Noise Emissions At the Chicago Fuller Car Wash

Similar documents
OPERATIONS NOISE STUDY FOR A PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH IN THE SHERMAN OAKS DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES

Reduction of vehicle noise at lower speeds due to a porous open-graded asphalt pavement

Definitions of Acoustical Terms

INTERIOR NOISE OF A KOREAN HIGH-SPEED TRAIN IN TUNNELS

Silencers. Transmission and Insertion Loss

Reductions in Multi-component Jet Noise by Water Injection

Directivity of the CoRTN road traffic noise model

APPENDIX D NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Sound Application Guide: Description and Ratings

Special edition paper

CAV controllers. Type VFL. Volume flow limiter for insertion into ducting K

PROPOSED HELICOPTER LANDING PAD 85 MILL ROAD LARA

Stack Light- Light Only. Stack Light with Sound

Waste Licence Reg. No W Noise Compliance Annual Report: South Dublin County Council s (SDCC) Ballymount Baling Station

Adelaide Wind Power Project Turbine T05 (AD117) IEC Edition 3.0 Measurement Report

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in Gasoline and Diesel Using the znose Edward J. Staples, Electronic Sensor Technology

REVIEW ON NOISE AND VIBRATION IN AUTOMOBILES

Product Data. Features/Benefits. 35K Bypass Terminal. 110 to 4400 cfm

Sound science: Understanding AND

Engine Power and Fueling Comparison Between Vessels with Conventional Transmissions and Controllable Speed Propeller Transmissions During Dynamic

Experimental NVH evaluation of a pure electric vehicle in transient operation modes

Ch. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS

Energy Density Active Noise Control in an Earthmoving Machine Cab

Mufflers. Absorptive, Reactive, Reactive Lined, Reactive Side Entry, Reactive Side Entry Lined

Product Application Guide- 30mm Stacklights. 30 mm Stacklight- Light Only

CAV controllers. Type VFL. Volume flow limiter for insertion into ducting PD VFL 1

Location of Noise Sources in Fluid Power Machines

Project Location. I-80 Toll Plaza at I-480/I-80 Interchange, Lorain County, Ohio

Environmental Noise Assessment Stonebridge Golf & Country Club Maintenance Facility. Nepean, Ontario

SILENCER SELECTION INSTRUCTIONS

PROFILING OF PULSATION AND VIBRATION IN COMPLEX RECIPROCATING COMPRESSOR FACILITIES

SILENCER SELECTION INSTRUCTIONS

Acoustic Noise Generated by Wind Turbines

ULTRAPROBE 201. Instruction Manual

Fan Powered Terminal Units FPV, FDV Series Variable Volume Parallel Flow

CASE STUDY OF TYRE NOISE: ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ROAD SURFACES

High Performance Fan Coils FCHG Genesis Series Horizontal

Mr. John Aitken June 6, 2017 Page 2

Prof. João Melo de Sousa Instituto Superior Técnico Aerospace & Applied Mechanics. Part B Acoustic Emissions 4 Airplane Noise Sources

Appendix 6-E: Baseline Sound Study and Environmental Sound Evaluation

11/10/94 Revision A 06/07/95 PATENT INFORMATION - REAR MOUNTED SURROUND (RMS) LOW FREQUENCY DRIVER LFM811 INVENTORS: CONCEPT:

Interior Acoustics. Lecture delivered by: Kiran V. R. Asst. Prof. Dept. of AAE MSRSAS-Bangalore. M.S Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies - Bangalore

APMP TCAUV Workshop The application of acoustics, vibration and ultrasound metrology in transportation industry

Jet-Pylon Interaction of High Bypass Ratio Separate Flow Nozzle Configurations

TOP 10 NOISE CONTROL TECHNIQUES

Minimizing Noise. Marybeth G. Nored Dr. Klaus Brun Eugene Buddy Broerman Augusto Garcia Hernandez Dennis Tweten. Southwest Research Institute

Test Facilities. (1) Vehicle Technologies

Appendix B. Chapter 11. by Resonance

Prediction of parking area noise in Australian conditions

Mechanism and Countermeasures for Abnormal Noise Produced by Idler Pulley Bearings under Low Temperature Conditions

ACOUSTIC NOISE AND VIBRATIONS OF ELECTRIC POWERTRAINS

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

Engineering Data ED Vertical Stack Water Source Heat Pumps Products

FLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT. itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1J8

Absorptive Silencers UNIVERSAL. Absorptive Silencers ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL

NCHRP Project 1-44: Measuring Tire-Pavement Noise at the Source APPENDIX C. Results of Test Parameter Evaluation

ANALOG SOUND LEVEL METER

Circular Silencer. Rigid and flexible construction Type CA CB CF CS. TROX GmbH Telephone +49/28 45/ Telefax +49/28 45/

WorldAutoSteel. Siemens PLM Software solution enables WorldAutoSteel to identify and analyze NVH problem areas for FutureSteelVehicle project

TR-09RD. Vibrating wire sensors are used in the mining, civil and hydrological engineering, and other geophysical disciplines.

Air- Blast Sprayer Calibration for Pecan Orchards

On the prediction of rail cross mobility and track decay rates using Finite Element Models

Compressor Noise Control

FEATURE ARTICLE. Advanced Function Analyzers: Real-time Measurement of Particulate Matter Using Flame Ionization Detectors. Hirokazu Fukushima

APPENDIX H-4 AIRCRAFT NOISE EMISSION ESTIMATES

REPORT N O AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT

General TAHVIEH HAMOON Airfoil Centrifugal Fans Utilize the latest design techniques to product a quiet highly efficient air mover.

Introduction to vehicle NVH and Acoustics

noise Top 10 Noise Control Techniques Top 10 Noise Control Techniques... Noise Control - Best Practice The You must control Noise at Work Regulations

Measurement of Noise within Passenger Trains on a Costal Railway Line

Interior Duct Wall Pressure Downstream of a Low-Speed Rotor

The effect of grinding and grooving on the noise generation of Portland Cement Concrete pavement

PERFORMANCE DATA Intermittent Volume (Parallel Flow), Standard Design

WHITE PAPER. Flow Induced Noise Reduction Techniques for Microphones in Low Speed Wind Tunnels

Evaluation of Rumbler, Preformed Rumble Strip

Final Report. Pile-Driving Noise Measurements at Atlantic Fleet Naval Installations: 28 May April 2016

PVHRU Max Quiet. Engineering Solutions. Packaged Void Heat Reclaim Unit. Acoustic Testing Laboratory College of Science & Technology

Report Ref: Hexham OSR Quarterly Noise Survey JUL-SEP 13.docx

Federal Railroad Administration, DOT CFR section Description Guideline PART 179

RAILYARDS SUPPORT A VARIETY OF OPERATIONS INCLUDING: LOCOMOTIVES, ON-ROAD AND OFF-ROAD TRUCKS, CARGO-HANDLING EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

Introduction: Supplied to 360 Test Labs... Battery packs as follows:

Exercise 3. Battery Charging Fundamentals EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION. Charging fundamentals

MEASUREMENTS OF VIBRATION AMPLITUDE AND IMPACT FORCE IN 2M SHOCK TUNNEL

Passenger Vehicle Interior Noise Reduction by Laminated Side Glass. Abstract

Briefing on Automotive NVH Technique

Rehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics

Traffic Calming: traffic and vehicle noise

Noise Reduction of Accumulators for R410A Rotary Compressors

Proposed Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor (Amtrak s Hiawatha Service) Environmental Assessment (EA)

SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD

November 6, Agenda

Section 3 Technical Information

Versatility. Features. By installing the SILENT MV, you will never experience the disturbance of noisy ventilation again. Benefits

A CASE STUDY OF A FLOW-INDUCED TORSIONAL RESONANCE

Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Hydraulic Power Steering Systems

DATA & FACTS Unit Heaters MultiMAXX HB. Quick Selection and Fast Delivery

Seeing Sound: A New Way To Reduce Exhaust System Noise

Figure 2 - Spreading function for the masking effect

Transcription:

Specialists in Hearing and Acoustics 12172 Route 47 - #218, Huntley, Illinois 60142 Tom Thunder, AuD, FAAA, INCE Principal Office: 847-359-1068 Fax: 847-359-1207 Greg Andorka, BSEE - Senior Field Engineer Website: www.acousticassociates.com E-mail: info@acousticassociates.com Noise Emissions At the Chicago Fuller Car Wash June 28, 2107 We visited the Fuller Car Wash at 2146 Rockwell in Chicago to conduct sound level testing. This testing was performed to obtain data that could be used to project sound levels at residential locations near similar car washes at other locations. The blowers used to dry the cars dominate the car wash noise. The sound emissions of the spray nozzles and conveyor mechanisms are secondary and radiate much lower sound levels. In addition, the sprayers and conveyor emit a higher frequency sound that decays more rapidly outside the car wash due to air absorption. Accordingly, our focus was on blower noise. Figure 1 is an aerial view of the car wash on Rockwell and Cermak. The entrance faces Rockwell to the east while the exit faces a 3-story, brick building to the west. The doorways are roughly 10x10 feet. Figure 1 An aerial view of the car wash. The entrance faces Rockwell to the east.

Figure 2 shows a view of the car wash tunnel from the exit door. There are ten (10) centrifugal blowers attached to steel poles. Two (2) blowers are located on each side and are the closest to the exit door. They are only several feet from the exit doorway. Six (6) blowers are located on overhead poles. The inlets are open inlets with no ductwork. Each blower has its own discharge nozzle so there is no discharge ductwork. Procedure Measurements were made at both the exit and the entrance to quantify the difference in noise emissions due to the long tunnel effect. We also made measurements at 0 o azimuth (on axis) and 90 o azimuth to quantify the difference due to the directivity of the tunnel. While a measurement distance of 25-50 feet is optimum for acoustical reasons, measurement locations at this site were Figure 2 - View of the car wash exit showing the blowers, which are constrained because of positioned a few feet from the exit door. building and site configuration elements. Consequently the actual distances ranged from 10 to 33 feet. We recorded the noise using a precision microphone and a professional grade digital recorder. A calibration tone was placed on the recording to ensure a proper analysis. Professional sound editing software was used to listen to the recording, document the annotations, and evaluate the temporal variations in noise. We used professional grade software to analyze the recording to generate the overall sound level at 1- second intervals. Figure 3 gives a plot of these 1-second sound level measurements from the exit and entrance doors and at 0 o and 90 o azimuth angles to the doors. This graph shows the rise and fall of the blower noise as they turn on and off. The figure also shows the fluctuation of blower noise as the car moves through the blower area. We used the same sound analysis software to generate sound spectra; specifically, we generated the sound level at each of 11 different frequencies across the audible frequency range. A spectral analysis is important because the noise from the blower varies as a function of frequency. Also, how sound decays over distance varies as a function of frequency. Figure 4 shows the results of this analysis. In this chart, we normalized all the data to a distance of 50 feet for easy comparison. We also corrected the exit data since it was confounded by reflections from the nearby building. The entrance data at 90 degrees was corrected to extract the influence of background noise. Finally, we smoothed the spectra slightly because there was some jaggedness that was likely a result of building reflections or tunnel resonance. Acoustic Associates, Ltd. Page 2

Figure 3 - Time series sound level of the recorded sample taken at the car wash. Findings As seen in Figure 4, all of the noise spectra show a prominence in the 500-2000 Hz range. For reference, a tea kettle whistle is about 1000 Hz. Because the fans are not large fans, there is not much low frequency energy. And because there is no ductwork, there is not much high frequency noise from aerodynamic flow. The most important finding is the overall (total) A-weighted level shown on the left-hand side of Figure 4. The graph clearly shows that the exit side generates 14 db greater noises than the entrance. This means the exit is three times louder than the entrance. This fact is important in orientating the exit toward less sensitive receivers. Figure 4 also reveals that there is a significant directivity character to the car wash. In other words, the tunnel radiated sound significantly along its axis (at 0 o azimuth) and 10 db less to the side (at 90 o ). A 10 db reduction means that the noise is half The total A-weighted sound level is the overall sound level with a filter applied to the noise measurement that diminishes the levels in the low frequencies below 500 Hz. The A-weighting filter is the most commonly used metric in noise assessment because it mimics the lowfrequency roll-off of the ear. as loud to the side as it is directly in front. This fact has important implications in siting the car wash tunnel relative to receivers near the facility. Acoustic Associates, Ltd. Page 3

Table 1 below, summarizes our findings. Table 1 - Sound level emissions from a car wash with ten centrifugal blowers Measurement Location Exit at 0 degrees Exit at 90 degrees Entrance at 0 degrees Entrance at 90 degrees Sound Level at 50 feet 83 db 73 db 68 db 58 db Figure 4- Overall sound level and octave band sound levels measured at the car wash. Design Considerations The loudness of the sound heard by residents near a car wash will depend on the following: 1. Ambient noise Hi ambient background noise often prevents a car wash from being heard or annoying. Fortunately, most car washes are located along heavily traveled roads where the ambient noise is high. In most cases, it is helpful to measure the ambient across a full day to help village boards understand the real (not perceived) impact of a car wash. Acoustic Associates, Ltd. Page 4

2. Distance The farther the residents, the lower the sound level. Distance is a major factor in hearing a car wash. Sound drops off at 6 db per doubling of distance. For example, a car wash at 200 feet is 12 db lower or half as loud than the same was is at 50 feet. 3. Fences A fence can help reduce the intensity of car wash emissions. Unfortunately, the typical board-on-board fence offers minimal attenuation. To be effective, it must be solid. Also, the typical 6-foot fence is ineffective. Heights of 10-15 feet are usually required to achieve a significant noise reduction. 4. Orientation As indicated above, it is best to point the exit away from sensitive areas. Based on our data, the exit is triple the loudness for residents facing the entrance at the same distance. 5. Angle The data show that if there are nearby residents, it is best to orientate the wash so that its axis is perpendicular to the line-of-sight to the residents. This takes advantage of the directivity of a car wash where emissions are substantially reduced at angles greater than 60 o. Considerations For future Projects The sound levels in Table 1 give the sound level emissions to be used for future projects that have similar equipment. The table shows that the emissions would be the highest for residents on the exit side of the car wash especially those on axis with the wash tunnel. For residents at 90 o off axis (from the exit or entrance), the sound level drops 10 db (half as loud). You can interpolate the sound level for residents at angles between 0 o and 90 o. The levels in Table 1 are given for 50 feet. For residents at greater distances, the level drops off at 6 db per doubling of distance. So a resident at 100 feet would be 6 db less than at 50 feet. Most noise codes have a limit of 55 db for daytime operations. So if the emissions are higher than this, you should consider reorienting the exit toward a commercial building of the street. If this is difficult, then you can achieve a 10 db reduction with a well-designed sound fence. Finally, you can search for quieter equipment or reduce the number or speed of the blowers. A door or mass-loaded vinyl strips at the exit would work well and reduce the noise 10-20 db. But the wash tunnel would need to be designed to allow the door to remain closed while the blowers are on. If a town is most interested in the impact a wash has on residential neighbors, then an ambient noise study is recommended. In many cases, since car washes are near busy streets, the ambient noise is higher than the towns 55 db limit. In this case, there is no sense in designing a car wash to meet the stricter 55 db limit when the ambient noise is already higher. A noise study is also recommended to justify a wash being open later than when the town wants it to close. This is because the ambient noise in the area may not actually drop until after 9:00 PM or even as late as 11:00 PM. Submitted, Thomas Thunder, AuD, FAAA, INCE Bd. Cert. Principal Audiologist and Acoustical Specialist Adjunct Faculty Northern Illinois University and Rush University Acoustic Associates, Ltd. Page 5