Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

Act 229 Evaluation Report

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

CHART BOOK ON WAGES, OPERATING COSTS, AND COST OF LIVING

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

THE 2001 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 975 955 940 935 930 Rank 47 48 48 48 47 Commuters (1000s) 506 497 489 486 481 Freeway 5,422 5,384 4,950 4,763 4,696 Arterial Streets 8,239 8,182 7,735 7,670 7,562 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.14 3.34 3.35 3.28 2.61 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.48 3.75 3.74 3.56 2.84 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 40 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 29 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 5.00 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 18,895 18,399 18,412 18,376 18,042 Rank 40 41 41 38 38 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 22 21 21 21 21 Rank 23 27 25 22 21 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 39,159 38,133 38,159 38,085 37,392 Rank 38 39 39 37 37 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 45 45 45 45 45 Rank 29 25 25 25 24 Travel Time Index 1.32 1.31 1.32 1.32 1.32 Rank 13 13 10 10 9 Commuter Stress Index 1.37 1.36 1.37 1.37 1.37 Rank 15 15 14 14 12 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 3.46 -- -- -- -- Rank 3 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 1,014 1,004 1,019 1,038 1,051 Rank 37 36 36 34 35 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,161 1,149 1,166 1,188 1,203 Rank 19 21 18 12 12

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 925 925 910 900 1,050 Rank 47 47 47 47 40 Commuters (1000s) 478 475 469 461 534 Freeway 4,776 4,800 5,300 5,400 5,700 Arterial Streets 7,861 7,900 8,100 8,165 8,200 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.17 3.35 2.92 2.56 2.23 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.46 4.04 3.28 2.74 2.40 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 17,270 16,838 15,035 13,291 14,953 Rank 40 42 45 47 44 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 20 19 17 15 17 Rank 24 41 57 67 46 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 35,793 34,896 31,159 27,545 30,989 Rank 37 43 45 47 43 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 43 42 38 34 33 Rank 28 41 55 73 74 Travel Time Index 1.30 1.30 1.27 1.24 1.23 Rank 10 12 19 26 27 Commuter Stress Index 1.35 1.35 1.32 1.29 1.28 Rank 13 14 23 31 33 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,023 994 922 837 973 Rank 34 39 42 45 40 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,171 1,137 1,055 958 1,114 Rank 16 25 41 60 28

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 1,060 1,070 1,080 1,095 1,090 Rank 39 39 38 38 38 Commuters (1000s) 536 539 541 538 529 Freeway 5,700 5,750 5,700 5,585 5,615 Arterial Streets 8,230 8,290 8,280 8,170 8,190 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.87 1.46 1.33 1.43 1.49 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.85 1.44 1.31 1.44 1.43 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 15,872 15,461 14,963 14,730 14,380 Rank 41 39 39 38 38 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 18 18 17 17 16 Rank 33 25 31 20 23 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 32,896 32,043 31,011 30,528 29,803 Rank 41 40 38 37 36 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 35 34 33 32 32 Rank 59 62 61 64 62 Travel Time Index 1.25 1.24 1.23 1.23 1.22 Rank 22 24 25 24 24 Commuter Stress Index 1.29 1.29 1.28 1.27 1.27 Rank 30 30 30 30 27 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,068 1,068 1,057 1,057 1,061 Rank 35 35 35 35 35 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,222 1,222 1,210 1,210 1,215 Rank 19 16 14 13 11

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 1,090 1,090 1,085 1,085 1,085 Rank 37 36 36 35 35 Commuters (1000s) 528 524 518 522 520 Freeway 5,750 5,745 5,470 5,400 5,590 Arterial Streets 8,210 8,035 7,980 7,835 7,780 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.08 1.04 1.17 1.22 1.16 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.07 1.12 1.23 1.29 1.23 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 14,094 13,842 13,514 13,263 12,864 Rank 37 34 32 31 29 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 16 16 15 15 15 Rank 17 12 12 10 10 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 29,210 28,688 28,007 27,488 26,660 Rank 35 35 34 33 32 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 31 31 30 30 29 Rank 64 57 57 50 48 Travel Time Index 1.22 1.22 1.21 1.21 1.20 Rank 24 23 23 20 21 Commuter Stress Index 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.25 1.25 Rank 29 28 25 26 24 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,075 1,079 1,070 1,074 1,073 Rank 34 32 32 30 28 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,230 1,235 1,225 1,229 1,228 Rank 10 9 9 8 8

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 1,085 1,080 1,075 1,060 1,050 Rank 34 34 34 35 35 Commuters (1000s) 514 502 496 481 478 Freeway 5,555 5,105 5,000 4,900 4,750 Arterial Streets 7,745 7,725 7,710 7,600 7,545 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.06 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.08 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.13 1.18 1.20 1.21 1.08 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 12,410 11,420 10,858 10,331 9,614 Rank 27 28 28 28 26 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 14 13 12 12 11 Rank 9 10 12 9 9 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 25,720 23,669 22,504 21,411 19,926 Rank 30 27 28 28 26 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 28 26 25 24 23 Rank 47 49 45 43 44 Travel Time Index 1.20 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.16 Rank 19 20 18 19 20 Commuter Stress Index 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.22 1.20 Rank 24 25 27 25 26 Total Cost ($ millions) 1,064 1,004 984 964 935 Rank 26 24 25 24 24 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,218 1,149 1,126 1,103 1,070 Rank 8 9 8 8 8

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 1,045 1,040 1,035 1,035 1,030 Rank 35 35 34 32 31 Commuters (1000s) 471 465 461 455 449 Freeway 4,600 4,450 4,360 4,435 4,490 Arterial Streets 7,400 7,205 7,215 7,300 7,305 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.09 1.01 1.10 0.98 1.29 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.90 1.18 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 9,039 8,553 8,526 8,232 7,868 Rank 25 24 24 23 21 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 10 10 10 9 9 Rank 9 9 8 9 9 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 18,733 17,727 17,671 17,061 16,306 Rank 25 26 23 23 23 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 22 21 21 20 20 Rank 40 38 30 31 26 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.14 Rank 19 17 17 17 17 Commuter Stress Index 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 Rank 26 26 26 24 24 Total Cost ($ millions) 926 919 954 955 929 Rank 24 23 21 20 19 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,060 1,052 1,092 1,092 1,063 Rank 8 8 8 9 9

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 1,030 1,025 1,020 Rank 31 32 32 Commuters (1000s) 448 440 434 Freeway 4,335 4,125 4,035 Arterial Streets 7,125 7,275 6,730 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.30 1.33 1.39 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.19 1.22 1.28 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 8,625 7,777 6,552 Rank 17 17 19 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 10 9 7 Rank 7 7 10 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 17,876 16,117 13,578 Rank 19 19 19 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 21 20 17 Rank 19 18 24 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.14 1.12 Rank 12 13 15 Commuter Stress Index 1.19 1.18 1.16 Rank 21 21 25 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 1,055 992 863 Rank 17 17 18 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,207 1,136 987 Rank 7 8 10