Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Similar documents
Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

TARDEC Technology Integration

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Predator Program Office

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

Methylene Chloride Alternative HAP-Free Chemical Paint Strippers at Anniston Army Depot

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Quarterly Progress Report

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Portable Fluid Analyzer

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

2012 E2S2 CARB s New Mobile Equipment Regulations

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Development of the M2A1 Container Coatings ECP

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Command Naval Surface Atlantic Fleet

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

SMC Standard SMC-S June Supersedes: New issue. Air Force Space Command SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER STANDARD

DISTILLATE FUEL PROCESSING FOR MARINE FUEL CELL APPLICATIONS. G. Steinfeld, R. Sanderson, H. Ghezel-Ayagh, S. Abens

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

PROJECT CLINKER INSTALLATION OF OPTICAL EQUIPMENT( HYDRAULIC CARRIAGE FOR AIRSHIP. Z te Authority. P. Daly and T. Rosenberg

Transcription:

JCAT Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 25 JAN 2006 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2006 to 00-00-2006 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Air Systems Command,48066 Shaw Rd Bldg 2188,Patuxent River,MD,20670 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 26th Replacement of Hard Chrome and Cadmium Plating Program Review Meeting, January 24-26, 2006, San Diego, CA. Sponsored by SERDP/ESTCP. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 28 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Presentation by: Andy Schwartz Materials Technician 48066 Shaw Rd Bldg 2188 Patuxent River MD 20670-1908 301-342-8865 Andrew.schwartz@navy.mil Contributions By: Steven A. Brown Materials Engineer 48066 Shaw Rd Bldg 2188 Patuxent River MD 20670-1908 301-342-8101 Steven.a.brown1@navy.mil

Overview Find repair alternatives to damaged cadmium plated or any steel surface, such as Landing Gear and ground equipment. Ease of application, be able to apply at squadron level. Most Common repair method at squadron level, sand and paint.

Sermetel 249, an aqueous inorganic metallic coating applied at room temperature. Contains Zinc and Aluminum powder. Brush or Spray application. Products Tested

Sermetel TDC, is a waterborne, inorganic, self curing, room temperature coating. Can be spray or brush on. Two part mix, binder and Zinc Powder Products Tested

Product Tested Z.R.C Cold Galvanizing Compound, aersol or brush on. 95% Zinc Powder, Acetone, MEK and Propane. Applied at room temperature, self curing. Aerosol Cans used for this test

Controls and Substrates Used 4130 steel substrates, 4 x 6 x.030 Used 4340 steel.25 round bars, Type 1.A1 ASTM F519. Cadmium Plated (immersion) substrates and round bars used as controls, no post treatment, round bars baked IAW ASTM F519.

Tests Performed In Service Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing per ASTM F 519 annex 5. Bare corrosion testing using ASTM B117 salt fog Paint Adhesion Testing per ASTM D 3359 Painted corrosion testing per ASTM B117 and ASTM D 1654, used MIL-PRF-23377 Class C2 and MIL-PRF-85285 primer and topcoat. Cadmium Plating per ASTM F-519 Table 2 Treatment B

Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing Done in 2 phases, phase 1 of round bar testing along with bare corrosion results will determine phase 2 testing. All specimens tested at 45% of tensile strength for 150 hrs. All Specimens must pass to be considered Non-Embrittling Specimens tested immersed in DI water, Sea Water per ASTM 1154 and Anti-Icing fluid per Mil-A-8243, 4ea Phase 2 testing featured round bars that were damaged, the groove was taped off, and undamaged. Damaged round bars

Hydrogen Embrittlement Test Results Phase 1 Sermetel TDC ( factory applied) failed all 4 sea water tests and 3 of 4 DI water tests in phase 1, no anti-icing fluid tests were preformed due to this poor result. Sermetel 249 (factory applied) failed 2 of 4 DI water tests and passed all 4 sea water tests and anti-icing fluid tests. ZRC cold galvanizing failed 1 of 4 sea water tests and passes all 4 DI water and anti-icing fluid tests.

Hydrogen Embrittlement Data Phase 1 Phase 1 150 Hour Test at 45% Navair Applied Sermetel TDC Enviroment result DI Water failed at 24.6 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours 150 Hour Test at 45% Factory applied Sermetel TDC Enviroment result DI Water failed at 24 hours DI Water failed at 6.2 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water failed at 117 hours Sea Water failed at 4 minutes Sea Water failed at 7 minutes Sea Water failed at 6 minutes Sea Water failed at 24 hours 150 Hour Test at 45% Factory applied Sermetel 249 Enviroment result DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water failed at 103 hours DI Water failed at 27 hours Sea Water passed at 150 hours Sea Water passed at 150 hours Sea Water passed at 150 hours Sea Water passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours 150 Hour Test at 45% Navair applied ZRC Cold Galvanized Enviroment result DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours DI Water passed at 150 hours Sea Water passed at 150 hours Sea Water failed at 128 hours Sea Water passed at 150 hours Sea Water passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours De-icing fluid passed at 150 hours

Hydrogen Embrittlement Test Results Phase 2 Sermetel TDC and 249 were not tested due to poor results in phase 1 testing and bare corrosion data. ZRC Cold Galvanizing failed 2 of 4 damaged coating in sea water and passed all four DI water and anti-icing fluid tests Cadmium plated round bars only 3 of 24 failed. ZRC Cold Galvanizing and cadmium plating had very similar results Round Bar Test in Progress

Hydrogen Embrittlement Test 150 Hour Test at 45% Navair applied ZRC Cold Galvanized Enviroment Damaged result Di water Yes passed at 150 hours Di water Yes passed at 150 hours Di water Yes passed at 150 hours Di water Yes passed at 150 hours Sea Water Yes passed at 150 hours Sea Water Yes passed at 150 hours Sea Water Yes failed at 14 hours * Sea Water Yes failed at 98 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * Data Phase 2 150 Hour Test at 45% Navair Applied Cadmium Plating Enviroment Damaged result Di water Yes passed at 150 hours * Di water Yes passed at 150 hours * Di water Yes passed at 150 hours * Di water Yes passed at 150 hours * Di water no Failed at 77 hours * Di water no passed at 150 hours * Di water no passed at 150 hours * Di water no passed at 150 hours * Sea Water Yes passed at 150 hours * Sea Water Yes passed at 150 hours * Sea Water Yes passed at 150 hours * Sea Water Yes Failed at 107 hours * Sea Water no passed at 150 hours * Sea Water no Failed at 1hour * Sea Water no passed at 150 hours * Sea Water no passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid Yes passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid no passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid no passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid no passed at 150 hours * De-icing fluid no passed at 150 hours *

Bare and Painted Corrison Tests Surface Preparation on 4130 steel 4 x 6 x.032 panels. Solvent Wipe Grit blast Dry compressed air cleaning Turco HTC immersion cleaner at 130 Degrees F for 15 minutes. Cadmium plated panels only, acid dip 10 seconds

Bare Corrosion Test 24 hrs ASTM B117 Sermetel 249 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize Cadmium Plating

Bare Corrosion Test 7 Days ASTM B117 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize unscribed ZRC Cold Galvanize scribed Cadmium Plating

Bare Corrosion Test 14 days ASTM B117 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize unscribed ZRC Cold Galvanize scribed Cadmium Plating

Bare Corrosion Test 21 days ASTM B117 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize unscribed ZRC Cold Galvanize scribed Cadmium Plating

Painted Corrosion 24 Hrs ASTM B117 Sermetel 249 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize Cadmium Plating

Painted Corrosion 7 Days ASTM B117 Sermetel 249 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize Cadmium Plating

Painted Corrosion 14 Days ASTM B117 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize Cadmium Plating

Painted Corrosion 21 Days ASTM B117 Sermetel TDC ZRC Cold Galvanize Cadmium Plating

Paint Adhesion Test Tested Primer on bare steel and Primer on ZRC Cold Galvanize to steel. Used 3 primer systems, Mil-PRF-53022, MIL-PRF- 85582N, MIL-PRF-23377 Class C2. Each primer system tested Dry, 1 day wet at room temperature, 4 days wet at 120 F, 7 days wet at 150 F. Averaged a rating of 4 for all ZRC Cold Galvanizing tests. ASTM D 3359 Method A, ratings based on paint removed after peeling tape, 5 being the best no peeling or removal, 4 trace peelings or removals, 3 jagged removals up to 1/16, 2 jagged removals up to 1/8, 1 removal of most area s under the tape and 0 removal beyond the area of the X

Paint Adhesion Test Data NumCold Galvanize Paint Paint Adhesion Results 21 No 53022 Dry 5 22 No 53022 1 Day Wet 4 23 No 53022 4 Day Wet 4 24 No 53022 7 Day Wet 1 25 No 23377C Dry 5 26 No 23377C 1 Day Wet 5 27 No 23377C 4 Day Wet 5 28 No 23377C 7 Day Wet 5 29 No 85582N Dry 5 30 No 85582N 1 Day Wet 5 31 No 85582N 4 Day Wet 4 32 No 85582N 7 Day Wet 3 33 Yes 53022 Dry 4 34 Yes 53022 1 Day Wet 4 35 Yes 53022 4 Day Wet 4 36 Yes 53022 7 Day Wet 4 37 Yes 23377C Dry 4 38 Yes 23377C 1 Day Wet 4 39 Yes 23377C 4 Day Wet 4 40 Yes 23377C 7 Day Wet 4 41 Yes 85582N Dry 4 42 Yes 85582N 1 Day Wet 3 43 Yes 85582N 4 Day Wet 4 44 Yes 85582N 7 Day Wet 4

Paint Adhesion Test Data 53022 7 Day Wet Over ZRC CG 23377C 7 Day Wet Over ZRC CG 85582N 7 Day Wet Over ZRC CG

Conclusions Sermetel 249 is not a viable repair coating due to its poor performance in the bare and painted corrosion tests. Sermetel TDC is not a viable repair option due to poor performance in the Hydrogen embrittlement tests. ZRC Cold Galvanizing is a viable repair option for ground equipment only. More testing is needed to determine if it can be used on high strength steel.

Future Testing Repeat Hydrogen embrittlement tests for ZRC Cold Galvanizing immersed in Sea water to double check results. Apply Non Chrome Post Treatment (TCP) to ZRC Cold Galvanizing to enhance paint adhesion and corrosion resistance. Test ZRC Cold Galvanizing IAW HSS JTP Coordinating with Lakehurst NJ on testing that could lead to field demo on Test Equipment

Questions Comments