VOTRAN & the Volusia TPO Transit Development Plan (FY2012 FY2021) & Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan ( )

Similar documents
A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

An Overview of Transportation Responsibility

A Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #10

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

SPARTA Ridership Satisfaction Study

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Click to edit Master title style

1 Have you used Sun Trolley (which also includes Riverwalk Trolley)? Yes (Go to Question #2) No (Go to Question #10)

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Draft Results and Recommendations

Draft Results and Open House

2019 New Transit Service Plan

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

Proposal 145: Transit Referendum

April 2010 April 2010 Presented by Alan Eirls

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Shared mobility as an equity strategy: local and global context. Cassie Halls, Program Coordinator

NEXT. Powered by Qualtrics. 10/3/2018 Potholes & politics

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

Marion County s Nov Transit Referendum

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry

Technical Advisory Committee

Proposed Service Plan

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Oakland County Board of Commissioners General Government Committee April 23, SMART Services in Oakland County

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TAXICAB OPERATIONS HERALD HENSLEY DIRECTOR OF PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

The Smart Growth Countywide Transit Master Plan

Executive Summary October 2013

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility

Treasure Island Toll Policy, Affordability and Transit Pass Programs. TIMMA Board Meeting December 11, 2018

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

Regional Priority Ranking Recommendations for WSDOT Consolidated Grant Program

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

Travel to Work Survey 2018

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

April 2011 April 2011 Presented by Robert Spaulding & Alan Eirls

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Results from the North American E-bike Owner Survey

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

7 Mass Transit. 7.1 Existing Conditions. 7.2 Transit

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Project Summary Table

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview

METRO TRANSIT a n n ua l re p o r t. madison, wisconsin // mymetrobus.com

Volusia County DUI Court Daytona Beach, FL

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview July 2017

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

DART Capital Program Update

El Metro Operations Proposed FY Budget

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Martha s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Tarrant County Projected Population Growth

Blue Ribbon Committee

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

What is the Connector?

Opportunities to Leverage Advances in Driverless Car Technology to Evolve Conventional Bus Transit Systems

Wherever Your Path May Lead. RTS Takes You There! Citizen s Academy April 2017

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan Planning the Future of Transit in Our Region

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD E- BIKES: A REVIEW OF THREE STUDIES IN NORTH AMERICA

Transportation Demand Management Element

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Needs and Community Characteristics

MILWAUKEE COUNTY TRANSIT SYSTEM 2011 ANNUAL REPORT


ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Transcription:

VOTRAN & the Volusia TPO Transit Development Plan (FY2012 FY2021) & Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (2012-2017) Review Committee Meeting #2 May 12, 2011

VOTRAN Trends % Change (2004-2009) *Percentage changes were calculated using 2004-2009 National Transit Database data. General Performance Indicators Strengths Passenger trips: (+)6.0% Neutral Passenger fare revenue: (+)4.3% Revenue miles: (-)3.9% Challenges Total operating expense per capita (2004 $): (+)6.7% *2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 operating expenses were deflated to 2004 dollars to show the actual percentage change.

VOTRAN Trends % Change (2004-2009) *Percentage changes were calculated using 2004-2009 National Transit Database data. Service Supply, Consumption, and Quality Strengths Passenger trips per capita: (+)6.0% Passenger trips per revenue mile: (+)9.7% Passenger trips per revenue hour: (+)8.4%

VOTRAN Trends % Change (2004-2009) *Percentage changes were calculated using 2004-2009 National Transit Database data. Cost Efficiency, Operating Ratios, and Fares Neutral Revenue miles per vehicle mile: (-)2.1% Operating expense per passenger trip (2004 $): (+)0.6% Average fare: (-)2.9% Challenges Operating expense per revenue mile (2004 $): (+)11.0% Operating expense per capita (2004 $): (+)6.7% Farebox recovery: (-)16.7% *2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 operating expenses were deflated to 2004 dollars to show the actual percentage change.

VOTRAN Peers (FY 2009) Peer Selection Indicators Revenue miles Total operating expense Vehicle operated in maximum service Service area population

VOTRAN Peers (FY 2009) Capital Area Transit System (CATS) Sarasota County Area Transit (SCAT) Chatham Area Transit Authority (CAT) Lee County Transit (LeeTran) Charleston Area Regional Transportation Authority (CARTA) Pasco County Public Transportation (PCPT)

VOTRAN Peers (FY 2009) *Percentage changes were calculated using 2009 National Transit Database data. General Performance Indicators Strengths % indicates Votran s deviation from the peer group average Operating expense: (-)4.66% Passenger trips: (+)4.43% Neutral Revenue miles (+) 0.28% Vehicles operated in maximum service: (+)0.94% Passenger fare revenues (-) 1.17% Challenges Service area population density (-)82.43%

VOTRAN Peers (FY 2009) *Percentage changes were calculated using 2009 National Transit Database data. Service Supply, Consumption, and Quality Strengths % indicates Votran s deviation from the peer group average Passenger trips per revenue mile: (+)5.43% Challenges Vehicle miles per capita: (-)14.28%

VOTRAN Peers (FY 2009) *Percentage changes were calculated using 2009 National Transit Database data. Cost Efficiency and Operating Ratio Strengths % indicates Votran s deviation from the peer group average Farebox recovery: (+)4.87% Operating expense per passenger trip: (-)11.09% Operating expense per revenue mile: (-)3.60% Operating expense per service area capita: (-)20.93% Challenges Average fare: (-)3.35%

Public Involvement Review committee On-board survey Stakeholder interviews Public workshops Discussion group workshops

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Q1. Where are you coming from now? Work 19.02% Medical 2.43% Social/Personal 6.35% School 2.71% College 2.80% Recreation 2.78% Shopping/Errands 10.62% Home 47.39% Other 5.91% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 87% of respondents walked to the bus stop for the one-way trip

# of Responses On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Q3. Number of blocks walked or biked? 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 Walked Bicycled 300 200 100 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 # of Blocks Traveled to Bus Stop The majority of respondents who walked traveled 1 to 2 blocks

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Q5. Where are you going to now? Work 25.87% Medical 3.03% Social/Personal 8.67% School 3.05% College 3.78% Recreation 4.71% Shopping/Errands 15.38% Home 27.44% Other 8.07% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 77% of respondents will walk to their final destination

# of Responses On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Q7. Number of blocks walked or biked? 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 Walked Bicycled 300 200 100 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 # of Blocks Traveled from Bus Stop The majority of respondents will walk 1 to 2 blocks to their final destination

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Q8. How would you make this trip if not by bus? Drive 7.03% Taxi 8.44% Walk 24.94% Wouldn't make trip 23.72% Bicycle 9.52% VOTRAN Gold Service 2.23% Ride with someone who does not live with you 13.71% Ride with someone who does live with you 7.50% Other 2.90% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 25% of respondents would walk & 24% would not make the trip

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed 38% of respondents are long-time VOTRAN users (more than 4 years) 65% of respondents use VOTRAN 5-7 days per week 81% of respondents do not have access to a vehicle 72% of respondents are permanent residents of Volusia County

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Overall satisfaction with VOTRAN 4.10 How easy it is to transfer between buses 4.01 Your ability to get where you want to go using the bus 3.98 Safety/Security at the bus stop 3.86 Time of day the earliest buses run on weekdays 3.80 The number of times you have to transfer 3.64 Frequency of service 3.50 Time of day the latest buses fun on weekdays 3.20 Availability of Sunday service 2.59 1 2 3 4 5 Overall satisfaction with VOTRAN service was rated an average of 4.10

Age Gender Ethnicity Income On-Board Survey Under $10k $10k-$19k $20k-$29k 24.84% 17.72% 43.22% $30k-$39k 7.58% Average rider profile Age: 16-24 Female White Earning under $10,000 There is little difference between the responses in the age and gender categories 1.40% $40k-$49k $50k + White Black Hispanic Asian Other Male Female 15 or under 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 3.36% 3.29% 29.28% 7.95% 0.82% 3.32% 1.75% 22.89% 18.55% 17.75% 20.48% 13.20% 3.98% 49.59% 50.41% 58.62% 75 + 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Top 3 things liked most about riding the bus Convenience Nothing Air conditioning Top 3 things liked least about riding the bus Nothing Waiting No Sunday service

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed Q24. What is the most important reason you ride the bus? I do not have a driver's license 27.16% Car is not available all the time 23.74% Parking is too expnesive/difficult 0.86% I do not drive 19.96% VOTRAN is more convenient 9.03% VOTRAN fits my budget better 11.19% VOTRAN is safer/less stressful 2.27% Other 5.79% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Top responses included not having a driver s license, not driving, and car not available

On-Board Survey *4,752 on-board surveys were completed 84% of respondents do not find it difficult to use VOTRAN Yes 15.95% The majority of respondents prefer to receive VOTRAN information on the bus schedules or in the bus No 84.05%

Stakeholder Interviews - East Joshua Wagner Mayor Barringer Pamela Brangaccio Mayor Locke III Mayor Jennings Joyce Shanahan Ric Goss County Council City of New Smyrna Beach City of New Smyrna Beach City of South Daytona City of Daytona Beach Shores City of Ormond Beach City of Ormond Beach

Stakeholder Interviews - East Improve frequencies and fewer transfers Later evening service is needed Perception that the bus is for the transit dependent Connections to SunRail are needed VOTRAN does an effective job with the resources available Additional flex routes should be explored

Stakeholder Interviews - East Current fares are reasonable Good route system on the east side Identifying a dedicated funding source is critical Implement more trolleys to appeal to visitors and other choice riders Need to get more VOTRAN information out to the community

Stakeholder Interviews - West Andy Kelly Patricia Northey Dan Parrott Ron Paradise Mayor Strickland Jamie Croteau Alison Stettner County Council County Council City of DeBary City of Deltona Orange City Orange City Orange City

Stakeholder Interviews - West Need for multimodal center along I-4 Connections are needed to make SunRail convenient enough to avoid the car Routes and frequencies are not convenient VOTRAN is doing an effective job with the resources available Perception that the bus is for the transit dependent

Stakeholder Interviews - West Need west to east side weekend service Population is shifting to the west Additional flex routes should be explored Trash cans and shelters are needed at the bus stops The homeless are in need of transit service Land use and transit need to be linked with incentives for TOD development

Stakeholder Interviews At-Large Frank Bruno Joyce Cusack David Byron Jon Cheney George Recktenwald Jerry Britton Melissa Booker Volusia County County Council Volusia County Volusia County Volusia County Volusia County Volusia County

Stakeholder Interviews At-Large Perception that the bus is for the transit dependent No additional service is needed at this time Improve frequencies Trolley is needed from the Ocean Center to ISB The current fare seems low Smaller buses should be explored More direct route from Daytona to DeLand is needed

Stakeholder Interviews At-Large Dedicated funding is critical There is no money for road maintenance over the next 3-5 years Free parking is a deterrent More marketing is needed Land uses to promote transit should be identified earlier Trails connecting SunRail and VOTRAN should be explored A circulator connecting the colleges and the airport is needed

Public Workshops Breakout group activity results: Pursue public-private partnerships for trolley service Implement ITS to assist disabled transit users Coordinate employer vanpools Use JARC and New Freedom to increase fixed-route service and make infrastructure ADA compliant

Public Workshops Gaps and Overlaps exercise results: Improve frequencies throughout the County Provide connections with Amtrak station in DeLand Better shelter designs Need a route from Deltona to DeLand Need a cross county route Review TD trip policy Need later evening service

Public Workshops Gaps and Overlaps exercise results: Need a route from DeLand to Daytona airport Need connections to the SunRail Need later evening service on the west side of the county Need more infrastructure Need better automated information for customers Establish park-and-ride lots Need bike paths and trails

Public Workshops Gaps and Overlaps exercise results: Transit should be linked better to economic development Evaluate paratransit fare structure Evaluate ADA and TD usage rules Need a route on Clyde Morris in Ormond Beach The trolley should serve the transfer center Need to review fixed-route and trolley overlaps

What s Next? Discussion Groups June 2011 Review Committee Meeting #3 June 2011 Review Committee Meeting #4 July 2011

Questions? Joel Rey, P.E., AICP Director of Transit Services Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. jrey@tindaleoliver.com (813) 224-8862, Ext. 226 LaChant Barnett Project Manager Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. lbarnett@tindaleoliver.com (407) 657-9210