Power Pack Testing at Environment Canada s Testing Facilities Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations

Similar documents
Working Paper No. HDH-11-08e (11th HDH meeting, 10 to 12 October 2012) Heavy Duty Hybrid Powertrain Testing

PROPOSED HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE AND ENGINE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REGULATIONS UNDER CEPA, 1999

Certification Procedures for Advanced Technology Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Evaluating Test Methods and Opportunities for Global Alignment

Greenhouse gas Emission Model (GEM) A Compliance Vehicle Model for Certification

Transport Canada s ecotechnology for Vehicles (etv) Program

Canada s Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations for Model Years

U.S. Heavy-Duty Vehicle GHG/Fuel Efficiency Standards and Recommendations for the Next Phase

Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emission Certification Options for Phase 2

77 th GRPE, 6-8 June 2018 Agenda item 13, HD FE Harmonization. OICA HD-FE TF Y. Takenaka

March th session March 16 18, 2011, Ann Arbor, USA

Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Regulatory opportunities, design challenges and policy- relevant research. Fanta Kamakaté. July 30, 2009

EPA/NHTSA UPDATE ON PHASE II GHG AND FUEL EFFICIENCY RULES FOR MEDIUM AND HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES. Houshun Zhang U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

On-Going Development of Heavy-Duty Vehicle GHG / Fuel Economy Standards

U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle GHG and CAFE Standards

Daimler Trucks North America FMVSS 121 / GHG14 Update. June 26, 2012

PEMS International Conference & Workshop April 3, 2014

HDH Validation Program 2 (HILS)

Heavy-Duty Vehicle Efficiency Global status and current research

US GHG Regulation, Phase 2. Final Rule Summary

The starting point: History of the VW defeat device scandal and lessons learned

FINAL SECOND-PHASE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR HEAVY-DUTY ENGINES AND VEHICLES IN CANADA

Brexit Update for US Industry Neil Williams 18 October 2018

The National Academy's Approach to Medium and Heavy Duty Truck Fuel Consumption

Overview of International HDV Efficiency Standards

Evolution of HDV GHG / Fuel Economy Standards: The Importance of US HDV Rule

Model Based Design: Balancing Embedded Controls Development and System Simulation

ENERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWERTRAIN AND CHASSIS INTEGRATED SIMULATION ON A MILITARY DUTY CYCLE

Heavy-Duty Vehicle GHG Regulatory Developments Around the World

NREL Transportation and Vehicles: Fleet DNA & Commercial Vehicle Technologies. Josh Eichman and Ken Kelly National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Toyota Motor North America, Inc. Grant of Petition for Temporary Exemption from an Electrical Safety Requirement of FMVSS No. 305

Thermal Management: Key-Off & Soak

Overview of the Final Phase 2 Fuel Efficiency and GHG Emission Standards for Heavy- Duty Vehicles

Submission to Transport Canada, Environmental Policy

EPA s Technology Verification Program and Research

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

THE IMPACT OF BIODIESEL FUEL BLENDS ON AFTERTREATMENT DEVICE PERFORMANCE IN LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Port Yard Hostler Demo Projects: Assessing LNG & Hybrid Yard Hostlers at POLB & POLA

Cars and vans CO2 regulations: even ambitious EU standards deliver less than half transport emission reductions needed to meet 2030 climate targets

Update: Estimated GHG Increase from Obama Administration Inaction on the 2014 RFS

Integrated Engine and Aftertreatment System Technology for EPA 2010 Heavy-duty Emissions Regulations

Testing of Emissions- Relevant Driving Cycles on an Engine Testbed

Modeling the Electrically Assisted Variable Speed (EAVS) Supercharger

GLOBAL REGISTRY. Addendum. Global technical regulation No. 10 OFF-CYCLE EMISSIONS (OCE) Appendix

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model (GEM) User Guide

Alternatives to an Open Competitive Commercial Collection Program Presented by Robert Craggs RAM/SWANA Conference

Economic and Social Council

NOx reduction effect on CO 2. NOX Reductions are achievable without significant penalties in CO 2

HD Truck Fuel Economy Task Group Key Issues for Phase 2 of EPA/NHTSA Rule Bill Van Amburg, CALSTART Leadership Circle Auburn Hills, MI June 5, 2013

Design and evaluate vehicle architectures to reach the best trade-off between performance, range and comfort. Unrestricted.

MEASUREMENT OF RUNNING RESISTANCE BY TORQUEMETER METHOD. A.Müschen, E.Dewulf, P. Bailey, C.Hosier

Volkswagen Group of America Virginia Energy Conference Session 30: Fossil Fuels Diesel Developments Presented by Stuart Johnson, Engineering and

Research Report. FD807 Electric Vehicle Component Sizing vs. Vehicle Structural Weight Report

Overview of Electricity Trade Agreement between Québec and Ontario. May 10, 2017 For Information Purposes Only

Net Metering Policy Framework. July 2015

April 2016 Workshop on Road Map to Indian Real Driving Emissions

Decision on Merced Irrigation District Transition Agreement

The Regional Municipality of York. Purchase of Six Battery Electric Buses

Accommodating High Levels of Variable Generation. EPRI Managing Complexity for Safety and Reliability September 14-15, 15, 2009

Testing Electrified Drivetrains for Vehicles without the Battery or Engine. Application Reprint of Readout No. 38

Background. NOx and PM Standards have driven diesel engine design for two decades

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Vehicle Performance. Pierre Duysinx. Research Center in Sustainable Automotive Technologies of University of Liege Academic Year

Development of a Multibody Systems Model for Investigation of the Effects of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains on Vehicle Dynamics.

EU initiative for CO2 emissions reduction in Europe

Vehicle functional design from PSA in-house software to AMESim standard library with increased modularity

UPCOMING CO2 LEGISLATION FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN EUROPE AND US. Lukas Walter, AVL

Natural Gas for Transportation Codes & Standards Issues

DISCUSSION DOCUMENT. New standards for off-road small spark-ignition engines under consideration

Examinations of Working Places in Metal and Nonmetal Mines. AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

Real-world to Lab Robust measurement requirements for future vehicle powertrains

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement

Model-Based Design and Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation for Clean Vehicles Bo Chen, Ph.D.

Q&A ON EMISSIONS TESTING

Regulatory Announcement

The Path to Low Carbon Passenger Vehicles

EPA s Technology Verification Program and Research

California Environmental Protection Agency. Air Resources Board. Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) Update 2015 CRC LCA of Transportation Fuels Workshop

FUEL CONSUMPTION STANDARDS FOR HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES IN INDIA

Criteria. As background, the US Environmental Protection Agency s Green Vehicle Guide states that:

DTP Subgroup LabProcICE. WLTP 5th DTP Meeting Zuerich slide 1

ZEVs Role in Meeting Air Quality and Climate Targets. July 22, 2015 Karen Magliano, Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division

Outline. Purpose. TDG Regulatory Update

Douglas Electric Cooperative Roseburg, Oregon

GRPE/HDH Engine-Base Emissions Regulation using HILS for Commercial Hybrid Vehicles JASIC

Electric Vehicle Adoption in the South African Context

Overview of Regulations for Autonomous Vehicles

EPA Fuels Regulatory Streamlining. Tia Sutton, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA and NHTSA: The New Auto Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards

Energy Efficiency of Automobiles A Pragmatic View

Exhaust Aftertreatment Technology for Emission Control of Diesel Engines

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Options for Certification, Validation and Monitoring and Reporting of HDVs

An update on MTCC Caribbean s Pilot Projects: Preliminary Results of Data Collection Stephan Nanan

# of tests Condition g/mile ± g/mile ± g/mile ± (miles/gal) ± Impact of Diesel Extreme on emissions and fuel economy USDS results:

Christopher Cannon, Chief Sustainability Officer Port of Los Angeles AAPA Environmental Committee Meeting November 14/15, 2017

Eco-Driving by Utilizing a Digital Tachograph System

Midterm Evaluation of the Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards

California Low Emission Truck Policies and Plans

Community Specifications - an EASA Perspective. Bryan Jolly ATM Rulemaking Officer 17 March 2011

EU CO2 Standards: Electric is a must!

Streamlined Application Decision Perimeter Seating Bus Additional Vehicles

Transcription:

Power Pack Testing at Environment Canada s Testing Facilities Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations San Francisco, CA, USA October 22, 2013.

Outline Background Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations Collaborative Test Programs Questions Page 2

Background Canada has a policy of alignment with emission standards and test procedures of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the transportation sector The policy of alignment is designed to recognize the highly integrated nature of the vehicle and engine industry in North America Most vehicles and engines offered for sale in Canada are imported and most vehicles manufactured in Canada are exported to the U.S. Significant focus of compliance and enforcement activities is on importers The Government of Canada is implementing the policy of alignment through initiatives such as the Regulatory Cooperation Council and the Canada-U.S.A. Air Quality Agreement Page 3

HDV GHG Regulatory Initiative The Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations were published in Canada Gazette, Part II on March 13, 2013 Aligned with U.S. EPA standards and establish GHG emission standards for on-road heavy-duty vehicles and their engines for model years 2014 and later Differences to recognize Canada unique considerations Through initiatives such as the Regulatory Cooperation Council and the Canada-U.S.A. Air Quality Agreement, the Government of Canada has been collaborating with the U.S. EPA Page 4

Collaboration for 2014-18 HDV GHG Regulations The Government of Canada s Department of the Chassis Dynamometer Testing Environment (Environment Canada) assisted EPA's development of this rulemaking by conducting emissions testing of heavy-duty vehicles at their test facilities to gather data on a range of possible test cycles, and to evaluate the impact of certain emissions reduction technologies. Environment Canada also facilitated the evaluation of heavy-duty vehicle aerodynamic properties at Canada s National Research Council wind tunnel, and during coastdown testing. U.S. EPA and NHTSA Final Rule Wind Tunnel Testing Coastdown Testing Page 5.

Hybrid Collaborative Program with. the U.S. EPA Environment Canada conducted and developed hybrid emissions testing at the River Road Test facility in Ottawa to gather data contributing to knowledge base for the development of heavy-duty vehicle GHG rules Objective of the hybrid emissions testing: compare hybrid vs. non-hybrid emission results compare chassis to engine dynamometer testing compare lab-to-lab emission data The hybrid emissions testing fed into the U.S. EPA GHG rulemaking: provided data for lab-to-lab validation informed future decisions regarding heavy-duty hybrid test procedures Page 6

Hybrid Emissions Testing Engine with hybrid power pack and whole vehicle chassis testing were both done with the hybrid system active and inactive Chassis dynamometer: Hybrid class 7 truck Engine dynamometer: Power pack specifications were the same as the vehicle, except for certain simulated vehicle related parameters The engine data was translated into vehicle data for comparison Cycles used Steady state 55 mph and 65 mph EPA GHG transient CILCC WCHC Vehicle FTP Emissions measured: CO, CO 2, NO x, NO, CH 4, THC,PM Page 7

Power Pack Testing Details Schematic of the Heavy-Duty Test Cell #1 Page 8

Power Pack Testing Setup Dynamometer 500HP DC motor 2200rpm max speed Trunnion mounted Load cell torque measurement. 5000 pulses per revolution rpm measurement Regenerative drive Page 9

Power Pack Testing Instrumentation Page 10

Challenges Physical and system limitations Control system : updated engine dynamometer to accommodate power train testing Complexity of the system: Wiring CANBus Signals Automated clutch and manual transmission, and regenerative electric motor system Simulating chassis testing on an engine dynamometer updated to do power train testing (simulating driver and vehicle) Signal simulation (parking brake, braking, etc.) Required involvement of the manufacturer Active regeneration Additional software requirements (J1939, Eaton s Service Ranger) Page 11

CO 2 Results C02 Emissions [ g/mile ] 1200.000 1000.000 CO2 [g/mile] 800.000 600.000 400.000 200.000 0.000 55 MPH 65 MPH CILCC GHG GHG - EPA's 5.57 FD vftp ENGINE - Active Hybrid ENGINE - Inactive Hybrid CHASSIS - Active Hybrid CHASSIS - Inactive Hybrid ENGINE - EPA - Active Hybrid ENGINE - EPA - Inactive Hybrid WHVC Page 12

Summary of the CO 2 Results Hybrid Active Hybrid Inactive Cycles EPA vs. EC Powertrain EPA Powertrain vs. Chassis EC Powertrain vs. Chassis 55 mph 14.7% -2.6% 12.4% 65 mph 9.3% 6.7% 15.4% EPA GHG 2.8% 6.5% 9.0% CILCC -1.8% 3.9% 2.2% 55 mph 15.5% -0.6% 15.0% 65 mph 12.1% 4.9% 16.3% EPA GHG -3.4% 4.6% 1.4% CILCC -0.6% Some of the conclusions from the CO 2 results: CO 2 powertrain results for the transient cycles compare very well between labs The difference in CO 2 emissions for the steady-state cycles can be explained by the final drive ratio being different between the two labs Offset between powertrain and chassis dyno results are likely due to the lack of accessory loads, cooling system and wheel slip Page 13

Future Plans Continued Collaboration for Phase 2. Environment Canada is continuing to collaborate with the U.S. EPA to support the development of more stringent standards for post-2018 model year heavy-duty vehicles Additional aerodynamic research, emissions testing and tire testing are underway to support the second phase of the U.S. rulemaking We expect the technical collaboration with Environment Canada to continue as we implement testing and compliance verification procedures for this rulemaking. We may also begin to develop a knowledge base enabling improvement upon this regulatory framework for model years beyond 2018 (for example, improvements to the means of demonstrating compliance). We also expect to continue our collaboration with Environment Canada on compliance issues. U.S. EPA and NHTSA Final Rule Page 14

Questions? For more information about chassis, engine and power train dynamometer testing contact: Julie Deschatelets, Stéphane Couroux, A/head, Heavy-Duty Vehicles Chief, GHG Regulatory Development Transportation Division Transportation Division Environment Canada Environment Canada (819) 956-4968 (819) 934-6013.