Technical Documentation

Similar documents
Session 5 Wind Turbine Scaling and Control W. E. Leithead

LIFECYCLE SERVICE SOLUTIONS

LIFECYCLE SERVICE SOLUTIONS

Smart Wind Turbine Solutions 2MW Platform

Siemens Gamesa AEP increase Solution

Low-noise wind turbine design using DinoTails Next Generation. Rob Kuilboer, NSG bijeenkomst, Oktober 2018

Demonstration with optical fibres by Smart Fibres Ltd. Task 15

Hywind Scotland status and plans

Are you looking for the maximum return on your investment in wind energy?

CHAPTER 64 TAIL ROTOR. Section Title Page

Wind Blade Failure Identification and Prevention

Siemens G2 platform 2.3-MW geared wind turbines. Exceptional performance, proven reliability. Answers for energy.

Durch professionelle Datenanalyse clever optimieren sensitive Eis- und Schadenserkennung am Rotorblatt

Bright outlook for improved profitability. Direct drive wind turbine SWT Answers for energy.

TURKISH WIND ENERGY CONGRESS Innovative Blade Design. Istanbul November 2012

Within the 300 GW total, the Energy Department estimates that 54 GW will be required from offshore wind to feed the large coastal demand centers.

ATLAS Principle to Product

Experimental Verification of the Implementation of Bend-Twist Coupling in a Wind Turbine Blade

Effects of Large Bending Deflections on Blade Flutter Limits. UpWind Deliverable D2.3. Bjarne Skovmose Kallesøe Morten Hartvig Hansen.

GE Renewable Energy. GE s 3 MW Platform POWERFUL AND EFFICIENT.

European Wind Integration Study (EWIS) Towards a Successful Integration of Wind Power into European Electricity Grids

Siemens G2 platform 2.3-MW geared wind turbines. Exceptional performance, proven reliability. Answers for energy.

Simulating Rotary Draw Bending and Tube Hydroforming

Ingenuity for Life Wind Power Morten Pilgaard Rasmussen. Restricted Siemens AG 2016

V MW Creating more from less

Renewable Energy Innovation Outlook: Offshore Wind Technology

Wind Energy in the Southeast: Offshore and Land-Based Potential

Innovative Axial Flux Air Cored Permanent Magnet Generator suitable for Slow, Medium Speed and Direct Drive Wind Turbines

Siemens D3 platform 3.2-MW direct drive wind turbines. Reduced complexity, increased profitability. Answers for energy.

Expert en Acoustique et Vibration

ABB Wind Power Solution

JDR PRODUCT APPLICATIONS. MCE Deepwater Development 2017

GE Renewable Energy. Unsubsidised Onshore Wind. Charles Haworth PhD Risk and Operations Leader EMEA & Asia. Imagination at at work.

V MW The future for low wind sites

Validation Simulation of New Railway Rolling Stock Using the Finite Element Method

Wind Generation and its Grid Conection

Skid against Curb simulation using Abaqus/Explicit

Expert Report: Pitch Control 2016

RTM COMPOSITE LUGS FOR HIGH LOAD TRANSFER APPLICATIONS

EP4-Platform: E-126 EP4 / E-141 EP4. Arno Hildebrand, Programm Manager EP4 ENERCON Research & Development

Protection for Wind-Turbines. It

Are you looking for the maximum return on your investment in wind energy?

Aero-Elastic Optimization of a 10 MW Wind Turbine

MiRIS Europe's largest Hybrid industrial energy storage pilot plant

Fault Ride-Through for a Smart Rotor DQ-axis Controlled Wind Turbine with a Jammed Trailing Edge Flap

The X-Rotor Offshore Wind Turbine Concept

Introduction CONTENT Future of offshore wind energy in Europe Offshore wind energy in Spain Alternatives to the transmission system to the grid Compar

ENERCON 3 MW and 7,5 MW Portfolio E-82 E3, E-101 and E-126

Multi Rotor Solution for Large Scale Offshore Wind Power

RNRG WHITE PAPER Early Detection of High Speed Bearing Failures

Energía Eólica Marina: perspectiva de un fabricante de aerogeneradores. II Conferencia Internacional de Energía Offshore

Advanced Blade Pitch Systems - Insights and Trends

Steam Turbine performance improvement solutions for Indian fleets

**EthosEnergy, Power Plant Services Americas

HIGH PERFORMANCE WIND TURBINES

RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT OF ACCESSORY GEARBOX BEVEL DRIVES Kozharinov Egor* *CIAM

Crashworthiness of an Electric Prototype Vehicle Series

Rotor imbalance cancellation

Quiet yet powerful, The quietest wind turbine of the 3MW-class. WindSoMe Seminar/Workshop Thursday, January 26th 2017

Non-Linear Simulation of Front Mudguard Assembly

Turbine alternator flow loop test report.

The validation of MBS multi-megawatt gearbox models on a 13.2 MW test rig

APPENDIX J V90 3.0MW Turbine Specifications

Dr.-Ing. Ervin Spahi, Wadden Sea Forum, Bremerhaven Electric grid on and off-shore: current status, obstacles and new developments

FUSE TECHNOLOGY Ambient temperature

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Unlocking Vietnam s Nearshore Wind Potential

How do things run smoothly even in rough winds?

The strain sensor is available with integrated electronic evaluator.

V MW An efficient way to more power

Wind Power Applications & Supercapacitors

Turbine alternator flow loop test report.

MAIN SHAFT SUPPORT FOR WIND TURBINE WITH A FIXED AND FLOATING BEARING CONFIGURATION

Siemens G4 platform 3.6-MW and 4.0-MW geared wind turbines. The offshore workhorse redefined. Answers for energy.

Estimation of Unmeasured DOF s on a Scaled Model of a Blade Structure

1 st DeepWind 5 MW baseline design

Vertical Pumps for the Oil & Gas Industry

Low Speed Wind Turbines. Current Applications and Technology Development

Market Perspective & Solutions

Intelligent mechanical systems. ZF technology in wind turbines puts wind energy in motion

Intelligent mechanical systems. ZF technology in wind turbines puts wind energy in motion

Vestas as a multibrand service partner

Performance Testing of Composite Bearing Materials for Large Hydraulic Cylinders

Making wind even more profitable V MW M. Reliable technology added new innovations. Large rotor diameter expands your

A STUDY OF THE CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR DISCHARGE PIPELINE CONSTRAINED OSCILLATION. KIRILL SOLODYANKIN*, JIŘÍ BĚHAL ČKD KOMPRESORY, a.s.

Module 3: Types of Wind Energy Systems

Project 1J.1: Hydraulic Transmissions for Wind Energy

V MW Making wind even more profitable

Contemporary technological solutions

Bushing connector application in Suspension modeling

Non-Linear Implicit Analysis of Roll over Protective Structure OSHA STANDARD (PART )

Finite Element Analysis of Clutch Piston Seal

Embracing the full life cycle of the wind turbine

Renewable Energy. The value of Wind Energy. Imagination at at work. Mark Rush Technical Director GE Renewable Energy Sales

Power From Shore: An introduction to HVDC Light Offshore

Generators for the age of variable power generation

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

Address for Correspondence

BLADEcontrol Greater output less risk

EMS ELONGATION MEASUREMENT SYSTEM. Strain measurement system for wind turbines optimizing the control & condition monitoring

Aeroelastic Modelling of the LMH64-5 Blade. C. Lindenburg

Transcription:

Technical Documentation

D-STRING Prevent cracks in the max chord region of the blade The D-String is a simple yet effective technology developed to eliminate cracks in the trailing edge max chord area by eliminating breathing as the root cause. The installation of the D-String positively affect the operation of your wind turbine. 2 D-STRING Technical documentation

1. Commercially viable solution that eliminates the occurrence of cracks on aging blades. 2. Significantly increase the anticipated life-time of your blades. 3. Secures operation of the blade without added maintenance cost. 4. Decreasing time for maintenance, in turn reduces the LCoE increasing the profit margin. 5. The cost of a single repair equals the cost of a D-String kit for 3 blades (including installation). Expert opinion by DEWI OCC The D-String documentation has been reviewed by DEWI OCC who found that: the structural properties and integrity of the blades are not negatively affected by the installation of D-Strings. The D-String product does not influence the structural safety of the trailing edge panels of a general rotor blade design. D-STRING Technical documentation 3

The D-String Technical Description The D-String product is made out of three components; two cones, a fuse and a Vectran 2,5 mm string. The D-String connects the two trailing edge panels, thus reducing the peeling stresses in the blade, thereby eliminating cracks developing in the TE max chord area. The number of D-String installed are depending on the individual blade types. The two cones act as anchoring devices in the trailing edge panels, while the string transfers the loads between the two cones to the blade panels. Fuse The fuse is placed between the cones as an additional safety to prevent any damages to the panels. 4 D-STRING Technical documentation Cone

The D-String Prevents Breathing The D-String prevents breathing of the trailing edge panels thereby reducing the peeling stresses in the adhesive bondlines. With D-String The D-String directly reduce the deformations of the panels, hence significantly reducing the peeling stresses in the adhesive bondlines. There is a direct correlation between breathing and the peeling stresses in the adhesive bondlines: the higher the magnitude of the breathing, the higher the peeling stresses. No D-String The two figures illustrate a FE simulation of the reduction of the peeling stresses in the trailing edge adhesive bondline, with and without D-Strings installed. Field measurements show that the installation of D-String results in a 95-97% reduction of the breathing. Breathing Numerical Finite Element Simulation of breathing D-STRING Technical documentation 5 during operation

The D-String Prevents Debonding When rotating, the blades are subjected to gravity forces in the edgewise direction regardless of the wind condition. This influence the connection of the outer shell to the aft shear web generating peeling stresses in the connections. Longitudinal cracks Transverse cracks 6 D-STRING Technical documentation

Debonded shear web Peeling in the adhesive bondlines Deformed panels Undeformed panels Peeling and debonding The installation of D-Strings reduce peeling stresses significantly in the aft shear web preventing debonding of the skin to the shear web. Cracks develop due to out-of-plane deformations of the TE panels leading to debonding of the trailing edge bondline and main box. D-STRING Technical documentation 7

Test Program Eliminating Risk The D-String have been thoroughly tested at the Technical University of Denmark to demonstrate the performance under normal and extreme operating conditions. Static- and Dynamic Tests The D-String components were tested individually and sub-assembled in different settings. The full assembled D-String was tested statically and dynamically in a blade panel using the same D-String installation technique as for blades in operation. The test results have verified that the D-String has the necessary properties in order to remove the breathing, without causing any risk to the blade.

Both Static and dynamic tests of the D-String have proven that the D-String can be installed without any concern for harming the blades. The loads generated by the D-String are quite small; typically less than 1/10 of what the trailing edge panels of the blades can sustain as depicted in the table below. V80 Trial Installation Years of Operation The first operating D-Strings were installed in a V80 blade in January 2013. Recent inspection confirmed that no cracks has formed in the area where the D-strings are installed. D-String in V80 blade, January 2013 D-String Safety Load Criteria The applied safety margin is the difference between the blade panel breaking load of 300 kg to the normal operational load with the D-String installed of only 20-30 kg. The fuse will slide at 150 kg thus half the panel breaking load. Panel Breaking Load, Static Tests Fuse Breaking Load, Static Tests Max Operational Load on the D-String Normal Operational Load on the D-String, Field Measurement 300 kg 150 kg 80 kg 20-30 kg

Easy Installation of D-Strings The D-String can be installed up-tower using simple tools with either rope access or using a 360 degree platform. Bladena assists with the installation of the D-Strings and works with a network of independent service providers who ensures a reliable and cost-effective installation, meeting the highest standards safety and quality. 1. Stop the turbine 2. Access the turbine using rope or a basket 3. Drill conical holes 4. Position the D-String 10 D-STRING Technical documentation

1. Stop the turbine 2. Access the turbine using rope or a basket 3. Drill conical holes 4. Position the D-String 5. Pull the string through 6. Position the D-String 7. Add Pretension 8. Seal the panel Commercial references for the D-String is available on different blade types, to mention a few, Vestas, GE and LM portfolio. If you are interested to hear more about your blades in particular, feel free to contact: Europe: Ryan Lauridsen, no. +45 20 14 59 96 US and Canada: Dave Zanier, no +1 647 339 2924 5. Pull the string through 6. Position the D-String 7. Add Pretension 8. Seal the panel D-STRING Technical documentation 11

Operational and Financial Impact Installation of the D-String will positively impact the operation of your Wind Turbines by: 1. Decreasing time for maintenance. This in turn reduces the LCoE increasing the profit margin. 2. The cost of a single repair equals the cost of a D-String kit for 3 blades (including the installation). 3. The D-String secures operation of the blade in the anticipated lifetime of the turbine without added maintenance cost. $ Aging blades have an increasing demand for repairs, due to cracks, this often corresponds to the end of warranty period when the cost of repairs befall the Wind Turbine Owners (see the figure below). To secure your assets, it is therefore beneficial to install the D-Strings before the end of warranty to ensure cheap and easy operation going forward. Failure Rates Warranty Owners Risk Few Failures Standard operation Increasing failure rates Years of Operation

Examples of Reference Turbines Installation of the D-String will positively impact the operation of your wind turbines byreducing cost for O&M, hence lowering the LCoE: Turbine Vestas 80 (Denmark) Year 2013 Failure Transverse crack in TE panel Turbine 1.5 MW 37c, 34a (US) Year 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Failure Bond line crack, Trailing Edge Turbine Repower MM92 LM 45.3 (US) Year 2015 Failure Transverse crack in TE panel Turbine Vestas V90 (Canada) Year 2016, 2017 Failure Longitudinal crack in Trailing Edge D-STRING Technical documentation 13

D-String Business Case Based on failure rates in the field the D-String ROI is 1 year for offshore wind farms with a combined saving in the lifetime of the blade of 13.200.00 Euros. Off-Shore Wind Farm. 60x 3 MW turbines Blade O&M Cost without D-String 2.860.000 Euro/Year Blade O&M Cost with D-String 1.980.000 Euro/Year Savings on O&M Cost due to D-String 880.000 Euro/Year Gained Production due to D-String Turnover pr. Day without D-String 2.853 Euro/Day Turnover pr. Day with D-String 2.859 Euro/Day Gain pr. Year - 60 Turbines 106.592 Euro/Year Total Gain on O&M and Production 986.592 Euro/Year Return on Investment 1,0 Years Combined saving during lifetime of the blades 13.200.000Euro cumulative maintenance cost [euro] x 10 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 D-string installed No D-string O&M cost 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time [years] cumulative maintenance cost [euro] x 10 7 2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 D-string installed No D-string O&M cost Note: Graphs does not include lost production, only reduction in direct O&M cost. 1 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 Time [years] 14 D-STRING Technical documentation

Investment Off-Shore On-Shore D-String list price per turbine 10.000 10.000 D-String installation 5.000 3.000 Downtime due to install. 12 hrs. 1.800 1.800 Total Installation Cost 16.800 14.800 60 Turbine Wind Farm 1.008.000 888.000 On-Shore Wind Farm. 60x 3 MW turbines Based on failure rates in the field the D-String ROI is 1,33 years for onshore wind farms with a combined saving in the lifetime of the blades of 7.350.00 Euros. Blade O&M Cost without D-String Blade O&M Cost with D-String Savings on O&M Cost due to D-String 1.420.000 Euro/Year 930.000 Euro/Year 490.000 Euro/Year Gained Production due to D-String Turnover pr. Day without D-String 2.857 Euro/Day Turnover pr. Day with D-String 2.865 Euro/Day Gain pr. Year - 60 Turbines 176.602 Euro/Year Total Gain on O&M and Production 666.602 Euro/Year Return on Investment 1,3 Years Combined saving during lifetime of the blade 7.350.000 Euro cumulative maintenance cost [euro] x 10 7 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 D-string installed No D-string O&M cost cumulative maintenance cost [euro] x 10 6 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 D-string installed No D-string O&M cost Note: Graphs does not include lost production, only reduction in direct O&M cost. 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time [years] 5 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 Time [years] D-STRING Technical documentation 15

The D-String does not affect the structural safety of trailing edge panels of a general rotor blade design Expert opion by DEWI OCC The D-String has a significant impact on the anticipated lifetime of your blades. The D-String decrease the LCoE thus increasing the profit margin. Return on investment of 1 year for offshore turbines and 1,3 years for onshore turbines! Want to hear more about your blades Simply contact Bladena Europe Ryan Lauridsen US Dave Zanier ryl@bladena.com dz@bladena.com +45 20 14 59 96 +1 647 339 2924