Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Similar documents
Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

TARDEC Technology Integration

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Metal Detector Battery Longevity Study

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

Performance of Sony s Alloy Based Li-ion Battery

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Predator Program Office

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Replacement Packing for 37MM Antitank Gun Recoil

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Portable Fluid Analyzer

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Impact Seeded Fault Data of Helicopter Oil Cooler Fan Bearings

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Report No. D November 24, Live Fire Testing of Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles was Effective for the Portions Completed

Quarterly Progress Report

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

ANALYSIS OF DEBRIS FROM HELICOPTERS FROM THE FIELD

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

IMPACT OF FIRE RESISTANT FUEL BLENDS ON FORMATION OF OBSCURING FOG

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

Power Considerations for Micro-Autonomous Systems

Crew integration & Automation Testbed and Robotic Follower Programs

Transcription:

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft by Brian Porter and Gary Haas ARL-TN-337 December 2008 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

NOTICES Disclaimers The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. Citation of manufacturer s or trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use thereof. Destroy this report when it is no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator.

Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 ARL-TN-337 December 2008 Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft Brian Porter and Gary Haas Vehicle Technology Directorate, ARL Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) December 2008 2. REPORT TYPE Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) July 2007 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Brian Porter and Gary Haas 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 1L162618AH80 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Research Laboratory ATTN: AMSRD-ARL-VT-UV Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER ARL-TN-337 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT In quest of weight savings, several modifications were made to a Joker model unmanned rotorcraft. Battery power for various subsystems was consolidated in a custom box, and smaller gauge wiring was substituted for the original. The results included a 17% increase in flight time as well as logistics benefits from fewer batteries to be recharged. 15. SUBJECT TERMS unmanned aerial vehicle, power distribution system, flight time extension, battery consolidation, airframe weight reduction 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT UNCLASSIFIED b. ABSTRACT UNCLASSIFIED c. THIS PAGE UNCLASSIFIED 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UL 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 12 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Brian Porter 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) 410-278-8866 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18 ii

Contents List of Figures List of Tables iv iv 1. Background 1 2. Objective 1 3. Weight Reduction Modifications 2 4. Results 4 Distribution List 5 iii

List of Figures Figure 1. The original configuration, shown on the left, uses a dedicated battery for each component. The new configuration, shown on the right, uses a single battery operating through voltage regulators to power all components....2 Figure 2. The three original batteries, in yellow weigh 31.7 oz. The single battery of the new configuration, in white, weighs 12.7 oz....3 Figure 3. The original configuration is shown on the left. A third battery on the other side of the original electronics box is not visible here. The new configuration with a power distribution box is shown on the right...3 Figure 4. CG is shifted ~1.75 in forward....4 List of Tables Table 1. Battery energy and weight....2 iv

1. Background The Unmanned Vehicle Technologies (UVT) Branch of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory Vehicle Technology Directorate participated in testing at Redstone Arsenal, AL, with the aim to assess the capability to detect and track small threat unmanned air systems, in collaboration with personnel of Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) and the National Ground Intelligence Center. UVT provided a Joker unmanned rotorcraft, built by Neural Robotics, Incorporated, augmented by additional sensors and apparatus for wireless data collection and download. The Joker is a 3.5-hp electric drive helicopter powered by two 18-V, 8000-mAh lithium polymer battery packs. It has a 1650-mm main rotor diameter. The aircraft was originally designed as an aerial photography platform, but due to its inherent stability, it is being used for several different research areas such as autopilot research. AMRDEC had requested the longest possible flight time with the additional payload, and UVT responded with the effort described herein. 2. Objective The major objective of the effort was to reduce the weight of the craft. Weight in a rotorcraft directly affects the power required to keep the craft airborne, which, in turn, affects the energy required from the battery. A secondary objective was to adjust the center of gravity (CG) of the craft. The power reduction from a shift in vehicle CG is twofold. The primary benefit comes from the rotorcraft expending less thrust by decreasing the main rotor moment arm about the CG. The secondary effect is derived from the drag profile of the rotor disk. At a larger CG offset, the rotor tip-path-plane has a larger cross section against the forward wind generating more drag. With a CG located closer to the rotor shaft, the main rotor does not need to tip as far forward to generate the desired moment balance about the CG. A lower drag profile thus requires less power to move the vehicle forward. Another objective was to reduce the effort required of the one-man ground crew and the turnaround time on the ground. 1

3. Weight Reduction Modifications The unmodified Joker uses three separate batteries for the electronics as well as two batteries which power the rotor/drive system. The three batteries are dedicated to one electronic element, with the native 11.2 V of the battery regulated to the voltage required by the component. The batteries are mounted along with electronics in a box mounted between the landing rails, underneath the airframe. For the Redstone test, three additional electronic elements were to be added. To prevent a weight gain, it was decided that a power distribution system, based on a single battery supplying power conditioned by voltage regulators, would be built to serve all the electronics. The single, 3800-mAh battery weighs 12.7 oz, compared to the total 31.7 oz of the three individual batteries of the original configuration. The additional electronics and housing add 9.5 oz, so the net gain over the stock configuration is 9.5 oz (see table 1 and figures 1 and 2). The components and the batteries were packaged in an auxiliary box mounted to the front of the existing Joker electronics box, as shown in figure 3. Additional weight savings were realized by reducing the wire gauge of conductors in the original electronics box, from 12- to 18-gauge multistrand wire. This weight savings was not measured. Table 1. Battery energy and weight. Load Voltage (V) Battery Energy (mah) Battery Weight (oz) 5 1100 5.9 9 3800 13.1 12 2200 12.7 Multiple 3800 12.7 11.1 Volt 1100 2200Mah mah Li-Po Battery 11.1 Volt 3800 2200Mah mah Li-Po Battery 11.1 Volt 2200Mah mah Li-Po Battery 5 Volt Regulator 9 Volt Regulator 12 Volt Regulator Onboard GPS W/5 Volt regulator Onboard Auto-pilot W/9Volt regulator Onboard Serial modem W/12Volt Regulator 11.1 Volt 3800 mah Mah Li-Po Battery Onboard GPS Secondary GPS Onboard auto-pilot Secondary auto-pilot for data recording Onboard Serial modem Secondary Serial Modem Figure 1. The original configuration, shown on the left, uses a dedicated battery for each component. The new configuration, shown on the right, uses a single battery operating through voltage regulators to power all components. 2

Figure 2. The three original batteries, in yellow weigh 31.7 oz. The single battery of the new configuration, in white, weighs 12.7 oz. Batteries Distribution box Figure 3. The original configuration is shown on the left. A third battery on the other side of the original electronics box is not visible here. The new configuration with a power distribution box is shown on the right. 3

4. Results With the creation of the power distribution box, the weight of the aircraft (electronics [including special electronics for the test] and batteries) was trimmed by 9.5 oz from the 19.85 lb of the unmodified aircraft, for a reduction of roughly 3%. With the mass of the battery at its new location forward on the airframe, the CG was shifted to a better point directly below the rotor shaft, as shown in figure 4. Center of gravity after modification Original center of gravity Figure 4. CG is shifted ~1.75 in forward. The cumulative effect of the changes is evident in an increase in flight time from 12.4 min to 14.5 min, or 17%. The dramatic improvement in performance from the slight weight reduction can be attributed to the weight loss combined with the relocation of the CG. An additional benefit of the new power distribution box is that only one battery, rather than three, needs to be charged by the ground crew, reducing the time to swap batteries and the number of chargers in the field. One charge typically lasts three flights. 4

NO. OF COPIES ORGANIZATION 1 DEFENSE TECHNICAL (PDF INFORMATION CTR only) DTIC OCA 8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 0944 FORT BELVOIR VA 22060-6218 1 DIRECTOR US ARMY RESEARCH LAB IMNE ALC IMS 2800 POWDER MILL RD ADELPHI MD 20783-1197 1 DIRECTOR US ARMY RESEARCH LAB AMSRD ARL CI OK TL 2800 POWDER MILL RD ADELPHI MD 20783-1197 1 DIRECTOR US ARMY RESEARCH LAB AMSRD ARL CI OK PE 2800 POWDER MILL RD ADELPHI MD 20783-1197 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND 1 DIR USARL AMSRD ARL CI OK TP (BLDG 4600) 5

NO. OF COPIES ORGANIZATION 1 CMDR US ARMY RDECOM AVIATION & MISSILE RDEC AMSRD AMR AS CC CO J BAEDER REDSTONE ARSENAL AL 35898-5000 6