Non-Linear Implicit Analysis of Roll over Protective Structure OSHA STANDARD (PART )

Similar documents
Non-Linear Simulation of Front Mudguard Assembly

Value Engineering of Engine Rear Cover by Virtual Simulation

Design Improvement in Kingpin Stub Axle Assembly Using FEA

FE Modeling and Analysis of a Human powered/electric Tricycle chassis

Gasket Simulations process considering design parameters

Simulation of Structural Latches in an Automotive Seat System Using LS-DYNA

Virtual Durability Simulation for Chassis of Commercial vehicle

Explicit Simulation of Dampened Starter System using Altair Radioss

Vibration Fatigue Analysis of Sheet Metal Fender Mounting Bracket & It's Subsequent Replacement With Plastic

Simulation and Validation of FMVSS 207/210 Using LS-DYNA

Simulation of proposed FMVSS 202 using LS-DYNA Implicit

EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERMEASURES IN RESPONSE TO FMVSS 201 UPPER INTERIOR HEAD IMPACT PROTECTION

ANALYSIS OF STABILIZER BAR USING SIMPLIFIED APPROACH

Transient Dynamic Analysis and Optimization of a Piston in an Automobile Engine

ROOF STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF A TRUCK IN THE EVENT OF A ROLLOVER

USING INSPIRE AS AN UPFRONT DESIGN, OPTIMIZATION & SIMULATION TOOL FOR EXISITNG MANUAL GEARBOX COMPONENTS

*Friedman Research Corporation, 1508-B Ferguson Lane, Austin, TX ** Center for Injury Research, Santa Barbara, CA, 93109

Design Evaluation of Fuel Tank & Chassis Frame for Rear Impact of Toyota Yaris

ROOF CRUSH SIMULATION OF PASSENGER CAR FOR IMPROVING OCCUPANT SAFETY IN CABIN

Bushing connector application in Suspension modeling

Advanced Vehicle Performance by Replacing Conventional Vehicle Wheel with a Carbon Fiber Reinforcement Composite Wheel

Accelerating the Development of Expandable Liner Hanger Systems using Abaqus

Simulating Rotary Draw Bending and Tube Hydroforming

Vehicle Seat Bottom Cushion Clip Force Study for FMVSS No. 207 Requirements

Full Vehicle Durability Prediction Using Co-simulation Between Implicit & Explicit Finite Element Solvers

Definition of Unambiguous Criteria to Evaluate Tractor Rops Equivalence

Design, Analysis& Optimization of Truck chassis- Rail & Cross member

PREDICTION OF PISTON SLAP OF IC ENGINE USING FEA BY VARYING GAS PRESSURE

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

NOISE REDUCTION ON AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR BY SHEET METAL OPTIMIZATION TAFE LIMITED

Structural Analysis of Pick-Up Truck Chassis using Fem

Load Analysis and Multi Body Dynamics Analysis of Connecting Rod in Single Cylinder 4 Stroke Engine

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Vehicle Space Frame with Experimental Validation

LIGHT VEHICLE ROLLOVER PROTECTION STRUCTURE (ROPS) TEST PROTOCOL

Design and Optimization of HTV Fuel Tank Assembly by Finite Element Analysis

Abaqus Technology Brief. Automobile Roof Crush Analysis with Abaqus

Design Improvement in front Bumper of a Passenger Car using Impact Analysis

Optimization of Design Based on Tip Radius and Tooth Width to Minimize the Stresses on the Spur Gear with FE Analysis.

Structural performance improvement of passenger seat using FEA for AIS 023 compliance

Study Of Static And Frequency Responsible Analysis Of Hangers With Exhaust System

Crashworthiness Evaluation of an Impact Energy Absorber in a Car Bumper for Frontal Crash Event - A FEA Approach

Harmonic Analysis of Reciprocating Compressor Crankcase Assembly

DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF HTV FUEL TANK ASSEMBLY BY FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

METHOD FOR TESTING STEERABILITY AND STABILITY OF MILITARY VEHICLES MOTION USING SR60E STEERING ROBOT

Predicting Valve Train Dynamics using Simulation with Model Validation

NASA Human Exploration Rover Design and Analysis

Design and optimization of Double wishbone suspension system for ATVs

Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of an Energy-absorbing Guardrail End Terminal

Quasi-Static Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of an Automobile Seat Latch Using LS-DYNA

Increase Factor of Safety of Go-Kart Chassis during Front Impact Analysis

Optimization & Development of Vehicle Rear Under-Run Protection Devices in Heavy Vehicle (RUPD) for Regulative Load Cases

Modal analysis of Truck Chassis Frame IJSER

VEHICLE ANTI-ROLL BAR ANALYZED USING FEA TOOL ANSYS

Modeling & Impact Analysis of a Car Bumper with Different Loads on Different Materials

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT OF ACCESSORY GEARBOX BEVEL DRIVES Kozharinov Egor* *CIAM

Torsional analysis of the chassis and its validation through Finite. Element Analysis

A CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF HYDRAULIC JACK TO HEAVY LOADED VEHICLES

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF TUBULAR CHASSIS OF GO-KART

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

Exhaust System Optimization of Passenger Car for Maximizing Fuel Efficiency through HyperWorks

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN CAR COMPATIBILITY PHENOMENA

Finite Element Analysis of Rear Under-Run Protection Device (RUPD) for Impact Loading

Fatigue Life Estimation of Chassis Frame FESM Bracket for Commercial Vehicle

Finite Element and Experimental Validation of Stiffness Analysis of Precision Feedback Spring and Flexure Tube of Jet Pipe Electrohydraulic Servovalve

S.Sivaraj #1, A.Hazemohzammed *1, M.Yuvaraj *2, N.Karthikeyan *3, V.Murugan *4, # Assistant Prof., Dept, * U.G Students,

Evaluation of the Fatigue Life of Aluminum Bogie Structures for the Urban Maglev

Development of a Finite Element Model of a Motorcycle

Damping Assessment for Crankshaft Design to Reduce the High Vibrations

Drop Simulation for Portable Electronic Products

XVII th World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (CIGR)

Stress and Design Analysis of Triple Reduction Gearbox Casing

2 nd European HyperWorks Technology Conference Strasbourg September 30 th October 1 st, Welcome! 1/30

STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION & DURABILITY ANALYSIS OF VW BETTLE CROSS EXHAUST MUFFLER SYSTEM

Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Typical Wiring Harness Connector and Terminal Assembly Using ABAQUS/CAE and ABAQUS/STANDARD

ISSN: Page 4

Skid against Curb simulation using Abaqus/Explicit

OPTIMUM DESIGN OF COMPOSITE ROLL BAR FOR IMPROVEMENT OF BUS ROLLOVER CRASHWORTHINESS

Accelerating the Development of Expandable Liner Hanger Systems using Abaqus

Investigation of Radiators Size, Orientation of Sub Cooled Section and Fan Position on Twin Fan Cooling Packby 1D Simulation

An Analysis of Less Hazardous Roadside Signposts. By Andrei Lozzi & Paul Briozzo Dept of Mechanical & Mechatronic Engineering University of Sydney

DYNAMICS AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF A TRUCK IMPACT ONTO VARIOUS TYPES OF ROADSIDE CONCRETE BARRIERS ON CURVED ROADS. A Thesis by. Prasanna K Parvatikar

Automotive Seat Modeling and Simulation for Occupant Safety using Dynamic Sled Testing

UT Lift 1.2. Users Guide. Developed at: The University of Texas at Austin. Funded by the Texas Department of Transportation Project (0-5574)

Design and Optimisation of Roll Cage of a Single Seated ATV

MODELS FOR THE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF THE SUSPENSION SYSTEM OF THE VEHICLES REAR AXLE

Application and CAE Simulation of Over Molded Short and Continuous Fiber Thermoplastic Composites: Part II

FX-HR Holden Front End - 800kg axle rating - manufactured after August 2010

Structural Analysis of Student Formula Race Car Chassis

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF IMPACT BETWEEN SHUNTING LOCOMOTIVE AND SELECTED ROAD VEHICLE

Abaqus Technology Brief. Prediction of B-Pillar Failure in Automobile Bodies

MODEL FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF AUTOMOTIVE EXHAUST SYSTEM

Analysis Of Gearbox Casing Using FEA

Dynamic Load Analysis and Optimization of a Fracture-Split Connecting Rod

Improvement Design of Vehicle s Front Rails for Dynamic Impact

Optimal Design Solutions for Two Side SORB using Bumper Design Space. SMDI Bumper Group - Detroit Engineered Products

SIMULATION AND VALIDATION OF AUTOMOTIVE SEAT USING THE REGULATION FMVSS 207/210

Aluminum Gear Shift Fork with Supporting Pad for light weighting in Commercial Vehicles

Design and Analysis of Front Suspension of Three Wheeler Passenger Vehicle

Modeling Contact with Abaqus/Standard

Transcription:

Non-Linear Implicit Analysis of Roll over Protective Structure OSHA STANDARD (PART 1928.52) Pritam Prakash Deputy Manager - R&D, CAE International Tractor Limited Jalandhar Road, Hoshiarpur Punjab 146022, India pritam.prakash@sonalika.com Vibhay Kumar Sr. Manager - R&D, CAE International Tractor Limited Jalandhar Road, Hoshiarpur Punjab 146022, India vibhay.kumar@sonalika.com Satpal Singh Saini Head - R&D, CAE International Tractor Limited Jalandhar Road, Hoshiarpur Punjab 146022, India satpal@sonalika.com Abbreviations: ROPS Roll over protective structure, OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Standards for Agriculture. L-D curve Load v/s Deflection curve, SRP Seat Reference Point, FER - Factor of energy ratio. Keywords: OSHA standard (Part 1928.52), Non-Linear Implicit Analysis, ROPS, Tractor Safety. Abstract The aim was to setup and implement a safety device i.e. Roll over Protective Structure. (ROPS)as per the US Homologation i.e. OSHA stands for OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS FOR AGRICULTURE (Part 1928.52).Roll over protective structure with a front mounted Foldable ARC type ROPS, intended to absorb energy during the rolling over of the tractor and preventing the invasion of the driver space. This gives rise to do more effective use of material and geometry parts which can reduce the overall weight with enhanced utility. This paper gives a brief idea about how Non-Linear Implicit (Geometry and Material) technique and Radioss, Hypermesh & Hypergraph are used to achieve and estimate all parameter as per standard. Material non-linearity included to capture the plastic behavior of the parts, Internal energy v/s Time curves plotted for ROPS to check required energy absorbed and area under the load v/s Deflection curves calculated to estimate the strain energy absorbed for longitudinal and lateral loading conditions. Deformed structure is checked for any intrusion with the zone of clearance as per standard. Introduction Rollover Protective Structure (ROPS), is a cab or frame that provides a safe environment for the tractor operator in the event of a rollover. A machine with structural members having its primary purpose to protect the operator with marginal protection in the operation of a machine turnover (rollover). Causes of Rollover: Overturning on slopes Maneuvering at speeds Poor ground conditions Working on gradients ROPS are available, affordable and able to save lives! The ROPS must meet standards, such as those set forth by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, which certify they provide adequate protection in a tractor upset. The purpose is to establish the test and performance requirements for a protective frame designed for wheel-type agricultural tractors to minimize the frequency and severity of operator injury resulting from accidental upsets. General requirements for the protection of operators are specified in 29 CFR 1928.52. 1

This paper is about the virtual simulation of two poster front mounted foldable arc type ROPS as per OSHA 29CFR 1928.52. Testing Requirement: All protective frames for wheel-type agricultural tractors shall be of a model that has been tested as follows: Laboratory test: A laboratory energy-absorption test, either static or dynamic, under repeatable and controlled loading, to permit analysis of the protective frame for compliance with the performance requirements of this standard. Field-upset test: A field-upset test under controlled conditions, both to the side and rear, to verify the effectiveness of the protective system under actual dynamic conditions. Such testing may be omitted when: o The analysis of the protective-frame static-energy absorption test results indicates that both FERis and FERir of this section) exceed 1.15; As per the standard OSHA 29 CFR 1928.52, Rear and side loading need to perform. The test is as described and performed as mentioned. Herein, Laboratory Test is taken care of i.e. Static Test Procedure and trying to correlate with physical testing in future. The following definitions shall apply: W = Tractor weight (see 29 CFR 1928.51(a)) in lb (W' in kg); Eis = Energy input to be absorbed during side loading in ft-lb (E'is in J [joules]); Eis = 723 + 0.4 W (E'is = 100 + 0.12 W'); Eir = Energy input to be absorbed during rear loading in ft-lb (E'ir in J); Eir = 0.47 W (E'ir = 0.14 W'); L = Static load, lbf [pounds force], (N) [Newton]; D = Deflection under L, in. (mm); L-D = Static load-deflection diagram; Lmax = Maximum observed static load; Load Limit = Point on a continuous L-D curve where the observed static load is 0.8 Lmax on the down slope of the curve; Eu = Strain energy absorbed by the frame in ft-lb (J); area under the L-D curve; FER = Factor of energy ratio; FERis = Eu / Eis; FERir = Eu / Eir; 2

The test shall be stopped when: 1. The strain energy absorbed by the frame is equal to or greater than the required input energy Eis; or 2. Deflection of the frame exceeds the allowable deflection; or 3. Frame load limit occurs before the allowable deflection is reached. Finite Element Analysis has been carried out to simulate the static testing condition and requirement. As per the above formulae s and equations, the required energy for both the load cases i.e. Rear and Side Tests are as follows in Table 1: SRP Seat Reference Point: Table 1: Required Energy Calculation for Side & Rear Loading. The seat-reference point ("SRP") is that point where the vertical line that is tangent to the most forward point at the longitudinal seat centerline of the seat back, and the horizontal line that is tangent to the highest point of the seat cushion, intersect in the longitudinal seat section. The seat-reference point shall be determined with the seat unloaded and adjusted to the highest and most rearward position provided for seated operation of the tractor. 3

Figure 1: Seat Reference Point FE Modeling: ROPS pipe and all supportive plates for ROPS Assy. are modeled using 2-D quad and tria elements. Rigid and beam elements are used to represent bolt & pin. Total Number of Elements used is 14289 with having 14617 Nodes. Materials: Stress- strain curve is used to simulate the plastic behavior of used material in ROPS. Rear or Longitudinal Loading: Rear-load application shall be distributed uniformly on the frame over an area perpendicular to the direction of load application. Size and location of the plate is as per the OSHA guidelines. Enforced displacement is applied at the plate center and mounting holes of ROPS is constrained in all d.o.f. L-D curve is plotted to calculate the stain energy. 4

Figure 2: ROPS: Rear or Longitudinal Loading Side or Transverse Loading: Apply the side-load on the same frame, and record L and D simultaneously. Side-load application is also applied as per the given condition and guidelines of OSHA. Enforced displacement is applied at the plate center and mounting holes of ROPS is constrained in all d.o.f. 5

Figure 3: ROPS: Side or Transverse Loading Results & Discussions ROPS simulation is carried out in Radioss. The load cases i.e. side and rear load cases were simulated as per OSHA standard guideline. Figure 4: Absorbed Internal Energy Plots for Side and Rear Loading Fig. 4 is internal energy plot for both side (transverse) and rear (longitudinal). It has been observed that the required energy is observed by the ROPS in both the load cases. 6

Rear or Longitudinal Loading: (a) OSHA Images for deflection intrusion (b) FEM deflection plot Figure 5: Rear or Longitudinal Deflection plots Required e = 30 in. (762 mm) at the longitudinal centerline; f = Not greater than 4 in. (102 mm) to the rear edge of the crossbar, measured forward of the seat-reference point ("SRP"); m = Not greater than 12 in. (305 mm), measured from the seat-reference point to the forward edge of the crossbar. FER > 1.15 Observed Value m = 269.2 mm f = Not intruded beyond SRP as displacement is 134.75mm FER = 1.30 7

Side or Transverse Loading: Figure 6: L-D Curve for Rear or Longitudinal Loading (a) OSHA Images for deflection intrusion (b) FEM deflection plot Figure 7: Side or Transverse Deflection plots Required d = 2 in. (51 mm) inside of the frame upright to the vertical centerline of the seat; e = 30 in. (762 mm) at the longitudinal centerline; g = 24 in. (610 mm) minimum; FER > 1.15 8

Observed Value d = 147.03 mm g = 640 mm FER = 1.54 Figure 8: L-D Curve for Side or Transverse Loading Benefits Summary Hyper works help in simulating stringent requirement of OSHA. Inbuilt feature of area calculation for L-D curve in Hypergraph helped in doing iteration fast. Through virtual simulation we were able to freeze design in very less time. Challenges Calculating strain energy by using L-D curve. Future Plans To establish correlation between test and FEA result. There is always scope of improvement, and Authors are hoping to enhance the process as much as possible to correlate lab testing. Conclusions 1. The critical components likes ROPS for Tractors can be very accurately simulated using Hyper- Works to describe the standard criteria. 2. The Methodology proves effective in predicting maximum allowable ROPS deflections when considering the standard criteria. 9

3. The results can be correlated with the actual lab testing, thereby reducing cost and time in the development. 4. The accelerated method of computation proved effective thereby arriving at correct design after several iterations but in much reduced time. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank International Tractors Limited - R&D & Altair India for their support. REFERENCES [1] OSHA 29 CFR 1928.52 Standard for wheeled agricultural tractors. [2] Hyper Works User manual. [3] P.D. Ayers, M. Dickson, S. Warner: Computer design of Roll-over Protective structure for agricultural tractors. 10