Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Similar documents
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Welcome to Open House #5 Scarborough Rapid Transit

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Scarborough Transit Planning

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Yonge Relief Network Study (YRNS)

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Issues Facing the Panel

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to Public Information Meeting June 21, 2016

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to 2031

LRT vs. Subway. Scarborough RT and Sheppard

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

Scarborough Subway Extension. Stakeholder Advisory Meeting February 28, 2017

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Public Information Session June 2, Transportation Planning Section City Planning Division Toronto Transit Commission

SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Project Description

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Option 2 - Convert to Automatic Train Control (ATC) Signalling Technology

3. SIGNALLING 3.1 INTRODUCTION. Present Operation - Facts and Figures

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Re: EX16.1. Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan to Attachment 5

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan: Phase 1

Update on Community or Heritage Rail Project (Project Manager Services) The Engineering Department recommends that Council:

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS TRANSIT FLEET UPDATE

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

APPENDIX 6: Transportation Modelling Considerations City of Toronto, February 2014

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Presentation Context. Major Mackenzie & 48 Land Owners Group. Presentation on Behalf of the. Development Services Committee.

New McNicoll Bus Garage Public Open House

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

SUBJECT: Russell Hill Subway Train Accident Of August 11, 1995 Due Diligence Checklist Update

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) PLEASE SIGN IN

Opportunities for Improved Bus Service on Finch Avenue 27 April 2011

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

RELIEF LINE PRELIMINARY BENEFITS CASE ANALYSIS. November 2012

Rate Review 2017 Off-Street Municipal Parking Facilities

INTEGRATED GO RER- SMARTTRACK OPTIONS

Eglinton East LRT Project Update and Next Steps

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

MEDIA RELEASE. June 16, 2008 For Immediate Release

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

Needs and Community Characteristics

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN RICHMOND HILL

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

CONNECTING THE REGION

Making Tracks to Torontonians 2012

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-E May 13, 2010 Bus Fleet Plan

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

Spadina Subway Extension Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental Assessment

AVAILABLE Q Partnership. Performance.

EX29.1 REPORT FOR ACTION. SmartTrack Project Update and Next Steps SUMMARY

Late Starter. Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

On June 11, 2012, the Park Board approved the installation of three electric vehicle charging stations along Beach Avenue.

Journey to Excellence. Building Markham s Future Together. Development Services Committee. Transit. Update. June 23, 2015

BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) MISSISSAUGA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

Pembina Institute REPORT. Mayor Ford s. New Transit Proposal. Analysis and recommendations. by Cherise Burda and Graham Haines

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Accessible Transit Services Plan

The Regional Municipality of York. Purchase of Six Battery Electric Buses

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE TOWN OF NEWMARKET

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

Yonge Relief Network Study: Technical Summary Final July Metrolinx

Energy Technical Memorandum

Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

1. ECONOMIC & FISCAL MANAGEMENT 1.1. Delivery Model Considerations: Subway Versus LRT in Median

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN EAST GWILLIMBURY

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

CONNECTING THE REGION

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-D May 13, 2010 Rail Fleet Plan

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Transcription:

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, 2006 SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Commission: 1. Endorse the conclusions of the attached report which are, in summary: Upgrading the Scarborough RT line to accommodate larger, new-generation RT vehicles is the lowest-cost option to accommodate projected demand, and to encourage increased transit ridership in the corridor; Upgrading the Scarborough RT minimizes the service disruptions which are unavoidable with any improvements to this corridor, offers the greatest ability to quickly increase capacity on the line, and provides an opportunity to improve the passenger transfer between the subway and the RT at Kennedy Station; Making a longer-term commitment to new-generation RT vehicles carries with it the risks associated with owning and maintaining a small fleet of vehicles, with a unique technology, which is currently available from only one supplier; It would not be cost-effective or justifiable to replace the existing Scarborough RT with an extension of the Bloor-Danforth subway. Also, such a change could not practically be implemented in the time frame required for replacement of the existing aging RT; There are opportunities to extend the Scarborough RT and to expand and introduce new rapid transit service elsewhere in Scarborough. A comprehensive rapid transit plan for Scarborough, led by TTC and City staff, should be undertaken to determine the best way of integrating existing and possible future rapid transit facilities including surface rapid transit (Bus Rapid Transit and streetcar/lrt), the Scarborough RT line, and the Sheppard Subway; 2. Approve, in principle, the upgrading of the Scarborough RT line as soon as possible to accommodate larger, new-generation RT vehicles, and to provide needed increased service capacity, noting that: Upgrading of the line is estimated to cost $190 million (2006 $) and will require that service be disrupted for up to eight months; The purchase of new-generation RT vehicles to replace the existing fleet, and to accommodate forecast demand to 2031, is estimated to cost $170 million (2006 $); With such approval, funding for upgrading the line, and for the purchase of larger, newgeneration RT vehicles, will be included in the TTC 2007-2011 Capital Program budget submission; Staff will bring forward a proposed implementation and staging plan for upgrading of the Scarborough RT line to accommodate new-generation vehicles; 3. Authorize staff to initiate a consultant project to develop an Integrated Rapid Transit Plan for Scarborough, to address:

Extension of the Scarborough RT line to Sheppard Avenue and other possible corridors; Surface streetcar/lrt or Bus Rapid Transit on roads such as Kingston Road (a portion of which is currently under study and will be the subject of an Environmental Assessment starting in 2007), Danforth Avenue, Eglinton Avenue, Sheppard Avenue, Markham Road, and the Finch Hydro Corridor; Staged construction of the Sheppard Subway east from Don Mills Station; and 4. Forward this report to the City of Toronto. FUNDING The recommendations of this report have no direct effect on the TTC s Capital or Operating budgets at this time. If the Commission approves the recommendations in this report, staff will seek funding approval for the required projects as part of the 2007-2011 Capital Program. Currently there are three approved projects, with a total cost of $275.8 million ($113.3 million in the years 2006-2010), included in the approved 2006-2010 Capital Program for the related vehicles and track requirements for the Scarborough RT: Purchase of 44 Mark IIA SRT Cars (pg. 1063), McCowan Yard - Fleet Accommodation (pg. 785) and 25-Year SRT Car Overhaul (pg. 1019). It was also noted that subject to the findings of the SRT Corridor study, a new car of a different profile would require the addition of a project to address wayside, yard and station modifications to accommodate the vehicles. BACKGROUND The Scarborough RT operates between Kennedy Station on the Bloor-Danforth Subway and McCowan Station. The current fleet of 28 RT cars used on the line, which were acquired for the opening of service in 1985, is nearing the end of its useful service life. It is expected that the aging vehicles will result in progressively-deteriorating service reliability over the coming years. Presently, the line carries about 42,000 passengers daily. Most of these passengers transfer to and from the Bloor-Danforth subway and are required to traverse three levels at Kennedy Station. During peak periods, the Scarborough RT service operates every 3 minutes and 30 seconds, carrying about 4,000 people per hour in the peak direction, which is the maximum capacity of the line with the current vehicle fleet. There has been significant growth in TTC ridership in the Scarborough area in the past ten years and, based on the City s Official Plan forecasts, this growth in ridership is expected to continue to 2021 and beyond. The ridership growth has resulted in an immediate need to increase capacity on the line to carry current passenger loads, and to expand capacity to accommodate future travel demand. However, there are not enough vehicles in the current fleet to allow an increase in service on the line. The vehicles that are currently used on the RT line are no longer manufactured and, although custom vehicles could be procured, there would be a considerable capital cost premium with this approach. For these reasons, at its meeting of September 17, 2005, the Commission authorized staff to undertake a Strategic Planning Study for the Scarborough RT, the main purposes being to:

develop a plan for replacing the existing vehicles, and expanding capacity in the Scarborough RT corridor, before the current fleet reaches the end of its useful service life, and recommend a service option that will provide adequate capacity to meet the projected future travel demand in the corridor. This study has now been completed and the study report is attached. The study process involved a number of information sessions with the general public and Scarborough Community Council, as well as with representatives of the University of Toronto at Scarborough, Centennial College, and the Scarborough business community. DISCUSSION Current demand in the Scarborough RT corridor is estimated to be 4,500 passengers per hour in the busy direction, about 13% more than can actually be carried with the existing fleet of vehicles. Ridership projections for the year 2021, the year for which Official Plan projections of growth in population and employment are available, suggest a future capacity requirement of approaching 7,000 passengers per hour (increase of 75%) in the peak direction (pphpd). In practical terms, planning for growth beyond 2021 with a design capacity of between 7,500 and 8,000 pphpd, would be prudent.

A number of service alternatives for the Scarborough RT were examined initially, and three main alternatives emerged from a service-essentials screening process, namely: 1. The acquisition of larger, new-generation RT-technology vehicles, 2. Conversion of the Scarborough RT guideway to multiple-unit streetcar/light Rail Transit (LRT), and 3. Replacement of the current service by an extension of the Bloor-Danforth subway. A summary evaluation of these three alternatives is provided below. The large capital cost differences between the subway and non-subway (RT or LRT) alternatives leads to the conclusion that the most cost-effective means of meeting future passenger demand in this corridor is Option 1 by upgrading the existing RT line to accommodate larger, new-generation RT vehicles. The evaluation shows that the huge capacity achievable with a subway is not needed or warranted in this corridor and, therefore, the very large capital cost premium of a subway cannot be justified. Instead, wise use of such funding for transit improvements would provide considerable latitude to generally expand the network of higher-order transit services within the whole Scarborough travel area. Summary Evaluation of Scarborough RT Corridor Alternatives Measure 1 New Generation RT 2 Streetcar/LRT 3 Subway Stations No change No change Eliminates: McCowan, Midland and Ellesmere Support for Scarborough Centre Development and Intensification Good Good Superior (depending upon impact on Sheppard Corridor) Capital Cost (2006 $ - $360 million $490 million $1,200 million includes vehicles) Resources available for Significant Significant None other transit initiatives Service Disruption Up to 8 months 36 months Uncertain Early Capacity Increase Yes No No Implementation Risk Low High Very high Long Term Capacity Meets needs Meets needs Exceeds needs Transfer at Kennedy Station Can be improved Can be improved Not required Expansion Potential Limited Most Opportunities Constrained by Resources Stated Public Preference Low Low High

The broader assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks associated with each of the options concluded that the upgrading of the existing line to accommodate larger, newgeneration RT vehicles provides the best way of quickly improving rapid transit service in Scarborough while still allowing an expansion of rapid transit services in other corridors in Scarborough as identified in the City s Official Plan. The assessment showed that the option of introducing new-generation RT vehicles: 1. Has the lowest total cost and represents the most cost-effective solution for meeting the growing transit needs within the existing Scarborough RT corridor; 2. Can be implemented quickly and has the greatest flexibility to provide short-term capacity increases; 3. Has the minimum service disruption due to construction; 4. Offers the opportunity to completely re-design the Kennedy RT Station so that it would be more convenient for customers who transfer between the RT and the Bloor-Danforth subway; 5. Does not preclude options for a comprehensive rapid transit network in Scarborough through the provision of surface rapid transit rights-of-way (streetcar/lrt/bus Rapid Transit) on other corridors and/or the completion of the Sheppard Subway; 6. Leaves the TTC with a unique one-of-a-kind vehicle and the risks associated with owning and maintaining such a technology over the long term. The study concluded that the streetcar/lrt option: 1. Requires higher capital investment and a considerably longer disruption of service due to the re-construction which would be required to accommodate streetcar/lrt vehicles on that line; 2. Is supportive of the concepts of surface rapid transit expansion which flow from the City of Toronto s Official Plan, the TTC s Ridership Growth Strategy and the joint TTC/City Building a Transit City plan; and 3. Is risky because, if the higher-cost and more-disruptive streetcar/lrt option were to be chosen, but there are not the financial resources or broader support to expand streetcar/lrt transit throughout Toronto, then the higher costs and longer disruption to service in the RT corridor would have been incurred to no benefit.

There is a need for further analysis of the specific rapid transit opportunities, and their capital requirements, that could be combined with new-generation RT in the Scarborough RT corridor, and LRT/BRT in other Scarborough corridors. From a timing perspective, a subway alternative would have to proceed almost immediately to ensure that rapid transit service is maintained to Scarborough City Centre on a continuous basis. With the RT upgrade option, however, there is a window of opportunity to develop a realistic integrated package of rapid transit improvements and expansion in Scarborough that could be staged and implemented in an affordable way. JUSTIFICATION Upgrading the Scarborough RT line to accommodate larger, new-generation vehicles is the lowest-cost, and most-easily implemented, option for maintaining and providing the increased capacity needed to accommodate the projected future increasing demand for rapid transit in the corridor. It provides an opportunity to improve the quality of passenger transfers at Kennedy Station. It will also allow for the earliest introduction of increased service to respond to the existing and growing demand in the corridor. There are opportunities to extend and expand rapid transit service in Scarborough. However, a comprehensive rapid transit plan is needed for Scarborough to determine the best way of integrating existing and possible future rapid transit facilities including surface rapid transit services (Bus Rapid Transit and LRT), the Scarborough RT line, and the Sheppard Subway. - - - - - - - - - - - - August 11, 2006 11-55-47 Attachment: Scarborough RT Strategic Plan Study Report