Research TEST Result. Japanese Proposal

Similar documents
Australian Pole Side Impact Research 2010

Joint Australian and Canadian Pole Side Impact Research

JAMA/JARI Evaluation Tests of

Informal document No. GRSP (45th GRSP, May 2009 agenda item 4(b))

Side Impact and Ease of Use Comparison between ISOFIX and LATCH. CLEPA Presentation to GRSP, Informal Document GRSP Geneva, May 2004

Survey on Safety of New Mobility Vehicles

Research on Chest Injury Criteria

New Side Impact Dummy Developments

WorldSID 50 th Update

Scope of GTR- Pole Side Impact

Pole Side Impact GTR: Assessment of Safety Need: Updated Data Collection

UN Regulation (UNR) for Hydrogen Fuelled Vehicles of Categories L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5

Comparison of vehicle categories under Japanese regulations with ECE

SIDE IMPACT SAFETY: ASSESSMENT OF HIGH SPEED ADVANCED EUROPEAN MOBILE DEFORMABLE BARRIER (AE-MDB) TEST AND WORLDSID WITH RIBEYE

ECE/TRANS/180/Add.14/Appendix 1

Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision)

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Side Impact Protection. Technical perfection, automotive passion.

Full Width Test ECE-R 94 Evaluation of test data Proposal for injury criteria Way forward

Proposal for amendments to UN R16: Mandatory fitting of safety-belt reminder

REAR SEAT OCCUPANT PROTECTION IN FAR SIDE CRASHES

EEVC Report to EC DG Enterprise Regarding the Revision of the Frontal and Side Impact Directives January 2000

Presentation of the draft Global Technical Regulation on Safety Belts

Pre impact Braking Influence on the Standard Seat belted and Motorized Seat belted Occupants in Frontal Collisions based on Anthropometric Test Dummy

Technical Note on the EuroSID-2 with Rib Extensions (ES-2re)

(62 nd GRSP, December 201 agenda item 26(g)) Regulation No. 80. ms comparison of static und mic test procedure.

Post Crash Fire and Blunt Force Fatal Injuries in U.S. Registered, Type Certificated Rotorcraft

AEB IWG 04. Industry Position Summary. Vehicle detection. Static target

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP)

PROGRESS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADVANCED EUROPEAN MOBILE DEFORMABLE BARRIER FACE (AE-MDB)

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION

Study of Pedestrian s fatal accidents (vs. motor vehicles at low speed) in Japan

Study of Pedestrian s fatal accidents (vs. motor vehicles at low speed) in Japan

December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

TRL s Child Seat Rating, (TCSR) Front Impact Testing Specification

Frontalaufprall im Verbraucherschutz Frontal Impact In Consumer Test Programms

AUTOMOTIVE SIDE-IMPACT SIMULATIONS AND COMPARISON OF DUMMY AND HUMAN BODY MODEL CRASH DYNAMIC RESPONSES ACCORDING TO REGULATORY STANDARDS.

Pedestrian Protection in Europe

Virtual human body model for fast safety assessment

Insert the title of your presentation here. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

Revised draft global technical regulation on Pole Side Impact

ECE/TRANS/180/Add.14. Global Registry. Addendum 14: Global technical regulation No. 14

REPORT NUMBER: 214P-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 214 DYNAMIC SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION RIGID POLE

Economic and Social Council

Benefits for Australia of the introduction of an ADR on pedestrian protection. RWG Anderson, G Ponte, D Searson

REPORT NUMBER: 214P-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 214 DYNAMIC SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION RIGID POLE

Economic and Social Council

Lateral Protection Device

ANCAP Assessment Protocol. Adult Occupant Protection v8.0.2

Wheelchair Transportation Principles I: Biomechanics of Injury

Service Bulletin A

The Power of Your Seatbelt

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FAR SIDE OCCUPANT TEST & ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE

Economic and Social Council

REPORT NUMBER: 214P-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 214 DYNAMIC SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION RIGID POLE

MINUTES OF THE SECOND MEETING OF THE GRSP INFORMAL GROUP ON A POLE SIDE IMPACT GTR

Vehicle Safety Research in TGGS

Safer Vehicle Design. TRIPP IIT Delhi

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP December 2013

Evaluation of Event Data Recorder Based on Crash Tests

Potential Use of Crash Test Data for Crashworthiness Research

ECE/TRANS/180/Add.3/Amend.2

Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1

Proposal for the 02 series of amendments to Phase 2 of Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)

Economic and Social Council

CEMA PT16 N09Rev2. Reference document: ENTR_F1_ _rev 16 v Article / clause Original text Proposal from CEMA Rationale and

INVESTIGATING POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THE IIHS SIDE IMPACT CRASHWORTHINESS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129

SIDE COLLISION SAFETY PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURE

Economic and Social Council

STUDY ON CAR-TO-CAR FRONTAL OFFSET IMPACT WITH VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY

GTR GLOBAL REGISTRY. ECE/TRANS/180/Add January Created on 18 November 2004, pursuant to Article 6 of the

(53rd GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 4(a))

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION

EVALUATION OF MOVING PROGRESSIVE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST METHOD BY COMPARING CAR TO CAR CRASH TEST

Extremely High Load Capacity Tapered Roller Bearings

REDUCING RIB DEFLECTION IN THE IIHS TEST BY PRELOADING THE PELVIS INDEPENDENT OF INTRUSION

CURRENT WORLDWIDE SIDE IMPACT ACTIVITIES DIVERGENCE VERSUS HARMONISATION AND THE POSSIBLE EFFECT ON FUTURE CAR DESIGN

An Evaluation of Active Knee Bolsters

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP December Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP, December 2013, agenda item 19)

REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments. Proposal submitted by France

Proposal. Submitted. agenda item 17) supersedes made 2017/04/19) Insert new. of the. The minimum size area." Insert new. inform the.

THUMS User Community

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.77/Rev.1/Amend.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.77/Rev.1/Amend.3

Date: October 6(Thu) 9:30-16:30, 2011 Place: JPJ Academy, Malacca. Akademi Pengangkutan Jalan Malaysia KM 15, Jalan Tiang Dua, Air Molek, Melaka

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.94/Rev.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.94/Rev.2

Development of Advanced HIII Abaqus dummies

ADVANCED RESTRAINT SY S STEM (ARS) Y Stephen Summers St NHTSA Ve NHTSA V hi hhicle S Saf t e y t R Resear R h c 1

JARI Research Activities for Traffic Safety

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2

Revised proposal to amend UN Global Technical Regulation No. 3 (Motorcycle brake systems) I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.57/Rev.2/Amend.4 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.57/Rev.2/Amend.4

D1.3 FINAL REPORT (WORKPACKAGE SUMMARY REPORT)

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN CAR COMPATIBILITY PHENOMENA

Side Pole Impact Accidents and Vehicle Testing

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2

FIMCAR Accident Analysis Report to GRSP frontal impact IWG Summary of findings

FIMCAR. Frontal Impact Assessment Approach FIMCAR. frontal impact and compatibility assessment research

Figure 1. What is the difference between distance and displacement?

Transcription:

GRSP Inf. Group on on a Pole Side Impact GTR PSI-05-06 March 22,23, 2012 Research TEST Result & Japanese Proposal JASIC / Japan

Background Though number of pole side impact accidents is small, the fatal and serious injury risk of pole side impact accidents are high. So we need to introduce pole side impact GTR to vehicle regulation in Japan. The curtain airbag and side airbag are necessary to satisfy pole side impact GTR. And they are also effective for other side impact.

Japan vehicle categories In Japan, there are 3 categories for passenger vehicles. The smallest vehicle category is Light-motor-vehicle, commonly known as Kei cars in English. It refers to automobiles with a size of 3.4 m in length, 1.48 m in width, and 2 m in height or less, respectively, and a displacement of 0.66 liter or less.

Situations of Kei cars in Japan About 30% of passenger cars are Kei cars in Japan. Some reasons why Kei cars are popular are as below: 1. Small width Japanese land area being so small, there are lots of small parking places and narrow roads ( less than 4.0m road). Kei cars are easier to park in small parking and drive such narrow roads than larger cars. 2. Light weight ( About 750 kg 950 kg ) Most Kei cars have better fuel consumption and made less using material than larger cars. So Kei cars are more ecological and economical. Many people need Kei cars in Japan

Matter for Kei cars in Pole Side Impact Comparison of the size of Kei cars and Standard-size cars 737.5 295 442.5 335 865 530 As for the distance of the door outer and the seat center, K-car is 87.5mm smaller than Standard-size car. Seat Center Kei cars (Width = 1,475) Seat Center Standard-size cars (Width = 1,730) We think that it is difficult for Kei cars to have enough performance for pole side impact test, because of the small space between the door outer and passenger.

Test Configuration Test Protocol ; Pole Side Impact GTR DRAFT Ref. Amended Draft Text of PSI Regulation (Seoul Meeting).docx 32km/h or 26km/h 75 Φ=254mm WorldSID-50M Test Velocity Test No.F11_1201_428 = 32km/h Test No.F12_0101_428 = 26km/h Test Vehicle = Typical Model of Kei-Car Driver Dummy = WorldSID-50M (SBL-E) Test Vehicle Mass = 1047kg Seat-slide = Mid-track + 2 notch Seat-height = Lowermost Airbag Deployed by Timer:8msec

Test Set-Up

No.F11_1201_428 Post-Test ; 32kmph No.F12_0101_428 ; 26kmph

F11_1201_428 (32kmph) Test Results Dummy Kinematics - 1 0msec 10msec 20msec 30msec 40msec 50msec 60msec 70msec F12_0101_428 (26kmph) 0msec 10msec 20msec 30msec 40msec 50msec 60msec 70msec

F11_1201_428 (32kmph) Test Results Dummy Kinematics - 2 0msec 10msec 20msec 30msec 40msec 50msec 60msec 70msec F12_0101_428 (26kmph) 0msec 10msec 20msec 30msec 40msec 50msec 60msec 70msec

Test Results Airbag Deployment F11_1201_428 (32kmph) 12msec 14msec 16msec F12_0101_428 (26kmph) 12msec 14msec 16msec

Injury Measure Test Results Dummy Injury Measure Proposed Req s* F11_1201 _428 F12_0101 _428 HIC36 1000 254 143 Shoulder Rib Disp. mm [65] 74.6 ** 61.8 Shoulder Force Resultant kn [2.56] 3.30 2.27 Thorax Rib Disp. mm [50/57] 60.6 49.4 Thorax Rib #1 31.8 20.2 Thorax Rib #2 38.4 18.9 Thorax Rib #3 0.91 0.75 Thorax Rib #1 Thorax Rib V*C m/s [0.82] 0.23 0.17 Thorax Rib #2 0.73 0.16 Thorax Rib #3 T12 Resultant Acc.(3ms) G [75] 61.7 46.5 Abdomen Rib Disp. mm [57] 44.8 27.6 Abdomen Rib #1 44.2 27.2 Abdomen Rib #2 Abdomen Rib V*C m/s [0.82] 0.90 0.29 Abdomen Rib #1 0.88 0.36 Abdomen Rib #2 Pubic Force kn [3.12] 1.64 1.26 Pelvis Resultant Acc.(3ms) G [111] 94.2 64.2 * ; Ref. Amended Draft Text of PSI Regulation (Seoul Meeting).docx ** ; Shoulder Rib Displacement was Bottoming-Out ; Exceeding proposed Req s ; 80% or above of proposed Req s

Test Results Dummy Injury Measure F11_1201_428 32kmph F12_0101_428 26km/h HIC36 Shoulder Rib Disp. Shoulder Force Resultant Thorax Rib #1 Disp. Thorax Rib #2 Disp. Thorax Rib #3 Disp. Thorax Rib #1 V*C Thorax Rib #2 V*C Thorax Rib #3 V*C T12 Resultant Acc.(3ms) Abdomen Rib #1 Disp. Abdomen Rib #2 Disp. Abdomen Rib #1 V*C Abdomen Rib #2 V*C Pubic Force Pelvis Resultant Acc.(3ms) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140%

Test Results The tests performed on Kei cars, where the side and curtain airbags were deployed as early as possible, resulted in the shoulder, thorax and abdomen injury values not meeting the proposed threshold values in a pole side impact at 32 km/h. In a pole side impact at 26 km/h, on the other hand, all the injury values were met. Based on the above results, we consider it difficult to achieve the early deployment at 32 km/h for Kei cars.

Stationary 10km/h or below 20km/h or below 30km/h or below 40km/h or below 50km/h or below 60km/h or below 70km/h or below 80km/h or below 90km/h or below Over 90km/h Other Cumulative composition rate (%) Accident data in Japan A survey on accidents in Japan shows that the danger recognition speed in single vehicle crashes of Kei cars is lower than standard-size cars by about 5 km/h in the 50%tile range of all the accidents. Standard-size car One-box Standard-size car Sedan Standard-size car SUV Kei car Sedan Kei car Other

Cumulative composition rate (%) Further, a survey on pole side impact accidents in Japan also shows that the danger recognition speed in single vehicle crashes of Kei cars is lower than standard-size cars by about 5 to 7 km/h around the 70%tile range. 100 80 60 Number of Pole Side Impact Accidents Cumulative composition rate by speed No. of pole side impact accidents (Kei cars) No. of pole side impact accidents (Standard-size cars) Source: ITARDA s statistics * Years: 2006-2010 * Vehicles: Kei & standard-size cars 40 Accident speed lower in Kei cars than in standard-size cars 20 Danger recognition speed (km/h) (Travel speed) 0 10 or below 11-21- 31-41- 50 or over Unknown

Japanese Proposal Taking into account the Kei-car use rate and the results of surveys on accident speeds in Japan, we propose the following impact speeds for pole side impact tests : * 32 km/h for vehicles with a width of 1,500 mm and more, * 26 km/h for vehicles with a width of less than 1,500 mm.

Annex1, 6.1., amend to read 6.1. A carrier sled shall be used to impact a test vehicle prepared in accordance with paragraph 3, paragraph 4 and paragraph 5 of this Annex, at any velocity up to and including 32 km/h, with a stationary rigid pole. However, if the vehicle width is less than 1,500 mm, the test velocity shall be 26 km/h.