Traffic Counts

Similar documents
Project Manager: Neil Beckett. Prepared by: Bernadette Bañez. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett. Approved for issue by: David Darwin

Prepared by: Bernadette Bañez. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett/Philp Blagdon. Approved for issue by: David Darwin

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

DEVELOPING A RISK PREDICTION MODEL FOR A SAFE SYSTEM SIGNATURE PROJECT

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

Northwest Territories Highway Traffic, 2007

WIM #48 is located on CSAH 5 near Storden in Cottonwood county.

Expansion Projects Description

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t Decembe r 2013 Page 1

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

6. Strategic Screenlines

Young drivers. Drivers involved in fatal or injury crashes. Drivers involved in fatal/injury crashes per 100. per licence holders (lines)

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT

Traffic Monitoring Report 2017

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

briefing notes road safety issues

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

City of Lethbridge ELECTRIC UTILITY. Electric Distribution Tariff Rate Schedule

Trip and Parking Generation Study of the Peaks Ice Arena

WIM #29 was operational for the entire month of October Volume was computed using all monthly data.

Traffic Monitoring Report 2016

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT OFF-ROAD FORKLIFT COMPONENT

New Zealand Transport Outlook. VKT/Vehicle Numbers Model. November 2017

M6 TOLL TRAFFIC MONITORING STUDY

2016 Traffic Signal System Performance Metrics Update Kumar Neppalli, Traffic Engineering, Public Works John Richardson, Planning and Sustainability

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

MISO Generation Fuel Mix Report Readers' Guide. Last Updated: 28 June 2015 Version: 1.0

Portland General Electric Company Fourteenth Revision of Sheet No P.U.C. Oregon No. E-18 Canceling Thirteenth Revision of Sheet No.

Deriving Background Concentrations of NOx and NO 2 April 2016 Update

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VICDOM BROCK ROAD PIT EXPANSION

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material images contained in the material are not copied

2012 Water Consumption Statistics Report. Water Services Department

WIM #40 is located on US 52 near South St. Paul in Dakota county.

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t July Page 1

Michigan. Traffic. Profile

Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 7/31/2013

Portland General Electric Company Eleventh Revision of Sheet No. 7-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-18 Canceling Tenth Revision of Sheet No.

VALIDATION OF A VEHICLE EMISSION MODEL USING ON-ROAD EMISSION MEASUREMENTS

2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT. CAPITAL and METRO LINES

STANDBY SERVICE. Transmission Service Primary Service Secondary Service

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t Au gust Page 1

Black Employm ent an d Unemploymen t Ap ril Page 1

WIM #39 MN 43, MP 45.2 WINONA, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

TMH 8. Traffic and Axle Load Monitoring Procedures

1 On Time Performance

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL PUMP ENGINE COMPONENT

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project: HERE, INRIX and TOMTOM Data Validation. Report for North Carolina (#08) I-240, I-40 and I-26

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

STOR Market Information Report TR27

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

9A Hours of Work Motor Transport

CAPTURING THE SENSITIVITY OF TRANSIT BUS EMISSIONS TO CONGESTION, GRADE, PASSENGER LOADING, AND FUELS

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LOAD EXPERIENCE OF A HIGHWAY AS CONTRIBUTED BY CARGO VEHICLES

Michigan. Traffic. Profile

Unemployment Rates - November 2011

Reducing Speed Limits to Support Lower Skid Resistance Investigatory Levels. Fergus Tate National Traffic and Safety Manager NZTA

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

D.P.U A Appendix B 220 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

February 2012 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts Key Findings

Trip and Parking Generation Data Collection at Grocery Store with Gas Station and Auto Repair

Driver Speed Compliance in Western Australia. Tony Radalj and Brian Kidd Main Roads Western Australia

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

SCC Greenhouse Gas Assessment

THE DAMAGING EFFECT OF SUPER SINGLES ON PAVEMENTS

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Unemployment Rates January 2011

Credit gained for a standard may be used only once to meet the requirements of this qualification.

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

VEPM 5.3. Vehicle Emission Prediction Model update: Technical report. Prepared for NZ Transport Agency. April 2017

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project: HERE, INRIX and TOMTOM Data Validation

Transcription:

www.trafficcounts.co.nz

www.trafficcounts.co.nz Quality Assurance Information Prepared for: Job Number: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Abley Limited 0000 Shane Ingley, Transportation Engineer Courtney Groundwater, Senior Transportation Engineer Date issued Status Approved by Name 30 May 2014 Final Steve Abley 17 December 2015 Final Revised Website Steve Abley 19 January 2016 Final Revision 1 Paul Durdin Reformat Nichola Blue This document has been produced for the sole use of our client. Any use of this document by a third party is without liability and you should seek independent traffic and transportation advice. No part of this document may be copied without the written consent of either our client or Abley Ltd. Please refer to http://www.abley.com/output-terms-and-conditions-1-0/ for our output terms and conditions. 2

Contents 1. Map data 1 2. Helpful definitions 2 3. Data sources and notes 3 4. Spatial quality 4 5. Terms and conditions 5 6. Contact Us 6 Appendix A: Spatial Data Quality 7 Appendix B: Data Explanation 9 i

1. Map data This website provides traffic count data from multiple sources across New Zealand. This website will be of use to transport professionals and any other users who wish to access traffic count data spatially in a centralised location. We recommend that the latest version of Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome is used to view the website. The count data currently provided on the website is sourced from: New Zealand Transport Agency Auckland Transport Tauranga City Council Hamilton City Council New Plymouth District Council Queenstown Lakes District Council The data provided by each authority differs. All of the relevant data can be accessed in a pop-up window when clicking on a data point. The range of data provided varies between sources. The information available includes: 5-Day ADT 7-Day ADT % HCV Total A grey data point is displayed where the relevant data is not included in the received dataset. 1

2. Helpful definitions 7-day ADT and 5-day ADT These are raw average daily traffic (ADT) counts across either a Monday-Friday (5-day) or Monday-Sunday (7-day) period. Generally these are obtained by local authorities from a traffic count survey of a fixed period and are not adjusted for seasonal and daily variations AADT Annual average daily traffic (AADT) represents a 7-day average traffic volume adjusted for seasonal variations 1. On the website AADT figures are displayed in the 7-day ADT layer for ease of comparison between count sites. AADT figures are reported separately in the individual pop-up boxes for each count site. AADT figures are generally provided for State Highway count sites only. % HCV Total This is the sum of %MCV, % HCV I and % HCV II 2. This represents vehicles with a mass greater than 3.5 tonnes and is consistent with the %Heavy Vehicles reported in the NZ Transport Agency State Highway Traffic Data Booklets. 1 Transit NZ (1994) A guide on estimating AADT and traffic growth, and a traffic count monitoring programme basis. Retrieved from http://www.lpcb.org/index.php/documents/data-collection/traffic-and-weigh-in-motion/11027-2000-nz-guide-to-estimation-and-monitoring-of-traffic-counting-andtraffic-growth/file 2 To align with the NZTA definition of Heavy as being a vehicle greater that 3.5 tonnes: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/state-highway-trafficvolumes/docs/shtv-2010-2014.pdf 2

3. Data sources and notes New Zealand Transport Agency Data available at http://nzta.govt.nz/resources/state-highway-traffic-volumes/ 3 Auckland Transport Data available at https://at.govt.nz/about-us/reports-publications/traffic-counts/ 4 Please note that the most recent count data on the AT website is not yet included in www.trafficcounts.co.nz This will be incorporated shortly. Tauranga City Council Sourced directly from Tauranga City Council. Two data sets; recent and historic, were provided. The historic data set is shown in grey on the web map. Data for individual points can be accesses in the same way as for the recent data set by clicking on the point of interest. Where recent and historic points are in the same location, data can be accessed by scrolling through the pop-up boxes using the arrows at the top right of the box. Hamilton City Council Sourced directly from Hamilton City Council, some data available at http://www.hamilton.govt.nz/ourservices/transport/maintainingimproving/pages/traffic-counts.aspx 5 Please note, Hamilton City Council states: data has been derived from limited counting data and is an estimate only of the average daily traffic for each year. The 2014 count type is identified for each data point as programmed (actual count) or interpolated (estimate only). New Plymouth District Council Sourced directly from New Plymouth District Council, some data available at http://www.newplymouthnz.com/councilatoz/roads/trafficcounts.htm [6]. Counts classified as not latest in the New Plymouth dataset (see link above) have been moved to a historic database, similar to the Tauranga City Council counts. Queenstown Lakes District Council Counts sourced directly from Queenstown Lakes District Council http://www.qldc.govt.nz/ Historic data For some Road Controlling Authorities historic data sets, or count sites that do not include the latest information are included on the website. This is data is included for interest only but is not shown in colour when the Symbolise by options are chosen. Historic data can be viewed in the same way as for current data points by selecting the count site on the map and viewing the information in the pop-up box. 3 http://nzta.govt.nz/resources/state-highway-traffic-volumes/ 4 https://at.govt.nz/about-us/reports-publications/traffic-counts/ 5 http://www.hamilton.govt.nz/our-services/transport/maintainingimproving/pages/traffic-counts.aspx [6] http://www.newplymouthnz.com/councilatoz/roads/trafficcounts.htm 3

4. Spatial quality Where coordinates for traffic count sites are not included in the available data set a georeferencing process has been undertaken. This process varies between sources. Accuracy of the count site location (spatial quality) is dependent on the location information included in the dataset. Spatial quality is categorised using a scale from A (most accurate) to E (least accurate), see Appendix A. For some sites the quality of spatial information is not sufficient to include them on the web site. Please Note: Differences in spatial quality do not imply a difference in the quality of the traffic count data. Despite our best efforts to ensure that traffic count sites are located in the correct locations Abley cannot guarantee that sites are shown in the correct position. Location descriptions within the pop-up should always be double checked before use. If you find a site that is located incorrectly, please use the Report Traffic Count as inaccurate button in the pop-up and include a brief description of the problem. This will allow us to fix these errors and improve the data. The Type of Locator attribute in the pop-up provides an indication of the spatial accuracy of the data. New Zealand Transport Agency Data located based on the State Highway RS/RP values, using Esri s Linear Referencing toolkit 7 and the Auckland Motorways LRMS site. Auckland Transport Data located from the traffic count site description fields using a variety of methods. Data that could not be located this way was manually processed. Please note, following the amalgamation of Auckland s seven district councils into a single authority there are multiple streets with the same name in the district. This may have resulted in some errors in the electronic location of traffic count sites and should be checked in the pop-up before use. Tauranga City Council Data provided in a georeferenced format (NZTM X and Y coordinates). Hamilton City Council Data provided in a spreadsheet with a corresponding map. Traffic count sites were manually located using this information. New Plymouth District Council Data provided in a spatial (Esri Shapefile) format. Queenstown Lakes District Council Data provided in a spatial (Esri Shapefile) format. 7 http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//003m00000002000000 4

5. Terms and conditions Abley does not accept any responsibility regarding the traffic count information that has been sourced and adapted from the sources listed in Section 3. The terms of use for the Auckland Transport data are as follows: While all due care has been taken in the preparation and provision of this service, Auckland Transport does not give any warranty that the information contained is accurate, and accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the use of the data. People using the traffic count data should apply and rely upon their own skill and judgement when using the information, and consider the consequences arising from its use. The data should not be used in isolation from other sources of advice and information. Please note that traffic flow counts are variable due to various external factors, e.g. sensitivity of equipment, counting methods used, congestion effects and seasonal variations. The traffic flow data is intended to be used as an approximate indication of traffic volumes at counting sites. 5

6. Contact Us If you have a dataset that you would like to add to this website please get in contact using the details below. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact us: Abley Limited Phone: 03 377 4703 Email: trafficcounts@abley.com 6

Appendix A: Spatial Data Quality Count sites were spatially located, using different methods depending on the type and quality of data received. Sites are ranked A through F as an indicator of the spatial quality of the location. The location quality is specified in popups, under Type of Locator. Differences in spatial quality do not imply a difference in the quality of the traffic count data. Spatial Quality Description Spatial Accuracy Example A Coded outside an address or at a specified offset from an intersection Very high An address is identified in the site description. The address is stripped of flat numbers (so 54/2, 54-2 and 54B all become 54). If the address number cannot be located it is rounded down to the nearest whole ten number (so 54 becomes 50) and is re- checked. If matches are found the count site point is placed on the corresponding address. B Halfway between two cross-streets High, as the traffic flow will not change greatly between the cross-streets No address is identifiable but the main street and the two cross streets are identified. The count site is placed on the main street halfway between the two cross streets. This can only occur if the main street intersects the cross streets. C Midway along a street < 1km long Within 500m depending on the road length and number of cross streets. No address or intersection with cross streets is identified and the main road is less than 1km long. The count site is placed midway along the road. D Midway along a street > 1km long and < 3km long Within 1500m depending on the road length and number of cross streets No address or intersection with cross streets is identified, and the main road is between 1 and 3km long. The count site is placed midway along the road. E Midway along a street > 3km long Variable depending on the road length and number of cross streets. No address or intersection with cross streets is identified, and the main road is greater than 3km long. The count site is placed midway along the road. F Sites not located N/A Sites which have not been located within a reasonable degree of accuracy are not shown in the website. Manually Located Sites: The majority of the count sites were located automatically; however, some were located manually. These sites can be identified with an M after the spatial quality code. 7

For example, a site manually located at an address would have a spatial quality of AM. 8

Appendix B: Data Explanation Information provided for each site is slightly different depending on the level of detail of data collected at the site and the source of the data All Sources Spatial quality: (described in detail in Appendix A) Auckland Transport Count Site (definitions sourced from Auckland Transport): Description: the exact location of where on the road that the traffic count was placed Direction: movement direction of vehicles included in count Road Name: the road the traffic count was carried out on Displacement: distance from indicated cross-road Road Start Name: first cross-road Road End Name: second cross-road Start Date: the date that the 7 day count started 5-Day ADT: the Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) based on a Monday Friday week 7-Day ADT: the Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) based on a Monday Sunday week Saturday: the total number of vehicles that were counted on Saturday Sunday: the total number of vehicles that were counted on Sunday AM Peak: the volume of traffic counted in the morning peak hour AM Peak Hour: time of day of morning peak Mid Peak: the volume of traffic counted in the midday peak hour Mid Peak Hour: time of day of midday peak PM Peak: the volume of traffic counted in the afternoon peak hour PM Peak Hour: time of day of afternoon peak Car %: percentage of vehicles that were cars LCV %: percentage of vehicles that were LCVs MCV %: percentage of vehicles that were MCVs HCV I %: percentage of vehicles that were HCV I HCV II %: percentage of vehicles that were HCV II HCV Total %: sum of HCV I and HCV II 8 8 Through the data cleaning process it was discovered that the HCV Total % field in the Auckland Transport data is not calculated using a consistent method across all sites. This has been corrected on TrafficCounts.co.nz. The method used to calculate HCV total on this website is consistent with the definitions of HCV in the New Zealand Transport Agency s Traffic Monitoring for State Highways Manual, see http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/traffic-monitoring-statehways/traffic-monitoring-state-hways.html. 9

NZ Transport Agency Count Site (definitions sourced from the NZ Transport Agency): Description: the traffic count site location description Direction: the direction that the count site records (increasing, decreasing or both) State Highway (SH): the State Highway on which the site is located Reference Station (RS): fixed points on the state highway Route Position (RP): the distance from the last reference station (RS) to the specific location in kilometres Equipment: the primary equipment type being used to collect traffic data at the specific location AADT: See Helpful Definitions above % Heavy: an estimate of the proportion of the AADT which is deemed a heavy vehicle: i.e. greater than 3.5 tonnes for the current year (equivalent to HCV Total %) Accepted Days: the number of days for which valid traffic counts were accepted at the specific location during the year Tauranga City Council Count Site Site Number: Site identification number Road Name: The road the traffic count was carried out on Site Description: Site location Date: Count Date 7 Day: the Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) based on a Monday Sunday week 5 Day: the Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) based on a Monday Friday week Tauranga City Council (Historic) Count Site Site Number: Site identification number Old Site Number: Road Name: The road the traffic count was carried out on Site Description: Site location Date: Count Date 7 Day: the Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) based on a Monday Sunday week 5 Day: the Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) based on a Monday Friday week Peak Hour: Hour showing highest traffic volume (24-hr time) Peak Volume: Traffic volume during peak hour HCV: Percentage of vehicles classified as heavy 85 th %ile Speed (kph): 85 th percentile of vehicle speeds Hamilton City Council Count Site Site Reference: Site identification number Description: Site location (Year) ADT: an estimation of the average daily traffic during a specified calendar year. 10

(Year) Count Type: Count mechanism. Refer to Hamilton City Council s website 9 for further details. New Plymouth District Council & NPDC (Historic) Count Site Road Name: Road count was taken on Location: Site location Is Latest?: Whether site has a more recent count Count Date: Date of traffic count Direction: Direction of traffic count Peak Traffic: Traffic volume during peak hour Peak Hour: Hour showing highest traffic volume (24-hr time) ADT: Average daily traffic during count Queenstown Lakes District Council Count Site Road Name: Name of survey road Displacement: Offset from side road Count Date: Date of survey Count Type: Count mechanism Survey Type: Further details, for some count types only Peak Hour: Hour of peak traffic movement ADT: 7Average Daily Traffic (equivalent to 7-day ADT) Peak Traffic: Volume of traffic at peak hour % Car: Percentage of vehicles classified as cars % LCV: Percentage of vehicles classified as LCV % MCV: Percentage of vehicles classified as MCV % HCV I: Percentage of vehicles classified as HCV I % HCV II: Percentage of vehicles classified as HCV II % Bus: Percentage of vehicles that are buses % Heavy: Percentage of vehicles classified as heavy 10 9 http://www.hamilton.govt.nz/our-services/transport/maintainingimproving/pages/traffic-counts.aspx 10 This was originally the sum of MCV, HCV I, and HCV II. This has been re-adjusted to be the sum of HCV I and HCV II, in order to align the data with the NZTA definition of Heavy. 11

T +64 9 486 0898 (Akld) T +64 3 377 4703 (Chch) F +64 3 377 4700 E office@abley.com Auckland Level 8, 57 Fort Street PO Box 911336 Auckland 1142 New Zealand Christchurch Level 1, 137 Victoria Street PO Box 25350 Christchurch 8144 New Zealand www.abley.com