est bali april 2013 hans ulrich fuhrke giz sutip Introduction visualisation description of the flux* mrt system

Similar documents
Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Energy Efficiency Transport Sector

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Light rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form.

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Implementing Transport Demand Management Measures

Fiji Bus Industry: improving through greening

Two years since our book

Trolleybus Rapid Transit Systems in Developing Countries

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Doubling the Market Share of Public Transport Worldwide by 2025: A Smart Future for Cities

Kaohsiung City Government Kaohsiung: Heading towards an Eco-Mobility City

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

RUF capacity. RUF International, May 2010, A RUF DualMode system can obtain very high capacity by organizing the vehicles in small trains.

Building smart transport in Moscow

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

on the Real Estate Industry Rutt Bridges

In the following letter I would like to share with you the developments we reached in the referred subjects.

Mobility of Gurugram & NCR-

Decarbonization of the Transport Sector and Urban Form

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

IKORODU- CMS BRT EXTENSION PROJECT

ELISA SCHENNER. European Stadtwerke Holding AG

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

NATIONAL REPORT: SPAIN. At 31/12/2015

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation

Transitioning to Integrated Sustainable Multi-mobility. A Model Climate Action Strategy

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

* Presented at 2011 World Bank Transport Forum, March Jaehak Oh. Director, Global Research Office for Green Growth & Convergence

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

How to make urban mobility clean and green

Province of Livorno. ITS to promote a change in travel behaviour

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Urban Land Use/Transport Policy, Metro and Its Impacts in Shanghai

Transport Sector Performance Indicators: Sri Lanka Existing Situation

Smart transit system and e-mobility technologies for the GCC s railway aspirations

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

Air. Goals: Improve statewide air quality Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 9 DRAFT DRAFT

Seoul Transportation

BYD SkyRail Elevate Your Commute, Elevate Your Life

Transport systems integration into urban development planning processes

The Central London Congestion Charge

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

Personal Rapid Transit as an Alternative to Bus Service in Two Communities

Harnessing technology and organizational aspects for new mobility services Viajeo PLUS City Showcase November 2015, Singapore

FACTSHEET on Metro Systems

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

How to manage large scale infrastructures? Infrastructure planning within Toulouse s SUMP. Alexandre Blaquière. 1st December 2016

ERTRAC Vision Future Road Transport Prepared by the Executive Group in collaboration with the Working Group Leaders.

The project faces a number of challenges:

Ministry of Environment and Forests. Ministry of Communication

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Moscow International Transport Experts Council. Laurence A. Bannerman

Charlotte Gateway Station A State & City Partnership June 24, 2015

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Parking & TOD around BART Stations. Jessica ter Schure November 1, 2009 Rail~Volution 2009 Boston, Massachusetts

BRT: A solution to an urban transport crisis or a financial burden?

"Diversity In Europe. a common voice for a sustainable development" Pro-ecological Transport Solutions

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Policies on Public Transport Development and Financial Schemes in Taipei

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Key Transfer Stations - Technical Memo

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Parking Management Strategies

CA PACITY TRA MWAY. November CODATU XVII High capacity tramway November

Bus and coach transport for greening mobility

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

Pametno gospodarenje cestovnom infrastrukturom Smart Management of Road Infrastructure Christophe Nicodème, ERF

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

A REVIEW OF HIGH-SPEED RAIL PLAN IN JAVA ISLAND: A COMPARISON WITH EXISTING MODES OF TRANSPORT

DAVID DAVID BURNS BURNS RAILROAD RAILROAD INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CONSULTAN CHICAGO CHICAGO, USA, USA

Designing and financing resilient transport infrastructure

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

Rui Wang Assistant Professor, UCLA School of Public Affairs. IACP 2010, Shanghai June 20, 2010

ACCEL. Fostering urban mobility

The Smart Growth Countywide Transit Master Plan

INTELLIGENT URBAN MOBILITY SOLUTIONS MARTIN ERTL CHIEF INNOVATION OFFICER BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION BERLIN,

Innovation in Transport. Mike Waters

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Employment Impacts of Electric Vehicles

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Halifax Commuter Rail: A Fresh Concept

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

Transcription:

f l u x* access to liveable cities est bali 23-24 april 2013 hans ulrich fuhrke giz sutip Introduction visualisation description of the flux* mrt system * continuous flow, shift, mutation

Photos from philippines

CAR FREE CITIES CITIES CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION CLEAN RECLAIMED AIR NOISE PUBLIC REDUCTION RECLAIMED PUBLIC SPACE MACRO ECONOMIC BENEFITS LIVABILITY WALKABILITY FOR ALL YOU ARE HERE INC- REASE CAR SALES FOR FISCAL REVENUES

three systems competing in urban public space: 1 nmt = walking and biking = healthy, livable cities lost the plot - needs radical change of mind 2 public transport = unsufficient and neglected needs high investments and political will 3 private vehicles = occupying entire public realm winner of the game, responsible for traffic jams, pollution, GHG emissions, loss of productivity

PRIVATE modal share UBLIC RURAL URBAN

heavy subsidies for private means of transport: next to all public space is provided for free to the minority of private vehicle passengers public space covering often less than 10% of urban space is regarded the highest valued asset of a city but not accessible for the majority, not (yet) able or in need to own a car or motorbike infrastructure (paved and drained roads, traffic guidance by signals, signs and traffic police) is provided for free - except the toll roads are charged, yet at a price less than their economic costs fuel is provided at roughly half the world market s price

exponential acceleration of information exchange* ACCES TIME * demand for access / need for speed

two tier approach: 1. long term vision:» How do we all want our city to be in 20 years?»start today the political process,»the financial preps and»the technical implementations 2. short term action: extend, increase and improve today NMT and PT conditions, performance and facilities traffic improvements and TDM measures

suggested & realistic vision for the urban future we want: Dense, connected and multifunctional built urban structures leaving some 15% of public space for all The public sphere is free of private fuel driven vehicles The reclaimed public realm invites to cover some 40% of transit needs by walking and biking, at the same time making cities alive as arts and culture, playing and communicating, meeting and consuming happens in the partly sheltered open space The huge remaining demand to gain access to every corner of the city is provided by an integrated public transport network, the backbone of which is an innovative urban rail.

The four wagon train (alternatively a system of 3 railcars could be employed) runs on constant speed of around 70 km/h (45 miles/h) nonstop on a single elevated line, which easily blends into the townscape above public land where no plot needs to be purchased. decoupled railcar enters the simple station after the train had passed in constant speed

all traincars are identic, run driverless on their own, carry up to 100 pax, have a left and right alley for pax movements in either direction, a central division bench for seating, handrails to lean onto and LED screens for information and advertising

The single stilted lines (sky train type, ~ 5m elevated single rail track) integrate into a typical cityscape, partly along main thoroughfares, but partly as well through narrow corridors of dense neighborhoods, where they might run along or over canals, parks and through modern mega structures, where stations are within or in front of these and connected with same level bridges

4 loops with 20 to 25 stops in a network of 240km covering a city like Jakarta

The approaching train decouples its last wagon 150 m before the next stop. This single car comes to a halt in that ministation, while the now three-wagon-train continues its ride in full speed and passes the station without stopping or slowing down.

left aisle moving forward, right aisle moving backwards

. flux. is the "non-stop-train" which constantly changes its wagon composition (adding front - loosing tail). is the system which would cover a whole city with its (e.g. Jakarta 4) loops meeting each other and itself every 3-5 stations with single track one direction only one wagon at each station stopping

the last wagon decouples, decelerates, stops at the terminal, accelerates and joins/couples and continues traveling with the 3 next wagons coming from the rear, then later again the rear one decouples, slows down and stops at the next terminal. system equation based on a 3 / 2 / 3 wagon composition:

Coupling studies

Passenger movements and sojourn during the ride

If travelling in the commonly deployed 4-car train, the distance of: 1 station then move 3 cars back 2 stations " 2 cars " 3 stations 1 car 4 stations remain in the same car 5 " then move 1 car to the front 6 " " 2 cars " 7 " 3 " " and so on...

Disabled passengers or those who want to take it even more easy have a fantastic second option by just remaining in the wagon they boarded and stop with it at every fourth station until coming close to the destination, to alight at which there is maximum two wagons to be changed to: - Stay in original wagon for destinations 4,8,12,16 etc stations away - Move one back for destinations 3,7,11,15 etc stations away - move one ahead for destinations 5,9,13,17 etc stations away - move two back for destinations 2, 6, 10, 14, 18 etc stations away... still travelling much faster than in any conventional system as only every forth station causes a two minute delay due to the stop there.

financial performance theoretical calculation: 20 hours daily operation, with steady full occupation of 100 pax/car, the flux attracts some 6 million passengers a day (e.g.:jakarta) -assuming full occupancy and an average ride of 10 km/pax, 125 stations spread over the city and 500 wagons deployed return of U$ 6 million/day from ticketing alone assuming that every passenger pays the full single journey price of U$1 (IDR 10.000) for the average 10 km realistic assumption: 50% occupancy, pax use reduced ticketing schemes, like jobtickets, student-cards and long-term-passes: U$ 2 million/day return expected, annual turnover U$ 730 million Calculated investment of some 8 billion U$ for the 240 km network (JKT) and largely reduced operational costs mainly due to energy savings

The flux urban rail is made commercially feasible by these measures: A. Investment cuts for the installation: 1.) single- 2.) elevated - 3.) extended - line Network 4.) simplified short (20 m) station platforms 5.) prefabricated steel columns and tracks, standardized system for extensive networks in several cities 6.) maximized percentage of in-country production 7.) all rolling stock is composed of the same electric self-propelled, driver-less 100 pax wagon, which is calculated at less than 2 Mio U$ / unit

The flux urban rail is made commercially feasible by these measures: B. Gains on TOD (Transit Oriented re-developments): 1.) The investor - public or private is granted the right to develop the stations over public land with added commercial space: residential/offices/entertainment/services/outlets in accordance with prevailing or to be established building codes 2.) The operator/developer of existing structures is entitled / encouraged to negotiate the integration or connection of stations 3.) Station building and maintenance burdened on existing real estate operators

the flux urban rail is made commercially feasible by these measures: C. minimized operating costs: 1.) huge energy savings by non-stop and constant speed travels of 75% of the rolling stocks 2.) braking energy recovery 3.) unmanned rolling stocks 4.) in-country spare parts and technical know-how 5.) simplified 20m non-ac (except if within urban structures), elevated platform stations, many to be maintained by real estate operators on their account (PPP)

The flux urban rail is made commercially feasible by these measures: D. Revenues from ticket sales through highest ridership: 1.) speed (nearly doubled) 2.) direct access (max 1 km distance to station within inner city) 3.) integration (walking accessibility, pedicab, e-taxi, bus feeders drop off and bike park&ride facilities) 4.) shortest waiting time (max 30 seconds to board next ride) 5.) high turnover (2 minutes headways) 6.) comfortable boarding time (90 sec) 7.) nonstop ride, constant movement without acceleration and braking during journey 8.) information displays and guidance in stations and on train 9.) clean and comfortable rolling stocks 10.) integrated electronic ticketing 11.) branding of the flux system creating pride and identity

The flux urban rail is made commercially feasible by these measures: E. Extra revenues: 1.) advertising in and on (LED skin) attractive rolling stocks and stations (potentially up to 5% of total revenues) 2.) patent returns and franchising opportunities