Initial Concept Review Team Alpha ALUM Rover (Astronaut Lunar Utility Mobile Rover) Friday, October 30, GMT

Similar documents
Cooperative EVA/Telerobotic Surface Operations in Support of Exploration Science

3 DESIGN. 3.1 Chassis and Locomotion

Lunar Architecture and LRO

An Overview of CSA s s Space Robotics Activities

NEXT Exploration Science and Technology Mission. Relevance for Lunar Exploration

The Study of Locomotion of Small Wheeled Rovers: The MIDD Activity

Light-Lift Rocket II

The European Lunar Lander Mission

Planetary Surface Transportation and Site Development

Analysis of Power Storage Media for the Exploration of the Moon

Name: Space Exploration PBL

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

Eurathlon Scenario Application Paper (SAP) Review Sheet

Soviet Lunokhod 1 and 2 missions and things around

Two Related Primary Challenges for Successful Renewed Lunar Exploration

On the feasibility of a fast track return to Mars

Canadian Lunar & Planetary Rover. Development

Edible Rovers Activity High School Edible Rover Worksheet Geometry Answers

From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

Landing Targets and Technical Subjects for SELENE-2

Innovative Mars exploration rover using inflatable or unfolding wheels

Lunar Robotics. Dr. Rob Ambrose, NASA JSC December Dr. Robert O. Ambrose

INTERNATIONAL LUNAR NETWORK ANCHOR NODES AND ROBOTIC LUNAR LANDER PROJECT UPDATE

Mars Surface Mobility Proposal

Brief overview of lunar surface environment Examples of rover types and designs Steering systems Static and dynamic stability

Robots to Support a Human Mars Mission

Japanese Rover Test-bed for Lunar Exploration

Massachusetts Space Grant Consortium

LUNAR DAYLIGHT EXPLORATION Cost Constrained Human and Robotic Exploration Brand Norman Griffin 1 A.M., ASCE

Analysis of Architectures for Long-Range Crewed Moon and Mars Surface Mobility

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

Rover development status

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

A New Facility for Lander Touchdown and Rover Mobility Testing at DLR

Challenges of Designing the MarsNEXT Network

Case Study: Term Project

LUNAR WHEEL TEAM TEAM: ADAM ANDERSON DAN BARRET RICHARD FREDRICKSON KRISTINA LYNN RAMOS ERIC SOLIS. ADVISORS: Dr. COLIN BRITCHER Dr.

CALL FOR IDEAS FOR THE RE-USE OF THE MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM PLATFORM CAPABILITIES. D. McCoy

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Space Robotics Planetary Exploration - a DLR Perspective

Moon Exploration Lunar Polar Sample Return ESA Thematic information day BELSPO, 3 July 2012

Resource Prospector Traverse Planning

RIMRES: A project summary

Design of Mobility System for Ground Model of Planetary Exploration Rover

Robo$cs Mission Experience from Mars. Brian Wilcox Mark Maimone Andy Mishkin 5 August 2009

INTRODUCTION Team Composition Electrical System

Travel: Detailed Flight Plan

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Design and Navigation of Flying Robots

Sample Fetching Rover - Lightweight Rover Concepts for Mars Sample Return

Astro the Rover. Olympus Mons Rover Team

Mobile Payload Element (MPE)

SAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering

Europa Lander. Mission Concept Update 3/29/2017

Reference Science Scenario for SDT Report

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

MIT: MoRETA Citation: Miller, D (2009). MoRETA: CDIO Knowledge Library, Cambridge, Mass: CDIO Global Initiative,

Lunar Escape: Development of Astronaut Recovery Rover Program

VISION-BASED NAVIGATION TECHNIQUES IN PLANETARY ROVERS

Smart Robots on Mars: Deciding Where to Go and. What to See

Wheeled Mobile Robots

THE MARS EXPLORATION ROVERS: HITTING THE ROAD ON MARS. Nagin Cox

Palamede, more than a microsatellite. Workshop on University Micro Satellites in Italy Rome, July 27, 2005

Mobile Surface Systems in a Moonbase System of Systems

MASCOT Marco Polo Surface Scout. Progress Report on Lander Package Study for Marco Polo

16.89J / ESD.352J Space Systems Engineering

Industrial-and-Research Lunar Base

Lunar Science and Infrastructure with the Future Lunar Lander

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

Building an Economical and Sustainable Lunar Infrastructure To Enable Lunar Science and Space Commerce

AFG Project Update Spring 2006 Semester 02/15/2006

Exploration Architecture Update

In 2003, A-Level Aerosystems (ZALA AERO) was founded by current company President Alexander Zakharov, since then he has led

Performance Evaluation of Wheeled Rover by Analysis and Test

This is Ground Control... Professor Derek Long Department of Informatics King s College London

ASTRIUM. Lunar Lander Concept for LIFE. Hansjürgen Günther TOB 11. Bremen, 23/

TALON Robot Rechargeable Battery Audio Vehicle Dimensions Endurance Vehicle Communication Ports OCU Rechargeable Battery Endurance Optional Sensors

Spinning-in of Terrestrial Microsystems and Technologies to Space Robotics: Results and Roadmaps

Microbots for Large-Scale Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

The Mars Express Mission A Continuing Challenge. Erhard Rabenau, NOVA Space Associates Ltd Mars Express Senior Mission Planner

DYNAMIC LOAD IN OPERATION OF HIGH-SPEED TRACKED VEHICLES

IMAGING LIDAR TECHNOLOGY Development of a 3D-LIDAR Elegant Breadboard for Rendezvous & Docking, Test Results, Prospect to Future Sensor Application

Station for Exploratory Analysis and Research Center for Humanity (SEARCH)

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Gravity Control Technologies Phase I - Unmanned Prototype

Human Exploration of the Lunar Surface

Future NASA Power Technologies for Space and Aero Propulsion Applications. Presented to. Workshop on Reforming Electrical Energy Systems Curriculum

VLVnT Installation and Maintenance of the submarine network

Lunar Escape. Astronaut Rescue and Recovery Rover. Members: Mohammad Alzohay, Dan Janke, Kyle Kilgore, Samad Qureshi, Nicholas Wade-Mayhue

DESIGN, SIMULATION AND TESTING OF SHRIMP ROVER USING RECURDYN

SOLERO: SOLAR-POWERED EXPLORATION ROVER

System Level Design Review

Table of Contents. Abstract... Pg. (2) Project Description... Pg. (2) Design and Performance... Pg. (3) OOM Block Diagram Figure 1... Pg.

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

NASA Perspectives on the Importance of Reform in Electric Energy Systems Education

Electric Penguin s philosophy:

Transcription:

Initial Concept Review Team Alpha ALUM Rover (Astronaut Lunar Utility Mobile Rover) Friday, October 30, 2009 1830-2030 GMT

Rover Requirements/Capabilities Performance Requirements Keep up with an astronaut (estimated top speed 1.5m/s) Drive over a 30cm obstacle Drive on a 20 deg slope in any direction with nominal payload Payload accessible for 5%ile female through 95%ile male Accommodate all lunar thermal environments Self-contained power supplies for 8 hour EVA Size Requirements Max stowed mass: 100 kg Max stowed dimension: 2 m Max stowed volume: 3 m^3 Capabilities Capable of independent missions Capable of self-tended recharging

ASU Mission Requirements Mission: o Land in Oceanus Procellarum (20 o N, 40 o W) Exploration with astronauts o Continue in autonomous/tele-operated mode after astronauts depart Rover should survive a minimum of 3 months on lunar surface Scientific Objectives o Remotely identify rock composition o Ability to catalog samples of interest (location, spectrum) o Observe surface morphology o Test obstacle avoidance methods to be used by future autonomous rovers

ASU Instrumentation Heritage Science Instruments o Thermal Emission Spectrometer Based on MER Mini-TES Remote detection of rock composition o Two visible light cameras with a CMOS image sensor Based on MER PanCam Stereo images/panoramas of surroundings Assess the topography, mineralogy, and geological context around the landing site Microscopic Imager o Color CCD sensor o Document rocks and regolith

ALUM Rover High Gain Antenna Navigation Mast (Stereo and Omnidirectional Cameras) Payload Module Robotic Arm Battery Module Tweel Hub-mounted Brushless DC Motor Dust Guard Avionics

Rover Dimensions 1.4 m 1.2 m 1.6 m

Modular Approach Payload Modules Astronaut Tool Modules Sample Collection Modules Life support module for extended duration EVAs Science instruments Hinged bar restrains modules

Power System Power Requirements Torque = 40 N*m, max speed = 1.5 m/s 91W / wheel Assume 75% efficiency => 500W total for the wheels Plus power to run equipment Total (estimated) energy required = 5kW-hr Considerations Lithium-sulfur batteries (rechargeable): high specific energy density 500-600 Wh/kg Lithium-ion batteries (rechargeable): 100-160 Wh/kg Solar panels Total Capacity 10 kw-hr (theoretical)

Wheel Rationale Pros Cons Pneumatic Mechanically Simple Pressure vessel, Thermal Response Aluminum Mesh Offers shock absorption Used on LRV Limited life due to fatigue Tweel Offers shock absorption on par with pneumatic New technology, needs to be adapted to lunar environment Design choice: Tweel Considerations 1.Durable and superior performance 2.Currently being developed for lunar applications

Steering Selection Pros Cons Skid Steer Mechanically Simple Kicks up Too Much Dust Inefficient Steering Single Ackerman 4W Steer More efficient turning Won't kick up as much dust as Skid Steering Can perform any type of steering Can turn in place Increased Complexity and Mass Each wheel would require a steering motor Design choice: Single Ackerman Rationale: Astronauts won't be restricted to moving in straight lines, especially when navigating rough terrain Astronauts will be working in close proximity to the rovers, making dust an increased concern

Suspension Rationale Pros Cons Active Suspension Navigate rugged terrain Increased complexity, Requires computation Double Wishbone Passive, proven technology (LRV) Significant Mass MacPherson Strut Passive, low-mass Limited ability to tune kinematics Design choice: MacPherson strut Rationale: Passive system frees computational power Traverse speed is high Photo courtesy of Honda

Stability Stability on Flat Terrain o Accelerations up 1m/s^2 o At v = 1m/s, radius of curvature 1m o At v = 0.5m/s, radius of curvature 0.2m Stability on 20 deg slope: o Accelerations up to 0.4 m/s 2 20 deg upslope o At v=1m/s, radius of curvature of 2m o At v=0.5m/s, radius of curvature up to 0.5m

Mass Budget Item Quantity Mass (kg) Total Mass (kg) Wheel 4 4 16 Batteries - 20 20 Visible light camera2 0.3 0.6 Wheel motors 4 2 8 Gearboxes 4 2 8 GNC Computer - - TBD High gain antenna 1 6 6 Low gain antenna 1 6 6 Suspension and Structure - - TBD Solar Panels - 5 5 TOTAL - - 69.6

Rover Operation on EVA The astronaut will be able to... Operate rover using controls on suit Assign scientific tasks o Picking up rock samples o Use of instruments Set waypoints for the rover View images and data from the rover on a viewscreen Approach and access rover without the rover moving

Astronaut Control on EVA Arm-mounted control panel with viewscreen o See what rover sees o Touchscreen to set targets for travel or manipulation o Display navigation information Laser pointer to designate targets o Waypoints o Instruct rover to manipulate samples with robotic arm Image by SAIC

Astronaut Access to Rover Rover height was chosen based on work envelopes of 5th percentile females and 95th percentile males Astronauts can access rear modules from behind the rover Modules carrying tools may have racks extended over the wheels for easier access

Modes of Operation between EVA and after Astronaut Departure Autonomous Reconnaissance o Scout for areas of interest between EVA's o Take images and other data and transmit to Astronauts or operators on Earth o Used to decide where to explore Teleoperation Mode o Operate the rover from habitat o Set way points for the rover o Similar control as if on EVA

Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance Astronaut Following o Rely on Astronaut's natural ability to avoid obstacles o Track and follow Astronaut's path o Keep a safe distance from the Astronaut Stereoscopic image processing o Process stereo images to identify obstacles o For use in autonomous modes, where rover speed isn't critical Positioning o IMU for relative position and orientation o Star tracker for absolute position

Recharging During crew mission Rover will also use stereo vision to dock with charge port After crew departure Before crew departs, a solar panel will be placed on the rover to provide power

Bibliography Bell, J F., et al. (2003), Mars exploration rover athena panoramic camera (pancam) investigation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(E12), 8063. Christensen, P R., et al. (2003), Miniature thermal emission spectrometer for the Mars exploration rovers, Journal of geophysical research 108.10.102. Edgett, K S., et al. (2009), The Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) aboard the Mars rover, Curiosity, Lunar and Planetary Institute Contribution 1505, p. 5. Taylor, L. (1991), Helium abundances on the moon: Assumptions and estimates, Arizona Univ., Resources of Near-Earth Space: Abstracts p 40 (SEE N91-26019 17-91).

Questions?