WVU PRT Redefining Mobility

Similar documents
Needs and Community Characteristics

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza ~13.g Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA rnetro.net

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Purple Line Light Rail P3 Project

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

High Speed Rail Conference

The $600 Million Rebirth of San Diego Trolley

New Haven Hartford Springfield Rail

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

The Latest on Joint Development Policy Guidance

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

FACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

March Government Center Station

Transit Implementation Strategy. Presentation for the Atlanta City Council

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

Late Starter. Tuesday, November 6, 2018

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Milwaukee County Transit System

El Metro Operations Proposed FY Budget

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Commuter Vanpool Program Scope of Work

Overview of Transit Projects in the Transportation Investment Act in MARTA Jurisdictions. June 11, 2012

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - A May 10, FY2018 Third Quarter Capital Program Updates

What is the Connector?

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Equipment Management Department. Council Budget Presentation

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

DART Priorities Overview

EMERGING REQUIREMENTS

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

City of El Paso: Sun Metro Legislative Agenda Briefing

Presentation of the Baltimore Metro System

UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE Campus Planning and Transportation Services

Update on Transportation Activities in Fairfax County

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Electric Multiple Unit Procurement Update

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

The Future of Rail in Maryland. Kevin B. Quinn, Jr. Administrator

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Colorado Association of Ski Towns August 26, 2016

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Program Update March 14, 2011 Revised & Updated March 31, 2011

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry

Image from:

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Essential Elements of a Successful Preventive Maintenance Program

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Fleet Options. Information and Comparison

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer

TPA Steering Committee for Tri-Rail Extension to Northern Palm Beach County. February 26, 2018

Transit Maintenance Equipment. Maintenance Facilities FY

High Quality Service through Continuous Improvement st Quarter Performance Report

Capital Needs Assessment Riders Advisory Council July2, 2008

Branch Edmonton Transit

South Lake Union Streetcar. Capital Financing and Operating and Maintenance Plan. April 13, Prepared for: Seattle City Council

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

July 28, 2009 Presentation to the Illinois Statewide Smart Grid Collaborative

METRO Light Rail Update

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

O-Train Confederation Line Stage 1

Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Analysis

APTA Rail Conference 2017 Mark L. Dorn Design Manager for Oklahoma City MAPS 3 Modern Streetcar Jacobs/AECOM Team

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

Strategic Plan

Review of the Wake County Transit Plan

Proposal for September 2006 Start of Commuter Rail from Lovejoy on the Macon Line to Atlanta

Western ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 17, CONTACT: Mayor s Press Office

Transcription:

WVU PRT Redefining Mobility Department of Transportation and Parking West Virginia University February 2016 Clement Solomon WVU Campus Transportation Campus Location Three mile separation between campus extremes Elevation change of 600 feet between downtown and HSC 2007 Transportation and Parking Plan Recognized university not provide parking for everyone Downtown with over 3,000 space parking deficit Emphasis on transportation over parking 2010 PRT Master Plan Recommendations Only public mass transit system to handle volume Upgrade to automatic train controls, replacement of PRT vehicles, and power distribution needed Salvage the existing infrastructure Without major system investments System will deteriorate to the point that it will not be able to operate One of the greatest assets of the Morgantown 1

History Of PRT PRT concept has been around since the 1950 s Direct origin-to-destination service Service on demand rather than fixed schedules WVU PRT designed by Boeing Phase I started construction in 1972 Service in 1975 with phase II completed 1978 Total project cost $125 million (1970 dollars) About the PRT 4.5 miles of parallel heated guideway with 10% grades 5 stations from Downtown to Health Sciences 71 electric powered vehicles 20 passenger capacity 11,000 lbs. empty weight 3 phase, 575 volt electric power Current operation funded by student transportation fee of $97/semester ($3.3 million) 2

The PRT Experience Moves large volumes of people Highest single day ridership over 32,000 trips Average weekday of 15,000 trips 85% student, 8% F/S, 7% general public System can accommodate 6,700 passengers/hour 84 million accident free passenger milestone this week Integral part of mobility network Cost per trip $2.01 only New York and Boston lower for fixed guideway operations WVU icon The Need for Modernization Age of the system (38 years) Continual decline in reliability Current reliability rate in 90% range not satisfactory Outdated technology with no vendor support Dwindling/No market availability for parts Boeing built the system then left Viewed by students as antiquated and unreliable 6 3

PRT Modernization Plan Phase 1 Onboard vehicle computer control system Propulsion project Estimated cost $15,000,000 Phase 2 Replacement of automated train control system Replacement of Four substations and electrical gear Hospital Tunnel Repair Estimated cost $52,580,000 Phase 3 Vehicle replacement project Infrastructure inspection and repairs Estimated cost $34,300,000 Completed 2014 to 2016 2017 to 2019 Phase 1 On Board Vehicle Computer System and Propulsion New on-board computer system provides a 28% improvement in the PRT s performance Controls vehicle functions according to location and status Monitors and transmits vehicle information/location from the vehicle to the Central Computers New propulsion units reduce vehicle failures and increase car availability from 60% to over 80% of the fleet Car availability will improve rider satisfaction by reducing wait time and system downtime Allow for routine preventive maintenance Compatible with Phase 3 vehicle replacement 4

Phase 2 Automated Train Control System Approximately 50% of the downtime due to train control system The design and installation of a new train controls system will include: Passive guideway New vehicle controllers Wayside and station computer control equipment and central control equipment Fare gates with new destination selection units Use radio frequency communications in lieu of current method Can be overlaid with existing operation Reducing maintenance needs and vastly improving system availability Phase 2 Four substations/electrical Gear Mechanical failure of the power collection assembly, an ongoing problem Replacing the substations/electrical gear will greatly reduce the frequency of maintenance Isolate and localize faults Avoid a system wide shut down Yield greater operational flexibility Increase system availability 5

Phase 3 Vehicle Replacement Project Vehicle mileages range from 250,000 to over 600,000 miles Empty weight of a PRT vehicle is approximately 10,000 pounds Nonconformity to industry standards Technical and mechanical support is nonexistent Design of new PRT vehicles envisioned will be: Geometrically similar to the existing vehicles Built using innovative materials and components Yield a lower vehicle weight and components that can be easily procured Previous phases will be incorporated into the new vehicle design Crack in Axle Assembly Vehicles Develop Chassis Fatigue Average 380K Miles Phase 3 - Infrastructure Inspection/Repair Overall structural integrity of the PRT guideway infrastructure is good Need to inspect, document and design the needed repairs for the PRT guideway Majority of the repairs will be related to the deterioration of the concrete pier pads Degradation of these pads could yield elevation differences Could cause failure of hydronic piping used to melt snow and ice on the guideway 6

Funding Strategy PRT modernization possible funding sources: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) formula grants External financing WVU transportation fees Phase 1 funded through Used bond proceeds, FTA Formula Grant Funds, and local funds to the tune of $18.4 million Phases 2 and 3: WVU Funds QUESTIONS? Clement Solomon, PhD Director of Transportation and Parking Phone: 304 293-5502 Email: csolomon@wvu.edu 7