Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Similar documents
Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

SUMMARY REPORT ON EVALUATION OF A FUEL ADDITIVE AT SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

FUEL EFFICIENCY CASE STUDY

FUEL EFFICIENCY CASE STUDY

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

SCC Greenhouse Gas Assessment

80 Tonnes & Under. Restriction: 20 Tonnes & Under. CraneSafe Certification

CraneSafe. Certification. CraneSafe. Certification CraneSafe Certification

New Catalytic Stripper System for the Measurement of Solid Particle Mass, Number, and Size Emissions from Internal Combustion Engines

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

SEPA Statement Processed Fuel Oil

MECA DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM OF ADVANCED EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES FINAL REPORT

ETV Joint Verification Statement

Debswana Anglo American Fuel Additive Test Criteria. Centron Diesel Fuel Enhancer Lab & Performance Test Results TOMORROW S FUEL TECHNOLOGY TODAY

Aerodynamic device vortex generators

BG Diesel Fuel Products THE PROOF

Fuel Maximizer Combustion Catalyst Diesel Fuel Additive

PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET

REAL WORLD DRIVING. Fuel Efficiency & Emissions Testing. Prepared for the Australian Automobile Association

A VEHICLE FUEL TANK FLUSH EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION PROGRAM. Mr. Timothy C. Belian, Executive Director

Reduce Haul Truck Fuel Consumption

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK

ASTM E 1354 Caloric Content Determination of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540"

Fuel Borne Catalysts

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

OPTIMISING SEWAGE PUMPING STATION PERFORMANCE

Appendix A.1 Calculations of Engine Exhaust Gas Composition...9

APPENDIX 1 TECHNICAL DATA OF TEST ENGINE

OFFSHORE Diesel Fuel Treatment Technical Data By:

FurnaceDoctor -DPT Dewpoint Analyzer. User Manual Version 008

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

R&D on a Medium-speed, Four-cycle Diesel Engine Using Heavy fuel oil

PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET

Criteria. As background, the US Environmental Protection Agency s Green Vehicle Guide states that:

Technical Papers supporting SAP 2009

Section 12: Record Keeping Requirements. Minnesota Trucking Regulations

HST ANTI-SPALL WINDSCREENS (0071/070042)

Battery Grade Spherical Graphite Produced

RULE EMISSIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN FROM SMALL INDUSTRIAL, INSTITUTIONAL, AND COMMERCIAL BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS, AND PROCESS HEATERS

EPA Registration. 1. Attached is the EPA letter confirming the registration of the MPG-CAPS.

Draft Agenda. Item Subject Responsible Time. 4. GAS INFORMATION SERVICES PROJECT IMO 10 min. 5. OPTIONS FOR GAS BULLETIN BOARD SYSTEM IMO 15 min

Burn Characteristics of Visco Fuse

# of tests Condition g/mile ± g/mile ± g/mile ± (miles/gal) ± Impact of Diesel Extreme on emissions and fuel economy USDS results:

BULDER 00 ROOMHEATER

Clyde Waste Transfer Facility Quarterly Truck Noise Measurements April 2009

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

DPM-RT Operating Manual

HYDROGEN BASED DIESEL REDUCTION SYSTEM for TRANSPORT & HAULAGE SYSTEMS

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PORTSMOUTH, NEW HAMPSHIRE. Annual Fuel Bid - #01-18 INVITATION TO BID

The Effect Of XFT Fuel Catalyst On Fuel Consumption In Similar Tractor-Trailer Test Units Using The SAE/TMC J1321 Type II Test Protocol

SPE MS. Abstract

Zürich Testing on Fuel Effects and Future Work Programme

AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT

Test report. About the effect of Lambda System Cleaning Products. No

Z-Score Summary - Concrete Proficiency Testing Program (70) Z-SCORES SUMMARY. Concrete April 2017 (70)

1 Faculty advisor: Roland Geyer

Analysis of the fuel consumption and CO2 and NOx emissions of 44-tonne natural gas and diesel semi-trailer trucks

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK

RULE BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS, AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted 5/11/93, Revised 6/13/95, 6/13/00, 9/11/12)

Caltex Australia comments on Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme White Paper February 2009

February 28, Definition of Engines Covered Under the Rule

What to Expect from Your New Low (and Ultra-Low) Sulfur Fuels

Conductor Strength Tests on ACCR 1622TW T13 Pecos Conductor

Chief Operating Officer. Nigel Bell, Energy Resource Manager

2 Marine Specialties

-SQA- SCOTTISH QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY NATIONAL CERTIFICATE MODULE: UNIT SPECIFICATION GENERAL INFORMATION. -Module Number Session

PROSECUTING GUIDELINES FOR VEHICLE MASS MEASURING

Bald Hill on track to start lithium concentrate production this quarter

ATTENTION: DIESEL FUEL USERS

CASE STUDY 1612B FUEL ECONOMY TESTING

PRESENTATION ON BEST CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT in KSRTC 12/8/2010 1

Vehicular modal emission and fuel consumption factors in Hong Kong

Alfred & Plantagenet Multi-Residential Cart Recycling Program CIF Project Number # Final Report October 1, 2016

Ballast Water Management Surveyor checklist

EMISSIONS AND FUEL ECONOMY TEST FINAL REPORT (OAE-APSI-4) Locomotive EMD Engine FITCH FUEL CATALYST

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

CraneSafe. Certification. CraneSafe Certification. CraneSafe. Certification

Tank Truck Explosion Date of Incident: Type of Incident: Double Fatality

RULE NOX REDUCTIONS FROM MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES (Adopted 12/13/2016)

Comparison of Soot Measurement Instruments during Transient and Steady State Operation

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A DIESEL AND A COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS MEDIUM-DUTY TRUCK. THE CASE OF TORONTO

AIR QUALITY PERMIT. Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus

TREATMENT FOR DIESEL FUEL

Umatilla Electric Cooperative Net Metering Rules

Expected Energy Not Served (EENS) Study for Vancouver Island Transmission Reinforcement Project (Part I: Reliability Improvements due to VITR)

TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT PART OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE KEBRAFIELD ROODEPOORT COLLIERY IN THE PULLEN S HOPE AREA

WRITTEN COMMENTS OF THE MANUFACTURERS OF EMISSION CONTROLS ASSOCIATION ON THE U.S. EPA-HQ-OAR

1996, or for which modification is commenced on or before March 16, 1998, shall not exceed the

Transcription:

Copyright Statement All rights reserved. All material in this document is, unless otherwise stated, the property of FPC International, Inc. Copyright and other intellectual property laws protect these materials. Reproduction or retransmission of the materials, in whole or in part, in any manner, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder, is a violation of copyright law.

PLACER DOME Paddington/Red Hill Operations Evaluation of FTC Combustion Catalyst as a means of reducing diesel fuel costs in mobile mining equipment May, 2005 Prepared by: Fuel Technology Pty Ltd 2 Tipping Road KEWDALE WA 6105 Tel: (08) 9353 1016 Fax: (08) 9353 1013 E-mail fueltech@iinet.net.au ACN 100 293 490

C O N T E N T S Executive Summary Page 1 Background Page 2 Introduction Page 2 Test Method Page 3 Test Results Page 4 Bosch Smoke Measurements Page 5 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Page 6 Conclusion Page 6 Appendix A B C D Bosch Smoke Results Carbon Balance Printouts Raw Data Fuel Technology Measurements using Carbon Balance Techniques

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The FTC/FPC Combustion Catalysts manufactured and marketed by Fuel Technology Pty Ltd have proven in laboratory and field trials to significantly reduce fuel consumption under comparable load conditions and to also substantially reduce carbon emissions. Following meeting with Jim Lavery and Colin Brand it was agreed that a fuel efficiency study should be conducted on haul trucks at the Red Hill site employing two International Engineering test procedures, namely Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC) and Carbon Mass Balance (CMB). It was also agreed that selected Doug Gould prime movers at Paddington be tested using the CMB test procedure as SFC circuit could not be established. This trial commenced on 21 st March, 2005 and was completed on 11 th May, 2005. Due to flow meter malfunction during SFC testing at Red Hill all data collated using this test method is unusable. However, the AS2007-1982 test procedure undertaken at both Red Hill and Paddington provides accurate fuel consumption figures. The net average efficiency gain (reduction in fuel consumption) measured at Red Hill and Paddington by the CMB test method was 7.2%. Smoke emissions were reduced by an average of 33.5% following FTC-3 treatment of fuel. Page 1

BACKGROUND The FTC Combustion Catalyst is the only fuel chemical yet proven by the world s leading testing authority, Southwest Research Institute (Texas) to improve fuel efficiency in an as new 2500HP diesel engine operating at its most efficient state. SwRI also determined that FTC does not alter the physical or chemical properties of diesel fuel. SwRI also determined, using the Caterpillar 1G2 Test (ASTM 509A) that there are no detrimental effects that could cause increased wear or deposit problems following catalyst treatment of fuel. These findings have been verified by countless field studies in diverse applications, which have confirmed efficiency benefits for mine mobile equipment. Maintenance benefits documented include reduced wear metal profiles in lubricating oil and reduced soot. Combustion and exhaust spaces become essentially free of any hard carbon with continuous catalyst use. FTC s action in producing fuel efficiency gains is to promote a faster fuel burn which releases the fuel s energy more efficiently. That is, a larger portion of the fuel burn occurs when the piston is closer to top dead centre. INTRODUCTION Equipment provided for this fuel efficiency evaluation comprised four Caterpillar 777D haul trucks, Nos 59, 60, 109 and 110. Additionally, four Doug Gould prime movers, Midabean, KNL, Knard and Lakanooky were also provided for the fuel efficiency test. Fuel Technology Pty Ltd supplied, on loan, FTC Catalyst metering systems at Red Hill and at Doug Gould s fuel farm. These systems were calibrated allowing fuel to be FTC treated at time of each test truck refuelling. Page 2

TEST METHOD The Carbon Mass Balance (CMB) is a procedure whereby the mass of carbon in the exhaust is calculated as a measure of the fuel being burned. The elements measured in this test include the exhaust gas composition, (HC,CO,CO 2 and O 2 ) temperature and the gas flow rate calculated from the differential pressure and exhaust stack cross sectional area. This is an engineering standard test (AS2077-1982) and has been used by the US EPA since 1974 as the Standard Federal Test Procedure for fuel economy and emission testing. (Horiba four gas analyser photograph No. 1). Each test truck at Red Hill was driven to the service bay while Doug Gould trucks were halted prior to entering weighbridge at Paddington. At this time CMB probe was positioned in the exhausts independently. With the assistance of on-site personnel the test truck engine was run at high idle while emissions were recorded. Exhaust smoke samples via Bosch Smoke testing equipment were also recorded at this time. Page 3

TEST RESULTS A summary of the CMB fuel efficiency results achieved in this test program is provided in the following tables. Carbon Balance Fuel Consumption Test Results TABLE 1 RED HILL Unit No. Untreated 21/3/05 Treated 9/5/05 Variation Carbon flow g/s Carbon flow g/s 59 11.928 10.881-8.8% 60 11.159 10.276-7.9% 109 11.553 10.827-6.3% 110 9.697 9.122-5.9% AVERAGE 11.084 10.276-7.3% TABLE 2 DOUG GOULD PADDINGTON Unit No. Untreated 21/3/05 Treated 9/5/05 Variation Carbon flow g/s Carbon flow g/s MIDBEAN Left Exhaust 0.493 0.458 Right Exhaust 0.592 0.551 TOTAL g/s 1.085 1.009-7% KNL Left Exhaust 0.793 0.739 Right Exhaust 1.043 0.969 TOTAL g/s 1.836 1.708-7% KNARD Left Exhaust 0.567 0.530 Right Exhaust 0.618 0.566 TOTAL g/s 1.185 1.096-7.5% LAKANOOKY Left Exhaust 0.611 0.569 Right Exhaust 0.798 0.743 TOTAL g/s 1.409 1.312-6.9% AVERAGE 1.379 1.281-7.1% The CMB test procedure provides confirmation that addition of the Catalyst to the fuel supply has resulted in a reduction in carbon flow (fuel consumption) of 7.3% at Red Hill and 7.1% at the Doug Gould fuel farm. Combining the two sites results in a total reduction in fuel consumption of 7.2%. Page 4

BOSCH SMOKE MEASUREMENTS A Bosch smoke test is also undertaken during conduct of the CMB test and the results are shown in the following table. Carbon impregnation on filter is then measured via Bosch infra red meter with a scale of 0 (perfectly white) to 10 (black) readings. Smoke patches in Appendix. TABLE 3 Bosch Smoke Results RED HILL Unit No. Untreated Treated Variation 21/3/05 9/5/05 59 1.3 0.9-31% 60 1.3 1.2-8% 109 1.5 1.2-20% 110 1.2 1.0-17% AVERAGE 5.3 4.3-19% TABLE 4 Bosch Smoke Results DOUG GOULD PADDINGTON Unit No. Untreated 21/3/05 Treated 9/5/05 Variation MIDABEAN Left Exhaust 0.5 0.4 Right Exhaust 0.6 0.4 AVERAGE 1.1 0.8-27% KNL Left Exhaust 0.4 0.1 Right Exhaust 0.4 0.2 AVERAGE 0.8 0.3-62% KNARD Left Exhaust 0.5 0.1 Right Exhaust 0.6 0.6 AVERAGE 1.1 0.7-36% LAKANOOKY Left Exhaust 0.2 0.1 Right Exhaust 0.1 0.1 AVERAGE 0.3 0.2-33% TOTAL AVERAGE 3.3 1.7-48% Page 5

GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION A gross reduction of 7.2% of the current estimated annual fuel consumption of 15,000 KL translates to 2,906 tonnes per annum reduction in CO 2 emissions, based on the formula outlined in Worksheet 1 of the Electricity Supply Business Greenhouse Change Workbook. Our estimate is based on the following calculations:- (15,000 KL x 38.6 x 69.7) 1000 = 40,356 tonnes CO 2 per annum - 7.2% (13,920 KL x 38.6 x 69.7) 1000 = 37,450 tonnes CO 2 per annum CO 2 reduction by application FTC Catalyst 40,356 tonnes 37,450 = 2,906 tonnes CONCLUSION These carefully controlled international engineering standard test procedures conducted at Red Hill and Paddington provides clear evidence of average reduced fuel consumption of 7.2%. A fuel efficiency gain of 7.2% as measured by the Australian Standards (AS2007) CMB test method if applied to the estimated fuel currently consumed by these two operations of approximately 15 ML per annum at a cost of $0.56/L will result in a net saving in excess of $500,000 per annum. Additional to the fuel economy benefits measured, is a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 2,906 tonnes per annum due to more complete combustion of the fuel. Further, the more complete combustion will translate to significant reduction over time in engine maintenance costs. FTC/FPC also acts as an effective biocide. Page 6

Appendix B Carbon Balance Printouts

Carbon Balance Results Paddington