Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Similar documents
I-95 Corridor Coalition. I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project: Validation of INRIX Data Monthly Report Virginia

I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project: HERE, INRIX and TOMTOM Data Validation. Report for North Carolina (#08) I-240, I-40 and I-26

I-95 Corridor Coalition. I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project: Validation of INRIX Data Monthly Report Virginia

I-95 Corridor Coalition. I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project: Validation of INRIX Data Monthly Report North Carolina

I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project: HERE, INRIX and TOMTOM Data Validation

I-95 Corridor Coalition

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Traffic and Toll Revenue Estimates

1 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 2 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 3 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 4 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 5 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 6 NRG #40 Anem. m/s. 30 m. 40 m. 30 m. m/s.

TxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE. ITS Texas 2016

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Expansion Projects Description

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

Technical Feasibility Report

2016 Traffic Signal System Performance Metrics Update Kumar Neppalli, Traffic Engineering, Public Works John Richardson, Planning and Sustainability

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

2016 Congestion Report

Louisville / Jefferson County Hazardous Material Commodity Flow Analysis

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management System Lessons Learned. June 2, 2014

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/30/2013

(As required by House Bill 1179, Chapter 734, Acts of 2016) MSAR 10955

Attachment A. BATA Resolution No. 128 BAY AREA TOLL AUTHORITY TOLL SCHEDULE FOR TOLL BRIDGES (EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2019)

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

Scalable Methods for Monitoring Limited Access Roadways Using Crowd-Sourced Probe Data

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 7/31/2013

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

Traffic Engineering Study

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Appendix 3 Traffic Technical Memorandum

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

USES OF ANPR DATA IN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND TRANSPORT MODELLING ABSTRACT

PRESENTATION Metro s Streets & Freeways Subcommittee

Utilizing High Resolution Bus GPS Data to Visualize and Identify Congestion Hot-spots in Urban Arterials

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Solar Power. Demonstration Site. Annual Performance Report 2017

Reduction of Vehicle Noise at Lower Speeds Due to Quieter Pavement. By Paul R Donavan

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office

Simulating Trucks in CORSIM

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Freight Performance Measures Using Truck GPS Data and the Application of National Performance Measure Research Data Set (NPMRDS)

M6 TOLL TRAFFIC MONITORING STUDY

An Investigation of the Distribution of Driving Speeds Using In-vehicle GPS Data. Jianhe Du Lisa Aultman-Hall University of Connecticut

Methane to Markets Partnership Expo. Remote Sensing - Aerial Leak Detection and Measurement. ANGEL Service Airborne Natural Gas Emission Lidar

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study

Evaluation of the Impact of the I-66 Active Traffic Management System: Phase II

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

1. Traffic Count Balancing Methodology. 2. Design-Year No-Build & Build Traffic Growth and Balancing D-1

Algo Traffic and the Tuscaloosa RTMC. Chris Sewell, P.E. ITS Operations Manager ALDOT West Central Region

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Introduction: Supplied to 360 Test Labs... Battery packs as follows:

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Location Tool and Visualization Map

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Location Tool and Visualization Map. July 17, 2018

Transcription:

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology Data taken from the Northern Section of I-49 (Capitol Beltway) on June 17, 28 The I-9 Corridor Coalition is a partnership of state departments of transportation, regional and local transportation agencies, toll authorities, and related organizations from Maine to Florida. In December 27, the Coalition contracted with INRIX, Inc. to provide comprehensive and continuous real-time travel information (travel times and speeds) of over 2 miles of freeways and arterials to member agencies. The travel time and speed data is to support the dissemination of travel information using 11 and websites; display of travel times on variable message signs, traffic management during incidents and performance measurement. The contract specifies two primary data quality specifications related to accuracy and timeliness that would be independently validated. Additional information and details of the accuracy specifications are available at the project web site at http://www.i9coalition.org/vehicle-probe.html. The validation of the accuracy and timeliness of the data is based primarily on a Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring system developed at the University of Maryland, though some drive testing will also be performed. In preparation for the validation phase of the project that would commence on July 1, of 28, the University of Maryland and INRIX Corporation jointly performed a data collection and comparison exercise on June 17, 28. The exercise was conducted on the northern portion of the I-49 Capital beltway between the junctions of I-27 and I-9 as shown in the Map of Figure 1. The University of Maryland placed Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring equipment at the four interchanged indicated on the map. Sensor locations were chosen to correspond as closely as possible with the beginning and end points of TMC codes used by INRIX to report data. Drive tests were also performed on the route during the AM and PM rush hours. During the AM rush hour, sensor were placed along the outer loop to record westbound travel times on the beltway, and in the evening the sensors were placed on the inner loop of the beltway to record eastbound travel times. During the same periods, INRIX reported speeds from their pre-production I-9 Vehicle Probe data system that subsequently went into operation on July 1, 28. The results of the Bluetooth, drive testing, and INRIX data are reported below. Figure 1 Map of data collection and sensor placement on June 17 28. The results of the exercise are presented in two charts for each segment in the AM and PM peak. The first chart is a comparison of travel time of the three sources of data, and the second chart is

a comparison of the same data but viewed in the speed domain. An explanation of each data set is provided in the following section. Data Explanation Figure 2A is a graph of the Bluetooth travel time data taken between the portion of the beltway between sensors A and B of east bound traffic on the Capital Beltway between 2: PM and 7:3 PM (14: to 19:3 using a 24 hour clock as labeled in Figure 2) on June 17. Each data point represents the travel time of a vehicle between points A and B on the beltway. The free-flow travel time is approximately minutes as observed near 7 PM. 4 Travel Time From A To B 3 3 2 2 1 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Figure 2A Travel time as recorded from Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring sensors at points A to B on the inner loop during the evening of June 17, 28 Figure 2B overlays the drive test data performed by the University of Maryland during the same time period. The black circles represent the four runs during this period. The UMD drive test vehicle had a Bluetooth device that was detected by the sensors. The corresponding travel times detected by the sensors are marked in Figure 2B. The initial drive test travel time of approximately 13 minutes is a result of the extra time needed to place the Bluetooth sensor at location A. Lastly Figure 2C overlays the Inrix data provided by the pre-production I-9 Vehicle Probe system. The data for this particular section was divided into six separate TMCs (Traffic Message Channel segments) varying in length from.37 miles to 1.93 miles as shown in Table 1. The speed of each TMC segment was converted to its equivalent travel time based on the distance of each TMC segment, and then summed to obtain the travel time across the entire distance between A and B. The Inrix data on July 17 was reported in minute intervals, so this transformation was performed on each min data set.

4 3 Travel Time From A To B 3 2 2 1 Figure 2B 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Drive test data overlayed on Bluetooth Travel Time data 4 3 Travel Time From A To B 3 2 2 1 Figure 2C 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Inrix travel time data overlayed on Bluetooth and UMD drive Test data

The travel time data from each source was converted to its equivalent speed by dividing by the distance between locations A and B. Figure 3 represents the same data displayed in Figure 2C, but as speeds instead of travel times. TMC Segments from A->B TMC Code Distance (Miles) 1+4619 1.93193 1+462.36818 1+4622 1.11289 1P4619.378743 1P4621.686336 1P4622.43664 Table 1 TMC segment information for I-49 between points A and B, eastbound 8 7 Speed From A To B 6 4 3 2 Figure 3 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Comparison of all three sources of data in the speed domain The graphs on the remaining pages show the travel time and speed charts for the remaining segments: B to C and C to D in the afternoon, and then B to A, C to B, and D to C in the morning.

12 11 Travel Time From B To C 9 8 7 6 4 Figure 4A 3 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Comparison of travel time data for PM eastbound traffic from B to C 7 Speed From B To C 6 4 3 2 Figure 4B 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Comparison of speed data for PM eastbound traffic from B to C

12 11 Travel Time From C To D 9 8 7 6 4 Figure A 3 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Comparison of travel time data for PM eastbound traffic from C to D 8 Speed From C To D 7 6 4 3 2 Figure B 14 1 16 17 18 19 2 Comparison of speed data for PM eastbound traffic from C to D

13 12 11 Travel Time From B To A 9 8 7 6 Figure 6A 4 3 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 Comparison of travel time data for AM westbound traffic from B to A Speed From B To A 7 6 4 3 2 Figure 6B 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 Comparison of speed data for AM westbound traffic from B to A

12 11 Travel Time From C To B 9 8 7 6 4 Figure 7A 3 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 Comparison of travel time data for AM westbound traffic from C to B 8 Speed From C To B 7 6 4 3 2 Figure 7B 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 Comparison of speed data for AM westbound traffic from C to B

3 3 Travel Time From D To C 2 2 1 Figure 8A 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 Comparison of travel time data for AM westbound traffic from D to C 8 7 Speed From D To C 6 4 3 2 Figure 8B 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 Comparison of speed data for AM westbound traffic from D to C