Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Final Report. Refining the Real-Timed Urban Mobility Report. Tim Lomax, Shawn Turner, Bill Eisele, David Schrank, Lauren Geng, and Brian Shollar

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 820 805 790 775 750 Rank 54 54 54 55 55 Commuters (1000s) 419 418 411 402 388 Freeway 5,777 5,806 5,800 5,684 5,569 Arterial Streets 5,633 5,667 6,225 6,314 6,186 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.12 3.37 3.33 3.29 2.56 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.47 3.76 3.75 3.56 2.83 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 26 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 26 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 2.30 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 9,360 9,311 9,233 9,008 8,892 Rank 60 60 61 60 60 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 16 16 16 16 15 Rank 75 71 69 69 71 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 19,127 19,028 18,868 18,408 18,171 Rank 61 61 61 61 60 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 33 33 34 33 34 Rank 81 79 72 75 71 Travel Time Index 1.16 1.16 1.17 1.17 1.17 Rank 65 63 50 48 48 Commuter Stress Index 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 Rank 49 46 47 45 45 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 1.73 -- -- -- -- Rank 81 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 439 444 447 445 453 Rank 62 62 62 62 62 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 760 768 773 770 784 Rank 79 77 76 76 77

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 725 710 700 685 680 Rank 56 57 58 58 58 Commuters (1000s) 373 364 357 348 343 Freeway 5,522 5,495 5,505 5,695 5,350 Arterial Streets 6,045 6,015 6,090 5,925 6,100 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.13 3.36 2.92 2.55 2.23 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.43 4.07 3.30 2.73 2.40 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 8,806 8,816 8,890 8,676 8,489 Rank 60 61 60 60 60 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 15 15 15 15 15 Rank 68 74 72 67 65 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 17,996 18,017 18,168 17,731 17,349 Rank 60 61 60 59 59 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 35 36 37 37 37 Rank 63 66 60 57 55 Travel Time Index 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 Rank 46 47 46 45 42 Commuter Stress Index 1.23 1.23 1.24 1.24 1.23 Rank 39 44 42 41 41 Total Cost ($ millions) 456 455 476 477 483 Rank 61 62 60 60 59 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 789 787 824 826 836 Rank 76 76 77 76 75

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 675 670 665 660 655 Rank 58 58 56 58 57 Commuters (1000s) 338 334 328 321 314 Freeway 5,100 4,800 4,550 4,350 4,100 Arterial Streets 5,910 5,705 5,435 5,300 5,205 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.83 1.45 1.32 1.46 1.47 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.85 1.43 1.29 1.48 1.42 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 8,479 8,335 7,679 7,379 6,951 Rank 57 56 58 58 59 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 15 14 13 13 12 Rank 59 62 64 58 60 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 17,327 17,033 15,692 15,080 14,204 Rank 57 57 60 59 60 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 37 37 34 33 32 Rank 53 49 55 59 62 Travel Time Index 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.16 Rank 39 39 43 39 46 Commuter Stress Index 1.24 1.24 1.22 1.22 1.21 Rank 39 39 42 40 40 Total Cost ($ millions) 498 503 474 463 448 Rank 58 58 58 59 60 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 863 871 820 801 776 Rank 70 69 71 70 71

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 650 640 610 605 590 Rank 57 57 59 59 60 Commuters (1000s) 308 300 282 276 266 Freeway 3,900 3,650 3,460 3,400 3,430 Arterial Streets 5,110 5,025 4,950 4,805 4,690 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.07 1.01 1.12 1.21 1.14 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.07 1.10 1.19 1.29 1.21 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 6,771 6,254 5,751 5,418 5,082 Rank 59 59 60 61 59 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 12 11 10 9 9 Rank 56 56 58 60 53 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 13,836 12,781 11,753 11,072 10,386 Rank 59 59 60 59 58 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 32 30 29 28 27 Rank 58 62 62 61 59 Travel Time Index 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.14 1.13 Rank 42 45 47 45 47 Commuter Stress Index 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.18 Rank 39 40 42 41 43 Total Cost ($ millions) 451 426 398 383 370 Rank 59 60 60 59 61 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 781 738 689 664 641 Rank 66 67 70 66 66

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 580 570 565 560 540 Rank 60 59 58 56 57 Commuters (1000s) 258 251 245 240 229 Freeway 3,410 3,255 3,030 2,830 2,650 Arterial Streets 4,550 4,460 4,115 3,960 3,725 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.03 1.10 1.09 1.12 1.04 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.09 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.07 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 4,810 4,511 4,277 3,836 3,350 Rank 60 59 55 57 58 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 8 8 7 7 6 Rank 56 50 53 49 51 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 9,829 9,218 8,741 7,839 6,845 Rank 58 57 56 56 59 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 26 25 24 22 20 Rank 57 55 54 54 59 Travel Time Index 1.13 1.12 1.12 1.11 1.09 Rank 42 44 40 45 56 Commuter Stress Index 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.15 1.14 Rank 42 43 41 44 45 Total Cost ($ millions) 360 347 339 313 285 Rank 60 56 56 58 60 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 624 600 586 541 493 Rank 63 60 57 59 63

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 520 510 500 480 455 Rank 59 60 59 61 63 Commuters (1000s) 218 213 206 197 185 Freeway 2,420 2,620 2,510 2,680 2,386 Arterial Streets 3,620 3,490 3,265 3,195 3,105 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.07 0.99 0.99 0.97 1.27 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.05 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.24 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 2,753 2,470 2,059 1,799 1,544 Rank 62 63 68 69 69 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 5 4 4 3 3 Rank 57 66 55 71 63 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 5,626 5,047 4,207 3,677 3,156 Rank 62 63 67 68 68 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 18 16 14 13 11 Rank 59 62 64 65 72 Travel Time Index 1.08 1.07 1.06 1.05 1.05 Rank 56 60 66 74 64 Commuter Stress Index 1.13 1.12 1.10 1.10 1.09 Rank 45 45 52 51 53 Total Cost ($ millions) 247 232 201 182 159 Rank 63 65 67 67 69 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 427 401 348 316 276 Rank 70 71 75 77 80

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 450 450 450 Rank 63 61 60 Commuters (1000s) 182 180 178 Freeway 2,190 1,995 1,980 Arterial Streets 3,075 2,960 2,910 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.28 1.31 1.37 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.25 1.28 1.34 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 1,416 1,252 1,126 Rank 68 69 70 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 2 2 2 Rank 78 68 62 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 2,893 2,559 2,301 Rank 68 69 68 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 11 9 9 Rank 64 70 65 Travel Time Index 1.04 1.03 1.03 Rank 75 80 76 Commuter Stress Index 1.09 1.08 1.08 Rank 49 54 51 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 151 140 130 Rank 69 69 70 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 262 242 224 Rank 79 79 79