Welcome. The purpose of today s session is to:

Similar documents
Appendix A-M Public Information Centre 4 Materials

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group #4 February 9, 2017

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

East Turnaround. Access to Ayreswood Avenue would be restricted to right-in/rightout movements under the proposed Rapid Transit plan.

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

Appendix A-L Public Information Centre 3 Materials

Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

CHAIR AND MEMBERS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING ON MARCH 20, 2019 RECOMMENDATION

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Scarborough Transit Planning

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

CHAIR AND MEMBERS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING ON NOVEMBER 9, 2015 ART ZUIDEMA CITY MANAGER SHIFT RAPID TRANSIT UPDATE

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Draft Results and Open House

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

London s Rapid Transit Initiative

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Draft Results and Recommendations

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

Strategic Plan

Needs and Community Characteristics

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Driving change. Investing in the Future of London s Mobility

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

Newmarket GO Station Mobility Hub Study. Open House #1 MAY 18, 2017

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

Appendix C. Parking Strategies

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

What We Heard. Edmontonians in communities Northwest of City Centre share their vision of the Metro Line NW LRT Expansion

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE TOWN OF NEWMARKET

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

Click to edit Master title style

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

Attachment 5. High Speed Transit Planning Study REPORT SUMMARY. Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch. Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN EAST GWILLIMBURY

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program moving

Federal Way Link Extension

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

CONNECTING THE REGION

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Green Line Long-Term Investments

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Troost Corridor Transit Study

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

WOLVERINE TO BHP JANSEN NEW TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FALL 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Downtown Parking/Wayfinding Study. Review of Recommendations to City Council: January 16, 2018

Transcription:

Welcome The purpose of today s session is to: Update you on what we ve heard from the community Share the preferred Rapid Transit network solution Present the draft Rapid Transit Master Plan Representatives from the City and project consultant team are available to answer your questions and collect your feedback. Please also submit comments using the forms provided. Richmond Street Municipal Underground Utilities Realignment Environmental Assessment Study Visit the Public Open House for this study taking place here tonight. This study was initiated in response to the potential need to realign sewers in the vicinity of the Richmond Street Rapid Transit tunnel. For more information, visit www.london.ca/eas 1

What is Shift? Our Rapid Transit Initiative What will Shift achieve? This important initiative will transform transportation in London. Focusing on Rapid Shift will define where Rapid Transit will go, what it will look like, and how it will be implemented. Transit as part of the transportation system along with cars, buses, bikes and pedestrians to help our city grow and prosper. Shift is about finding environmentally sustainable ways to move people in London faster and create great places to live and work. And, it s about developing the foundations to make London attractive for investment. 2

Project Timeline 2012 Council approves Smart Moves Transportation Master Plan February 2015 Shift is launched with Public Information Centre #1 at Central Library May 2015 Public Information Centre #2 at the Agriplex and Goodwill centre revealed the preliminary preferred Rapid Transit network December 2015 Public Information Centre #3 at the Central Library presented a Hybrid Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit solution May 2016 London City Council approves the initial Shift Business Case, which confirms Bus Rapid Transit as the preferred technology December 2016 The Ministry of Municipal Affairs issues Notice of Decision approving The London Plan, which was approved by Council in June 2016 February 2017 Public Information Centre #4, tonight, presents the final Rapid Transit Master Plan, which will proceed to Council for We Are Fall 2017 The Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) will develop the preliminary engineering design approval after consideration of your input 2020-2025 A new Rapid Transit system is up, running, and ready for riders in London Here 3

Project Process Shift is a multi-phase Environmental Assessment (EA) a public process that provides all citizens and stakeholders with the opportunity to provide input in planning and designing our Rapid Transit network. The 1 st stage of Shift is the Rapid Transit Master Plan. The 2 nd stage of Shift is the Transit Project Assessment study. The Rapid Transit Master Plan defines the rapid transit network, including route, technology and a preliminary list of stations. The Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) is a focused Environmental Assessment study that applies to Public Transit projects. After we incorporate your comments, the Master Plan will be recommended to City Council for adoption. It is focused on the engineering design of the Rapid Transit network. This includes developing and evaluating design alternatives to build the network. The plan, after it is adopted, will become the foundation for the next stage. The evaluation will consider the positive and negative impacts of each alternative, and identify mitigation measures. Additional public consultation will take place throughout this stage. 4

What We Heard Last Time Public Information Centre #3 Held December 2, 2015 at the Central Library on Dundas Street 149 sign-ins recorded 33 comment forms received At Public Information Centre (PIC) #3, you told us: The south tunnel portal at Central Ave could impact businesses and traffic through Richmond Row. Riders must be able to access Rapid Transit by foot, bike, bus and car. Both Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit offer advantages to London. Rapid Transit needs to connect to major trip generators like Western, Fanshawe, the malls, downtown, the airport, train & bus stations, and hospitals. You asked us: What impact will there be to my property? How will traffic change with Rapid Transit? Where will the bus maintenance facility go? What will happen to the existing bus routes along the corridors? What will Rapid Transit cost, and who will fund Rapid Transit? You noted: Rapid Transit is essential for London s future success given that comparable cities like Kitchener-Waterloo are buildings these systems. Any new development should be transit supportive near stations This needs to be engrained into land use planning and urban design 5

Assessment Framework The assessment of alternative networks was revisited since the last PIC. This included an update to the Business Case which is an influential component of the decision to carry forward the Full BRT Alternative as the preferred Network. This step was revisited since the last PIC 6

Network Alternatives Examined Preferred Corridors + RT Technology Base BRT Full BRT (Preferred Network) Hybrid (NE LRT + SW BRT) Full LRT 7

0 is 4 is 0 1 3 44 44 0 1 4 4 4 3 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 2 1 2 3 4 2 4 3 2 Evaluation Summary (Ranking the Alternatives) Alternatives Criteria/ Measures Business As Usual Base BRT Full BRT Hybrid Full LRT City Building and Revitalization Public Space and Heritage Transportation and Mobility 0 1 4 4 4 Implementation N/A 4 Natural Environment Costs and Benefits Economic Effects N/A 3 0 1 Overall Rank 0 the highest score. the lowest score. Full BRT is the preferred network alternative as it is best suited to ridership demand, provides a high quality of service and reliability, supports growth objectives, provides the highest value for the investment and is adaptable to future conditions. 8

The Preferred Network 24 km network 34 rapid transit stations 27 articulated buses 1.13 benefit-cost ratio $12.2 million annual operating costs $1.3 billion in transportation, environmental and economic benefits over the project lifespan City of London has committed $125 million toward our estimated $560 million Rapid Transit Initiative. To move forward, London is seeking approximately $435 million from federal and provincial partners. 9

Western University: Preferred Route Option 2: Lambton Drive through Alumni Circle is the preferred route through WU campus. Good access to major trip generators on both sides of Western Road Excellent coverage of planned campus expansion areas Direct route for bus rapid transit Consistent with Western s on-going Open Space and Landscape Plan Design features and station locations will be explored in consultation with Western University. Existing bus routes will be modified to coordinate with rapid transit stations. 10

Old East Village: Preferred Route Two-way on King Street is the technically preferred route, with one lane in each direction for BRT and one lane eastbound for general traffic. Supports growth along King Street and Dundas Street Allows for public realm improvements along Dundas Street Maintains traffic patterns with fewer turn restrictions and allows local transit along Dundas Street Less disruptive and lower cost to construct than the alternatives RT station locations are similar for all alternatives Better rider comprehension of RT route and station locations 11

Transit Ridership Demand North Corridor Downtown to Masonville via Richmond Street, University Drive, Lambton Drive, Western Road East Corridor Downtown to Fanshawe College via King Street, Dundas Street, Highbury Avenue and Oxford Street East West Corridor Downtown to Wonderland Road via Riverside Drive, Wharncliffe Road, and Oxford Street West South Corridor Downtown to White Oaks Mall via Wellington Road North and East corridors will operate as one route with 5 minute service. South and West corridors will operate as one route with 10 minute service. 12

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Elements BRT can cost between $15 to Can carry up to 4,500 $40 million per route kilometre passengers every hour in each direction Vehicles run primarily in dedicated lanes, but can operate in mixed-traffic Has the flexibility to operate outside of dedicated lanes Vehicles are high capacity, accessible and offer comfortable seating Mercedes-Benz Smart Bus Geneva Cologne Los Angeles 13

Technology is evolving: Electric Buses 400 km 12 Years $200 K 0 Depending on the model, electric buses can travel for up to 400 km on a single charge The typical lifecycle of an electric bus is 12 years similar to that of a standard bus The typical additional cost of an electric bus compared to a standard bus The amount of point source emissions that are produced by electric buses 14

Focus Areas: Conceptual Design Areas will be reviewed in detail during the Transit Project Assessment Process to evaluate design alternatives and minimize negative impacts. 1 2 3 7 5 4 FOCUS AREAS 1 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 RICHMOND STREET NORTH RICHMOND TUNNEL DOWNTOWN FORKS OF THE THAMES WELLINGTON SOUTH OLD EAST VILLAGE 15

Focus Area 1: Western University Elgin/Western Station Richmond/Western Station Windermere Rd. Station Lambton/Western Station University/Richmond Station Google Maps Station locations will be confirmed in consultation with Western University during the TPAP process. The alignment is consistent with Western s on-going Open Space and Landscape Plan and approved by the Board of Governors. 16

Focus Area 2: Richmond Street North Richmond Street between Grosvenor Street and University Drive University/Richmond Station A decision needs to be made on whether this stretch of Richmond Street will have 2 lanes of traffic or 4 lanes of traffic. The decision will consider impacts of the two options, including: 4 lanes will require road widening and result in property impacts, reductions to driveways and parking, and the removal of some trees. 2 lanes will result in increased congestion for general traffic, and require a shift in travel patterns. Do you have suggestions on what this Richmond/Grosvenor Station decision should consider in the next study phase? Google Maps Four Lanes of Traffic Two Lanes of Traffic 17

Focus Area 3: Richmond Street Tunnel Google Maps Station locations, the tunnel and underground station design will be developed in the next study phase. 18 The Rapid Transit tunnel, once completed, will: Maintain transit service reliability, improve transit travel time, serve emergency vehicles, and avoid long-term impacts to Richmond Row businesses and public realm.

Focus Area 4: Downtown Angel St. Station Queens Ave. Station Waterloo St. Station Central Transit Hub Talbot St. Station Station locations will be confirmed during the next study phase. Google Maps 19

Focus Area 5: Forks of the Thames Riverside Dr. Station Museum Station (potential) Station locations will be confirmed during the next Talbot St. Station study phase. Google Maps 20

Focus Area 6: Wellington Road South Bond St. Station Station locations will be confirmed during the next study phase. Google Maps This section of Wellington Road needs an improved alignment plus widening for rapid transit. The design will be developed in the next study phase to minimize impacts, such as: Property impacts: land acquisition, reduced driveways, parking, trees; and, Traffic impacts: changes to lane configurations, restricted turning movements 21

Focus Area 7: Old East Village Waterloo St. Station Adelaide St. Station Ontario St. Station Station locations will be confirmed during the next study phase. Google Maps The design for two-way rapid transit on King Street will be developed in the next study phase to minimize impacts, such as: Property impacts: driveways, parking, trees; and, Traffic impacts: changes to lane configurations, congestion, and restricted turning movements. 22

Vision for Rapid Transit The vision for the Rapid Transit Master Plan is intertwined with The London Plan s Mobility goals. The plans recognize that there is an interconnected link between land use and mobility. The plans rely on each other to succeed. Rapid Transit will form the backbone of an integrated multi-modal system. Rapid Transit will enable corridors designed to provide a variety of safe, convenient, attractive, viable and accessible mobility options for all Londoners. Rapid Transit will be leveraged to strategically promote and stimulate intensification while ensuring development is conducive to the efficient operation and attractiveness of public transit. 23

The Last Mile Every rapid transit trip begins and ends with a different mode (either walking, cycling, or local transit). This is referred to as the last mile. The quality of this last mile trip is dependent on the integration of rapid transit with the active transportation network and connections to base transit services. This is a crucial component of a successful rapid transit system. The active transportation network (sidewalks and bikeways) will be well connected to rapid transit. 1 st Mile Rapid Transit Last Mile Trip The base transit network will be reconfigured to provide seamless connections to rapid transit 1 st Mile Rapid Transit Last Mile Trip 24

The Last Mile Integration with Cycling Cycling is a flexible and cost-effective option to address first and last mile connections. Safe and convenient routes to access stations will be important for maximizing the number of people who can reach the system easily. London ON Bikes - Proposed Cycling Network Supporting Strategies Provide BRT vehicles with a bike rack. Provide safe and well-marked access to stations. Prioritize constructing routes that connect to stations, when possible. Coordinate the construction with cycling projects or protect for future construction, when possible. Incorporate a mix of short and long-term bike options at stations where space allows. At stations with limited space, provide bike parking nearby. 25

The Last Mile Planning for Pedestrians Planning around stations will put pedestrians first. Making walking to stations safe and easy is important; walking will be a part of every rapid transit Accessible stations and vehicles across the rapid transit network. trip. The plan will provide for a continuous, attractive pedestrian network along the rapid transit corridors. Supporting Strategies Provide safe pedestrian crossings at regular intervals. In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations. A continuous, attractive pedestrian space throughout the corridor will create a place people want to walk. Explore opportunities for new pedestrian links when development of public and private occurs. Prioritize snow removal at stations and along the corridors. Minimize pedestrian wait times at station access points. Signalized crosswalks will make it easy to access stations that are in the middle (median) of the roadway. Sidewalk widths will be tailored to meet the needs in each section of the corridors. 26

Integration with Local Transit Routes providing feeder service to rapid transit should have frequency that is no more than half that of Rapid Transit. For example, the wait time for a connecting bus from a rapid transit station that has 5 minute service should be a maximum of 10 minutes. Rapid Transit 12 buses per hour Base Transit 6 buses per hour Base Service that duplicates rapid transit will be minimized. Rapid Transit Base Transit x x Routes that don t connect to rapid transit should not be extended or Rapid Transit x RT Station deviate significantly from a logical path just to connect to rapid transit. A Base Transit B Combined transit service will increase by 35% between 2015 35% and 2035. 27

Integration with Land Use Planning The London Plan The London Plan is the City s Official Plan and was approved in 2016. It is the playbook for city-building over the next 20 years. The plan focuses on growing inward and upward, with 45% of growth to be infill and intensification, and the majority of that growth will be in the Primary Transit Area. Rapid Transit is a key component of the plan. There are three key areas that will support London ON Bikes - Proposed Cycling Network transit-oriented development: 1) Downtown will be the focus of high density intensification and be held to a high standard for urban design and walkability. It will support all modes of travel. 2) Transit Villages will anchor the end of each corridor. They will become mid to high density, mixed-use areas, where Londoners can live, work and play. 3) Rapid Transit corridors will support appropriate intensification along the routes and encourage transit and active travel. Various levels of intensification along BRT corridors 28

Changes to Traffic Circulation A B C A B C At signalized intersections, traffic will be able to cross the BRT lanes and make right or left turns. At unsignalized minor streets and driveways, traffic will only be able to make a right-turn in or out. Traffic will not be able to cross the BRT lanes. Traffic that today turns left out of an unsignalized minor street or driveway will instead turn right and U-Turn at the next signalized intersection. U-turns will use dedicated left-turn lanes and a protected signal. Along Rapid Transit Corridors, moving people will be the highest priority. BRT will travel in dedicated, centre-running (median) lanes for over 90% of the network to provide reliable service. BRT median lanes will be separated from regular traffic by curbs and pavement markings. At major intersections, traffic movements will stay the same as today. At minor streets and driveways, traffic will not be able to cross the BRT median lanes. Emergency vehicles will be able to use BRT lanes and the rapid transit tunnel. 29

Intelligent Transportation Systems Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Transit signal priority (TSP) is a technology to maintain the BRT schedule. This can be achieved through: Passive TSP signals are timed to provide a greenwave for BRT. Active TSP signals will adjust to give a green light to BRT when behind schedule (see right). Wonderland Road North & Sarnia Road 30

Transit Oriented Development Transit-oriented or transit-supportive development means development which is designed to be well connected and integrated with transit systems, helps to make transit use more efficient, comfortable and attractive, provides quality pedestrian amenities to support the walk to and from transit services and generates ongoing demand for transit ridership. - The London Plan Walk Transit Intersections T Higher Order Transit & transit frequency Bike Shared Mobility Roads Orienting infrastructure for Station Plazas Green Spaces Institutional Sites O making pedestrian connections between transit & development Public Parks Other Open Spaces Designated Development Lands Development D featuring a mix of uses & densities Local Corridor Mixed-Use Infill TOD Contextual Mixed-Use Infill TOD Beyond 30 years Local Scale Residential Infill TOD Adjacent Transitional Infill TOD Major Mixed Use Redevelopment 31

Storage and Maintenance Facility The Highbury facility opened in 1971 and has been expanded four times. It is currently approaching capacity. The LTC currently operates two bus maintenance and storage facilities. BRT ridership forecasts indicate that approximately 27 new articulated buses will be required by 2034 to serve demand. It is anticipated that the current storage and maintenance facilities will be adequate to support the 2034 BRT system. 450 Highbury Avenue, Google Maps The Wonderland facility opened in 2011. It has potential space for 110 buses and currently operates around 50% capacity. The facility includes a number of modern environmentally friendly features. 3508 Wonderland Road South, Google Maps 32

Urban Design BRT Corridors and Transit Villages The Transit Villages and BRT corridors have the potential to: encourage transit oriented mixed-use development and intensified urban form; provide an enhanced pedestrian realm, including continuous pedestrian clearways, public spaces and amenities; provide infrastructure for active transportation; optimize tree canopy and green infrastructure; and provide flexible open spaces to encourage a lively community. 33

Future Opportunities There are opportunities to enhance the rapid transit network, beyond the scope of this study, including: Extension along Clarence Street south of King Street to meet future intercity High Speed Rail. Extension along Oxford Street East from Fanshawe College to London s International Airport. Convert some or all segments to Light Rail Transit (LRT) subject to future conditions, ridership demand, and cost-benefit assessment. 34

Next Steps in the Process Rapid Transit Master Plan (RTMP) will be presented to Council for adoption. Once adopted by Council, we will advance the design and conduct more public consultation to show specific challenges and solutions that mitigate negative impacts. We will initiate the Transit Project Assessment 6-month process (TPAP) with additional consultation and opportunities for your input. Design refinements, property and utility impacts, station locations and minor route refinements can occur as the design evolves. 35

Stay Involved What do you think? The City wants to hear your thoughts on the proposed Rapid Transit Master Plan. Let us know by: Completing a Comment Sheet and putting into the comment box tonight Talking with a project team representative tonight Emailing us at Shift@London.ca You can also stay up to date by following us on the social media accounts below. 2425 36