Rollovers of the future: strong roofs, ESC, and curtain airbags

Similar documents
The Evolution of Side Crash Compatibility Between Cars, Light Trucks and Vans

Petition for Rulemaking; 49 CFR Part 571 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Rear Impact Guards; Rear Impact Protection

Safety Briefing on Roof Crush How a Strong Federal Roof Crush Standard Can Save Many Lives & Why the Test Must Include Both Sides of the Roof

NEW CRASH TESTS: SMALL CARS IMPROVE AND THE TOP PERFORMERS ALSO ARE FUEL SIPPERS

FMVSS No. 226 Ejection Mitigation Final Rule. Presented by Susan Meyerson 2 nd Meeting of the Pole Side Impact GTR Brussels, Belgium March 3-4, 2011

Roof Strength and Occupant Protection in Rollover Crashes. Paine M. 1, Newland C

CRASH ATTRIBUTES THAT INFLUENCE THE SEVERITY OF ROLLOVER CRASHES

SEVERITY MEASUREMENTS FOR ROLLOVER CRASHES

Using Injury Data to Understand Traffic and Vehicle Safety

Injuries from Motor Vehicle Crashes 48,000 46,000

The New Car Assessment Program: Suggested Approaches for Enhancements; Docket No. NHTSA

Appendix Baseline seats High Retention seats MAIS

Crash Investigation Data in the United States October 2017

Statement before the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation IIHS research on vehicle roof crush

Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; 49 CFR Part 571, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, Roof Crush Resistance; Docket No.

MIN <#> A DEVELOPMENT OF PANORAMIC SUNROOF AIRBAG

INVESTIGATING POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THE IIHS SIDE IMPACT CRASHWORTHINESS EVALUATION PROGRAM

GRSP ASIA MEETING - MARCH

Frontal Corner Impacts Crash Tests and Real-World Experience

The Future of Vehicle Safety

EMBARGOED NEWS RELEASE

Opportunities for Safety Innovations Based on Real World Crash Data

STUDY OF AIRBAG EFFECTIVENESS IN HIGH SEVERITY FRONTAL CRASHES

CRASH COMPATIBILITY: THE U.S. PERSPECTIVE. Brian O Neill, Adrian K. Lund, and Joseph M. Nolan Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Statement before the Transportation Subcommittee, U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Committee

Roof Strength and Injury Risk in Rollover Crashes

The older driver crash picture: trends and factors

IDENTIFYING PRIORITIES FOR IMPROVING REAR SEAT OCCUPANT PROTECTION KATHLEEN D. KLINICH CAROL A. C. FLANNAGAN

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Overview Data

Insert the title of your presentation here. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

Priorities for future vehicle safety improvements in the Western Australian light vehicle fleet

Balavich 1 INSTALLATION PATTERNS FOR EMERGING SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES

The Sad History of Rollover Prevention 30 Years, Thousand of Deaths and Injuries, and Still No Safety Performance Standard

Enhancing School Bus Safety and Pupil Transportation Safety

NHTSA SIDE IMPACT RESEARCH: MOTIVATION FOR UPGRADED TEST PROCEDURES

Correct driving posture

ROOF CRUSH SIMULATION OF PASSENGER CAR FOR IMPROVING OCCUPANT SAFETY IN CABIN

Pole Side Impact GTR: Assessment of Safety Need: Updated Data Collection

Pole side impact Cost / Benefit study, French data

AIRBAG: IS IT AN EFFECTIVE OCCUPANT PROTECTION SYSTEM?

Predicted availability of safety features on registered vehicles a 2015 update

Introduction. Background

INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY

UNDERSTANDING MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH MECHANISMS AND INJURIES

DOT HS April 2013

Center for Auto Safety 1825 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 330 Washington, D.C (202)

4 EJECTION crash test technology InternatIonal JUne 2010

On Site Side Air Curtain Investigation / Vehicle to Vehicle Dynamic Science, Inc. / Case Number: DS Lexus GS300 California June, 2002

Why do People Die in Road Crashes?

HEAD AND NECK INJURY POTENTIAL IN INVERTED IMPACT TESTS

STATUS OF NHTSA S EJECTION MITIGATION RESEARCH. Aloke Prasad Allison Louden National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

--- SA. Research Note -.,; People Saving People Injuries Associated With Hazards Involving ~ Motor Vehicle "Rollaways"

Lighter and Safer Cars by Design

Economic Realities. Evaluating Cases at Intake: Identifying Potential Claims for Catastrophically Injured Clients MARK EMISON KCMBA JUNE 28, 2018

FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS: THERE IS NO TRADEOFF WITH SAFETY, COST, AND FLEET TURNOVER. July 24, 2018 UPDATE. Jack Gillis Executive Director

DIFFERING PATTERNS OF HEAD AND FACIAL INJURY WITII AIRBAG AND/OR BELT RESTRAINED DRIVERS IN FRONTAL COLLISIONS

VOLKSWAGEN. Volkswagen Safety Features

Characteristics of Passenger Car Side to Pole Impacts - Analysis of German and UK In-depth data using different approaches

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. Research Note. DOT HS October 2017

Rates of Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age, United States,

Large Trucks. Trends. About 1 in 10 highway deaths occurs in a crash involving a large truck.

AGE AND GENDER OF OCCUPANTS KILLED OR INJURED IN MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES

Neck injury risk is lower if seats and head restraints are rated good

Statistics and Facts About Distracted Driving

Preliminary 2014 Ontario Road Safety Annual Report Selected Statistics

A Preliminary Characterisation of Driver Manoeuvres in Road Departure Crashes. Luke E. Riexinger, Hampton C. Gabler

Understanding Traffic Data: How To Avoid Making the Wrong Turn

Commercial, Police, and Military Vehicle Rollover Protection and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Geometry and Retrofit Rollover Testing

The Truth About Light Trucks

Types of Product Liability Claims to Consider. Toby D. Brown, Esq. Cunningham Bounds, LLC 1601 Dauphin Street Mobile, Alabama 36604

DOT HS August Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview

Restraint Effectiveness in Reducing Heamace Injury-contacts with Interior Rail-like Surfaces

THE FACTS BEHIND ANCAP BEYOND THE STARS

Roll Over Protection for the Oil & Gas Industry

ROPS, vehicle safety rating and mitigation of risk

CHARACTERISTICS OF SMALL OVERLAP CRASHES

Crashworthiness for Transit Bus. Presentation by Jodi Godfrey Co author: Lisa Staes

Vehicle Safety Risk Assessment Project Overview and Initial Results James Hurnall, Angus Draheim, Wayne Dale Queensland Transport

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Chevrolet Malibu

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

GIDAS accident analysis pole side impact with CV s TP/EVA

Vehicle Safety Research in TGGS

Do Smart Cars Equal Safer Roads?

OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCTION OF FATALITIES IN VEHICLE-GUARDRAIL COLLISIONS

REDUCING RIB DEFLECTION IN THE IIHS TEST BY PRELOADING THE PELVIS INDEPENDENT OF INTRUSION

Integrated. Safety Handbook. Automotive. Ulrich Seiffert and Mark Gonter. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA INTERNATIONAL.

EDR PRE-CRASH DATA: POTENTIAL FOR APPLICATIONS IN ACTIVE SAFETY TESTING

Devices to Assist Drivers to Comply with Speed Limits

How research drives vehicle safety improvements

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

POLICY POSITION ON THE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION REGULATION

Integrating OEM Vehicle ROPS to Improve Rollover Injury Probability Susie Bozzini*, Nick DiNapoli** and Donald Friedman***

EDR Report Information

Joint Australian and Canadian Pole Side Impact Research

Occupant Protection SEAT BELTS. Front belt height adjustment

Before the. Hearing on. Takata Airbag Ruptures and Recalls

Stronger road safety. in South Australia. Presented by Tamra Fedojuk Senior Statistician Road Safety Policy

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

Traffic Safety Facts 2002

Crashworthiness Evaluation. Roof Strength Test Protocol (Version III)

Transcription:

Rollovers of the future: strong roofs, ESC, and curtain airbags Matthew Brumbelow SAE Government / Industry Meeting 30 January 2013

Occupant fatalities per 1 million registrations Fatality rates in 1-3 year old SUVs and cars 80 1-3 year old SUVs: front 70 1-3 year old SUVs: side 60 1-3 year old cars: front 1-3 year old cars: side 50 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Occupant fatalities per 1 million registrations Fatality rates in 1-3 year old SUVs and cars 80 70 60 50 1-3 year old SUVs: front 1-3 year old SUVs: side 1-3 year old SUVs: rollover 1-3 year old cars: front 1-3 year old cars: side 1-3 year old cars: rollover 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Occupant fatalities per 1 million registrations Rollover fatality rates in 1-3 year old pass. vehicles 80 70 60 1-3 year old SUVs: rollover 1-3 year old cars: rollover 1-3 year old pickups: rollover 50 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Many factors are likely contributing to reduced rollover fatality rate Impact of economic recession Improvements in static stability factor (especially SUVs) Increased belt use rates Increased ESC fitment rates Increased side curtain airbag fitment rates Increased roof strength

Percentage of vehicles with ESC standard Electronic stability control Estimated 73 percent reduction in fatal single-vehicle rollover crash rates due to ESC (Farmer 2010) FMVSS 126 issued in 2007, required complete phase-in for 2012 model year SUV fitment rates were far ahead of FMVSS requirements 100 80 60 SUVs Cars Pickups 40 20 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Model year

Percentage of vehicles with standard head protecting SAB Curtain airbags Side impact protection has driven fitment of airbags Many curtain airbags have not been linked to roll sensors (especially in cars) FMVSS 226 will phase-in over 2014-2017 model years 100 80 60 40 20 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Model year

SWR Roof strength Estimated 23 percent reduction in fatal/incapacitating injury risk for a 1.0 unit SWR increase (Brumbelow and Teoh, 2009) IIHS rating system began in 2009; FMVSS 216 upgrade will phase-in over 2013-2017 model years 7.0 6.0 5.0 IIHS rating test IIHS or NHTSA research test Model year average 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 First model year of tested vehicle

How will future rollovers be different? Will ESC presence shift the average crash severity? Unsuccessful ESC interventions could still reduce speed entering roll Rollovers which ESC is unable to prevent may be more severe or otherwise initiated differently Will curtain airbags and stronger roofs produce a shift in the relative prevalence of injury types? Does the amount/type of vehicle deformation change with higher roof strength (as measured in FMVSS 216 configuration)? Questions like these should inform current research efforts

NASS-CDS query Vehicles with Good IIHS roof strength ratings (SWR 4.0) Calendar years 2003-2011 Two or more quarter-turns Total cases 61 With standard ESC 19 With curtain SAB linked to roll sensor (all had ESC) 12 With other inflated curtain SAB 12 Total VMAIS 3 8 In lateral rolls (n=58) 6 In end-over-end rolls (n=3) 2 In vehicles with both curtains deployed (n=18) In vehicles with one curtain deployed (n=5) 1 0 (1 unk due to fire)

Number of quarter-turns Rollovers by quarter-turns and ESC/curtain status Excluding 5 cases with unknown MAIS or countermeasure End-over-end 11 10 ESC standard, no curtain deployment 9 8 7 ESC not standard, curtain deployment ESC standard, curtain deployment 6 5 4 3 2 ESC not standard, no curtain deployment VMAIS 0-2 VMAIS 3+ 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of cases

2011-12-051 ESC, no curtains No obvious control loss, drove off road, hit ditch and flipped forward onto roof. Unbelted driver had AIS3 spinal cord contusion, lumbar spine burst fracture.

2009-76-073 ESC+curtains Case vehicle struck in left rear by oncoming vehicle, rotated CCW, rolled right 4 quarter-turns. Appears to have landed on back left corner of roof. Belted 69 year-old driver had AIS 1 leg strain, skin injuries. Belted 96 year-old front passenger had AIS 1 facial skin injuries. Both curtains, left torso SAB deployed.

MAIS3+ rate Injury severity compared to SWR<4 vehicles Lateral rollovers with 2-8 quarter turns for all 2007+ MY, excluding SWR>4 cases (N=316) 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 Raw Weighted 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Number of quarter turns SWR 4 cases Raw Weighted Expected MAIS3+ 17.2 1548 Actual 6 682 Rate Ratio 0.35 0.44

No std ESC Std ESC Roll initiation and duration by ESC presence Raw Weighted Raw Weighted Preceding impact 18 3190 6+ quarter-turns 3 287 Total 19 3337 Total lateral R/O 18 3210 Rate 95% 96% Rate 17% 9% Preceding impact 29 4278 6+ quarter-turns 13 2726 Total 42 6750 Total lateral R/O 40 6678 Rate 69% 63% Rate 33% 41% 100% 80% Standard ESC No standard ESC 60% 40% 20% 0% Raw Weighted Raw Weighted Preceding impact 6 or more quarter turns

Observations Rollover fatalities likely will continue falling as proportion of vehicles in fleet with ESC/curtains/high-SWR increases Still very few relevant NASS-CDS cases No known case of AIS 3 injury in a vehicle with ESC, roll-activated curtains and SWR 4 (n=12) Likely that an increased proportion of future rollovers will be preceded by other impacts based on available data Likely that average roll duration (quarter-turns) will be reduced based on available data

Future work Continued need to better understand effect of current countermeasures Previous analyses of NASS-CDS rollovers (e.g. prevalence of various injury types/mechanisms, occupant positioning for dynamic testing) could be misleading when evaluating current priorities IIHS will continue to monitor NASS-CDS for relevant cases; important that NASS continues to provide source of crashworthiness data after NHTSA s Data Modernization effort IIHS continues monitoring state crash databases for sufficient data Could allow individual injury risk effect estimates for ESC, curtains, and SWR values beyond 4.0

Dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries, and property damage on the highway