Prepared for: Prepared by: 4005 Port Chicago Highway Concord, California

Similar documents
Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre

Table 1. Air Sampling Results (ng/m 3 ) for Building D (100 and 200, Mako Shark) at MHS Malibu High School Malibu, California

SCA. Environmental, Inc.

ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

METROPOLITAN COAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LICENCE MONITORING SUMMARY

INSTRUCTIONS FOR HAZ-DUST RESPIRATORY PARTICULATE AIR MONITOR MODEL HD-1100

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

Ambient PM 10 Monitoring Sechelt, B.C Update

Presented by Tammy Edwards and Jena Brunson, MPH Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Industrial Hygiene Department

3 rd Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations. Prepared for:

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

United States Stove Company Project # Model: Breckwell SP1000 Type: Pellet-Fired Room Heater July 25, 2018

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

REASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE MONO BASIN PM-10 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

INTECH AUGUST QHSE PERFORMANCE

APPENDIX 6A. Air Quality Monitoring Results

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CREDIT FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS GENERATED THROUGH INCENTIVE PROGRAMS (Adopted June 20, 2013)

Glendale Water & Power Smart Grid Project

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017

BADLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC E. Central Ave. Bismarck, ND (701) AIR MONITORING & SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers at Area Source Facilities (Boiler GACT) Final Reconsidered Rule Requirements Summary

NEU Electric and Natural Gas Price Update

United States Stove Company Project # Model: KP60 AKA: AP60, VG60 Type: Pellet-Fired Room Heater May 31, 2018

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT

Example Airshed. Sample January 2019 Monthly Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report

WIM #40 is located on US 52 near South St. Paul in Dakota county.

Exposure of Underground Miners to Diesel Exhaust. AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

Retrospective Study of Respirable Coal Mine Dust Rule. AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

Appendix C SIP Creditable Incentive-Based Emission Reductions Moderate Area Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 Standard

Federal Railroad Administration, DOT CFR section Description Guideline PART 179

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from the transfer of organic liquids.

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

3.1 Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO): as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions).

Foyers Supreme Inc. Fireplace Products Project # 019-S Model: Fusion Type: Residential Wood Fired Heater February 19, 2016

Energy Performance Information Request Timeline

Confirmation: / 22 March 2013

Internal Audit Report. Fuel Consumption Oversight and Coordination TxDOT Internal Audit Division

Appendix F. Ship Drift Analysis West Coast of North America: Alaska to Southern California HAZMAT Report ; April 2000

City Of London Environmental & Engineering Services Department Wastewater Treatment Operations

Georgia Pacific Crossett Operations Hydrogen Sulfide and Meteorological Monitoring Program

WIM #48 is located on CSAH 5 near Storden in Cottonwood county.

WIM #29 was operational for the entire month of October Volume was computed using all monthly data.

RICE NESHAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Daily Trends and Source Apportionment of Ultrafine Particulate Mass (PM 0.1 ) Over an Annual Cycle in a Typical California City

CEMS FOR COAL FIRED POWER STATIONS DEVICE CALIBRATION AND MAINTENANCE

Mr. John Aitken June 6, 2017 Page 2

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. City of Virginia

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

Public Service Company of Colorado THE SOURCE TO WHICH THIS PERMIT APPLIES IS DESCRIBED AND LOCATED AS FOLLOWS:

DRAFT April 9, STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CREDIT FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS GENERATED THROUGH INCENTIVE PROGRAMS (Adopted [adoption date])

WORKSHOP REPORT. No, the RICE NESHAP applies only to stationary engines as defined in 40 CFR

Abbreviations and Acronyms. Executive Summary. 1. Introduction Purpose and Objectives Site Setting 1

2. provide data indicating what types and sizes of particles are not removed by used PHEAF devices, and

INTECH JUNE QHSE PERFORMANCE

B. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of October 24, 2017.

6/1/2011. NSPS and MACT Standards for Combustion Sources at Utility Authorities What happens when a permit has both federal and state regulations?

Science Applications International Corporation

Summary of Reprocessing 2016 IMPROVE Data with New Integration Threshold

KWA. Evaluation of the Vaporless Manufacturing LD 3000 and LD 3000S Mechanical Line Leak Detector on Large Rigid and Flexible Pipelines.

Appendix E Air Quality and Climate Change Technical Appendix

Act 229 Evaluation Report

AND LIVESTOCK OPERATIONS

4th Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations

NEU Electric and Natural Gas Price Update

RULE STATIONARY GAS TURBINES Adopted (Amended , ) INDEX

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. Guideline for Expedited Application Review (GEAR) Oil Field Sump Replacement Tanks

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY

SUMMARY. St-jean-sur-Richelieu, 2016, January 12th Client : J.A. Roby Project :PI model : Polaris; Sirius; Véga; Antares; Centauri; Rigel

La Canada Flintridge Parents for Healthy Air November 1, 2018 Presented by Elizabeth Krider, Ph.D., Esther Kornfeld and Tamar Tujian

1 st Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations. Prepared for:

I. 22. Price. Technical Report Documentation Page

PFI Standard Specification for Residential/Commercial Densified Fuel 18-June-2008

APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY CALCULATIONS

AUGUST 28, 2008 TEST REPORT # REV.1.1 MIXED FLOWING GAS TESTING CONNECTOR SERIES CLP S-D-A FTSH S-DV-A SAMTEC, INC.

FAA Aging Electrical Systems Research Program Update Prepared for: Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee January 23, 2002

AUGUST 28, 2008 TEST REPORT # REV.1.1 MIXED FLOWING GAS TESTING CONNECTOR SERIES SEM H-D-WT TEM H-D-WT SAMTEC, INC.

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE REPORT

ORDINANCE 742 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 742.

MARINE VESSEL REPOWER APPLICATION

Diesel Particulate in Mines Current Knowledge and Solutions

Applicable Requirements - NSPS Subpart JJJJ

CARL GRIMES, HHS CIEC PAST CHAIR, IESO CONSENSUS BODY PROCEDURAL DEVELOPMENT CHAIR ASHRAE-IAQA, Denver, CO April 16, 2010

Major/Area Source. Speaker: Eric Swisher. 23rd Virginia Environmental Symposium April 11, Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.

Natasha Stratton, MS Interim Director, Industrial Hygiene, Occupational Safety and Training

REMOVE II VANPOOL VOUCHER INCENTIVE PROGRAM

1st Quarter Summary of Meteorological and Ambient Air Quality Data Kennecott Utah Copper Monitoring Stations

Overview. Mercury Monitoring. Regulatory drivers Technology Overview Pros and Cons Alternative Hybrid Approach

Performance Rating of Residential Air Filter Equipment

FEDERAL SPECIFICATION METHANOL (METHYL ALCOHOL) 1.1 Scope. This specification covers three grades and four unit quantities of methanol.

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

FINAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

Schneider Electric Energy Solutions Savings Report. Florence City Schools

Demand Optimization. Jason W Black Nov 2, 2010 University of Notre Dame. December 3, 2010

SUMMARY. St-jean-sur-richelieu, January 15th 2016 Client: America s heat Project: PI-20114

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Arizona Tank Closure, Assessment and Response

Transcription:

AIR MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT Time-Critical Removal Action for the Experimental Ship Shielding Range, Parcel E-2 Hunters Point Naval Shipyard San Francisco, California Contract Number N62473-10-D-0807 Contract Task Order 0002 Prepared for: Base Realignment and Closure Program Management Office West Naval Facilities Engineering Command 1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92108-4310 Prepared by: 4005 Port Chicago Highway Concord, California 94520-1120

Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Monitoring Site Locations... 1 3.0 Analytical Methods... 2 4.0 Analysis of Air Monitoring Data... 2 5.0 Air Monitoring Results... 3 6.0 References... 3 List of Figures Figure 1 Air Monitoring Locations List of Tables Table 1 Air Monitoring Threshold Criteria List of Attachments Attachment 1 Air Monitoring Results i

1.0 Introduction Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. (herein after referred to as Shaw) is providing environmental remediation services to the U.S. Navy under the Radiological Environmental Multiple Award Contract, Contract Number N62473-10-D-0807, Contract Task Order (CTO) 0002. Shaw is performing air monitoring at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard (HNPS) in accordance with the Final Dust Mitigation Plan (DMP), included as Appendix D to the Final Work Plan, Time-Critical Removal Action for the Experimental Ship Shielding Range, Parcel E- 2, HPNS, San Francisco, California (Shaw 2012). The DMP describes procedures that minimize dust during work activities, and requires air monitoring to ensure these procedures are effective. The DMP helps prevent exposure of residents and construction crews to potential airborne chemicals of concern, and dust from the work area. This document summarizes the air monitoring data collected and analyzed to date for this project. This summary report describes the following: Where and how air monitoring samples are collected What test methods are used to analyze air monitoring samples How air monitoring data are evaluated This summary report also presents the air monitoring test results and compares the results with the established threshold criteria included in the DMP. 2.0 Monitoring Site Locations Air monitoring stations were mobilized to collect air samples upwind and downwind of work areas for the duration of the project. The predominant wind direction at HPNS is from the west. Locations of air monitoring stations and wind direction are shown on Figure 1. Air monitoring is being performed to help ensure effective dust control. The locations of the air monitoring stations were determined based on the prevailing wind direction and can be modified as needed. A windsock is used to show wind direction and weather forecasts are checked daily at www.noaa.gov. Monitoring stations remain stationary while sampling is being conducted. Each monitoring station includes three separate monitoring systems for: 1. Total suspended particulates (TSP) and for lead and manganese 2. Particulate matter larger than 10 microns in size (PM10) 3. Asbestos 1

3.0 Analytical Methods TSP, Lead, and Manganese. TSP samples are collected with a high-volume (39 to 60 cubic feet per minute) air sampler in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA s) reference sampling method for TSP, described in Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix B. Each sample is collected on a filter over an approximately 24-hour period; the filter is then weighed to determine the amount of TSP collected. Once the amount of TSP has been determined, the sample is analyzed for lead and manganese. Lead and manganese are analyzed using a modified EPA Method 12 (EPA 2007). The equipment specifications and sampling procedures used, including the sampling apparatus, filters, equipment accuracy, equipment calibration, and quality assurance checks, all conform to those specified in the analytical method. PM10. Air samples are collected and analyzed for PM10 in accordance with EPA s reference sampling method for PM10, described in 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix J. Each sample is collected on a filter over an approximately 24-hour period; the filter is then weighed to evaluate the concentrations of PM10 in ambient air. Asbestos. Air samples are collected and analyzed for asbestos in accordance with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 7400, in the NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NIOSH 1994). Method 7400 requires that samples be collected on threepiece cellulose ester filters, which are fitted with conductive cowlings, at a sampling rate of between 0.5 liter per minute (L/min) and 16 L/min. 4.0 Analysis of Air Monitoring Data Analytical results from air monitoring samples are compared with the threshold criteria listed in Table 1. If site activities cause exceedances of the threshold criteria, additional dust control measures will be considered and implemented. Table 1 Air Monitoring Threshold Criteria Test Parameters Threshold Criteria Basis TSP 0.5 mg/m 3 Calculated action level for general dust and particulates. Lead 50 µg/m 3 Cal/OSHA PEL Manganese 200 µg/m 3 Cal/OSHA PEL PM10 5,000 µg/m 3 Cal/OSHA PEL a Asbestos 0.1 fiber/cm 3 Cal/OSHA PEL 2

Notes: a Cal/OSHA PEL for particulates not otherwise regulated (respiratory) used for PM10. µg/m 3 micrograms per cubic meter Cal/OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency fiber/cm 3 fibers per cubic centimeter mg/m 3 milligrams per cubic meter PEL permissible exposure limit PM10 particulate matter smaller than 10 microns in diameter TSP total suspended particulates 5.0 Air Monitoring Results Weather information (including ambient pressure and temperature data) and air monitoring results are presented in the tables included as Attachment 1. 6.0 References EPA. 2007. Method 12 Determination of Inorganic Lead Emissions from Stationary Sources. Available Online at: <http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/methods/method12.html>. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 1994. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Method 7400. August. Shaw (Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.). 2012. Final Work Plan, Time-Critical Removal Action for the Experimental Ship Shielding Range, Parcel E-2, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, San Francisco, California. July. 3

Figure

Attachment 1 Air Monitoring Results

Table 1 Ambient Pressure and Temperature Monitoring Results Sample Date Ambient Pressure (in Hg) Ambient Temperature ( C) 25-Jun-12 30.09 18.2 26-Jun-12 30.04 18.2 27-Jun-12 29.93 20.4 28-Jun-12 30.07 17.6 29-Jun-12 30.12 17.7 2-Jul-12 29.91 16.9 3-Jul-12 29.91 21.2 9-Jul-12 36.06 14.4 10-Jul-12 29.93 20.0 11-Jul-12 29.89 18.3 12-Jul-12 29.86 19.2 13-Jul-12 29.95 12.8 16-Jul-12 29.92 15.6 17-Jul-12 29.99 16.9 18-Jul-12 30.02 17.3 19-Jul-12 30.04 19.4 20-Jul-12 30.08 20.0 23-Jul-12 29.93 19.3 24-Jul-12 29.96 18.7 25-Jul-12 30.00 17.4 26-Jul-12 30.00 15.6 27-Jul-12 30.04 17.0 3-Aug-12 29.91 15.8 6-Aug-12 30.13 18.1 7-Aug-12 30.07 17.1 8-Aug-12 30.00 21.2 9-Aug-12 29.94 19.9 4-Sep-12 30.03 16.7 5-Sep-12 29.99 16.9 24-Sep-12 29.97 18.7 25-Sep-12 29.93 17.0 26-Sep-12 29.91 15.3 Notes: C - degrees Celsius in Hg - inches of mercury Ambient pressure and ambient temperature data were gathered from the wunderground weather website (www.wunderground.com). Data were collected from station KCASANFR58 at 1200. Page 1 of 1 Air Monitoring Summary Report No. 005 Experimental Ship Shielding Range October 10, 2012

Table 2 TSP and Metals Monitoring Results Sample Date Sample Location Sampling Period (hours) TSP (mg/m 3 ) TSP Exceedance? Lead (µg/m 3 ) Lead Exceedance? Manganese (µg/m 3 ) Manganese Exceedance? 25-Jun-12 13 23.9 0.0240 No <0.016 No <0.016 No 25-Jun-12 14 24.1 0.0750 No <0.018 No 0.0500 No 26-Jun-12 13 23.7 0.0490 No <0.016 No 0.0260 No 26-Jun-12 14 23.6 0.0610 No <0.019 No 0.0300 No 27-Jun-12 13 24.3 0.0390 No <0.015 No 0.0430 No 27-Jun-12 14 23.9 0.0820 No <0.018 No 0.0160 No 28-Jun-12 13 24.1 0.0410 No <0.016 No 0.0840 No 28-Jun-12 14 23.5 0.1600 No 0.0270 No 0.0220 No 29-Jun-12 13 6.7 0.0170 No <0.057 No <0.057 No 29-Jun-12 14 6.5 0.1200 No <0.066 No 0.0750 No 2-Jul-12 13 24.4 0.0510 No <0.015 No 0.0160 No 2-Jul-12 14 23.3 0.0940 No <0.019 No 0.0420 No 3-Jul-12 13 5.6 0.1300 No <0.065 No 0.0750 No 3-Jul-12 14 5.0 0.1900 No <0.088 No 0.0990 No 9-Jul-12 13 23.1 0.0340 No <0.016 No <0.016 No 9-Jul-12 14 22.7 0.0650 No <0.019 No 0.0350 No 10-Jul-12 13 24.2 0.0360 No <0.015 No <0.015 No 10-Jul-12 14 23.8 0.0620 No <0.018 No 0.0250 No 11-Jul-12 13 24.2 0.0160 No <0.016 No <0.016 No 11-Jul-12 14 23.9 0.0760 No <0.018 No <0.018 No 12-Jul-12 13 24.3 0.0240 No <0.016 No <0.016 No 12-Jul-12 14 5.9 0.0970 No 0.0180 No 0.0500 No 13-Jul-12 13 6.2 0.0480 No <0.062 No <0.062 No 13-Jul-12 14 5.9 0.2400 No <0.072 No 0.1500 No 16-Jul-12 13 18.3 0.0029 No <0.0021 No <0.0021 No 16-Jul-12 14 22.6 0.0830 No <0.018 No 0.0500 No 17-Jul-12 13 24.2 0.0190 No <0.017 No <0.017 No 17-Jul-12 14 21.9 0.0410 No <0.019 No 0.0250 No 18-Jul-12 13 25.1 0.0130 No <0.016 No <0.016 No 18-Jul-12 14 Note 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 19-Jul-12 13 23.8 0.1000 No 0.9800 No 0.0850 No 19-Jul-12 14 23.3 0.0390 No <0.018 No 0.0190 No 20-Jul-12 13 6.7 0.0330 No <0.055 No <0.055 No 20-Jul-12 14 6.1 0.0850 No <0.070 No <0.070 No 23-Jul-12 13 24.8 0.0650 No <0.016 No 0.0290 No 23-Jul-12 14 26.8 0.0890 No 0.0190 No 0.0430 No 24-Jul-12 13 24.1 0.0590 No <0.017 No 0.0350 No 24-Jul-12 14 24.4 0.0570 No <0.017 No 0.0290 No 25-Jul-12 13 24.3 0.0260 No <0.017 No <0.017 No Page 1 of 2 Air Monitoring Summary Report No. 005 Experimental Ship Shielding Range October 10, 2012

Table 2 TSP and Metals Monitoring Results Sample Date Sample Location Sampling Period (hours) TSP (mg/m 3 ) TSP Exceedance? Lead (µg/m 3 ) Lead Exceedance? Manganese (µg/m 3 ) Manganese Exceedance? 25-Jul-12 14 23.4 0.0810 No 0.0200 No 0.0550 No 26-Jul-12 13 24.0 0.0190 No <0.018 No <0.018 No 26-Jul-12 14 24.1 0.0390 No <0.018 No 0.0290 No 27-Jul-12 13 6.7 0.0300 No <0.058 No <0.058 No 27-Jul-12 14 6.3 0.1900 No <0.067 No 0.1400 No 3-Aug-12 13 6.2 0.0120 No <0.018 No <0.018 No 3-Aug-12 14 6.6 0.1500 No <0.064 No 0.1100 No 6-Aug-12 13 24.0 0.0230 No <0.015 No <0.015 No 6-Aug-12 14 23.8 0.0680 No <0.018 No 0.0410 No 7-Aug-12 13 24.3 0.0340 No <0.015 No 0.0150 No 7-Aug-12 14 23.8 0.0740 No <0.018 No 0.0420 No 8-Aug-12 13 25.3 0.0450 No <0.019 No <0.019 No 8-Aug-12 14 25.0 0.0850 No 0.0340 No 0.0450 No 9-Aug-12 13 24.3 0.0350 No <0.015 No <0.015 No 9-Aug-12 14 23.9 0.0770 No 0.0370 No 0.0330 No 4-Sep-12 13 23.6 0.0190 No <0.018 No <0.018 No 4-Sep-12 14 24.0 0.0410 No <0.017 No 0.0240 No 5-Sep-12 13 Note 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5-Sep-12 14 24.0 0.0580 No <0.018 No 0.0320 No 24-Sep-12 13 24.1 0.0140 No Note 2 N/A Note 2 N/A 24-Sep-12 14 23.5 0.0520 No Note 2 N/A Note 2 N/A 25-Sep-12 13 23.4 0.0260 No Note 2 N/A Note 2 N/A 25-Sep-12 14 23.8 0.1100 No Note 2 N/A Note 2 N/A 26-Sep-12 13 23.9 0.0220 No Note 2 N/A Note 2 N/A 26-Sep-12 14 23.6 0.0700 No Note 2 N/A Note 2 N/A Notes: 1 - Sample results are not available due to temporary equipment malfunction. 2 - Only TSP and PM10 samples were analyzed during placement of clean (verified by sampling) backfill material. Sample locations are shown on Figure 1. The threshold criteria are as follows: TSP = 0.5 mg/m 3, lead = 50 µg/m 3, manganese = 200 µg/m 3. The detection limit for TSP is 0.06 µg/m 3 assuming a minimum sample volume of 1,600 m 3. The detection limits for lead and manganese are 16 ng/m 3 assuming minimum sample volumes of 1,600 m 3. µg/m 3 - micrograms per cubic meter mg/m 3 - milligrams per cubic meter N/A - not applicable ng/m 3 - nanograms per cubic meter TSP - total suspended particulates Page 2 of 2 Air Monitoring Summary Report No. 005 Experimental Ship Shielding Range October 10, 2012

Table 3 PM10 Monitoring Results Sample Date Sample Location Sampling Period (hours) PM10 (µg/m 3 ) PM10 Exceedance? 25-Jun-12 13 24.0 18.0 No 25-Jun-12 14 24.1 2.0 No 26-Jun-12 13 24.2 25.0 No 26-Jun-12 14 23.7 2.3 No 27-Jun-12 13 23.8 20.0 No 27-Jun-12 14 26.1 2.9 No 28-Jun-12 13 23.5 14.0 No 28-Jun-12 14 24.0 3.4 No 29-Jun-12 13 3.9 18.0 No 29-Jun-12 14 6.6 9.0 No 2-Jul-12 13 24.0 27.0 No 2-Jul-12 14 22.6 34.0 No 3-Jul-12 13 5.0 63.0 No 3-Jul-12 14 5.0 66 No 9-Jul-12 13 24.0 23 No 9-Jul-12 14 22.6 25 No 10-Jul-12 13 24.5 25 No 10-Jul-12 14 23.8 28 No 11-Jul-12 13 23.9 46 No 11-Jul-12 14 23.9 20 No 12-Jul-12 13 23.8 47 No 12-Jul-12 14 5.9 39 No 13-Jul-12 13 6.0 150 No 13-Jul-12 14 5.9 61 No 16-Jul-12 13 20.8 18 No 16-Jul-12 14 22.7 25 No 17-Jul-12 13 20.7 7 No 17-Jul-12 14 21.8 11 No 18-Jul-12 13 24.8 9 No 18-Jul-12 14 24.8 14 No 19-Jul-12 13 24.0 24 No 19-Jul-12 14 23.5 16 No 20-Jul-12 13 17.5 8 No 20-Jul-12 14 6.0 29 No 23-Jul-12 13 24.4 34 No 23-Jul-12 14 23.9 40 No Page 1 of 2 Air Monitoring Summary Report No. 005 Experimental Ship Shielding Range October 10, 2012

Table 3 PM10 Monitoring Results Sample Date Sample Location Sampling Period (hours) PM10 (µg/m 3 ) PM10 Exceedance? 24-Jul-12 13 23.7 27 No 24-Jul-12 14 24.2 26 No 25-Jul-12 13 24.0 14 No 25-Jul-12 14 23.4 23 No 26-Jul-12 13 23.7 10 No 26-Jul-12 14 24.1 13 No 27-Jul-12 13 6.7 22 No 27-Jul-12 14 6.2 38 No 3-Aug-12 13 6.7 6 No 3-Aug-12 14 6.6 30 No 6-Aug-12 13 6.7 49 No 6-Aug-12 14 23.8 20 No 7-Aug-12 13 24.0 19 No 7-Aug-12 14 Note 1 N/A N/A 8-Aug-12 13 24.9 2 No 8-Aug-12 14 Note 1 N/A N/A 9-Aug-12 13 23.9 23 No 9-Aug-12 14 23.9 22 No 4-Sep-12 13 23.6 14 No 4-Sep-12 14 24.0 31 No 5-Sep-12 13 Note 1 N/A N/A 5-Sep-12 14 24.0 44 No 24-Sep-12 13 24.1 15 No 24-Sep-12 14 23.4 15 No 25-Sep-12 13 23.4 34 No 25-Sep-12 14 23.7 28 No 26-Sep-12 13 23.9 22 No 26-Sep-12 14 23.6 43 No Notes: 1 - Sample results are not available due to temporary equipment malfunction. Sample locations are shown on Figure 1. The threshold value for PM10 is 5,000 µg/m 3. The detection limit for PM10 is 0.06 µg/m 3 assuming a minimum sample volume of 1,600 m 3. µg/m 3 - micrograms per cubic meter N/A - not applicable PM10 - particulate matter smaller than 10 microns in diameter Page 2 of 2 Air Monitoring Summary Report No. 005 Experimental Ship Shielding Range October 10, 2012

Table 4 Asbestos Monitoring Results Sample Date Sample Location Sampling Period (hours) Asbestos (fibers/cm 3 ) Asbestos Exceedance? 25-Jun-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 25-Jun-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 26-Jun-12 13 10.0 <0.0018 No 26-Jun-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 27-Jun-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 27-Jun-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 28-Jun-12 13 10.0 0.0023 No 28-Jun-12 14 10.0 0.0028 No 29-Jun-12 13 6.7 <0.0034 No 29-Jun-12 14 6.8 <0.0034 No 2-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 2-Jul-12 14 10.0 0.0031 No 3-Jul-12 13 5.0 <0.0045 No 3-Jul-12 14 5.0 <0.0045 No 9-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 9-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 10-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0015 No 10-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 11-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0018 No 11-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 12-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 12-Jul-12 14 5.9 <0.0022 No 13-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0019 No 13-Jul-12 14 5.9 <0.0039 No 16-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 16-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 17-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0018 No 17-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 18-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0019 No 18-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 19-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0019 No 19-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 20-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0015 No 20-Jul-12 14 6.1 <0.0039 No 23-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 23-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No Page 1 of 2 Air Monitoring Summary Report No. 005 Experimental Ship Shielding Range October 10, 2012

Table 4 Asbestos Monitoring Results Sample Date Sample Location Sampling Period (hours) Asbestos (fibers/cm 3 ) Asbestos Exceedance? 24-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 24-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 25-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0019 No 25-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 26-Jul-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 26-Jul-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 27-Jul-12 13 5.6 <0.0039 No 27-Jul-12 14 6.1 <0.0039 No 3-Aug-12 13 6.0 <0.003 No 3-Aug-12 14 6.6 <0.0034 No 6-Aug-12 13 10.0 <0.0018 No 6-Aug-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 7-Aug-12 13 10.0 <0.0018 No 7-Aug-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 8-Aug-12 13 10.0 <0.0018 No 8-Aug-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 9-Aug-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 9-Aug-12 14 10.0 0.0035 No 4-Sep-12 13 10.0 <0.0022 No 4-Sep-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No 5-Sep-12 13 Note 1 N/A N/A 5-Sep-12 14 10.0 <0.0022 No Notes: 1 - Sample results are not available due to temporary equipment malfunction. Sample locations are shown on Figure 1. The threshold value for asbestos is 0.1 fibers/cm 3. The detection limit is 0.003 fibers/cm 3 assuming a minimum sample volume of 900 liters. fibers/cm 3 - fibers per cubic centimeter N/A - not applicable Page 2 of 2 Air Monitoring Summary Report No. 005 Experimental Ship Shielding Range October 10, 2012