North Lamar/Guadalupe Connector Corridor

Similar documents
South Congress Connector Corridor

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Riverside Connector Corridor

Highland Connector Corridor

Manor/Dean Keeton Connector Corridor

MetroExpress Improvements

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Making Mobility Better, Together

January Final. Phase 2 Initial Screening Memorandum

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

What is Project Connect?

Specific recommendations are made for downtown Austin, park-and-rides, and several different transit center locations.

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Draft Enhancement Project and Investment Corridor

Average Weekday Ridership for the Guadalupe- Lamar Light Rail Minimum Operable Segment by Andrew Mayer

Needs and Community Characteristics

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Light Rail Proposal. June 15, 2016 Presentation to Mayor Steve Adler

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Station Evaluation Summary

Frequent Service Network Proposal

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

Draft Results and Open House

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Appendix H: Tier 2 Evaluation Methodology and Results February 2017

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

4.1 Land Use. SECTION CONTENTS Land Use Transit Transportation Technology

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Draft Results and Recommendations

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT

Address Land Use Approximate GSF

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

DFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Federal Way Link Extension

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Cotton Belt Regional Rail Project

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program. The Ellipse, St. Louis Park, 2009

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo

Transcription:

North Lamar/Guadalupe Connector Corridor

Enhancements Short-term improvements to keep Austin moving. Investments Long-term projects to support our future. Mobility Hubs MetroRapid MetroRail MetroExpress Commuters Connectors Circulators Project Connect Project Connect is a plan to create a system of high-capacity transit options that will connect people, places, and opportunities in an affordable, efficient, and sustainable way. Two teams have been working closely with residents, workers, and community groups to addresses our short and long-term needs. The Enhancements Team is working to identify projects that will ensure our existing transit network will operate efficiently as the Austin area grows. The enhancement projects will improve MetroRail, MetroRapid, and MetroExpress services, as well as create Mobility Hubs across the area. The Investments Team is developing plans for a transit system capable of maximizing the amount of people that can move through key corridors. Introducing new transit options will create a more balanced transportation system that benefits all Austinites. Connectors The Connector investment corridors are intended to serve multiple trip purposes and connect people with activity centers primarily within Central Austin. Over 30 corridors were identified by reviewing plans and studies completed by Capital Metro and its partners. Those corridors were narrowed down through a tiered evaluation process that explored each corridor s potential to successfully implement HCT. The eight Connector corridors advanced to Phase 2 are: North Lamar/Guadalupe South Congress Riverside South Lamar Manor/Dean Keeton* Highland/Trinity/Red River 7th/Lake Austin *The MLK connector corridor was included with Manor/ Dean Keeton as an alignment option Key Terms HCT ROW LRT BRT CVC TOD P&R TC PER UT ACC High Capacity Transit Right-of-Way Light Rail Transit Bus Rapid Transit Capitol View Corridor Transit Oriented Development Park & Ride Transit Center Preliminary Engineering Report University of Texas Austin Community College

North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor Corridor Overview Corridor Overview The North Lamar/Guadalupe Corridor has been one of the most critical transportation arteries in Austin for over a century. Phase 2 of Project Connect considered the 12 miles of the corridor stretching from Tech Ridge Park & Ride in North Austin to Republic Square in Downtown. The corridor connects many of Austin s most important destinations, including Downtown, the State Capitol, University of Texas, and several major state agency offices between 38th and Crestview. Tech Ridge Tech Ridge The Domain Rundberg North Lamar T.C The Domain Corridor Quick Look 35 Rundberg Corridor Start and Endpoints: Tech Ridge to Downtown Austin Corridor Length: 12.05 Miles 1 Existing Transit Services: Routes 1, 275, 481, 801 Current Bus Ridership: 8,837 Legend Legend North Lamar T.C Priority Corridor Other Priority Corridors Priority Corridor Jobs (1/2 Mile from Stations): 126,681 Jobs 290 Priority Extensions Other Priority Corridors Possible Extensions Priority Extensions Alignment Extensions Options Residents (1/2 Mile from 57,937 Residents Stations): Long Term Extension Options Possible Extensions Potential end of line Connections 2025 Alignment Options High-Frequency Network 183 Major Roads Long Term Extension Options Capital Metro Service Area Potential end of line Zero-Car Households: 2,393 Households Connections 2025 High-Frequency Network Major Roads Households Below Poverty: 7,137 Households Capital Metro Service Area 2016 Mobility Bond Eligibility? Yes (183 to Howard) Bike Lanes Yes (Guadalupe); None (Lamar) Continuous (S of 183); Intermittent (N of 183) Few (N of Airport); Many (S of ROW Constraints Airport) Sidewalks Republic Square N 3

Corridor Character Corridor Character (Tech Ridge to North Lamar Transit Center) Tech Ridge A potential terminus for the corridor, this area is a fast-growing part of the region with connectivity to existing and planned regional transit services. Source: Urban Music Fest 2018 N Source: HikeItBaby 2018 Walnut Creek The large footprint of this park results in limited opportunity to serve residential or employment between Parmer and Braker. 4

Corridor Character Source: Google Earth Street View Rundberg Existing shopping centers could be transformed into station-adjacent anchors for the existing high-density neighborhoods near Rundberg & Rutland. Source: Google Earth Street View North Lamar Transit Center (NLTC) One of Cap Metro s busiest transfer stations, NLTC could be an important station on a N Lamar/ Guadalupe HCT line. This station has the potential to become Mobility Hub with access to variety of transportation options. Chinatown Provides access to a diverse multiethnic shopping environment. Source: Google Earth Street View 5

Corridor Character Corridor Character (North Lamar Transit Center to Republic Square) North Lamar This part of the corridor is lined with auto-oriented businesses with many curb cuts and limited right-of-way. Source: Google Earth Street View Source: Apartments.com 2018 Crestview Anchored by the Midtown Commons TOD, a Red Line commuter rail station, and busy local transit stops. The intersection with Airport presents challenges to HCT. Source: Google Earth Street View Triangle Area Home to both the Triangle TOD and headquarters for the State Department of Health & Human Services. The state will expand the campus by over one million square feet over the next few years. 6

Corridor Character Source: 365things Austin 2015 University of Texas UT is one of the largest trip generators in the region, with over 50,000 students and nearly 20,000 employees at the main campus. Source: Statesman 2014 Downtown The heart of the region, downtown Austin has seen tremendous growth in both employment and residents recently, and features the expanding State Capitol Complex. West Campus This area is among the most densely populated in Texas, with tens of thousands of residential units recently built or under construction. Source: Scion Group 2015 N 7

Options Considered HCT Options Service Assumptions To better gauge the level of investment warranted along the North Lamar/Guadalupe corridor, the project team created options that assumed different combinations of transit service and guideway profiles. Transit service profiles were developed that would satisfy a range of potential transit demand depending on the capacity and frequency of the vehicles. Vehicles have a wide range of person carrying capacity, but also have different limitations on the space needed at stations, operating speed, or type of guideway required. The lower investment option assumes smaller vehicles operating individually, while the higher investment option assumes larger vehicles operating in pairs. Emerging Technologies New technologies, such as autonomous or electric transit vehicles, may introduce new efficiencies for HCT. Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology could be adapted to both bus and rail vehicles and will be considered as Capital Metro advances each corridor through the project development process and as the technology evolves. Lower Investment Service Assumptions Vehicle Assumption Up to 100 people per vehicle Peak Frequency 10 Min (6 vehicles/hour) Off-Peak Frequency 20 Min (3 vehicles/hour) Source: Getty 2018, Shenzen AV HCT Source: NACTO 2018, Nantes Busway Peak Capacity 600 passengers/hour/direction Higher Investment Service Assumptions Vehicle Assumption Up to 225 people per vehicle, two vehicles per pair Peak Frequency 10 Min (12 vehicles/hour) Off-Peak Frequency 20 Min (6 vehicles/hour) Source: Rail Life 2018, Tempe LRT Source: Jon Bell 2013, DART Peak Capacity 2,700 passengers/hr/direction 8

Options Considered HCT Options Guideway Assumptions The project team tested three guideway profile options on the North Lamar/Guadalupe corridor that were combined with the service profiles to generate a range of HCT performance indicators. The lower investment options assumes 100% of the dedicated guideway is at street level. The medium investment option introduces grade separation at key locations to overcome physical barriers - in this case, elevated at the north end of the corridor to cross IH 35 and at the Airport/Lamar/Red Line crossing. The higher investment option includes additional grade separation where ROW or roadway operations are constrained - at the Rutland/ Rundberg intersection and from Airport Blvd south to the terminus of the corridor. Lower Investment Higher Investment Street-level Guideway Grade-separated Guideway N N N 9

HOWA North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor High Capacity Transit Overview HARRIS RIDGE THOMPKINS HCT Overview (Tech Ridge to North Lamar Transit Center) TECH RIDGE CANYON RIDGE HOWARD THE LAKES Tech Ridge Parmer YAGER LAMAR PARMER THERMAL IH 35 Crossing Connecting from N Lamar to Tech Ridge P&R may require a new structure over IH 35. BITTERN Neighborhood Connectivity Nearby residential neighborhoods will require enhancements to bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to access HCT. 10 RAMPART GRACY

RUNDBERG VD FAIRFIELD RUTHERFOR North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor High Capacity Transit Overview ANDERS 35 2016 Mobility Bond Opportunities exist along N Lamar to coordinate HCT improvements with potential bond construction projects. North Lamar Transit Center Special attention will be given to pedestrian access from a HCT station to the NLTC. POWELL Braker Rundberg GEORGIAN NORTHCREST MAR BRAKER KRAMER N Lamar TC PARKFIELD MEARNS MEADOW Rutland/Rundberg Close spacing of Rutland and Rundberg intersections will require further study to accommodate the HCT station. N 0 LEGEND North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor OHLEN Potential Station (Exact Location TBD) Alignment Option Grade Separation Option (See Alternatives Description) 1/2 Mile (10-Min Walk) Station Area 0.25 BURRELL G 0.5 Mile WOODROW Parks Existing Red Line & Stations Hospitals Roads Connections 2025 High-Frequency Other Connections 2025 Route 11

RUTHERFORD ANDERSON HOUSTON B NORTH LOOP 51 North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor High Capacity Transit Overview ANDERSON LN HCT Overview (North Lamar Transit Center to Republic Square) 290 HWY 35 BARBARA G HARMON KOENIG LN Grade Separation Due to limited ROW, low speed limits, and high number of intersections in this segment, grade separation may provide meaningful improvement to HCT travel time and reliability. CLARKSON RED RIVER POWELL ST JOHNS RESEARCH N Lamar TC MORROW GUADALUPE Crestview DENSON Koenig Triangle/47th St. 45TH G WOODROW MEDICAL JUSTIN Crestview HCT could be grade separated at the Red Line and Airport intersection to minimize disruption to both HCT and other travel modes. YATES KOENIG Business Access (Justin to Koenig) The continuous left turn lane would be eliminated which may impact business access. 49TH 12 K

VER 38T CHERRYWOOD NAVASO TH Z North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor High Capacity Transit Overview VER DUVAL G 35 DEAN KEETON 23RD G SAN JACINTO 15TH Capitol (15th St.) UNIVERSITY 12TH 10TH BRAZOS 7TH 5TH CONGRESS Republic Sq (5th St.) 38TH SPEEDWAY 21ST Courthouse (10th St.) 38th St. 29th St. UT (24th St.) LAMAR 5TH 24TH 45TH G 29TH WEST LYNN MEDICAL G JEFFERSON HARRIS Austin State Hospital Vicinity With the ASH campus west of Guadalupe, streetlevel HCT could run along the west edge of the ROW to minimize impacts to turning movements. HARTFORD N LEGEND 0 0.25 0.5 Mile North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor Potential Station (Exact Location TBD) Alignment Option Grade Separation Option (See Alternatives Description) 1/2 Mile (10-Min Walk) Station Area WINSTED G Parks Existing Red Line & Stations Hospitals Roads Connections 2025 High-Frequency Other Connections 2025 Route 13

Extension Opportunity Extension Opportunity The Domain The Domain area is billed as Austin s Second Downtown. The area between Metric Blvd, US 183, Mopac, and Walnut Creek is part of the North Burnet/ Gateway Neighborhood Plan, which envisions a transformation from mostly low-rise industrial facilities and warehouses to a dynamic, high-density, mixed-use regional center. The Domain has proven to be a catalyst for numerous high-density redevelopment projects in the area, including the forthcoming redevelopment of the IBM campus across Burnet Road, which could feature another five million sqft of new mixed- use development. Several companies have recently announced high-profile leases at or near the Domain, further enhancing the profile of the area as the region s second largest job hub outside of the Downtown/ Capitol/UT core. Given the high concentration of jobs and the transit-supportive redevelopment vision for the area, one or more of Project Connect s could be expanded to serve this area directly and connect to existing services in the region such as the existing MetroRapid 803 and Red Line commuter rail. The two most likely options for connecting the N Lamar corridor to the Domain are: US 183/Rundberg/Burnet Potential to partner with TxDOT to use extensive ROW along US 183 from Lamar to Burnet to connect to Northgate Blvd and Rundberg Ln, where a station could be built to connect existing apartments to the multiple job opportunities found along the rest of the corridor. High capacity transit (HCT) could join Burnet Road to reach the Domain, taking advantage of dedicated lanes envisioned by the City of Austin s N Burnet corridor plan, which is eligible for 2016 mobility bond construction funding. Anderson Ln/Burnet The other most likely option would be to deviate from N Lamar at Anderson Lane. This would provide an opportunity to add a station near the Anderson/Burnet intersection, which could transform into a transit supportive node of mixed-use development. Although the City of Austin s N Burnet Corridor Plan does not envision dedicated transit facilities south of US 183, ample ROW exists to construct HCT and maintain existing travel and bicycle lanes and improve pedestrian amenities. Source: Endeavor 2018 14

Extension Opportunity N Lamar TC Ohlen/Payton Gin US 183 Rundberg/Northgate Anderson/ Burnet Braker US 183 Ohlen/Steck Rutland LEGEND 0 0.25 0.5 Mile Domain Station N North Lamar/ Guadalupe Corridor Potential Station (Exact Location TBD) Alignment Option Grade Separation Option (See Alternatives Description) 1/2 Mile (10-Min Walk) Station Area G Parks Existing Red Line & Stations Hospitals Roads Connections 2025 High-Frequency Other Connections 2025 Route 15

Street Sections Street Sections North of US 183, the 100 to 120 of ROW along Lamar provides ample room to accommodate the existing two travel lanes in each direction and add many of the enhanced streetscape elements envisioned by the City of Austin s North Lamar Corridor Plan, including bike lanes and wide sidewalks as shown in Segment 1. Some of these elements may be constrained at locations where ROW is 100 and/or at station locations or streets where left turn movements are desired. South of Justin Lane, the profile of N Lamar narrows to between 70 and 80 of available ROW. In order to maintain two lanes of travel, street-level high capacity transit (HCT) will require acquisition of additional ROW as shown in the second graphic of Segment 2 (with larger impacts at station locations or streets with left turns). Elevated transit would lessen the need to acquire additional ROW and could enhance transit travel time and reliability in this segment, but would cost more and produce a strong visual impact on the corridor. Like N Lamar south of Justin, Guadalupe between Lamar and 29th features 70-80 of ROW and carries two travel lanes in each direction, bike lanes in each direction, and a center turn lane as seen in Segment 3. ROW impacts for street level transit in this segment could be less severe, however, if one lane of travel were removed. This profile would also maintain bike lanes and/or on-street parking where appropriate. The last segment of the corridor Guadalupe through the Drag and Downtown is be shared by several other corridors, and is addressed in a separate briefing book. Tech Ridge Parmer Braker Rundberg North Lamar TC Segment 1: Parmer to NLTC Segment 1: Parmer to NLTC Elevated HCT Street Level HCT Existing 16

Street Sections Segment 2: Justin to Guadalupe Segment 3: N Lamar to 29th North Lamar TC Crestview Koenig Triangle/47th 38th Street 29th Street Segment 2: Justin to Guadalupe Elevated HCT Street Level HCT Segment 3: N Lamar to 29th Elevated HCT Street Level HCT Existing Existing 17

Comparing Options Comparing Corridor Options Capital Metro evaluated the performance metrics for the test scenarios to further inform the evaluation process. Estimated costs were based on recent and similar modal and infrastructure investments in other U.S. cities. Anticipated ridership was obtained using FTA s Simplified Trips-on-Project Software (STOPS) model. Travel time was estimated using assumptions about roadway speed limits and grade separated HCT speed limits. Throughput capacities were based on vehicle capacities and service frequencies. ROW and travel lane impacts were based on the street sections analysis and are rated as low, moderate or high. The results of these performance metrics suggest that the North Lamar/Guadalupe corridor can support a higher level of HCT investment. The significant ridership potential and ability for the corridor to function as the key transit spine for the region warrant larger investment in transit speed and reliability. The project team will continue to gather feedback on community preference for the level of investment that can best serve North Lamar/Guadalupe as the Project Connect system plan is refined. Lower Investment Higher Investment Average Daily Boardings (2025): 17,500 30,000 Peak Hour Boardings: 750 1,260 Peak Hour Passenger Capacity: 600 2,700 Annual Trips (2025): 5.2M 8.8M Capital Construction Cost (2018): $700M $2.44B Annual Operations & Maintenance Cost (2018): $6.6M $21.5M Travel Time: 34 min 23 min ROW Impacts: HIGH LOW Travel Lane Impacts: HIGH MOD *Preliminary planning-level evaluation results; subject to change during preliminary engineering 18

Comparing Station Areas Comparing Station Areas The draft station analysis utilizes information collected from the FTA s Capital Investment Grant (CIG) program, Capital Metro s TOD Priority Tool, U.S. Census Bureau, CAMPO, and other sources to evaluate potential station locations along Project Connect s eight. Seven metrics were chosen to rate the station areas according to national best practices and local conditions. An Overall Score of High, Medium, or Low was assigned based on the evaluation of these six metrics. The North Lamar corridor contains several stations that score highly overall and within individual criteria. All stations south of 38th St feature walkable environments, high employment density, and plentiful connections to other modes of travel - all of which are highly conducive to successful HCT performance. With the exception of Rundberg, stations north of Crestivew are less supportive of transit at present, although improvements to connectivity and walkability may be possible through coordination with the 2016 Mobility Bond corridor construction program. High Medium Low Tech Ridge Parmer Braker Rundberg North Lamar TC Crestview Koenig Triangle/47th 38th Street 29th Street UT (24th Street) Capitol (15th Street) Courthouse (10th Street) Republic 5th Street) Overall Score Population Density Employment Density Major Destinations Transit Connectivity Affordability Walkability Market Strength 19

Led by Capital Metro with support from the City of Austin. Want to learn more? Go to capmetro.org/projectconnect to read more about the work we re doing through Project Connect. Tell us what you think, take the Phase 2 Survey https://www.capmetroengage.org/en/provide-input Prepared by Alliance Transportation Group, AECOM, and Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates with support from Bronner Group and Robin O Connell Design Cover Image Source: Alliance Transportation Group Additional Project Connect briefing books: High Capacity Transit 101 Briefing Book Long-Term Investment Program Briefing Book and corridor flip books Short-Term Investment Program Briefing Book and project flip books Project Connect Funding and Financing Briefing Book