemergence application of Reflex at 1 pt/acre resulted in the highest number of weeds. The results indicate that Reflex and bicyclopyrone have a potential to be applied postemergence to control weeds in onion without adversely affecting the crop. Bicyclopyrone could be used alone to control weeds when onions are at the 2-leaf stage followed by a tank mixture of Buctril at 0.75 pt/acre plus GoalTender at 0.50 pt/acre at the 4- to 6-leaf stage. Marketable onion yield reflected the level of herbicide injury and weed control (Table 4). Postemergence application of Reflex at 1 pt/acre tank-mixed with Buctril at 0.75 pt/acre when onions were at the 2-leaf or 4- to 6-leaf stages resulted in 1162 or 1046 cwt/acre, respectively, compared to 1148 cwt/acre for the hand-weeded treatment. Marketable onion yield was equally high when bicyclopyrone at 0.16 pt/acre plus NIS at 0.25% v/v or a tank mixture of bicyclopyrone at 0.16 pt/acre plus Buctril at 0.75 pt/acre was applied postemergence when onions were at the 2-leaf stage. Marketable yield was a reflection of the number of harvested bulbs (Table 5). These results indicate the potential for Reflex and bicyclopyrone to be used postemergence to control weeds in direct-seeded onion. These results will be used to refine the treatments for the 2016 study. Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onion Committee, cooperating agricultural chemical companies, cooperating onion seed companies, Oregon State University, the Malheur County Education Service District, and was supported by Formula Grant nos. 2015-31100-06041 and 2015-31200-06041 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 71

Table 1. Onion response to Fomesafen (Reflex) and bicyclopyrone at the Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2015. Onion b Treatment Rate Unit Amount per acre Application Plant stand Injury Injury timing a 5/7/2015 5/8/2015 6/12/2015 Harvested bulbs no/acre % % no/acre 1 Reflex 0.25 lb ai/a 1.0 pt PRE A 659 d 90 b 97 b 2,077 fg GoalTender 0.125 lb ai/a 0.25 pt 2 leaf B GoalTender 0.125 lb ai/a 0.25 pt 4-6 leaf C 2 Reflex 0.5 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 0 d 97 a 100 a 0 g GoalTender 0.125 lb ai/a 0.25 pt 2 leaf B GoalTender 0.125 lb ai/a 0.25 pt 4-6 leaf C 3 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 118,582 a 0 d 5 ef 106,526 bc Reflex 0.25 lb ai/a 1.0 pt 2 leaf B Reflex 0.25 lb ai/a 1.0 pt 4-6 leaf C 4 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 117,263 a 0 d 8 e 95,844 cd Reflex 0.5 lb ai/a 2.0 pt 2 leaf B Reflex 0.5 lb ai/a 2.0 pt 4-6 leaf C 5 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 116,274 a 0 d 0 g 108,900 ab Reflex 0.25 lb ai/a 1.0 pt 2 leaf B Reflex 0.25 lb ai/a 1.0 pt 4-6 leaf C 6 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 118,143 a 0 d 5 ef 118,989 a Reflex 0.5 lb ai/a 2.0 pt 2 leaf B Reflex 0.5 lb ai/a 2.0 pt 4-6 leaf C 7 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 118,143 a 0 d 0 g 114,835 ab GoalTender 0.125 lb ai/a 0.25 pt 2 leaf B Reflex 0.25 lb ai/a 1.0 pt 4-6 leaf C 8 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 117,923 a 0 d 0 g 120,472 a A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 50 g ai/ha 0.214 pt 2 leaf B NIS 0.25 % v/v 0.7 pt 2 leaf B GoalTender 0.125 lb ai/a 0.25 pt 4-6 leaf C 9 A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 37.5 g ai/ha 0.16 pt PREPRE A 77,150 b 60 c 55 d 85,755 d GoalTender 4 oz ai/a 0.50 pt 2 leaf B GoalTender 4 oz ai/a 0.50 pt 4-6 leaf C 10 A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 50 g ai/ha 0.214 pt PRE A 38,355 c 84 b 80 c 45,103 e GoalTender 4 oz ai/a 0.50 pt 2 leaf B GoalTender 4 oz ai/a 0.50 pt 4-6 leaf C 11 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 116,604 a 0 d 5 ef 114,538 ab A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 37.5 g ai/ha 0.16 pt 2 leaf B GoalTender 4 oz ai/a 0.50 pt 4-6 leaf C 12 Prowl H 2O 0.95 lb ai/a 2.0 pt PRE A 117,483 a 0 d 4 f 118,099 ab A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 37.5 g ai/ha 0.16 pt 2 leaf B NIS 0.25 % v/v 0.7 pt 2 leaf B GoalTender 4 oz ai/a 0.50 pt 4-6 leaf C 13 Handweeded 116,384 a 0 d 0 g 116,912 ab 14 Untreated 115,725 a 0 d 0 g 13,056 f LSD (P = 0.05) 4,276 8 3 10,842 a Application timing: PRE = preemergence on March 9; 2-leaf = May 8; 4-6 leaf = May 29. Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 72

Table 2. Weed control on June 19 (14 days after herbicide application) with Reflex and bicyclopyrone in direct-seeded onion, Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2015. Weed control b Treatment Amount per acre Application Common Spotted timing a Redroot pigweed Hairy nightshade Kochia lambsquarters ladysthumb Grass weeds ----------------------------------------------------------------- % ----------------------------------------------------------------- Reflex 1.0 pt PRE 99 a 97 ab 100 a 99 ab 100 a 95 ab Reflex 2.0 pt PRE 97 a 98 a 100 a 100 ab 100 a 97 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 76 b 89 c 78 c 98 ab 93 c 98 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 94 a 93 abc 88 abc 95 c 97 ab 98 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 98 a 91 bc 96 ab 99 ab 100 a 99 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 100 a 95 abc 99 a 98 ab 100 a 97 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 99 a 92 bc 100 a 97 abc 100 a 96 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 97 a 94 abc 81 bc 97 bc 96 bc 98 a A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt 2 leaf A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.16 pt PREPRE 98 a 99 a 100 a 99 ab 100 a 90 b A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt PRE 100 a 98 a 100 a 100 a 99 a 94 ab Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 100 a 95 ab 100 a 99 ab 100 a 97 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 97 a 94 abc 100 a 100 ab 100 a 99 a Handweeded 99 a 98 a 98 a 100 ab 100 a 96 a Untreated 0 c 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 c LSD (P = 0.05) 15.6 5.8 16.6 2.8 3.4 5.5 a Application timing: PRE = preemergence on March 9; 2 leaf = May 8; 4-6 leaf = May 29. Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 73

Table 3. Number of weeds per plot (3.67 x 27 ft) on July 13 (45 days after herbicide application) in response to application of Reflex and bicyclopyrone in direct-seeded onion, Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2015. Number of weeds/plot b Treatment Amount per acre Application Common Redroot Hairy Spotted timing a Kochia lambsquarters pigweed nightshade ladysthumb Grass weeds Total weeds ---------------------------------------------------- no/plot (3.67 x 27 ft) ---------------------------------------------------- Reflex 1.0 pt PRE 2 b 7 b 0 b 2 b 1 b 13 b 24 b Reflex 2.0 pt PRE 3 b 7 b 0 b 1 b 3 b 12 b 24 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 28 b 39 b 39 b 3 b 45 b 5 b 158 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 9 b 29 b 21 b 7 b 18 b 4 b 88 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 2 b 32 b 8 b 2 b 2 b 5 b 50 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 1 b 18 b 4 b 2 b 2 b 8 b 33 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 1 b 29 b 1 b 3 b 3 b 9 b 46 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 5 b 25 b 23 b 3 b 28 b 5 b 89 b A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt 2 leaf A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.16 pt PREPRE 2 b 5 b 1 b 1 b 2 b 23 b 34 b A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt PRE 3 b 8 b 1 b 0 b 5 b 15 b 32 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 0 b 17 b 1 b 2 b 4 b 8 b 31 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 3 b 12 b 1 b 1 b 1 b 3 b 20 b Handweeded 1 b 7 b 4 b 1 b 1 b 11 b 23 b Untreated 272 a 495 a 297 a 173 a 1833 a 347 a 3,418 a LSD (P = 0.05) 80 133 57 37 801 68 641 a Application timing: PRE = preemergence on March 9; 2 leaf = May 8; 4-6 leaf = May 29. Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 74

Table 4. Onion yield in response to application of Reflex and bicyclopyrone applied on direct-seeded onion, Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2015. Marketable onion yield by grade b Treatment Amount per acre Timing a Small Medium Jumbo Colossal Supercolossal Total Total yield ------------------------------------------------------------ cwt/acre ------------------------------------------------------------- Reflex 1.0 pt PRE 0.7 b 0.0 e 3.6 g 21.0 e 0.0 b 24.6 d 25.3 d Reflex 2.0 pt PRE 0.0 b 0.0 e 0.0 g 0.0 e 0.0 b 0.0 d 0.0 d Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 53.6 a 196.4 a 197.1 e 0.0 e 0.0 b 393.5 c 447.1 c Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 56.7 a 186.0 a 148.2 ef 3.4 e 0.0 b 337.6 c 394.3 c Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 6.7 b 96.1 b 604.5 c 37.5 de 3.4 ab 741.5 b 748.2 b Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 3.7 b 60.2 c 787.7 ab 283.8 ab 26.6 a 1,158.3 a 1,162.1 a Reflex 0.75 pt 4-6 leaf Buctril 0.50 pt 4-6 leaf Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 4.0 b 14.7 de 810.6 a 204.5 bc 12.5 ab 1,042.3 a 1,046.3 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 14.4 b 93.1 b 667.5 bc 26.9 e 0.0 b 787.5 b 801.9 b A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt 2 leaf A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.16 pt PREPRE 1.2 b 31.6 cd 435.7 d 356.7 a 16.0 ab 839.9 b 841.2 b A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt PRE 5.7 b 5.2 de 254.1 e 152.9 cd 20.2 ab 432.3 c 438.0 c Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 5.1 b 25.5 de 800.6 a 230.4 bc 5.1 ab 1,061.7 a 1,066.8 a Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 3.0 b 26.9 de 818.3 a 267.5 abc 21.8 ab 1,134.5 a 1,137.4 a Handweeded 5.0 b 15.9 de 748.4 ab 378.5 a 6.1 ab 1,148.9 a 1,154.0 a Untreated 10.1 b 0.7 e 29.9 fg 0.0 e 0.0 b 30.6 d 40.7 d LSD (P = 0.05) 16.0 30.1 127.7 122.8 24.6 149.8 142.6 a Application timing: PRE = preemergence on March 9; 2 leaf = May 8; 4-6 leaf = May 29. Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 75

Table 5. Number of harvested onion bulbs in response to Reflex and bicyclopyrone applied to direct-seeded onion, Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR, 2015. Number of weeds/plot b Treatment Amount per acre Timing a Small Medium Jumbo Colossal Supercolossal Marketable Total bulbs --------------------------------------------------------- number/acre --------------------------------------------------------- Reflex 1.0 pt PRE 297 c 0 e 297 e 1484 e 0 b 1,780 e 2,077 fg Reflex 2.0 pt PRE 0 c 0 e 0 e 0 e 0 b 0 e 0 g Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 27,596 a 49,554 a 29,376 d 0 e 0 b 78,930 bc 106,526 bc Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 27,596 a 44,213 a 23,738 d 297 e 0 b 68,248 c 95,844 cd Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 3,561 bc 24,925 b 77,150 b 2,967 de 297 ab 105,339 a 108,900 ab Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 1,484 bc 13,946 c 81,007 ab 21,068 ab 1,484 a 117,505 a 118,989 a Reflex 0.75 pt 4-6 leaf Buctril 0.50 pt 4-6 leaf Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 2,077 bc 3,857 de 92,283 a 15,727 bc 890 ab 112,758 a 114,835 ab Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 6,528 bc 23,442 b 88,426 ab 2,077 e 0 b 113,944 a 120,472 a A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt 2 leaf A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.16 pt PREPRE 890 bc 8,902 cd 48,960 c 26,112 a 890 ab 84,865 b 85,755 d A16003 (bicyclopyrone) 0.214 pt PRE 2,374 bc 1,484 de 29,080 d 10,979 cd 1,187 ab 42,729 d 45,103 e Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 1,780 bc 6,825 cde 88,722 ab 16,914 bc 297 ab 112,758 a 114,538 ab Prowl H 2O 2.0 pt PRE 1,484 bc 6,528 cde 88,722 ab 20,178 ab 1,187 ab 116,615 a 118,099 ab Handweeded 2,374 bc 5,341 de 80,711 ab 28,189 a 297 ab 114,538 a 116,912 ab Untreated 12,166 b 593 e 297 e 0 e 0 b 890 e 13,056 f LSD (P = 0.05) 11,310 7,707 14,868 8,511 1,415 12,941 10,842 a Application timing: PRE = preemergence on March 9; 2 leaf = May 8; 4-6 leaf = May 29. Evaluation of Reflex and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion 76