Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

Similar documents
Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

Vehicle Assist and. Bus Revenue Service

Analysis of Top BUS RAPID TRANSIT. Projects in North America SPONSORED BY APRIL 2007 METRO MAGAZINE 27

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

BRT Vehicle Development: Where Do We Go from Here?

Bus Rapid Transit Applications Phase 2

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese - General Manager

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

Bus Rapid Transit: Basic Design for Non-Transit Planners

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements San Fernando Valley Service Council April 3, 2019

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Regional Transitway Guidelines. Identity and Branding Update Advisory Committee September 27, 2010

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Stakeholders Advisory Working Group Traffic and Transit Group Meeting #4, October 10, 2007

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

ARTERIAL BRT OVERVIEW

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

AMERICA. rides the BUS

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Information Session, October 10, 2017

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Application of IVI Technologies for Bus Rapid Transit Systems

Quantifying the Benefits of Bus Rapid Transit Elements

International and USA BRT TOD Comparisons. Cliff Henke and Kimi Iboshi Sloop, Parsons Brinckerhoff

Community Open Houses November 29 December 7, 2017

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CAPACITIES AND COSTS

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

Needs and Community Characteristics

What is the Connector?

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Key Transfer Stations - Technical Memo

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Study Area, Related Projects and Travel Markets

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Where will. BRT run? BRT will serve 20 stations along the line, connecting to bus routes and serving major destinations. How often will service run?

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Appendix 3-A: Peer System Review. Draft Report February 2016

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND COSTS

4/9/2018. April 5, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Blue Ribbon Committee

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005

Arterial BRT Quarterly Update

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

bg 2017 lacmta. Metro

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Plan. September 23, 2009

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Informal Business Discussion Minutes Tuesday, May 3, :00 PM 1. Transportation

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Transcription:

Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

Source: WCVB TV, Boston

BRT is an enhanced bus system that operates on bus lanes or other transitways in order to combine the flexibility of buses with the efficiency of rail. BRT operates at faster speeds, provides greater service reliability and increased customer convenience. BRT uses a combination of advanced technologies, infrastructure and operational investments that provide significantly better service than traditional bus service. Source: Federal Transit Administration

BRT Lite Swift BRT - Everett Hybrid BRT Eugene EmX Full BRT Orange Line - LA $2-5 million per mile $5 10 million per mile $10 30 million per mile

Source: WCVB TV, Boston

Source: RTC Southern Nevada

Source: Flickr, Photo by Complete Streets

Source: NBRTI

Source: Flickr, Ottawa Bus Gallery

Source: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Running Ways Stations Vehicles Fare Collection Intelligent Transportation Systems Service and Operating Plans Branding Elements Integration of Elements It s no single element, but the combination of elements that makes BRT systems successful

Vehicles

Enhanced Stations

Branding

BRT can use standard vehicles NABI Bus Metro Rapid, Los Angeles

Nova Bus, Select Bus Service, New York

BRT can use semi-stylized vehicles Gillig Bus MAX BRT, Kansas City

Van Hool Bus MAX BRT, Salt Lake City Note the 3 doors.

New Flyer Bus EmX BRT, Eugene

NABI Bus Orange Line, Los Angeles

Wrightbus SDX BRT, Las Vegas

Stations can be simple San Pablo Rapid, Oakland

MetroRapid Station, Los Angeles

Stations can be simple but aesthetic MAX Station, Kansas City

Same station at night

Curbside Station Median Station MAX Stations Salt Lake City

Stations can be enhanced SDX Station, Las Vegas

Stations can simulate rail stations HealthLine Station, Cleveland

EmX Station, Eugene

Orange Line Station, Los Angeles Orange Line Station, Los Angeles

Ticket Vending Machines MAX BRT in Salt Lake City uses repurposed parking ticket vending machines

Real Time Bus Information

Elevated Platforms Raised Platforms for Level Boarding

Public Art

Public Art

MAX Bus Only Lane, Salt Lake City

EmX Running Way, Eugene, OR

I-35W Managed Lanes, Minneapolis

I-35W Managed Lanes, Minneapolis

Opened 2008 7.1 miles 15,000 daily riders 5 minute headways $28M per mile

Dedicated bus lane Signal priority Off-board fares Near level boarding Median stations

Euclid and East Fourth Street

University Loft Apartments

Cleveland Clinic

Pittsburgh East Busway: $500M in development

Boston Silver Line: $650M in development

Research on three BRT systems shows positive impacts on residential property values, similar to light rail Pittsburgh Boston Cleveland

2008 CUTR study of L.A. Metro Transit Sought to answer the question of whether people perceive transit modes differently Bus, BRT, Light Rail, Heavy Rail

Local Bus Metro Rapid (BRT Lite)

Orange Line (Full BRT) Blue Line (LRT)

Gold Line (LRT) Red Line (Subway)

Survey respondents asked to rate 14 tangible and intangible attributes of transit service Rated importance and quality on a scale of 1 to 5 1 (not at all important), 5 (extremely important) Travel cost Travel time Frequency Span Convenience Reliability Safety onboard Comfort onboard Safety waiting Comfort waiting Customer service User friendliness Other riders Avoid stress/cost of car

Overall Rating 4.3 4.2 4.1 4 3.9 3.8 Orange Line BRT Gold Line LRT Metro Rapid 'BRT Lite' Blue Line LRT Red Line HRT Tier 4 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 3.7 Local bus 3.6 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Capital Cost per Mile ($M, 2005 dollars)

BRT Service Capital Cost/Mile Daily Ridership Peak Headway Route Length Orange Line L.A. 25M 23,000 4 minutes 14 miles HealthLine - Cleveland 23M 15,000 5 minutes 7 miles SDX Las Vegas 6M* 15,000 15 minutes 12 miles EmX Eugene 6.25M 10,000 10 minutes 4 miles MAX Kansas City 2.2M 4,400 10 minutes 9 miles MAX Salt Lake City 1.6M 4,200 15 minutes 10 miles

BRT combines the flexibility of buses with the efficiency of rail. BRT operates at faster speeds, provides greater service reliability. BRT provides these things through a combination of innovative vehicles, enhanced stations, running ways, state of the art technologies, improved fare collection, and branding.

Brian Pessaro Senior Research Associate National BRT Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research pessaro@cutr.usf.edu