CNG FUELING STATION INITIAL STUDY FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT. Appendices

Similar documents
Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

3.14 Parks and Community Facilities

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2016

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

Traffic Engineering Study

Parking and Loading. Page 1 of 7

Purpose: General Provisions:

Big Easy RV & Boat Storage A Green Energy Project Jana Lane Wildomar, California

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

Construction Realty Co.

San Rafael Civic Center Station Area Plan May 2012 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Southern California Edison s Preferred Resources Pilot (PRP) Solar Siting Survey. Summary Document

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

City of Meridian - Limited Parking Supply and Demand Analysis

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

APPENDIX C. Existing Utilities

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

T-THIRD PHASE 3 CONCEPT STUDY C: DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF CONCEPT ALIGNMENTS D: CONSTRUCTABILITY ANALYSIS AND COST ESTIMATES (HNTB CONSULTANTS)

PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT URL STAMFORD Parcel 38 Greyrock Place and Tresser Boulevard Stamford, CT April 2, 2014

The minimum number of accessory off-street parking spaces. shall conform to the requirements of the Table of General

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

Expo Light Rail Line Project Status Update Meeting Holman United Methodist Church January 27, 2011

Validation Study. Proposed Railroad Grade Separation Algonquin Road at the Union Pacific Milwaukee Railroad. May 15, 2008.

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

MEMORANDUM TO: Oak Park and River Forest High School District 200. Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona, Inc.

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

APPENDIX TR-1 PARKING AND QUEUING ASSESSMENT

11 October 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Attachment A RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT ROADWAY NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

Parking Study. Old Eau Gallie Waterfront. Melbourne, Florida FINAL REPORT

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

CITY OF MIAMI HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD BAYSIDE HISTORIC DISTRICT PARKING DESIGN GUIDELINES

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

Construction Staging Area 4 Avenue Road

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

Final Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 METHODOLOGY

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

Winnipeg Transit Bus Maintenance Garage Expansion Project

Project Description: Georgia Department of Transportation Public Information Open House Handout PI#(s): , County: Muscogee

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Maine Medical Center Campus-Wide Parking Study

Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site.

Article 10 Parking and Loading Standards

PARKING OCCUPANCY IN WINDSOR CENTER

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

Appendix C. Traffic Study

ARTICLE 8 OFF-STREET PARKING AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY STANDARDS

180 ZONING 180. ARTICLE XXX Parking Minimum required automobile parking spaces. [Amended by Ord. No. 464; by Ord. No.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Design Endorsement for Sterling Boulevard Extension

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

CITY OF OMAHA OMAHA, NEBRASKA

181 East 50 th St. Garden City, ID (208) (Cell)

Appendix G Aquilla Lake Pool Rise Recreational Resources

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. p:/2015/clusterb/tra/northyork/pw15086

engineering phase and during the procurement of design build contracts.

PARKING STUDY REPORT. Uptown Madison

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

McNICOLL BUS GARAGE. Public Open House June 12, 2017 Mary Ward Catholic School

Glengowrie Depot Upgrade. Nick Marciano, Manager Tram Maintenance, PTS

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Title 33, Planning and Zoning Chapter /1/11 Parking And Loading

Space holder to add drone footage/movie

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Temporary Sales Trailer Application

Transmission Improvements Plan for 575 MW Network Service Request Wansley CC 7 Generation Facility (OASIS # ) Georgia Transmission Corporation

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING AREA STANDARDS

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

STANDARD DRAWING INDEX

3.6 Parking and Loading Conditions

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

ZONING CODE PARKING REGULATIONS

10-10 TEMPORARY PARKING PROHIBITION FOR SNOW PLOWING AND REMOVAL. Brighton Avenue Both Between Route NJ 71 (Norwood Avenue) and Railroad Avenue.

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report

Parking Areas and Driveways for Single and Two Family Dwellings

Chapter. Parking SECTION OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

Transcription:

CNG FUELING STATION INITIAL STUDY FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Appendices Appendix F Parking Study April 2016

CNG FUELING STATION INITIAL STUDY FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION 1050 LESLIE STREET NORTH OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY LA HABRA Prepared for FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT & PLACEWORKS Prepared by GARLAND ASSOCIATES 16787 Beach Boulevard, Suite 234 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714-330-8984 MARCH 2016 F-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction and Study Methodology 1 II. Parking Conditions at Bus Yard 2 Page Existing Parking Inventory 2 Existing Parking Demand 2 Proposed Parking Supply 2 III. Parking Conditions at Maintenance & Operations Site 4 Existing Parking Inventory 4 Parking Demand 4 Opportunities for Providing Additional Parking Spaces 5 Opportunities for Parking Buses at M&O Site 6 Operational Measures to Improve Parking Efficiency 6 IV. Summary of Parking Analysis and Recommendations 8 i F-2

LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Existing Parking Inventory Bus Yard 2 2. Existing Parking Demand Bus Yard 2 3. Proposed Parking Supply Bus Yard 3 4. Existing Parking Inventory M&O Site 4 5. Parking Demand M&O Site 4 6. Opportunities for Providing Additional Parking Spaces 6 7. Summary of Parking Analysis 8 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Aerial Photograph of Bus Yard and M&O Site 2. Proposed Site Plan 3. Existing Parking Spaces at M&O Site 4. Opportunity for Additional Parking Spaces Unpaved Area Options 5. Opportunity for Additional Parking Spaces Driveway Closure & Circulation Aisle 6. Opportunity for Bus Parking at M&O Site 7. Recommended Parking Plan ii F-3

I. INTRODUCTION AND STUDY METHODOLOGY This report summarizes the results of a parking analysis that was conducted for the proposed reconfiguration of the existing bus yard that is operated by the Fullerton Joint Union High School District. The project includes the addition of a compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling station that would be open to the public. The existing bus yard (proposed CNG fueling station) is located at 1050 Leslie Street, which is on the east side of Leslie Street north of Imperial Highway in La Habra. The District s Maintenance and Operations (M&O) facility is located across the street from the bus yard at 1021 Leslie Street. The parking lots at the M&O site and the bus yard are used jointly by the two operations as most of the bus drivers park in the M&O lots and several of the M&O vehicles are parked in the bus yard lot. An aerial photograph showing the locations of the bus yard and the M&O site is provided on Figure 1. As the CNG station would displace a portion of the existing bus yard, the reconfigured site would have fewer parking spaces than the existing facility. The objective of this analysis is to analyze the impacts of the reduced number of parking spaces at the bus yard and to determine if the overall parking demands can be accommodated in the M&O parking lots. The study approach was to quantify the number of existing parking spaces at each property, quantify the parking demands at each site, evaluate the impacts of the reduced parking supply at the bus yard, then determine if the overall parking demands can be accommodated at the two properties. Opportunities for providing additional parking spaces at the M&O site were also explored. It should be noted that the number of vehicles associated with the bus yard and the M&O facility would not change as a result of the proposed CNG fueling station because the District s operation of these facilities would remain the same. The overall parking demand would, therefore, remain unchanged. 1 F-4

II. PARKING CONDITIONS AT BUS YARD The paragraphs below characterize the existing and proposed parking conditions at the District bus yard on Leslie Street. Existing Parking Inventory The bus yard currently has a total of 80 parking spaces on the property. An inventory of the parking spaces is presented in Table 1. The layout of the bus yard is shown on the aerial photograph on Figure 1. TABLE 1 EXISTING PARKING INVENTORY BUS YARD Type of Parking Space Number of Parking Spaces Long Spaces for Full-Size Buses 27 Long Spaces for M&O Vehicles 4 Spaces for Small Buses and/or Autos/Pick-up Trucks 49 TOTAL 80 Existing Parking Demand The parking utilization at the bus yard is comprised of full-size buses, small buses, employee vehicles, and M&O vehicles. Based on observations and information provided by District personnel, the parking demand for each type of vehicle was determined, as summarized in Table 2. As shown, this yard accommodates 51 buses (combined number of full-size and small buses) and a total of 68 vehicles. TABLE 2 EXISTING PARKING DEMAND BUS YARD Type of Vehicle Number of Vehicles Full-Size Buses 26 Small Buses 25 M&O Vehicles in Long Spaces 4 Autos/Pick-up Trucks in Small Spaces 13 TOTAL 68 Proposed Parking Supply The proposed site plan for the District bus yard and public CNG fueling station indicates that there would be a reduction in the number of parking spaces at the bus yard because the CNG station would displace some of the existing parking spaces. Table 3 shows the number of parking spaces that would be provided at the proposed bus yard. The proposed site plan for the bus yard and CNG fueling station is shown on Figure 2. 2 F-5

The proposed project would result in a loss of 24 parking spaces at the bus yard (80 existing, 56 proposed). As the current parking demand is 68 vehicles, the 56 spaces that would be provided results in a shortage of 12 spaces at the bus yard. These 12 spaces are used by employees and M&O vehicles, which would be relocated to the M&O site located on the opposite side of Leslie Street. The 51 buses could all be parked at the bus yard and five extra spaces would be available for parking employee vehicles or District vehicles. One additional space is provided as a bus wash pad, but it is not included in the parking inventory. TABLE 3 PROPOSED PARKING SUPPLY BUS YARD Type of Parking Space Number of Parking Spaces Long Spaces with CNG Fuel Post 39 Small Spaces with CNG Fuel Post 7 Small Spaces without CNG Fuel Post 10 TOTAL 56 3 F-6

III. PARKING CONDITIONS AT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS Site The paragraphs below characterize the existing and projected parking conditions at the District s Maintenance and Operations site on Leslie Street. Existing Parking Inventory The M&O site currently has a total of 96 on-site parking spaces. An inventory of the parking spaces is presented in Table 4 and the locations of these parking spaces are illustrated on Figure 3. TABLE 4 EXISTING PARKING INVENTORY M&O Site Type of Parking Space Number of Parking Spaces Maintenance Vehicles (White Fleet) 35 Conventional Parking Spaces (Employees & Visitors) 61 TOTAL 96 Parking Demand The parking utilization at the M&O site is comprised of maintenance vehicles (the white fleet), employee vehicles, and visitor vehicles. Based on observations at the facility, the existing parking demand for each category of vehicle was determined, as summarized in Table 5. As shown, the parking lots at the M&O site currently accommodate 90 vehicles on a typical day of operation. As there are 96 parking spaces on the property, the parking lots are nearly filled to capacity. Although many of the spaces designated for the white fleet are unoccupied for much of the day, they are reserved for the maintenance vehicles and are not used for employee or visitor parking. TABLE 5 PARKING DEMAND M&O Site Type of Vehicle Number of Vehicles Existing With Project Maintenance Vehicles (White Fleet) 35 35 Employee & Visitor Vehicles 55 55 Vehicles Displaced from Bus Yard 0 12 TOTAL 90 102 As stated previously, the installation of the CNG fueling station would result in a reduction in the number of parking spaces at the bus yard and cause a parking shortage of 12 spaces. The plan for accommodating the unmet parking demand is to transfer these vehicles to the M&O parking lots. Table 5 indicates that the parking demand at the M&O site would increase to 102 vehicles with the implementation of the proposed project. As there are 96 parking spaces at the M&O site, there would be a deficiency of six spaces. 4 F-7

Opportunities for Providing Additional Parking Spaces The M&O site was analyzed to develop options for providing additional parking spaces at the site. The layouts of the existing parking lots on the north, west, and south sides of the main building were found to be efficient and there are no practical opportunities for increasing the number of marked parking stalls other than reducing the size of the parking stalls or utilizing areas that are currently in use for storage (e.g., the northwest corner of the property at the west end of the white fleet parking spaces). There are, however, some opportunities to provide additional parking spaces on the east side of the site, as outlined below. Unpaved Area at Northeast Corner of Property The rectangular-shaped unpaved area at the northeast corner of the property could be paved and converted to parking. The area could be striped to provide five spaces along the north side (Option 1) or three spaces on the north side and two spaces on the east side of the area (Option 2), as shown on Figure 4. One existing space that is currently in use immediately south of the unpaved area would need to be eliminated to provide access to the new parking spaces, so there would be a net gain of four parking spaces. Unpaved Area at Northeast Corner of Property with Driveway Closure If the District would be agreeable to closing the north driveway that is located immediately south of the unpaved area, there would be an opportunity to provide five parking spaces along the east side of the property and three spaces along the north side of the property, as shown on Figure 5. These eight spaces would be a northerly continuation of the parking spaces that are currently in place along the east property line between the middle driveway and the north driveway. The M&O site currently has three driveways, so the elimination of this north driveway would be feasible if direct access from Leslie Street to the garage door is unnecessary. As the one existing parking space located immediately south of the unpaved area would need to be eliminated, there would be a net gain of seven parking spaces. Alternatively, the existing driveway could be closed and a new driveway constructed. This configuration would result in five parking spaces along the north side of the property and three spaces along the east side of the property at the location where the existing driveway would be close. As one existing parking space would be eliminated, there would be a net gain of seven parking spaces. Circulation Aisle at Southeast Corner of M&O Building A circulation aisle located at the southeast corner of the main M&O building immediately west of a landscaped area between the south driveway and the middle driveway could be striped to provide three new parking spaces, as also shown on Figure 5. It does not appear that this circulation aisle is necessary and it was observed that vehicles are often parked at this location even though it is not striped as parking stalls. Both Ends of the White Fleet Lot At the west end of the white fleet lot next to the fence along the west property line, three parking spaces could be provided in an area that is currently used for outside storage. Also, an additional 5 F-8

angled parking space could be provided at the east end of the row of spaces along the north property line. This option would result in four additional parking spaces in the M&O lot. The opportunities for providing additional parking spaces at the M&O site are summarized in Table 6. The use of the unpaved area would result in an increase of four parking spaces (as shown in Figure 4). If the north driveway can be closed, the use of the unpaved area would result in an increase of seven parking spaces. The combined use of the unpaved area and the circulation aisle at the southeast corner of the M&O building would result in a net increase of seven parking spaces if the north driveway is not closed and 10 parking spaces if the north driveway is closed. TABLE 6 OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES Parking Options Net Increase in Parking Spaces Unpaved Area at Northeast Corner of Property 4 Unpaved Area at Northeast Corner of Property with Driveway Closure or Driveway Relocation 7 Circulation Aisle at Southeast Corner of M&O Building 3 Both Ends of the White Fleet Lot 4 Combined Unpaved Area & Circulation Aisle 7 Combined Unpaved Area with Driveway Closure or Relocation & Circulation Aisle 10 Combined Unpaved Area with Driveway Closure or Relocation, Circulation Aisle & White Fleet Lot 14 Opportunities for Parking Buses at M&O Site An opportunity that could potentially be pursued by the District would be to use the area on the north side of the M&O building (between the building and the property line) as a location to park buses that are not actively in use. The area could accommodate up to nine parked buses; i.e., three rows with three buses in each row (see Figure 6). The objective of this option would be to temporarily relocate spare buses from the bus yard to the M&O site and thereby provide up to nine large parking spaces in the bus yard that would be available for maintenance vehicles, employee vehicles, etc. This option would alleviate the loss of parking spaces at the bus yard that would occur as a result of installing the CNG station. If the area on the north side of the M&O building were to be used for parking spare buses, the unpaved area at the northeast corner of the property would have to be paved to provide a travel path to Leslie Street and a new driveway would have to be provided at the east end of the currentlyunpaved area. The opportunity to provide five standard parking spaces in the unpaved area would be compromised and 10 existing parking spaces that are used for the white fleet (maintenance vehicles) would be eliminated. To partially offset the loss of parking spaces associated with this option, the existing driveway located immediately south of the unpaved area could be closed and three marked parking stalls could be provided. 6 F-9

Operational Measures to Improve Parking Efficiency In addition to the measures outlined above that could be used to provide additional parking spaces at the M&O site, there are several operational measures that could be used to improve the efficiency of the available parking supply, as outlined below. Require/Encourage the White Fleet Drivers to Park Personal Vehicles in the White Fleet Spaces This measure would require some or all of the white fleet drivers to park their personal vehicle in the parking stall where their assigned work vehicle is parked. The designated parking spaces where the white fleet vehicles are parked are generally empty during the day. This measure would provide the opportunity for the shared use of these parking spaces and thereby make other parking spaces available in the M&O lots. The disadvantage would be that the assigned parking spaces for the white fleet vehicles would not be readily available when the employees returned to the M&O site throughout the day and at the end of the day. During the times when an employee would have responsibilities at the M&O site, both the District vehicle and their personal vehicle would be parked in the lots and the shared parking concept would be negated as two spaces would be occupied. This would occur at the beginning of the day, the end of the day, and at any interim time periods when the employee had duties at the M&O site. In addition, the shared use of a parking space for a District vehicle and an employee s personal vehicle would be inconvenient for the employee and could result in vehicle conflicts in the parking lot if numerous employees were making the vehicle exchange simultaneously. Require/Encourage the Bus Drivers to Park Personal Vehicles in the Bus Stalls This measure would require some or all of the bus drivers to park their personal vehicle in the parking stall where their bus is parked. The designated parking stalls where the buses are parked are generally empty during the day. This measure would provide the opportunity for the shared use of these parking stalls and thereby make parking spaces available in the M&O lots. The disadvantage would be that the assigned parking stalls for the buses would not be readily available when the bus drivers returned to the bus yard at midday and at the end of the day. In addition, the shared use of a parking stall for a bus and an employee s personal vehicle would be inconvenient for the bus drivers and could result in vehicle conflicts in the bus parking lot if numerous bus drivers were making the vehicle exchange simultaneously. Remove Some or All of the Unused White Fleet Vehicles It was observed during the field reconnaissance for this study that there are several unused/inoperable white fleet vehicles that are occupying space in the M&O parking lot. In particular, vehicles of this type are being stored at the east end of the parking lot north of the main M&O building. The removal or relocation of these vehicles would render this area available for a more productive use. 7 F-10

IV. SUMMARY OF PARKING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the parking analysis are summarized in Table 7. The table shows the number of parking spaces and the parking demand (number of vehicles to be parked) at the bus yard, at the M&O site, and the total for the two facilities. This information is shown for existing conditions, for the scenario with the CNG station, and for the scenario with the CNG station and the proposed new parking spaces at the M&O site. In summary, there is an excess of 18 total parking spaces for the existing conditions scenario (176 spaces for 158 vehicles) for the two properties combined. For the scenario with the CNG station, there would be a deficiency of six parking spaces (152 spaces for 158 vehicles). If 14 new parking spaces are provided at the M&O site, as recommended, there would be enough spaces to accommodate the total combined parking demand of the two properties (159 spaces for 166 vehicles). TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF PARKING ANALYSIS With CNG Station & Existing Conditions With CNG Station Facility New Parking at M&O # of Spaces # of Vehicles # of Spaces # of Vehicles # of Spaces # of Vehicles Bus Yard 80 68 56 56 56 56 M&O Site 96 90 96 102 110 102 Total 176 158 152 158 160 158 Recommendations Modify the parking lot at the M&O site by implementing the following features: - Eliminate the north driveway and replace it with curb-and-gutter and a sidewalk. - Construct a new driveway immediately north of the existing (to be closed) north driveway to align with the circulation aisle on the north side of the M&O building. - Pave the currently-unpaved area at the northeast corner of the M&O site. - Provide three parking spaces along the east side of the property at the closed driveway location and five parking spaces along the north side of the property in the new paved area. - Provide three parking spaces in the circulation aisle located at the southeast corner of the main M&O building immediately west of the landscaped area between the south driveway and the middle driveway. - Provide three parking spaces at the west end of the white fleet lot next to the fence along the west property line and provide an angled parking space at the east end of the row of spaces along the north property line. 8 F-11

The recommended parking plan is illustrated on Figure 7. If it is not financially feasible to permanently eliminate the north driveway and replace it with curband-gutter and a sidewalk, the driveway could be temporarily closed by positioning cones and/or barricades along the property line. The proposed parking spaces could be provided with this interim condition if the unpaved area is paved as recommended. If it is not financially feasible to pave the currently-unpaved area and close the north driveway, operational measures such as requiring/encouraging the white fleet drivers to park personal vehicles in the white fleet spaces and requiring/encouraging the bus drivers to park personal vehicles in the bus stalls should be considered. 9 F-12

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT S C yp re ss St Figure 1 - Aerial Photograph of Bus Yard and M&O Site Former Fullerton College La Habra Campus (Vacant) Leslie St Pacific Architectural & Millwork (1031 S Leslie St) Stagelight Productions (1051 S Leslie St) Commercial (601 Imperial Hwy) (Vacant) CNG Site 0 District M&O Site 150 Scale (Feet) Base Map Source: Google Earth Pro, 2015 F-13

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Figure 2 - Proposed Site Plan PORTION OF R.S.B. 58/18 Bus Path of Travel Base Map Source: Rosell Surveying and Mapping, Inc., 2016 0 Scale (Feet) 80 F-14

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Figure 3 - Existing Parking Spaces at M&O Site Not A Part Sidewalk Leslie St North Driveway M&O Building M&O Building Sidewalk Sidewalk Sidewalk Center Driveway South Driveway District M&O Site Chain Link Fence 1 Existing Parking Stalls (96) 0 Scale (Feet) 100 F-15

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Figure 4 - Opportunity for Additional Parking Spaces - Unpaved Area Options Added Parking Spaces Leslie St North Driveway Option 1 Leslie St Added Parking Spaces North Driveway District M&O Site Chain Link Fence Base Map Source: Google Maps, 2016 Option 2 0 20 Scale (Feet) F-16

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Figure 5 - Opportunity for Additional Parking Spaces - Driveway Closure Option and Circulation Aisle Option Leslie St Added Parking Spaces North Driveway Closure Driveway Closure Option Leslie St Center Driveway Added Parking Spaces District M&O Site Chain Link Fence Base Map Source: Google Maps, 2016 Circulation Aisle Option 0 20 Scale (Feet) F-17

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Figure 6 - Opportunity for Bus Parking at M&O Site Bus Parking North Driveway Relocation Closed Driveway Leslie St Center Driveway District M&O Site Base Map Source: Google Maps, 2016 0 20 Scale (Feet) F-18

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED DISTRICT BUS YARD & CNG FUELING STATION FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Figure 7 - Recommended Parking Plan Not A Part Sidewalk Leslie St 11 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 M&O Building 9 10 96 Sidewalk North Driveway Relocation Center Driveway M&O Building 1 2 3 Sidewalk Sidewalk South Driveway District M&O Site Chain Link Fence 1 New Parking Stalls (14) 1 Existing Parking Stalls (96)* * Note that stall #96 has been relocated. 0 Scale (Feet) 100 F-19