Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic

Similar documents
Contract Award for Rideshare Services to Supplement GoLink Service

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

OPPORTUNITIES FOR SHARED USE MOBILITY SERVICES IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview July 2017

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

Shuttle Bug: Linking Workers to Public Transportation in Northern Cook and Southern Lake Counties University of Illinois- Chicago Urban

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation

Shared Mobility in Seattle:

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

SouthWest Transit s Microtransit Service 2018 APTA State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Wednesday, August 15 th

Optimizing Community Benefits with Shared Mobility. Susan Shaheen, Ph.D

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

New Mobility Business Models

Honorable Members of the Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure and Sustainability Committee

SHARED MOBILITY: FROM DEFINITIONS TO MARKET TRENDS & IMPACTS

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

DART Capital Program Update

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Alternative Transportation Options:

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation First and Last Mile Connections TNC Partnership Study

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Transit Oriented and City Center Development

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

Are we ready to jump back in the pool? Prospects for Carpooling and Ridesharing in the Years Ahead

AVs and Transit. Stephen Buckley, P.E., AICP NACV Summit June 12, 2018

7 Mass Transit. 7.1 Existing Conditions. 7.2 Transit

Click to edit Master title style

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

CNG Strategy/Overview

Seattle and King County Mobility Services Planning and Alternative Services Program 2016 APTA Annual Meeting. City of Seattle

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Global AirRail Conference

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Cotton Belt Regional Rail Project

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

Treasure Island Toll Policy, Affordability and Transit Pass Programs. TIMMA Board Meeting December 11, 2018

Impacts of Ridesourcing: Opportunities and Risks with MaaS

Otay Ranch Station 2020 MOBILITY SERVICES MAP REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

LADOT Enhancing Transit Services through Competitive Bidding

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Personal Rapid Transit as an Alternative to Bus Service in Two Communities

Toolbox Transit Presentation Professors Joseph DiJohn and Siim Sööt University of Illinois at Chicago

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Appendix C: GAPS ANALYSIS

TNC s and Everything Else: The New Wave in (Public) Transportation

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

How Transit Agencies are Using Emerging Mobility Services to Improve Access and Mobility and Solve Problems

Green Line Long-Term Investments

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

DART Priorities Overview

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

WELCOME TO TECH. talks TECHNOLOGY ENERGIZES

Milwaukee County Transit System

Thinking Outside the Bus: New Approaches to Commuter Transportation

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

Shared Automated Vehicles: 2018 Update on Developments and Policies

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Memorandum. To: The Arlington County Board Date: June 29, 2018 From: Subject:

Needs and Community Characteristics

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Taxi Certificate Update. April 19, 2016

COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT

Shared Mobility and Automated Vehicles: Policy and Data Sharing

Shared Mobility and Technologies Impact on Parking Design and Curbside Management

Starting and Growing Rural Vanpool Programs: From Financing to Vehicle Procurement

STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN DECEMBER 2016 STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN MOBILITY OPTIONS & CORRIDORS

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Transport systems integration into urban development planning processes

TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT SWEEP ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS: COLORADO CASE STUDIES

need transportation alternatives that use less energy.

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Appendix. Statistical Profile

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Shared mobility as an equity strategy: local and global context. Cassie Halls, Program Coordinator

Transcription:

Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic Mobility? February 20, 2018 Todd Plesko VP Planning & Development Dallas Area Rapid Transit 1

DART Transit Riders Are Disproportionately From Low Income Households Income Distribution of DART Riders 25.0% 20.0% 56.8 % of Riders Have Household Income Below $35,000 20.7% 22.6% 16.0% 15.0% 14.2% 10.9% 10.0% 9.2% 6.4% 5.0% 0.0% Less than $12,000 $12,000-$19,999 $20,000 - $23,999 $24,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000 or more 2

Job Density Within DFW Region in 2014 3

Hot Spot Analysis of Low Wage Jobs and Low Income Population Hot Spot, Low-Wage Job Growth 2002-2014 Hot Spot, Households Below Poverty Level 2014 4

Jobs Accessible within 60 minutes by transit from Kiest Station Neighborhood in Oak Cliff 450,000 400,000 Jobs Accessible By Transit 402,212 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 160,712 100,000 50,000 0 2,135 15 minutes 13,033 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes 5

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) suggests that transportation expenditures over 15 % of household income is unaffordable for low income households. 6

Percentage of Income Spent on Transportation in Dallas Low Income Neighborhoods 7

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 45,230 38,696 56,767 55,301 61,994 60,592 65,752 64,592 59,810 59,293 71,606 90,221 96,272 96,380 97,846 96,346 99,620 DART LRT Ridership Trends 110,000 100,000 LRT System Average Weekday Ridership Orange Line and Rowlett Extension 90,000 80,000 Red Line Extension to Plano Green Line 70,000 60,000 50,000 SOC-3 Blue Line 40,000 30,000 8

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 113,095 135,803 130,983 129,506 131,577 128,511 126,229 121,999 110,219 145,649 135,809 152,122 151,869 152,650 146,081 125,873 163,886 DART Bus Ridership Trends 170,000 Bus System Average Weekday Ridership 160,000 150,000 Recession and service cuts Recession and service cuts Fare Increase 140,000 130,000 120,000 110,000 100,000 90,000 80,000 9

Trend In Bus Subsidies per Boarding $8.00 Bus Subsidy per Boarding 2005 Through 2017 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 25 % Growth in Subsidy per Boarding Between 2010 and 2015 $5.10 1.2 % Growth in Subsidy per Boarding Between 2010 and 2015 $5.12 $5.10 $5.26 $5.32 $5.47 $6.19 $6.90 $4.00 $3.00 $4.04 $3.69 $3.70 $3.89 $4.09 13 % % Growth in Subsidy per Boarding Between 2015 and 2017 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00-2.0 % Growth in Subsidy per Boarding Between 2005 and 2008 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 10

DART Federal Shared Mobility Grant Demonstration DART received one of eleven major Federal grants to develop and test technology to integrate new shared ride services into a family of transit services. The demonstration will incorporate private sector services like Uber/Lyft, Taxi, Bikeshare, and dynamic carpooling into DART s mobility options DART will determine if these options will reduce travel time, wait time, and increase ridership overall for transit 11

DART s Sandbox GoPass Technology Upgrade GoPass 2.0 Upgrade (DART s Mobile APP) Will include shared ride trip planning Will create a transit account which will permit settlement for public and private services Includes a cash to mobile option which is essential for unbanked persons GoLink APP (To schedule on demand services) GoConnect APP (Uber/Lyft/Taxi) GoPool APP (dynamic carpooling) 12

New DART Shared Mobility Options for First-Last Mile and Direct Services DART GoLink (on demand service) GoConnect (Uber/Lyft/Taxi and Via) Bikeshare DART GoPool First Mile DART Service Last Mile Trip 13

GoLink Small Vehicles - 6 to 14 passengers Customer scheduled service in real time through a mobile application Publicly operated and supplemented by privately operated TNC s like Lyft, Via or Uber Zone Trip distances 1 to 4 miles Up to 50 % lower cost than low performing fixed bus routes 14

TapRide Software: Customer Interface Customers then enter how many passengers will travel After selection the customer gets a confirmation showing origin and destination points 15

Southern Sector Mobility on Demand Zones SOUTHERN SECTOR ZONES Full Service February 26 16

Plano Mobility on Demand Zones FAR NORTH PLANO Full Service August LEGACY Lunch Service Available Now Full Service March 26 NORTH CENTRAL PLANO Full Service March 12 17

What is GoPool? DART s first mobile-enabled carpooling platform connecting drivers and riders with similar routes. Employer Focused Lowest Cost Mobility Solution App Based Cashless System 18

Bike Share Low Cost -- $1.00 per hour 1 st and Last mile option 1.5 miles in 10 minutes No subsidy required Will be linked to DART GoPass App to see where Bikes are available 1 in 5 bike trips are linked to public transit 19

Autonomous Shuttles The Future Holy Grail for Public Transit Eliminate low productivity bus routes particularly in low density suburban areas where transit is not effective 60 to 70 % lower operating costs 20

21