How will high speed rail transform the sheffield city region

Similar documents
ATO for High Speed Lines. Trevor Foulkes M.A., C.Eng, FIRSE, FIET Head of Control-Command and Signal Engineering

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

Chapter 4. HS2 Route Capacity and Reliability. Prepared by Christopher Stokes

London 2050 Infrastructure Plan

Appendix 4. HS2 Route Capacity and Reliability. Prepared by Christopher Stokes

Friends of WALKDEN station MANCHESTER HUB. Response to Network Rail Stakeholder Consultation

Best Practices in Intercity Rail An Infrastructure Manager s Perspective. Nigel Ash Managing Director, Network Rail Consulting TRB January 2014

Light Rail Review 2011

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

Bus The Case for the Bus

2013 ELR Addendum Note Implications of Siemens / ABP Announcement East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Introduction to the Clean Vehicles Partnerships Awards. Andrew Chen Head of Emissions Strategy, Heathrow Airport

Modernising the Great Western railway

A Joint initiative by ProRail and Network Rail for ETCS Level 3 Hybrid Demonstration

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

JRC. Beyond the Elephant. Extending the Bakerloo. Jonathan Roberts, JRC At Lewisham Council Sustainable Development Select Committee 15 March 2012

WEST YORKSHIRE BUS STRATEGY 2040

TransPennine Express and Angel Trains orders 95 Inter-City rail carriages from UK manufacturer Hitachi

Reducing CO 2 emissions from vehicles by encouraging lower carbon car choices and fuel efficient driving techniques (eco-driving)

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

THE TRANSFORMATIONAL BENEFITS OF INVESTING IN REGIONAL RAIL FOUR CASE STUDIES

High Speed 2- engineering, benefits & challenges. Prof Roderick A Smith

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

High-Speed Rail development Securing the potential a UK (planning) perspective

Light Rail. Briefing. Light Rail can operate on urban streets alongside pedestrians, cyclists and motorised traffic

Geneva, 67th SC.2 Session October 2013 High Speed Trains Master Plan

committee report General Permitted Development Order SPT response to consultation

Iarnród Éireann Dublin Integrated Rail Plan Presentation to Institution of Engineers of Ireland. 17 th November

Investigation into the Department for Transport s decision to cancel three rail electrification projects. Report. Department for Transport

Bus Rapid Transit. Briefing. Common to all BRT schemes is the aim to improve passengers experience and percep on of public transport

Highspeed Rail -an international outlook

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Natasha Robinson. Head of Office for Low Emission Vehicles Office for Low Emission Vehicles. Sponsors

High Speed Rail Regional Impact

THE MOST SIGNIFICANT INTERNATIONAL DESIGNER OUTLET, FOR ONE OF THE MOST STABLE AND AFFLUENT MARKETS IN EUROPE

siemens.co.uk/traffic Driving tomorrow s cities Transport and mobility solutions

The UK s Industrial Strategy; the Automotive Sector Deal

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

THE MOST SIGNIFICANT INTERNATIONAL DESIGNER OUTLET, FOR ONE OF THE MOST STABLE AND AFFLUENT MARKETS IN EUROPE

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Transport for London s Consultation. Changes to the Ultra Low Emission Zone and Low Emission Zone.

Luxury Liverpool Developments

A Transformational Approach to Energy Supply. September 2016 Gail Scholes, Jo Gilbert

Low Emissions Towns and Cities Programme

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 ENERGY

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

The postcode lottery in energy profits

MAR1011. West Birmingham Bus Network Review March 2010

Tackling Transport Emissions National information hub to support local action

M6 TOLL TRAFFIC MONITORING STUDY

Strategies for expanding shared use of ultra low emission vehicles in GB. Chas Ball, Chief Executive, Carplus e-bridge Conference Berlin

How to make urban mobility clean and green

Sunderland. The UK s Automotive Hub

TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING

MERSEYSIDE ROUTE UTILISATION STRATEGY (RUS): CHESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL S COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION SECTION 2: CHESHIRE SCHEMES AND ISSUES

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Welcome. Hello and welcome to this information stall about our proposals for the expansion of the Orchard Centre.

Edinburgh Tram (Line Two) Bill. Response to the request for follow up written evidence at the Committee meeting on 24 November 2004

AGENDA. Agenda Introduction What is it? Examples Top Rated Franchise Sucess Rate Industry overview Suitability

Strategy for First Last Mile Travel

The Highways Agency is working to improve the M3 between junctions 2 to 4a.

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

Destination Growth: The Case for Britain's Regional Railways FINAL REPORT

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

We note the range of possible interventions identified in the consultation paper.

The operating cost model considered the variable elements of operating costs only, as follows:

Looking Towards the Future: Advantages of 765-kV Transmission Technology

SUPPLEMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM SCOTTISH AND SOUTHERN ENERGY

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

Passenger Promise and Rights: National Express Bus

MINUTES MATTER. Travel Time and Frequency of Train Service to Grand Central Terminal the Metro-North Railroad System Executive Summary

Innovation in Transport. Mike Waters

Yukon Resource Gateway Project

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

THE UK RAIL MARKET 2015

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

REED Job Index: January 2012 KEY FINDINGS

Procurement notes for councils (Scotland)

MetroBus (Rapid Transit): Preferred Option for Vehicle Specification

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

Integrating HSR Into Existing Regional Transportation Systems

Engineering Solutions to Congestion

PROMOTING SOOT FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

THE UK RAIL REPORT 2018

WAITING FOR THE GREEN LIGHT: Sustainable Transport Solutions for Local Government

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Integrating transport (buses)

Very Light Rail (VLR) as a means of delivering low-cost railways

The Car manufacturer s challenge in a fast paced world of More Electric, Connected and Automated Vehicles

Chairperson and Committee Members REGULATORY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 3 SEPTEMBER 2015

4.5 Projects & Priorities

Experiences in the field of electric mobility in Katowice

Powering Sydney s Future

Sintropher European Project Results and Messages. Colin Osborne Project Manager Seminar, Brussels September 2015

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation Feb 2018

The Low Carbon Vehicle Action Plan. Robert Anderson Low Carbon Fleet Advisor Cenex

LOGISTICS CASE STUDY

It will be of particular interest to those potentially affected by the Government s proposals for high speed rail.

Transcription:

How will high speed rail transform the sheffield city region HSR and the wider rail network 1

How HSR will transform the Sheffield City Region SUMMARY By 2033 the Sheffield City Region (SCR) will be served by High Speed Rail (HSR). The introduction of HSR services will improve the SCR economy by making the region more attractive for inward investment. HSR will significantly reduce rail journey times to London and other core cities, including Birmingham and Leeds. As passengers transfer to HSR, it will free-up capacity on the existing rail network, reducing overcrowding and allowing the creation of new journey opportunities, catering for expected future growth. Even with HSR, continuing passenger and rail freight growth up to 2033 and beyond will require further investment in the classic rail network. In addition, these enhancements will ensure full integration of the classic network with HSR and ensure the benefits are spread to locations not directly served by HSR, such as Doncaster and Chesterfield. Widespread electrification of the railway network will create carbon savings, reduce costs and improve reliability. Priestmangoode INTRODUCTION The proposed national High Speed Rail network (HSR) will revolutionise travel from the Sheffield City Region (SCR) to London and neighbouring city regions, reducing journey times, providing new links and creating new capacity to accommodate growth in rail demand. With HSR, a Sheffield Meadowhall to London journey will take just 69 minutes, with Birmingham being reached in 38 minutes. In addition, stations in Leeds and the East Midlands will be less than 20 minutes from Meadowhall. UK railways have seen unprecedented growth over the last decade. Demand has continued to grow through the economic downturn. The increase in passenger numbers is showing no signs of slowing. All SCR districts are expected to experience significant increases in employment and housing growth between 2008 and 2033. Projections indicate there will be 180,000 new households and 65,000 new jobs 1, increasing pressure on our already over-crowded rail network. Without HSR, our railways will not cope with the forecast increase in traffic. Investment in the rail network is needed, but simply seeking to cater for growth in long distance rail demand by enhancing existing lines cannot provide the capacity needed and will not be cost effective. With up to 66% of rail passengers on long distance corridors forecast to switch to HSR 2, the capacity that this will free up on existing main lines can be used to enhance local and regional services. Given the size of this potential transformation to rail travel in Britain, the time for making plans is now. 1 CLG (2010) 2008 based sub national household projections DFT, Tempro 6.2. 2 Capacity relief for existing lines and future light rapid transport network (Arup, 2011) 2 HSR and the wider rail network HSR and the wider rail network 3

HOW HSR WILL IMPROVE OUR ECONOMY A national HSR network would generate significant economic benefits both nationally and to the SCR. SCR has a population of 1.7m people and supports 650,000 jobs. We are internationally recognised in advanced manufacturing and business services. Our own research suggests that the areas served by the eastern leg of the proposed Y-shaped network will enjoy economic benefits worth 4.2bn 3 ( 400m direct to SCR). These expected economic benefits provide the opportunity for the city region to attract new businesses and provide a stimulus to existing sectors. As well as supporting additional jobs, our evidence is that HSR will increase the productivity of existing jobs. This will help increase the wealth and disposable income of residents, supporting an improved quality of life in our area. International evidence also shows that HSR can act as a catalyst for physical regeneration in the areas around stations on the network. The regeneration effect of HS1 between London and Kent unlocked investment worth almost 20bn 4. Work undertaken for Sheffield City Council shows that a well-located HSR station in SCR has the potential to accelerate the rate of regeneration and support additional growth in high value service sector employment. In March 2012, Government approved a package of incentives for the regions outside London, which includes superfast broadband, streamlined planning processes and business rate relief. The SCR Enterprise Zone is forecast to attract additional advanced manufacturing employers to SCR, and once this growth has happened, it could create up to 13,000 additional jobs in SCR. Although SCR will benefit from these incentives, only with the development of long-distance transport infrastructure, will we be able to achieve their full potential. HSR will allow us to attract investment from new international businesses. IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY HSR will bring significant journey time reductions which will make SCR far more accessible than ever before. Table 1 illustrates the potential journey times in minutes between the core cities on the eastern arm of the Y-shaped network. Some benefits of improved accessibility include: Enabling our residents to use their skills further afield and increase job opportunities. Improving business connections with suppliers and clients. Facilitating access to a larger pool of talent for businesses. A national HSR network serving SCR would generate the need for significant change in accessibility within SCR. The Department for Transport have identified Meadowhall as their preferred station location and this will need to be supported by improvements to the transport network to ensure local and regional connectivity. Partners across SCR are already undertaking extensive work to identify the infrastructure gaps that need to be filled to fully realise the benefits of the proposed Sheffield Meadowhall HSR station. We will make the case to Government that the transport infrastructure required to connect HSR is included within the legislation for the second phase of the project and that Government should support the enhancement of local connectivity needed to maximise the benefits of HSR. Table 1: Journey times between city centres using HSR, as published by HS2 Ltd London 49 Birmingham 68 36 Nottingham* 79 48 44 Sheffield 82 57 46 27 Leeds 3 Eastern Network Partnership (Arup, June 2011) 4 Economic impacts of HS1 (Colin Buchanan and Partners Ltd and Voltero) * Journey times from Nottingham include connections between Nottingham City Centre and East Midlands Hub HS2 station. Journey times from Sheffield include connections between Sheffield City Centre and Meadowhall HS2 station. 4 HSR and the wider rail network HSR and the wider rail network 5

CHANGES TO LOCAL RAIL SERVICES The Government plans for the HSR network is for up to 14 trains per hour in each direction for Phase 1 (London to Birmingham), rising to 18 for Phase 2 (the Y-shaped network). There could be up to 6 trains per hour serving the SCR, each with up to 1,100 seats per train 5. The introduction of HSR to SCR will result in some passengers switching from existing rail corridors, freeing up vital capacity which can be used to develop and grow local and regional services. The largest proportionate transfer is in passenger movements from services on the Yorkshire to West Midlands corridor. Analysis of forecast future journey patterns show that up to 66% of people are expected to switch to HSR. The same analysis on the other inter-city corridors indicates that 50% of passengers on the East Coast Main Line and 15% of passengers on the Midland Main Line would also switch to HSR 6. These levels of changes to customer travelling patterns create a unique opportunity for changes to the timetables and specification of existing rail services. Released capacity will enable trains to serve additional intermediate locations and provide new journey opportunities. FURTHER RAILWAY INVESTMENT The Government has committed to electrification of the Midland Main Line to Sheffield by 2019. They have also committed to increasing capacity and improving journey times on the Midland and East Coast Main Lines, as well as local station enhancements to allow longer trains. We had worked hard to make the case for these improvements. As well as addressing some of the short term requirements for the local rail network, these programme enhancements will start to prepare for the future integration of HSR with SCR s public transport network. Still, further enhancements will be required to make the most of the rail network, and investment from 2019 onwards is yet to be determined. This presents a unique opportunity to be able to influence future investment by ensuring the Government is aware of our needs for a reliable, effective rail network which serves everyone s needs. Table 2 describes the planned railway investment and indicates some SCR aspirations post 2019. In addition, the existing rail network will be essential to provide onward connections to places not directly served by HSR, such as Doncaster and Chesterfield, with the reduction in crowding providing the required growth opportunities to maximise the benefits of HSR. 5 HS2 Announcement documents (DfT, Jan 2012) 6 Capacity relief for existing Lines (Arup, July 2012) 6 HSR and the wider rail network HSR and the wider rail network 7

Table 2: SCR aspirations which will enable an effective rail network Network Aspiration How When Midland Main Line East Coast Main Line Hope Valley Line Sheffield-Barnsley-Leeds Allow faster and increased connections from Sheffield and Chesterfield. Provide increased interregional services for Sheffield, Chesterfield, Alfreton, Langley Mill and Nottingham. Capacity and Journey speed improvements. Increase regional connectivity to London from North East and Yorkshire and Humber Regions. Increase capacity and reduce journey times. Increase capacity and reduce journey times. Midland Main Line Electrification. Electrify Erewash Valley. East Coast Main Line enhancements. Electrify local networks to allow through East Coast services. Northern Hub Enhancements. Journey time improvements, electrification and longer trains. Confirmed Government objective 2014-2019. Confirmed Government objective 2014-2019. Further investment will be needed beyond 2019. Committed for delivery by 2019. Electrification, SCR aspiration for 2019 onwards. ELECTRIFICATION A significant part of the Government s commitments to 2019 and our proposals for future development is the replacement of diesel trains with electric trains through widespread electrification. There are four main benefits of electric trains: Faster Journeys Electric trains are able to accelerate and brake quicker than diesel trains, improving journey times. Often, electric trains are faster than the diesel trains they replace. Carbon Savings Electric trains reduce carbon emissions. Electrifying the Midland Main Line to Sheffield could cut carbon emissions by 13,000 tonnes per year. Figure 1: Map indicating network electrification plans and aspirations Sheffield-Doncaster Increase capacity and reduce journey times. Electrification and longer trains. Increased capacity confirmed Government objective 2014-2019. (may include additional trains and platform lengthening).* Electrification, SCR aspiration for 2019 onwards. Increased capacity confirmed Government objective 2014-2019. (may include additional trains and platform lengthening).* Reducing Costs Electric trains are cheaper to buy than diesel trains and operating costs are also lower. Within ten years of completion, the electrification of the Midland Main Line to Sheffield will have paid for itself and will continue to reduce the cost of rail to the public purse. Reliability Railway Stations Existing Electrified Lines Electrification Objective 2014-2019 Electrification Aspiration - Passenger Services Electrification Aspiration - Freight Network Other Lines HS2 Eastern Arm* Sheffield City Region Worksop Line Increase capacity. More frequent and longer trains. Increased capacity confirmed Government objective 2014-2019. (may include additional trains and platform lengthening).* Electric trains are more reliable than the diesel trains they replace. This means the reliability and punctuality of services improve. *indicative line of route as published by HS2 Ltd Freight routes Improved access to South Yorkshire from South Coast and West London. Extension of Electric Spine to allow access to freight facilities in Doncaster, Humberside and the North East. Creation of the Electric Spine route. Electrify: - Sheffield Doncaster. - Chesterfield Rotherham, via Beighton. - Trent Junction Clay Cross (Erewash Valley). - Doncaster Hull/Scunthorpe/ Immingham. - Access to intermodal freight terminals. Confirmed Government objective 2014-2019. Figure 1 shows the planned electrification for the local area and our aspirations for extending the electrification to optimise the benefits of switching from diesel to electric trains. Crown copyright All rights reserved SYPTE, 100030252 2012 Cross Country Enhance capacity Derby West Midlands. Electrify Derby Birmingham/ Lichfield and capacity enhancements. * The following stations require platform lengthening to allow 4-car trains: Chapeltown, Swinton, Woodhouse, Kiveton Bridge and Kiveton Park. 8 HSR and the wider rail network HSR and the wider rail network 9

WHAT HAPPENS IF HSR IS NOT BUILT? The East Coast Main Line connects some of the key economic centres in the country to each other and to London. It is one of our busiest rail routes and passenger numbers on long distance services are forecast to grow by up to 78% by 2036 7. Already 240m has been committed to enhance the line during the 5 years from 2014. SCR is making the case for capacity improvements at Doncaster station and further electrification from Sheffield to Doncaster. The Midland Main Line connects four of the eight largest cities in the UK to London and to each other. The commitment to upgrades and electrification announced in 2012 will be a welcome boost to capacity release and quicker journey time on this network. Together, the enhancements to the East Coast Main Line and Midland Main Line will be far from being able to address long term capacity needs. Even with years of disruptive investment, if HSR is not built, long distance rail services linking SCR to London, the Midlands and the North East would not be able to cope with growing demand. The network will not have sufficient capacity to support the significant growth in rail freight that our economy will need. The plans for upgrades and electrification will become a short term fix rather than be part of a strategic national rail network. A suppression in rail demand would inevitably lead to greater carbon emissions and increased car trips, leading to increased congestion on the local road network, the M1 and A1. SCR s economy would not grow as fast and it would have fewer jobs. Further Information on existing plans High Level Output Specification 2012: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-level-output-specification-2012 Network Rail Yorkshire & Humber Route Utilisation Strategy: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browsedirectory.aspx?dir=%5crus%20documents%5croute%20utilisation%20 Strategies%5CYorkshire%20and%20Humber Network Rail Northern Route Utilisation Strategy: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browsedirectory.aspx?dir=%5crus%20documents%5croute%20utilisation%20 Strategies%5CRUS%20Generation%202%5CNorthern 7 Network RUS Scenarios, Network Rail [2009] 10 HSR and the wider rail network HSR and the wider rail network 11

12 HSR and the wider rail network 5175A