APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

Similar documents
2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Otay Ranch Station 2020 MOBILITY SERVICES MAP REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Draft Transportation Demand Management Program for the Oak Knoll Project

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

11 October 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Parking Management Strategies

CAR 10-1 TRAFFIC CALMING CAR 10-1 OPR: Engineering 06/06

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

kw ST.GEORGE COMMERCIAL

Purpose: General Provisions:

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

San Rafael Civic Center Station Area Plan May 2012 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

RE: 67/71 Marquette Avenue Redevelopment Transportation Overview

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Transportation Sustainability Program

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Construction Realty Co.

Parking and Loading. Page 1 of 7

residents of data near walking. related to bicycling and Safety According available. available. 2.2 Land adopted by

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

ARTICLE 8 OFF-STREET PARKING AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY STANDARDS

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

6.16 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

CORE AREA SPECIFIC PLAN

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Qualcomm Stadium Redevelopment

Station Evaluation. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Spring 2012

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

Chevy Chase Lake. Preliminary Plan # B TRAFFIC STATEMENT. Prepared for: Chevy Chase Land Company & Bozzuto Development Company

Metra Milwaukee District West Line Transit-Friendly Development Plan

Transit and Job Growth: Lessons for SB 375. Jed Kolko Public Policy Institute of California

City of Pacific Grove

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

STUDIO CITY SENIOR LIVING CENTER PROJECT ENV EIR APPENDIX I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

SANDAG 3D Visualization Howard Blackson 6:15. Sub Area A Coalition Massing/Phasing - Mike Labarre 6:30

Draft Marrickville Car Share Policy 2014

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Indirect Source Review (ISR) - Air Impact Assessment (AIA) Non-Residential Project Application Form

Public Information Workshop

Re: Amend Sections and File No ZA Marcus Lotson, Development Services Planner

Appendix S. Shared Parking Analysis

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING AREA STANDARDS

West LRT. Alignment Update and Costing Report May Calgary Transit Transportation Planning Clifton ND Lea Consultants

D. Motor vehicle parking, bicycle parking, and loading areas shall be separated from one another.

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Appendix A. Community Workshop Results PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Access Management Standards

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW SHEPHERD PARK PUD WASHINGTON, DC

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

Technical Memorandum

Parking Management Element

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Existing Traffic Conditions

Understanding Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and Transit-Adjacent Development (TAD)

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Traffic and Toll Revenue Estimates

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE RESORT CENTRE ASP

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Transit Hub Case Study: Owings Mills Metro Station. By: Kathleen Cary Rose, J. Luke Byrne and Catherine Buhler

2030 Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies Mobility Working Document

Fill-In, Multiple Choice, Matching

Transcription:

APPENDIX 2.7-2 VMT Evaluation

MEMORANDUM To: From: Mr. Jonathan Frankel New Urban West, Incorporated Chris Mendiara LLG, Engineers Date: May 19, 2017 LLG Ref: 3-16-2614 Subject: Villages VMT Evaluation Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) has prepared this memorandum addressing vehicle miles traveled ( VMT ) associated with the proposed Village Specific Plan (herein referred to as the Project ). The Project site is located in the northwest portion of the City of Escondido (City), along both sides of West Country Club Lane west of Nutmeg Street. The Project site is approximately one-half mile east of I-15, about two miles north of State Route 78 (SR-78). The 109-acre Project site is a former 18-hole golf course. There are approximately 1,800 existing homes within 500 feet of the Project boundary. The Project The proposed Specific Plan would provide for the construction of 392 single family homes in three villages, as well as community amenities that will be available to both residents of the Project and the public at large. Community amenities open to both the public and future Project residents (HOA members) include a restaurant, bar, convenience market, trail system, parks, greenbelt, and banquet facility (with paid reservation). The 46-acres of open space that are part of the Project would consist of 32 acres of landscaped greenbelt with a series of parks, along an approximately 4-mile-long walking trail system. Facilities accessible via HOA membership include the pool, gym, village green (events lawn), and community HOA room. These additional features are considered smart growth elements as they seek to provide a mix of commercial and recreational uses within the larger residential community that are intended to reduce trip length and frequency. To further facilitate pedestrian circulation, the Project also proposes a Specific Alignment Plan (SAP) for Country Club Lane from Golden Circle Drive to Nutmeg Street. The SAP would provide a series of intersection improvements designed to calm traffic speeds and enhance pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Proposed improvements include the provision of roundabouts at Golden Circle Drive and La Brea Street, and intersection enhancements at Firestone Drive (all-way stop control with pedestrian crosswalks and curb bulbouts). Traffic signals with pedestrian crosswalks are proposed at Gary Lane and Nutmeg Street. Narrowed lanes and buffered bike lanes are also proposed to calm traffic speeds and provide an enhanced multi-modal experience, while fulfilling the City s Bicycle Master Plan design for Country Club Lane. These SAP features are considered complete streets elements as they provide substantial enhancements to the overall pedestrian and bicycle circulation network, which are, in turn, are intended to encourage increased multimodal trips in lieu of driving trips.

Mr. Jonathan Frankel May 19, 2017 Page 2 Analysis The analysis presented here evaluates the VMT in the future forecast year with the Project, under scenarios both without and with the VMT-reducing mixed-use amenities and SAP enhancements proposed by the Project. The daily VMT were estimated using the CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.1) default values for each land-use type. (See, Green House Gas analysis (Dudek, 2017).) The average weekday trip rates were taken from the Traffic Impact Study (LLG, 2017). Project-related traffic was assumed to include a mixture of vehicles in accordance with the model outputs for traffic. The Project s proposed land uses and density are consistent with the surrounding land uses. The location, density, and intensity of suburban-style development within the surrounding communities have mainly developed through planned residential development, and are generally characterized by low density single-family neighborhoods with pockets of medium density single-family development (duplex units, townhomes and detached homes on smaller lots). Given that the Project s land use type (i.e., primarily residential) and size are similar to the surrounding community, it is expected that the driving characteristics of Project residents would be similar as well. The type, amount, length and frequency of vehicle trips to work, school, shopping, and recreation generally would be similar to the surrounding community, which would result in a comparable residential Project VMT for the residential uses absent the Project s diversity of land uses and SAP. However, because the Project adds community serving retail and recreational opportunities, along with substantial enhancements to the bicycle and pedestrian circulation network, this combination of mixed-uses, along with the multi-modal enhancements, would ultimately reduce the Project s overall VMT as compared to other residential developments in the vicinity without these features. As discussed above, the Project would include community-serving commercial and recreational facilities, which would reduce not just Project VMT, but are also expected to reduce existing community-wide VMT. This is because local residents would have restaurant and retail uses available in their community, not previously available, that would be accessible via non-vehicular modes of transportation, encouraged by the Project s proposed pedestrian and bicycle enhancements. Implementation of the SAP for Country Club Lane would reduce speeds, improving both the pedestrian and bicycle experience. The proposed buffered Class II bike lanes also would provide a high level of comfort for cyclists, and the intersection improvements (stop/signal control, cross walks, bulbouts) proposed at Gary Lane, Firestone Drive and Nutmeg Street would work in conjunction with the proposed trails to encourage and facilitate pedestrian circulation along the corridor.

Mr. Jonathan Frankel May 19, 2017 Page 3 While the residential component of the Project is similar in density and scale to the surrounding residential land uses (3.6 dwelling units/acre vs. 4.6 dwelling units/acre, respectively), the Project s residential VMT is expected to be lower than the surrounding communities. Moreover, based on our professional judgment and experience, the Project amenities also are expected to result in a lower community-wide VMT due to the community-serving amenities and multi-modal enhancements, which would serve to reduce both Project VMT and community-wide VMT. Table 1 shows the overall reduction in Project VMT expected to result with implementation of the Project s VMT reduction features, as identified in the GHG study. TABLE 1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED COMPARISON PROJECT WITHOUT AND WITH VMT REDUCTION FEATURES Scenario Project without VMT Reduction Features Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled (mi) 11,507,389.5 Project with VMT Reduction Features 10,932,020.1 Difference with Reduction Features (575,369.4) Source: 1. Green House Gas analysis (Dudek, 2017) Conclusions Table 1 shows that the enhancements proposed by the overall Project development would result in a reduction of 575,369.4 annual vehicle miles traveled. This represents a reduction of approximately 5% compared to the VMT that would be generated without the VMT reduction strategies incorporated into the Project. As to the Project s effect on surrounding VMT, the City of Escondido recognizes that smart growth land use patterns and instituting complete streets plays a direct role in the rate and growth of vehicle miles traveled (General Plan Mobility Element, Section C) The Project proposes both of these strategies. The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association s (CAPCOA) publishes the report Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, which is a tool used by air quality analysts to evaluate the effects of various strategies to reduce VMT in existing

Mr. Jonathan Frankel May 19, 2017 Page 4 or future conditions. The Project s land use mix of retail and residential uses is considered a smart-growth pattern, and CAPCOA s document states that an increase in diversity of urban and suburban developments (mixed use) and the provision of traffic calming measures for existing and proposed development, could result in a potential reduction in VMT in the range of 9-31%. Attachment A contains the CAPCOA data. In conclusion, the Project s land use diversity and traffic calming measures are expected to result in reduced VMT for both the Project and the adjacent existing community. cc: Attachment File Attachment A: CAPCOA Transportation Strategies Excerpt

Parking Policy / Pricing Neighborhood / Site Design Land Use / Location Understanding Fact Sheets Table 6-2: Transportation Category Chapter 6 Transportation Category Measure Number Strategy BMP 65 Grouped With # Range of Effectiveness Percent Reduction in GHG Emissions Basis LUT-1 Increase Density 1.5-30.0% VMT LUT-2 Increase Location Efficiency 10-65% VMT LUT-3 Increase Diversity of Urban and Suburban Developments (Mixed Use) 9-30% VMT LUT-4 Incr. Destination Accessibility 6.7-20% VMT LUT-5 Increase Transit Accessibility 0.5-24.6% VMT LUT-6 LUT-7 LUT-8 Integrate Affordable and Below Market Rate Housing Orient Project Toward Non-Auto Corridor Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lane 0.04-1.20% VMT LUT-9 Improve Design of Development 3.0-21.3% VMT SDT-1 Provide Pedestrian Network Improvements 0-2% VMT SDT-2 Traffic Calming Measures 0.25-1.00% VMT SDT-3 Implement a Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Network 0.5-12.7% VMT SDT-4 Urban Non-Motorized Zones SDT-1 SDT-5 SDT-6 SDT-7 Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design (on-site) Provide Bike Parking in Non- Residential Projects Provide Bike Parking in Multi- Unit Residential Projects LUT-9 LUT-9 LUT-9 SDT-8 Provide EV Parking SDT-3 SDT-9 Dedicate Land for Bike Trails LUT-9 PDT-1 Limit Parking Supply 5-12.5% PDT-2 PDT-3 PDT-4 Unbundle Parking Costs from Property Cost Implement Market Price Public Parking (On-Street) Require Residential Area Parking Permits PDT-1, 2 & 3 2.6-13% 2.8-5.5%