TRACC. Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion

Similar documents
MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015

Product Specification. ABSORB 350 TM TL-2 Non-Redirective, Gating, Crash Cushion Applied to Quickchange Moveable Barrier

Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. X-Tension DS. is suitable for all road types: Motorways, country roads, city streets for speed categories up to 110 km/h.

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

SMART CUSHION INNOVATIONS

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety June 14, 2007

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

MPS 350i. Truck Mounted Attenuator. Trinity Industries Inc.

DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIERS

SMART CUSHION INNOVATIONS

November 16, 1998 Refer to: HNG-14. Mr. David Allardyce Mechanical Engineer B&B Electromatic Main Street Norwood, Louisiana 70761

Worksite Safety Update Promoting safety in road construction

HIGHWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC.

BarrierGate. General Specifications. Manual Operations General Specifications

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide

Guide Rail Safety Symposium

1962: HRCS Circular 482 one-page document, specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for crash tests.

Road Safety Problems Documented On April 23, 2012

Evaluation and Design of ODOT s Type 5 Guardrail with Tubular Backup

ROAD SAFETY PRODUCTS TAU TUBE TM FAMILY REDIRECTIVE CRASH CUSHIONS

Roadside Safety MASH

AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015

Assembly Manual Stemmons Freeway Dallas, Texas 75207

Florida s Turnpike Enterprise High Tension Median Cable Barrier Pilot Project. William H. Cook, P.E. Florida s Turnpike Assistant Roadway Engineer

Plastic Safety Systems

White Paper. Compartmentalization and the Motorcoach

Table of Contents. Scorpion Truck Mounted Attenuator 1. Scorpion Trailer Attenuator 9. Big Sandy Sand Barrels 13. TrafFix Water-Wall 16

Evaluating The Relevancy Of Current Crash Test Guidelines For Roadside Safety Barriers On High Speed Roads

safedirection.com.au Ref: PM 017/02

Median Barriers in North Carolina

Illinois Safety Program IDOT District ATSSA Workshop

High Tension Cable Barrier

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

SLED End Treatment System Manual

UNIVERSAL TAU-II-R. Installation and Maintenance Manual Supplement. NCHRP 350 TL-3 Redirective, Non-Gating, Reusable Impact Attenuaor

Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of an Energy-absorbing Guardrail End Terminal

Safety Barrier System Conditions

Product Information. Tested System Transitions DB SafeLink. Safe transition to other safety barrier systems

s MEDIAN BARRIERS FOR TEXAS HIGHWAYS

Guardrail/Bridgerail Recommendations for Very Low Volume Local Roads in Kansas

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

June 27, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176

Improving Roadside Safety by Computer Simulation

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide

W-Beam Approach Treatment at Bridge Rail Ends Near Intersecting Roadways

PN SoftStop. Revision A June End Terminal. Product Description Assembly Manual

Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact

Passenger Dies When Semi-Truck Trailer Hits Cow In Roadway Incident Number: 05KY089

Slotted Rail Guardrail Terminal

Wyoming Road Closure Gate

June 5, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178. Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO Dear Mr.

60 70 Guidelines. Managing Speeds. Work Zones

CRASH TEST OF MILE POST MARKER. T. J. Hirsch Research Engineer. and. Eugene Buth Assistant Research Engineer. Research Report Number 146-8

PARAPETS / RAILS / MEDIANS / SIDEWALKS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 25

D-25 Speed Advisory System

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

W-Beam Guiderail Transition from Light to Heavy Posts

Rev. E September All rights in copyright preserved

July 17, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176A

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/

BARRIER INSTALLATION GUIDE Produced by B. S Developments Manufacturers of Easi Set JJ HOOK Barriers

April 22, In Reply Refer To: HSA-10/WZ-206. Mr. Jan Miller TrafFix Devices 220 Calle Pintoresco San Clemente, California Dear Mr.

PARAPETS / RAILS / MEDIANS / SIDEWALKS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 25

End Terminals Installation and Repair Manual SMAT2 SMAT4

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

STATE ND PROJECT NO. CP 0883 (14) & CP 1152 (14) SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 9 31 SIGN NUMBER SIGN SIZE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REQUIRED UNITS PER AMOUNT UNITS

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

TTMA-100 Trailer TMA. User s Manual. NCHRP 350 TL-3 Trailer Truck Mounted Attenuator

TTI TRAFFIC SAFETY CONFERENCE. John A. Barton, P.E.

Technical Report Documentation Page

Table of Contents. Chapter 2 Safety Fundamentals for Bridge Inspectors. Methods of Access Introduction

All specifications in this manual are subject to change without prior notice

Impact & Asset Protection Systems Strong - Lightweight - Maneuverable - Interlocking

The final test of a person's defensive driving ability is whether or not he or she can avoid hazardous situations and prevent accident..

TEMPORARY & PERMANENT CONCRETE VEHICLE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS

Maine Turnpike Authority

Highway worker crushed by swinging backhoe boom

PURPOSE POLICY. Page 1 of 6 / S.O.G Highway Operations Pascal Arnes Chief of Fire

Evaluation of Barriers for Very High Speed Roadways

EMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY

EXTENDING TL-2 SHORT-RADIUS GUARDRAIL TO LARGER RADII

TxDOT Representative

Objectives. Understand defensive driving techniques. Increase awareness of safe driving behaviors

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Chapter 4 COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM

Procedure Effective date Rescinds Vehicle Placement In or Near Moving Traffic 17 November January 2005

.MAINTENANCE. Strategic Initiative Four:

Defensive and Safe Driving Accidents. Why must we maintain defensive and safe driving practices?

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Underrun Protection

FHWA Motorcycle Crash Causation Study

NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

To prevent future occurrences of similar incidents, the following recommendations have been made:

ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF TEXAS BRIDGE RAILS TO CONTAIN BUSES AND TRUCKS

Transcription:

TRACC Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion CSP Pacific Business Unit of Fletcher Concrete & Infrastructure Limited 306 Neilson Street Onehunga, Auckland Phone: (09) 634 1239 or 0800 655 200 Fax: (09) 634 4525 Website: www.csppacific.co.nz E-mail: info@csppacific.co.nz

Table of Contents About TRACC....3 Product Overview..4 Full Scale Crash Tests.5 Typical Crash Sequence.6 Photos of Installation 7 Photos after Impact..8 Annex 1...In-Service Evaluation CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-2 -

About TRACC and the Family of TRACC Products The TRACC (Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion) Family of Crash Cushions offers fully redirective, non-gating, bi-directional, energy absorbing crash cushion designed to protect motorists from impacting concrete barriers, bridge parapet rails, bridge piers and other hazards in both permanent and temporary work zone locations. The TRACC Family of Crash Cushions has been accepted by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration for use on the National Highway System regardless of design or posted speed. The TRACC Family The TRACC System is available in three sizes. The compact Test Level 2 SHORTRACC is an economical solution for applications where design speed is 45 mph (70 kph) or lower. The standard Test Level 3 TRACC is available for all speeds above 45 mph (70 kph). The FASTRACC was specifically designed and is available for roadways with speed limits of 70 mph (113 kph). Although testing guidelines contained in National Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 do not include impact speeds over 100 km/h, Trinity has developed and successfully crash-tested the FASTRACC with a ¾ ton (2000 kg) pickup truck at 70 mph (113 kph) to prove that the system performs well in a higher-speed impact. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has accepted the FASTRACC not only as a Test Level 3 crash cushions, but also one which has demonstrated additional capacity for head-on crashes at higher speeds than those recognized by NCHRP Report 350. The WIDETRACC was designed to protect errant vehicles from wide hazards. The WIDETRACC can be custom-designed for any width and for any design speed. You can always find a TRACC for your specific use. The TRACC can be supplied with a number of different transitions to fit guardrail, concrete barriers, toll booths etc. Why specify TRACC? The TRACC System is a very low maintenance roadside safety feature. Except for repairs due to impact, there is virtually no maintenance required for the system. It is recommended that an annual drive-by inspection be performed to ensure that no minor impacts went undetected and that debris has not accumulated around the system. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-3 -

Product Overview Dimensions Length. 14 0 or 21 0 or 25 9 Width.2 0 to Unlimited Width Height.2 8 Energy Absorbing Technique The TRACC system includes six major components: Sled, Frames, Base, Rip Plates, Cutting Blades and Panels. During an end-on impact, the impacting vehicle pushes the Sled along the Base. The Base is constructed by two beams and anchored into foundation. Each beam is assembled from two U-profiles connected through by Rip Plates. The Sled of the crash cushion is equipped with a Cutting Blade at the base. As the Sled moves along the Base, during an end-on impact, it sequentially contacts the Frames and pushes them forward, causing the Panels to telescope. Energy is absorbed through the Cutting Blade sliding inside along the Base and cutting the thin Rip Plates which vary in thickness along the length of the Base. CUTTING BLADE RIP PLATE BASE Throughout the entire TRACC system length, an angled impact into the side of the TRACC system causes the Panels, Frames and Base to interact and redirect the vehicle in the same manner as a longitudinal safety barrier, thereby qualifying the TRACC system as a fully-redirectional, non-gating crash cushion. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-4 -

Full Scale Crash Tests The TRACC-family has been subjected to a very comprehensive test program. It is impossible to report all figures and information in a document like this. Following is a short review of some of the test results. There are some differences in configuration of the tested systems due to when the test was carried out and to which standard/level. Standard Level Speed Mass Angle NCHRP 350 3 99 km/h 820 kg 0 (nose ¼ offset) NCHRP 350 3 100 km/h 2,000 kg 0 (nose centered) NCHRP 350 3 97 km/h 820 kg 14.8 (nose centered) NCHRP 350 3 98 km/h 2,000 kg 14 (nose ¼ offset) NCHRP 350 3 100 km/h 2,000 kg 20.6 (L.O.N. side impact) NCHRP 350 3 101 km/h 2,000 kg 19.5 (lateral up-stream at C.I.P.) NCHRP 350 3 101 km/h 2,000 kg 20 (lateral down-stream) NCHRP 350 3 112 km/h 2,000 kg 0 (nose centered) EN 1317-3 110 113 km/h 1,430 kg 0 (head-on-centre) EN 1317-3 110 114 km/h 1,440 kg 15 (side impact) EN 1317-3 110 114 km/h 1,480 kg 165 (side impact) The system has been approved to NCHRP 350 TL-2 and TL-3 and demonstrated additional capacity for a head-on impact at higher speeds than recognized by NCHRP 350. The TRACC system has also been approved to number of National Standards in Europe, the Middle East and the Pacific Rim. In all above-mentioned tests, TRACC has passed by meeting or exceeding the criteria. For more detailed information regarding test values please contact us. We can also submit both videos and high-speed films from the tests if required. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-5 -

Typical Crash Sequence Crash Test No. 404091-6 at Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-6 -

Photos of Installation CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-7 -

Photos after Impact CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-8 -

Annex 1 In-service Evaluation CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-9 -

Field Performance of the TRACC James R. Albritton, P.E. Exodyne Technologies, Inc. jralbritton@earthlink.net +1 817 560 1459 January 11, 2000 The Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion (TRACC), a product of Trinity Industries, Inc., has been on the market since January of 1999. Since its introduction to the marketplace, approximately 200 units have been sold to contractors, rental companies, and departments of transportation for installation in permanent and temporary locations. Seventeen units are known to have sustained reportable damage due to impact from errant vehicles during the first year of availability. This report summarizes the steps taken and the costs incurred in repairing the TRACC system after these impacts. A TRACC installed in a Toronto, Canada Construction Zone The TRACC is delivered to customers completely assembled and can be installed on an acceptable pad location (see TRACC installation manual for details) in less than one hour. Replacement of a damaged system with a fully functional standby unit can be accomplished in about 30 minutes. Repair of the system through the replacement of damaged components can then be done safely and accurately in a maintenance facility away from the dangers of traffic. For minor impacts involving very little part replacement, repair can be accomplished on the roadside without removing the damaged unit. The decision to repair or replace in the field is left to the maintenance crew and should be based on the best interest of the repair crew and the driving public. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-10 -

Of the seventeen impacts that have occurred, five can be considered major because the damage sustained by the system indicates an impact speed in excess of 50 miles per hour (80 km/hr). The remaining twelve impacts ranged from very minor bumps to significant head-on impacts at speeds lower speeds. No deaths have occurred and no significant injuries have been attributed to the seventeen impacts with the TRACC system to date. The first major TRACC impact occurred in Toronto, Canada, in a temporary construction zone. The TRACC was anchored to the existing roadway and attached to a temporary concrete barrier. A Dodge Neon drifted off the road and impacted the system head-on almost perfectly centered at a speed estimated to be 60 miles per hour (100 km/hr). The driver got out of the car and walked away from the accident with no significant injuries. The photos below show the damaged Dodge Neon and the damaged TRACC. Damaged Dodge Neon Damaged TRACC Prior to Replacement The contractor was called to replace the system within hours of the impact. He transported a new TRACC to the scene on the back of a flatbed boom truck, replaced the damaged unit, and then transported the damaged unit back to his repair facility for repair at a later date. The parts to repair the system cost approximately US$900 and the repair was accomplished by two men in about four hours. The photo below shows the replacement in progress. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-11 -

TRACC Replacement in Progress In all but one of the seventeen cases, the TRACC was replaced on the roadside with a new or reconditioned unit. Contractors report that such a replacement can be performed in as little as 30 minutes. In one case, the contractor safely replaced the damaged parts in the field during a period of low traffic volume. In Boise, Idaho, a TRACC was hit on the end, off-centered at a very sharp angle. The estimated impact speed was in excess of 60 miles per hour (100Km/hr). The driver of the Honda Prelude sustained leg injuries but recovered within a few days. He even provided the local TRACC installer with photos of the damaged TRACC. (He had returned to the scene to see what it was that stopped him when he left the roadway in the middle of the night. See his photo below.) Damaged TRACC in Boise, Idaho Replacement of the TRACC was accomplished as described above. The contractor did not worry about what parts to transport to the accident scene. He simply loaded a ready TRACC to replace the damaged one. Repair of the TRACC was done later in his repair facility. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-12 -

Because of the off-centered and angled nature of the impact, more parts were damaged than in the Toronto impact. The approximate cost of the parts was $3,975 for complete repair. The repair process required two workers about four hours in the safety of their own workshop. Several of the seventeen reported impacts involved low-speed head-on collisions that resulted in less than 54 (1370mm) of stroke of the system. In those cases, the plastic nose and the first stage of rip plates had to be replaced at a typical cost of US$350 for parts. The time required to repair such an impact is generally less than two hours. In one case, a contractor performed the repair on the roadside without removing the damaged unit. TRACC field performance to date has been excellent. A wide range of impacts have occurred with no significant injuries to report. In fact, the range of field tests has included several impacts that would have resulted in major injuries or death had an approved crash cushion not been present. Repairs to the TRACC have been accomplished with minimal difficulty and at very reasonable costs. Overall, the TRACC has met or exceeded all expectations in its first year of service. CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-13 -

CSP Pacific April 24, 2003-14 -