FACTSHEET on Metro Systems

Similar documents
FACTSHEET on Bus Rapid Transit System

FACTSHEET on Tram Systems

-Mobility Solutions. Electric Taxis

Urban Electric Mobility in a 1.5 C Scenario

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

actsheet Car-Sharing

Light rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form.

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Urban Transport systems in major cities in China. Sun Kechao Senior Engineer China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing, China

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

DAVID DAVID BURNS BURNS RAILROAD RAILROAD INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CONSULTAN CHICAGO CHICAGO, USA, USA

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Issues Facing the Panel

Implementing Transport Demand Management Measures

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Strategic Plan

Energy efficiency policies for transport. John Dulac International Energy Agency Paris, 29 May 2013

Policy Coordination in Urban Transport Planning: Some Experience from Asia- Nepal and Japan

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Policies on Public Transport Development and Financial Schemes in Taipei

IKORODU- CMS BRT EXTENSION PROJECT

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

How to manage large scale infrastructures? Infrastructure planning within Toulouse s SUMP. Alexandre Blaquière. 1st December 2016

Ministry of Environment and Forests. Ministry of Communication

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Building smart transport in Moscow

Bus The Case for the Bus

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

The project faces a number of challenges:

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Doubling the Market Share of Public Transport Worldwide by 2025: A Smart Future for Cities

Chapter 4. Design and Analysis of Feeder-Line Bus. October 2016

Parking Management Strategies

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Environmentally Sustainable Transport Singapore s s Experience

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT, PLANNING AND OPERATIONS.

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Transport Gautrain Update. Jack vd Merwe (Pr. Eng) CEO: Gautrain Management Agency 25 August 2009

G. Di Pasquale, A. Santiago Dos Santos, A. Galindo Leal, M. Tozzi. PluService, IPT, UITP

Transportation Demand Management Element

Innovation in Transport. Mike Waters

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

OPTIMAL POLICIES FOR TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

The development of the Milan transport system and the ECOPASS congestion charge

Energy Efficiency Transport Sector

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Istanbul METROBUS BRT. Adapted from Presentations by World Resources Institute/EMBARQ s Sibel Koyluoglu and Dario Hidalgo

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

Designing and financing resilient transport infrastructure

History of Subway in Kyoto

How to Create Exponential Decline in Car Use in Australian Cities. By Peter Newman, Jeff Kenworthy and Gary Glazebrook.

TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Needs and Community Characteristics

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

WAITING FOR THE GREEN LIGHT: Sustainable Transport Solutions for Local Government

Kaohsiung City Government Kaohsiung: Heading towards an Eco-Mobility City

Ex-Ante Evaluation (for Japanese ODA Loan)

Global AirRail Conference

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

Innovation and Transformation of Urban Mobility Role of Smart Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) service

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Factors affecting the development of electric vehiclebased car-sharing schemes

G u i d e l i n e S U S T A I N A B L E P A R K I N G M A N A G E M E N T Version: November 2015

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

LRT Almaty, PPP. 23 January 2018, Brussels

Mobility of Gurugram & NCR-

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

PROMOTING SOOT FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Transcription:

FACTSHEET on Metro Systems

This paper was prepared by: SOLUTIONS project This project was funded by the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) of the European Commission www.uemi.net Layout/Design: Barbara Lah Photo: Copyright CAIF 2017 The term metro is a common international term that refers to subways and heavy rail transit. Metros are the most expensive form of mass rapid transit per kilometre, but have the highest theoretical capacity. Because metros have an exclusive right-of-way infrastructure and perform mass and high-speed transit within urban areas and with neighbouring urban areas, they could reduce road congestion and travel time, especially with more frequent service and when accompanied by pedestrian-friendly and cycling access and by public feeder systems. SOLUTIONS partners Clean Air Asia FEHRL Mobili-T EMBARQ AVERE ICCT ICLEI IFSTTAR AUSTRIATECH UN-Habitat Wuppertal Institute POLIS Technion CEDEX TRL bast Transport Research Centre CATS Zaragoza Logistic center Rupprecht Consult

Examples There are many metro systems around the world. The most well-known are in London (which began operation in 1890, and which now has a 402 km network, 270 stations, and an annual ridership of 1.34 billion journeys a year), Paris (est. 1900; 214 km; 302 stations; 1.52 bn), New York (est. 1904; 375 km; 422 stations; 1.76 bn); Tokyo (est. 1927; 195 km; 179 stations; and Singapore (est. 1987; 170 km; 121 stations; 1 bn). Metro systems generally operate separately from road tra c below-grade, on elevated structure, or at-grade level that run along exclusive rights of way. As metros generally run along major thoroughfares, they are supported by other smaller modes of public transport like buses that serve as feeder systems and by e cient public transport interchange terminals with connections to various public transport services. Integrated or single ticketing contributes to smoother transfers. Apart from physical infrastructure, successful metros are backed by a back-end operational support or an information and communication technology to facilitate service delivery in line with the agreed timetable. Results The International Association of Public Transport estimates that metros carried 155 million passengers a day in 2006 and are by far the fastest mode of mass rapid transit. They travel at an average speed of 40-50 km/hour, while Light Rail Transit, and Bus Rapid Transit systems (see Factsheet 1.1) typically operate between 20-30 km/hour. tegrating metro systems with other modes. Bus systems can handle moving 30,000 passengers an hour in one direction, but only metro systems can transport over 35 000 people. Rail transport costs $15 million to $30 million ( 13.5 million 27 million) per kilometre and elevated rail transport $30 million to $75 million ( 27 million- 67.6 million) per kilometre. However, underground rail transport is estimated to be six times more expensive, reaching $60 million to $180 million ( 54 million- 16 million) per kilometre. However, despite the higher costs, they improve the overall mobility of the population. Policy/legistion The emission savings from metros are greater with higher ridership in terms of CO2emission/passenger/kilometre. Therefore, the frameworks for metros should promote its use together with other public transport modes and should attract demand to ensure high ridership. Among the fundamental requisite for metros are clearly articulated roles of parties involved, especially in public-private partnership (PPP) arrangements. Metros require large funding and resources for construction, operation and maintenance. Thus, the generated revenue should be able to cover operating costs or the infrastructure could deteriorate. Secondly, metros should be integrated with other public transport modes and with key origins and destinations. This indicates a need for land-use planning and long-term transit-oriented development to also ensure mixed-use and walkable development and Metro systems can transport many people and use space more e ciently than buses or cars, thereby saving emissions. They also consume less energy than buses and cars; a 1-kilogram equivalent of petrol will allow a single person to travel more than 48 kilometres by metro, compared to 38 kilometres by bus, and no more than 19 kilometres by car. Constructing, operating and maintaining metro systems also creates jobs. Technical and financial considerations Metro systems are most applicable in areas with more than 5 million inhabitants, in corridors with a trip volume of more than 700,000 trips per day, and with at least $18,000 ( 16,000) per capita annual income at the city level, given its high cost of construction and operation. Other pre-requisites include competitive fares, a steady and growing prosperous population, and in

high-density population along its route that are within walking distance of the stations, as well as travel demand management to ease the crowding situations during peak hours. Institutions The lead agency for metros is usually the transport ministry but because operational subsidies are usually still required for metros, the private sector is involved by way of PPP. The transport and planning ministries should lead in oversight and in identifying station locations aligned with the country s sustainable transport masterplan and the city s long- term urban plan. Planning for such a large-scale solution involves di erent national and local government agencies to model and forecast demand growth, draw up land-use and transport plans, provide information and communication technology (ICT), among others, to develop and maintain metros cost e ectively. The government should likewise help ensure the participation of the key stakeholders like residents and retailers in the community to consider the diverse viewpoints and priorities. Transferability Integrated public transport planning would ultimately be an enabler for encouraging shifts towards public transport. Successful metros are generally viewed to be convenient, comfortable, attractive, a ordable, e cient and reliable, thus the integration is not only by physical infrastructure with easy interchanges but also through ticketing system integration for seamless transfers between various transport modes. A thorough understanding of cost requirements for metros would allow planners to anticipate operating and maintenance expenses. Another approach is land value capture which is a funding instrument used to recover land value increments (i.e. unearned income of the private land owner) generated from publicly created value generated by public infrastructure investments. Land-value capture is used for nancing public transport systems that have intensive capital and operation and maintenance costs like metros, or for furthering transport-oriented developments. Transport agencies and developers could agree to have the latter contribute to the construction of transport infrastructure including public transport services, walkable districts and public spaces (e.g. parks, bicycle lanes, sidewalks) as their property value would increase.

Case Study: Singapore s MRT Context The idea for the Singapore metro system, known as the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) network, came about in 1967 when urban experts predicted that, as the population and the number of motor vehicles in Singapore grew over the next 20 years, tra c conditions would worsen. The MRT went into operation in 1987, and today it is one of the most extensive and e cient rail systems in the world, covering almost every heavy transport corridor of the country. A comprehensive tra c study in 1981 concluded that a mass transit rail system would be more favourable and practical for Singapore instead of a public transport system an all-bus public transport one. The Mass Rapid Transit Corporation (MRTC) was o cially set up in 1993 to oversee the network and would later be combined with the Registry of Vehicles and Roads and Transport Division to form the Land Transport Authority. Masterplan (2008), the government is increasing the rail transit system density from 31 kilometre per million population to 51 kilometres per million population by 2020. It also sets out three challenges: increasing travel demand and limited land; declining public transport mode share; and changing demographics and expectations. The Land Transport Authority is also committed to removing physical barriers and ensuring clear passageways, and installing tactile guidance systems and wheelchair-accessible toilets to meet the needs of the elderly and less mobile MRT users. In action The MRT runs on four main lines: North South Line, east West Line, Circle Line (which runs along the perimeter of the country s central business district), and the North east Line. While the Land Transport Authority owns the MRT system, private companies operate it. The bus and LRT systems serve as feeder modes to connect residential areas and other light corridors to MRT stations. The MRT operates daily from 5:30am until midnight, though it extends during special holidays. Between 7 amand 9 am, trains run every 2-3 minutes, and the average interval for the rest of the time is 3-7 minutes. Passengers can use ticket smartcards to travel on the MRT and the LRT and bus system. Students, senior citizens, and children enjoy special rates. To ease the pressure on the MRT during peak hours, commuters are given incentives when they travel during o -peak hours through an awards scheme. With a registered smartcard, travellers can automatically earn one point for every kilometre they travel before 6:30 am and after 9:30 am from Monday to Friday, with additional points available if travelling during the designated decongesting hours (6:30 7:30 am and 8:30 9:30 am.) Results estimates say that the average annual MRT ridership could grow from the current 688 million to 1.3 billion by 2030. According to Singapore s Land Transport

UEMI Secretariat secretariat@uemi.net +49 (0)30 2887458-16