Crude Oil Blend Scheduling Optimization of an Industrial-sized Refinery: A Discrete Time Benchmark

Similar documents
Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Quantitative Methods for Strategic and Investment Planning in the Oil-Refining Industry

PRODUCTION PLANNING OF OIL-REFINERY UNITS FOR THE FUTURE FUEL MARKET IN BRAZIL

H. Hadera 1,2, I. Harjunkoski 1, G. Sand 1, I. E. Grossmann 3, S. Engell 2 1

Operational Model for C3 Feedstock Optimization on a Polypropylene Production Facility

Scheduling of cracking production process with feedstocks and energy. constraints

The Role of a New FCC Gasoline Three-Cut Splitter in Transformation of Crude Oil Hydrocarbons in CRC

Integrating RTN scheduling models with ISA-95 standard. Pedro M. Castro Ignacio E. Grossmann Iiro Harjunkoski

APC Implementation Case Study Vacuum Gasoil Cloud Point Model Predictive Controller 1

Changing Refinery Configuration for Heavy and Synthetic Crude Processing

The Chevron Pembroke oil

PRISM TM Refining and Marketing Industry Analysis

Acomprehensive analysis was necessary to

TYPES OF BLENDING PROCESS

China s Refining Industry: History and Technology Evolution. Rob Tufts, BRSI Inc., Cochrane Alberta, Canada

Modernization of Libyan Oil Refineries and Petrochemical Plants

CHAPTER - 1 INTRODUCTION

Refining Technology in the Petroleum, Metals and Bioprocesses Industries

Remote Process Analysis for Process Analysis and Optimization

TechnipFMC RFCC Technology converts bunker fuels into high value products for African refiners

DHEYAA JAAFAR HAJAM AL - MUSAUI Deputy Minister for Refining Affairs Ministry of Oil, Iraq

FCC UNIT FEEDSTOCK FLEXIBILITY IN MOL S DANUBE REFINERY

ASPHALT SUPPLY IN A VOLATILE OIL WORLD. Bill Haverland ConocoPhillips Company

Modernizing a Vintage Cat Cracker. Don Leigh HFC Rahul Pillai KBR Steve Tragesser KBR

Focus on Slurry Hydrocracking Uniflex Process Upgrade Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Improve Margins

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

Middle East DownStream Weak May 2013 ABU DHABI, UAE

The Advantage of Real Atmospheric Distillation using D7345 Test Method. Presented by Jonathan Cole, PAC

Changes to America s Gasoline Pool. Charles Kemp. May 17, Baker & O Brien, Inc. All rights reserved.

Maximizing Bottom-of-the Barrel Conversion with Commercially Proven Technologies. Jacinthe Frécon

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

Refining/Petrochemical Integration A New Paradigm. Anil Khatri, GTC Technology Coking and CatCracking Conference New Delhi - October 2013

Richard Salliss & Rakesh Mehta New Approach to Refinery Crude Switch Optimization using Profit Suite and Unisim

1. Introduction. 2. Challenges. APC Implementation Case Study Implementing Advanced Process Control on Hydrocracker Unit 1

REFINING LANDSCAPE BEYOND 2010 MALAYSIA

ASPHALT SUPPLY IN A VOLATILE OIL WORLD. Bill Haverland ConocoPhillips Company

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

Annexure-I. Product Pattern after Implementation of Projects

Anton Chebotarev. нефтехимического комплекса» 2017 UOP LLC. A Honeywell Company All rights reserved. 23 November 2017

Upgrade Bottom of the Barrel to Improve Your Margins

A new simple and robust process FT-NIR Spectrometer with small footprint and extended maintenance interval

New Residue Up-grading Complex at European Refinery Achieves Euro 5 Specifications

SOLVENT DEASPHALTING OPTIONS How SDA can increase residue upgrading margins

SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF GASOLINE BLENDING IN A NIGERIAN PETROLEUM REFINING COMPANY.

PILOT PLANT DESIGN, INSTALLATION & OPERATION Training Duration 5 days

National Iranian Oil Refining & Distribution Company (NIORDC)

REFINERY PROCESS AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

Refinery / Petrochemical. Integration. Gildas Rolland

EST technology: an advanced way to upgrade the bottom of the barrel G. Rispoli

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS 2-1 ECONOMIC ASPECTS 2-2

Diesel Maximization: Putting a Straw on the FCC Feed AM Annual Meeting March 22-24, 2015 Marriott Rivercenter San Antonio, TX.

Issues to be Discussed ASPHALT SUPPLY IN A VOLATILE OIL WORLD. Crude Oil Supply (2006) CRUDE OIL SUPPLY. Crude Oil Demand CRUDE OIL PRICING

Fundamentals of Petroleum Refining Refinery Products. Lecturers: assistant teachers Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna Belinskaya Natalia Sergeevna

Unit 1. Naphtha Catalytic Reforming. Assistant lecturers Belinskaya Nataliya Sergeevna Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna

Jagdish Rachh, TSC EMEA, 4 th October UniSim Design New Refining Reactors Deep Dive

AL BADI TRADING OIL & GAS PRODUCTS LLC

Raising the Bar Premium Base Oils Produced by the All-Hydroprocessing Route

Canadian Bitumen and Synthetic Crudes

Technologies & Construction Strategies for Clean Fuels Production in Africa. Stéphane Fédou

THE OIL & GAS SUPPLY CHAIN: FROM THE GROUND TO THE PUMP ON REFINING

A STUDY OF MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING WITH APPLICATION IN PRODUCTION PLANNING AND PETROLEUM SECTOR IN INDIA

Oil & Gas. From exploration to distribution. Week 3 V19 Refining Processes (Part 1) Jean-Luc Monsavoir. W3V19 - Refining Processes1 p.

GTC Technology Day. 16 April Hotel Le Meridien New Delhi. Latest Applications of GT-DWC

Challenges for proper implementation of residue upgrading processes within oil refineries

Oxidative Desulfurization. IAEE Houston Chapter June 11, 2009

CHALLENGES = OPPORTUNITIES

Eni Slurry Technology:

Alon Big Springs refinery

Simulation studies of Naphtha Splitter unit using Aspen Plus for improved product quality

Removing High Sulphur Bunker from the Refineries: Eni s case study

Preface... xii. 1. Refinery Distillation... 1

Production of Transportation Fuels by Co-processing Biomass-Derived Pyrolysis Oils in a Petroleum Refinery Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit

Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Petroleum Products at U.S. Refineries

GTC TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

Petroleum Refining-Production Planning, Scheduling and Yield Optimization

Regional Refining Outlook

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

Introduction of S-OIL

National Iranian Oil Engineering & Construction Co.

UOP UNITY Hydrotreating Products

Synthesis of Optimal Batch Distillation Sequences

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

20,000 bpd CRUDE OIL REFINERY FOR SALE AND RELOCATION

Once a waste of lamp oil production

DECARBONIZATION OFTRANSPORTATIONFUELS FEEDSTOCKS WITHPETROLEUM FRACTIONS VIA CO-HYDROPROCESSINGBIO-BASED

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

Refinery & Petrochemical Integration- An IOCL Perspective

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm Joseph C. Gentry, Director - Global Licensing Engineered to Innovate

Petroleum Refining-Production Planning, Scheduling and Yield Optimisation

- Supercritical Water Cracking Technology -

FSR on Expansion and Modernization of the MOIN Refinery Project

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

100,000 bpd Refurbished Oil Refinery FOR SALE AND RELOCATION

ERGMed Coastal. Refining

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

Report. Refining Report. heat removal, lower crude preheat temperature,

Commercial installations : BP Lavera steam cracker, France, BP Grangemouth (UK), COPENE Camaçari (Brazil) and a number of undisclosed plants.

Transcription:

Crude Oil Blend Scheduling Optimization of an Industrial-sized Refinery: A Discrete Time Benchmark Motivation: Replace Full Space MINLP by MILP + NLP decompositions for large problems Remark: Continuous-time model cannot be easily implemented by plant operators Objective: Explore to the limit discrete-time models: example 7days/2h step (84 periods) Brenno C. Menezes PostDoc Research Scholar Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, US Faramroze Engineer Senior Consultant SK-Innovation Seoul, South Korea Ignacio E. Grossmann R. R. Dean Professor of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, US EWO Meeting, CMU, Pittsburgh, Sep 21 st, 2016. Jeffrey D. Kelly CTO and Co-Founder IndustrIALgorithms Toronto, ON, Canada 1

Crude-Oil Scheduling Problem FSA Vessels or Feedstock Tanks Receiving or Storage Tanks Crude Transferring Crude Receiving Whole Scheduling: from Crude to Fuels CBSO Charging or Feed Tanks Crude Dieting 1996: Lee, Pinto, Grossmann and Park (MILP), discrete-time 2004: Randy, Karimi and Srinivasan (MILP), Fuel continuous-time gas 2009: Mouret, Grossmann and Pestiaux: MILP+NLP continuous-time LPG 2014: Castro and Grossmann: MINLP ; MILP+NLP, continuous-time REF B Gasoline 2016 Goal: solve the SK refinery KHT scheduling L Kerosene for a week (34 crude, 4 pipelines, 24 storage DHT tanks, E9 feed Diesel tanks, 5 CDUs) N Diluent RFCC 1 st Feedstock Storage S (MILP) Fuel oil Assignment FCC (FSA) VDU Asphalt Improves DC the polyhedral space of optimization for CDU feed diet Reduces optimization search space for further scheduling Refinery Units NHT 2015: Cerda, Pautasso and Cafaro: MILP+NLP, Naphtha continuous-time (336h: 14 days; binary 4,000; continuous 6,000; constraints 100K; CPU(s) 500) Crude-Oil Management Crude-to-Fuel Transformation Blend-Shop 2 nd Crude Blend Scheduling Optimization (CSBO) Fuel Blending (MILP+NLP) Includes logistics details PDH Decomposition (logistics + quality problems) Hydrocarbon Flow Yields (Menezes, Kelly & Grossmann, 2015) Rates (crude diet, fuel recipes, conversion) Fuel Deliveries 2

Crude Blend Scheduling Optimization (CBSO-QL) Mixing-time Uptime-Use MILP(QL) + NLP(QQ) Multi-Use Other types Quantity + Logic Key logistics details (QL) asasasa 1 st : fill-draw-delay for storage tanks (e.g. 24h) 2 nd : uptime (run-length) for blend header (3h) 3 rd : 1 flow-out at-a-time for the blend header 4 th : fill-draw-delay for feed tanks (e.g. 3h) FSA CBSO 5 th : 1 or 2 flow-in at-a-time for the CDU 6 th : uptime for tank-to-cdu flows (e.g. 12h) 7 th : 0-h downtime (continuous) for the CDU 8 th : Feed tank transitions Sequence-dependent (Kelly and Zyngier, 2007) 3

Crude Blend Scheduling Optimization (CBSO-QQ) Key quality details (QQ) asasasa MILP(QL) + NLP(QQ) Yields Rates (crude diet, fuel recipes, conversion) Quantity + Quality 1 st : Feed Tank diet 2 nd : CDU models (modes of operations). Drawback: binary variables, Option: NLP models Fractionation Index (Alattas et al., 2012, 2013); Improved Swing-Cut (Menezes et al., 2013), Distillation Blending (Kelly et al., 2014) FSA CBSO 4

Phenomenological Decomposition Heuristic MILP(QL) + NLP(QQ) asasasa Yields Rates (crude diet, fuel recipes, conversion) 5

Crude-Oil Blend Scheduling: Illustrative Example Clustering (MILP) Crude blend scheduling (MILP+NLP) 336h: 14 days discretized into 2-hour time-period durations (168 time-periods) The logistics problem (MILP): Z MILP =695.6 8,333 continuous + 3,508 binary variables 3,957 equality and 15,810 inequality constraints Non-Zeros: 59,225 ; Degrees-of-freedom: 7,884 CPU(s): 176.0 seconds / 8 threads in CPLEX 12.6. MILP-NLP gap: 0.09% with only one PDH iteration. The quality problem (NLP): Z NLP =701.9 19,400 continuous variables 14,862 equality and 696 inequality constraint Non-Zeros: 26,430 ; Degrees-of-freedom: 4,538 CPU(s): 16.8 seconds in the IMPL SLP engine linked to CPLEX 12.6. 6

2 nd Crude-oil Blend Scheduling Optimization (CBSO-QL) Sequence of feed tanks to CDU: F3->F1->F2->F1->F3 To tank F1 To tank F2 Blender x = continuous variables (flow f) y = binary variables (setup su) To tank F1 To tank F3 To tank F1 CDU Feed Tanks Boxes in black means binary setup => y=1 Time (step 2h) Gantt Chart: Crude blender, CDU and Feed Tanks Holdup. 7

2 nd Crude-oil Blend Scheduling Optimization (CBSO-QQ) Feed Tank 1 Crude composition (C1-C6) Time (step 2h) Gantt Chart: Feed Tank F1 Holdup and its crude composition. 8

SK Refinery Example The proposed model is applied in an industrialsized refinery including 5 crude-oil distillation units (CDU) in 9 modes of operation and around 35 tanks among storage and feed tanks. The past/present timehorizon has a duration of 48-hours and the future timehorizon is 168-hours discretized into 2-hour timeperiod durations (84 time-periods). The logistics problem (MILP): 30,925 continuous and 29,490 binary variables 6,613 equality and 79,079 inequality constraints (degrees-of-freedom = 53,802) and it is solved in 128.8 seconds using 8 threads in CPLEX 12.6. The quality problem (NLP): 102,539 continuous variables and 58,019 equality and 768 inequality constraints (degrees-of-freedom = 44,520) and lasts 103.3 minutes in the IMPL SLP engine linked to CPLEX 12.6. The MILP-NLP gap between the two solutions is within 11% with two PDH iterations. 9

Conclusion Novelty: Segregates crude management in storage assignment and crude blend scheduling. Phenomenological decomposition in logistics (MILP) and quality (NLP) problems applied ina scheduling problem. Details all logisticsrelationships from practiced industrial operations. Impact for industrial applications: UOPSS modeling, pre-solving, and parallel processing permitted to solve an 2h time-step discrete-time formulation for a highly complex refinery (34 crude-oils, 24 storage tanks, 9 feed tanks, 5 CDUs): for 7 days (84 time-periods) EWO Meeting, Mar 9 th, 2016. 10

Conclusion Next Steps: Add upgrading units and their tanks (RFCC hydrotreaters, RFCC, VDU) Add cutpointoptimizationinsteadofmodes ofoperation incdus Crude-Oil Blender x Sequential Blending to prepare the Feed Tanks. Factors using bulk qualities as an LP between the Storage and Feed Tanks to be used in the logistics (MILP) Whole Scheduling: from Crude-Oils to Fuel Deliveries Initialization, Synchronization, Real-time Scheduling EWO Meeting, Mar 9 th, 2016. 11

Thank You Q?&A! www.industrialapplications.club www.induapps.club brenno@induapps.club 12