Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont. Rhode Island DOT

Similar documents
MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

PRESERVATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE. Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Meeting Portsmouth, NH November 8-10, 2010

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. ASCE Conference Wyndham Hotel North Little Rock Thursday, October 16, 2014

HMA Thin Lifts for Pavement Preservation in Tennessee

Recommended Transportation. Capital Improvement Program

If it ain t broke, don t t fix it. HMA Thin Lifts for Pavement Preservation in Tennessee 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

New Jersey Department of Transportation

New Jersey Department of Transportation

HURON COUNTY ENGINEER S OFFICE

Municipal Road and Bridge Revolving Loan Fund Program Summary Rhode Island Department of Transportation

The State of SCDOT. Presented: February 1, 2017 Secretary Christy A. Hall, P.E.

Tulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program

Western ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director

CITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE

Corridor Sketch Summary

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

ANNUAL VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL

APPENDIX G. Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change Analysis

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS July 2002

Kentucky Highway District 6

SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

Maintaining Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity

Columbia County Road Department. Department Presentation June, 2013 By David Hill

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Lapeer County

PORTS-TO-PLAINS. Corridor Planning. Ports-to-Plains Stakeholder Meeting

January 13, 2012 AACE Annual Meeting, Wickenburg, AZ. I-15 in Arizona. Its Past, Present, and Future

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS. Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016

I.D.O.T. Update Version -

Transportation. Background. Transportation Planning Goals. Level of Service Analysis 5-1

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Ultra-thin Bonded Wearing Course Performance Update, Minnesota

Control of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas

RE: S.P (T.H. 210) in Crow Wing County Located on T.H. 210 from Brainerd (R.P ) to Ironton (R.P )

CAPITAL FUND 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS

MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications

Revised Evaluation Scores. System Preservation

Alberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn

Lowering Pavement Evaluation Costs Using Big Data

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Rotary Club of Stuttgart Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Smoothness Specification Update

EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION Howell Ferry Road Duluth, Gwinnett County, Georgia. WILLMER ENGINEERING INC. Willmer Project No

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Understanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois

Director s Message. July 3, Nazario Sauceda Director Bureau of Street Services

RhodeWorks Initiative

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

Pole Mounted Speed Display Pilot Program Study. January, 2016

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Pavement Management Program Report

Pavement Management Plan

The Status of Transportation Funding, Road Charge and Vehicle Miles Traveled in California

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Purpose and Need Report

City of Freeport Water & Sewer Capital Improvement Program FY2019-FY2024

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Public Information Packet FY Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

Pavement Thickness Design Parameter Impacts

Kentucky Highway District 1

2018 NACE Conference Wisconsin Dells, WI. Joseph Cheung P.E. FHWA Office of Safety

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan -- Table XVII-1

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

January * Kansas Stats/ Rankings. * Accident Stats

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

East Kings Highway and Roberts Avenue Speed Hump Analysis

June WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program Seattle, Washington

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Current Corridor Characteristics. MN 62 Corridor Performance

Successful Revenue Generators for Pavement Management and Pavement Preservation

DRAFT Subject to modifications

1 TO 2 2 TO 3 3 TO 4 11 TO TO 1

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Location Tool and Visualization Map

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision. Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Click to edit Master title style

Innovative Warm Mix Asphalt Projects: The Contractor s Perspective

Goods Movement Plans. Summary of Needs Assessments. January 21, 2015 GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 6

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

High Risk Rural Road Program Road Safety Audit Report

Richmond Area MPO Regional Priority Transportation Projects

2017 Jefferson County Outreach Jefferson County Maintenance. Matthew Burkett ~ Jefferson County Maintenance Manager

Transcription:

Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont Rhode Island DOT April 8, 2014 SHRP2 R26 (Preservation of High-Traffic Volume Roadways) and MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management David E. Capalbo, P.E.

SHRP2 R26

SHRP2 R26 Implementation Assistance Program Preservation Projects Rhode Island DOT (Lead Adopter) Colin A. Franco, P.E. (colin.franco@dot.ri.gov) Jose Lima (jose.lima@dot.ri.gov) Participation Summary (4 Projects) Crack Seal Rubber Chip Seal SAMI Chip Seal Thin HMA Overlay

SHRP2 R26 Implementation Assistance Program Preservation Projects Project ID, Highway Route & Treatment Location (City/Town, County, Milepost, Direction) Time of Treatment Application Facility Type & Number of Lanes 2-Way Average Annual Daily Traffic (2009) and % Trucks Project Details (Treatment Description, Material Type, Application Thickness and Method/Equip, Test Section Length, Existing Pavement Type/Condition (1) I-95 Crack Seal Hopkinton and Richmond (Washington County), from Connecticut State Line to Exit 4, both directions May to July 2014 Urban Interstate 4 lanes 23,100 4.9% The work includes cleaning, sealing, and filling cracks and open joints across all existing pavement. Also included in the work shall be maintenance and protection of traffic and public access, and final sweeping of each roadway segment for 9.4 miles. (2) SR 102 Rubber Chip Seal Exeter (Washington County), from Pole 38 to Wheeler Lane, both directions May to July 2014 Rural Collector 2 lanes 10,200 2.8% The project involves grinding existing epoxy pavement markings, applying new water based pavement markings, spot leveling with HMA to restore road profile, applying a ½ thick 20% rubberized asphalt chip seal, sweeping and restriping with epoxy pavement markings. The chip seal treatment will be applied from edge to edge for 2.6 miles.

SHRP2 R26 Implementation Assistance Program Preservation Projects Project ID, Highway Route & Treatment Location (City/Town, County, Milepost, Direction) Time of Treatment Application Facility Type & Number of Lanes 2-Way Average Annual Daily Traffic (2009) and % Trucks Project Details (Treatment Description, Material Type, Application Thickness and Method/Equip, Test Section Length, Existing Pavement Type/Condition (3) SR 3 SAMI Chip Seal West Greenwich and Coventry (Kent County), from I-95 to SR 118, both directions May to July 2014 Rural Collector 5 lanes 16,200 2.8% The work includes sweeping, 1-1/2 mircomilling of bituminous pavement, leveling, and application of 3/8 thick 20% rubber asphalt chip seal and overlay with 1 thick paver placed polymer/rubber modified elastomeric surface treatment (PPEST). Also included in the work shall be maintenance and protection of traffic, adjustment of all structures and restriping for 1.2 miles. (4) SR 114 Thin HMA Overlay East Providence (Providence County), from SR 1A to SR 152, both directions May to July 2014 Urban Arterial 4 lanes 10,900 4.8% The work includes sweeping, 1 mircomilling of bituminous pavement, leveling, and placement of 1 thick PPEST. Also included in the work shall be maintenance and protection of traffic, adjustment of all structures and restriping for 0.5 miles.

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management MAP 21 (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century) National Highway System (NHS).vs. Remaining Roads NHS includes Interstates, Limited Access Highways and Principal Arterials Remaining State roads includes Minor Arterials, Collectors and Locals National Performance Standards for NHS International Roughness Index (IRI) for Interstates will be set in Summer 2014 Pavement Structural Health Index (PSHI) for remaining NHS roads will be set in Summer 2015 Rhode Island ranks 49 th in nation (2010 Reason Foundation) RIDOT goals to be approved by FHWA Funding penalties of up to 35% if goals are not met

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management Pavement Structural Health Index (PSHI) Original PCI equation =0.10IRI+0.15Delam+0.10Rut+0.20Allig+0.15Block+0.10Long+0.10Trans+0.05Ege+0.05Bleed Current PSHI equation* =0.30IRI+0.20Delam+0.10Rut+0.16Allig+0.10Block+0.07Long+0.07Trans *Developed in 2013 and implemented for 2012 data Scores were modified for IRI and rutting in 2013, and will be adjusted for sealed cracks in 2014

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management Centerline Miles of Roads in Rhode Island Total NHS Non-NHS Eligible for Federal Funds Not Eligible for Federal Funds RIDOT 1099 523 510 66 Municipal 5275 38 663 4574 Others* 106 3 6 97 Total 6480 564 1179 4737 *Includes RITBA, State Colleges, Military, FWS, BIA, Narragansett Indian Tribe, QPD, DOA, DEM and Airports

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management Condition of RIDOT Roads 2012 PSHI 2023 PSHI Goals Good (PSHI >80) 59.6% 70.0% Fair (PSHI 70-80) 23.2% 25.0% Poor (PSHI <70) 17.2% 5.0%

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management Annual Construction Funds to Reach 10 Year Goals 2012 PSHI 2023 PSHI Goal Annual Funds Needed to Meet 10 Year Goal Current Annual Funding 2023 PSHI Results with Current Annual Funding NHS Interstate 71 miles 100.0 Good 0.0 Fair 0.0 Poor 100.0 Good 0.0 Fair 0.0 Poor $ 9,000,000 $ 9,000,000 100.0 Good 0.0 Fair 0.0 Poor NHS Limited Access (RIDOT & RITBA) 86 miles 74.5 Good 16.7 Fair 8.8 Poor 100.0 Good 0.0 Fair 0.0 Poor $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 100.0 Good 0.0 Fair 0.0 Poor NHS Principal Arterials (RIDOT, RITBA & Municipal) 415 miles 49.4 Good 27.8 Fair 22.7 Poor 76.0 Good 20.0 Fair 4.0 Poor $ 36,000,000 $ 27,000,000 70.6 Good 22.3 Fair 7.1 Poor Remaining RIDOT Roads 576 miles 56.3 Good 24.6 Fair 63.0 Good 32.0 Fair $ 25,000,000 $ 4,000,000 29.4 Good 45.3 Fair 19.1 Poor 5.0 Poor 25.3 Poor Municipal/Other Roads Eligible for Federal Funds 669 miles $ 5,000,000 $ 3,000,000 All Roads 1099 miles RIDOT 710 miles Municipal & Other $ 83,000,000 $ 51,000,000

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management Annual Construction Funds Breakdown Crack/Chip Seal Resurface Reclaim Reconstruct NHS $ 1,500,000 $ 37,000,000 $ 250,000 $ 5,000,000 Other State Roads $ 500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 Municipal Roads $ 0 $ 3,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 Total for $51 million $ 2,000,000 $ 43,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 5,500,000 NHS $ 1,500,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 5,000,000 Other State Roads $ 3,500,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,000,000 Municipal Roads $ 0 $ 5,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 Total for $83 million $ 5,000,000 $ 70,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 7,000,000

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management Annual Construction Centerline Mileage Breakdown Crack/Chip Seal Resurface Reclaim Reconstruct NHS 44.2 35.1 0.3 1.2 Other State Roads 4.1 6.6 0.3 0.1 Municipal Roads 0 3.0 0 0 Total for $51 million 48.3 44.7 0.6 1.3 NHS 44.2 38.1 0.3 1.2 Other State Roads 64.1 34.4 1.2 2.5 Municipal Roads 0 5.0 0 0 Total for $83 million 108.3 77.5 1.5 3.7

MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management Challenges to Reach 10 Year Goal Current funding of $51 million/yr targeted to previously selected roads in TIP Additional $32 million/yr needed (63% increase) Flexibility in project selection (Right treatment, to the right pavement, at the right time) Municipal roads on NHS and others eligible for Federal funding Environmental permitting challenges Justice Department s clarification on ADA Utility company work within State right-of-way

Questions?