University of North Carolina at Wilmington

Similar documents
Fayetteville State University

Winston-Salem State University

NC STATE UNIVERSITY FLEET SERVICES

University of North Carolina at Asheville

DEFENSE AGENCIES Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct and E.O in Fiscal Year 2008

North Carolina FY Petroleum Displacement Program Report

Earth Day Report April 22, 2013

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2006 February 12, 2007

TOWN OF MONTREAT GREEN FLEET POLICY (Adopted April 8, 2010)

U.S. Department of Energy: Vehicle Technology and Infrastructure Deployment

Texas Tech University Energy Savings Program October 2009 Update

Green Fleet Conference Hyatt Regency Chicago October 19-20, 2009

FleetDASH. Fleet Sustainability Dashboard - FleetDASH. Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory August 17, 2017

MEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy

Angelo State University Energy Savings Program October 30, 2014

TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION 2008 ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN

UCSB Campus Sustainability Plan Template

Zero Emission Truck Commercialization Summary of the I-710 Project Zero-Emission Truck Commercialization Study Draft Report

Fleet Sustainability Policy

Tennessee Clean Fuels 2018 Calendar Year Fleet Data Collection SURVEY

AFV Driver Training. Presented by Annalloyd Thomason 10 th National Clean Cities Conference Coordinator Meeting May 2, 2004

2016 Greenhouse Gas Inventory

2015 Transportation Technology Deployment Report:

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE REVISED FISCAL IMPACT (replaces fiscal note dated March 21, 2013)

Alternative Fuels: Existing Conditions

The United States Postal Service Ethanol & Bio-Diesel Programs. The Alternative Clean Transportation Conference Long Beach, California May 6, 2014

Performance Metrics for the Organizational Fleet Manager. William Gookin & Scott Conlon Mercury Associates

Texas Tech University Energy Savings Program August 2008 Update

Trev Hall U.S. Department of Energy

2012 ANNUAL REPORT Denver Clean Cities

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Equipment Management Department. Council Budget Presentation

CAPITAL PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SECTION VIII FACILITIES OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program. Advisory Committee Meeting

ON-ROAD FUEL ECONOMY OF VEHICLES

Enterprise Fleet Management System

Texas Tech University Energy Savings Program January 2010 Update

IMPROVING YOUR CAR S GAS MILEAGE. Page 2

Criteria. As background, the US Environmental Protection Agency s Green Vehicle Guide states that:

U S Postal Service Fleet Planning and Management. GovEnergy 2007

Greening Denver s s Fleet

OFFICE OF FLEET MANAGEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET TESTIMONY APRIL 7, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Alamo Natural Gas Vehicle Consortium

Minnesota State Light Vehicle Fleet Sustainability Benchmarks FY 2018

Alternative Fuel Price Report

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS

1

Air. Goals: Improve statewide air quality Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 9 DRAFT DRAFT

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Chapel Hill Street Lights, Traffic Signals, and Fleet Vehicles

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2008 May 21, 2009

Dakota County, Minnesota

Greening Denver s Fleet. Public Works Fleet Division Denver, Colorado

FY 2012 PROPOSED BUDGET MOTOR POOL FUND SUMMARY

SANTEE COOPER Biodiesel Fuel Usage. Presentation To National Clean Cities Conference May 5, 2004 Ft Lauderdale, FL

Caltrans Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Experience. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Equipment (DOE)

Montgomery County Department of General Services DGS Delivering Green Service

FAST EISA Section 246 Infrastructure Reporting FAQ

CNG as an Alternative to Diesel

New with Sun Tran Operations. PAG Environmental Planning Advisory Committee May 4, 2012

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

FLEET SERVICES OVERVIEW and ACCOMPLISHMENTS Public Works Commission August 10, 2017

Conventional Fuel Management Strategies That Work

Maine Clean Communities Newsletter

Wisconsin Clean Cities Driving Wisconsin Forward. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Eco-Driving Program

Transportation Demand Management Element

RFS2: Where Are We Now And Where Are We Heading? Paul N. Argyropoulos

2017 Transportation Technology Deployment Report:

SYSTEM SAFETY, SECURITY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE JULY 17, 2014 PURCHASE OF HYBRID SEDANS APPROVE CONTRACT AWARD ACTION: RECOMMENDATION

[Author Name] [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] Green Fleet Policy

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TRANSPORTATION BIOFUELS PLANNING STUDY

ACWA Annual Conference 2013 July 25 th Mount Bachelor Village Resort, Bend Oregon

Department of the Air Force Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct 1992/2005 and E.O for Fiscal Year 2007

Moving Forward in Alabama with Alternative Fuels and Advanced Technology Vehicles

Use of FuelTrac Card for Purchases of Gas for University Vehicles

School Transportation Assessment

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. July 2017

Berkeley Lab - Innovative Fleet Ideas, Goal Performance & Challenges

expect more. Vehicle Solutions RUSH ENTERPRISES OFFERING

SEU Fleet GHG Reduction Program

Too Good to Throw Away Implementation Strategy

Audit Follow-up. Fleet Fuel Operations (Report #0801, Issued October 18, 2007) As of March 31, Summary. Report #0811 June 20, 2008

Enterprise Fleet Management System

Trends in Iowa Ethanol Blends Sales: E10, E15, E20, and E85 and the Biofuel Distribution Percentage

Georgia Department of Revenue Policy Bulletin - MVD HB 170 Transportation Funding Act of 2015

Fleet Options. Information and Comparison

Clean Cities 101. Advancing the Choice: Sustainability through Clean Vehicles. Sustainable Communities Training Conference March 10, 2009

Electric Vehicles House Select Committee on Energy Independence & Alternative Fuels Anne Tazewell Transportation Program Manager December 7, 2011

Strategies to Reduce Fleet Emissions UNH s Coordinated Transportation Approach. Dirk Timmons University Transportation Services April 7 th 2008

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Vehicle Technologies Program

California Transportation Electrification and the ZEV Mandate. Analisa Bevan Assistant Division Chief, ECARS November 2016

1 Faculty advisor: Roland Geyer

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE 8899 East 56 th Street Indianapolis, in Agency Fleet Management Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017

Department of the Treasury Division of Administration Transportation Services State Central Motor Pool

RUPOOL: A Social-Carpooling Application for Rutgers Students

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2009 January 12, 2010

COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) BUS ENGINES

Do Tax Incentive Programs Change Taxpayers' Behavior?

ACTION: ESTABLISH LIFE-OF-PROJECT BUDGET FOR UP TO 100 NEW COMPO BUSES

Transcription:

University of North Carolina at Wilmington Facilities 112, Campus Box 5602 601 South College Road Wilmington NC 28403 Fleet Information Total Leased Vehicles Total County Titled Vehicles Total State Titled Vehicles Total Other Vehicles Fuel Information Fueling Infrastructure 44 State Titled Vehicles Only Location Age Size Fuel 0 Fuel Type Gallons Pet. Eqv. PP Lot 20yrs 3000 Gas 126 Gasoline 42,235 42,235 PP Lot 20yrs 3000 Diesel 61 E10 0 - E85 0 - Diesel 389 389 Breakdown of State Titled Vehicles Only Vehicle Type Quantity Miles Off-road Diesel 0 - Gasoline Only 123 462,500 B5 0 - Diesel 3 2,150 B20 0 - Hybrids 0 - B100 0 - Flex-fueled Vehicles 0 - CNG 0 - Comp Natural Gas 0 - Propane 0 - Propane 0 - Other 0 - Electric 0 - Quarts Other 0 - Motor Oils 664 166 10% Eligible 0 - Syn & Rec Motor Oils 0 - Totals 126 464,650 Total 42,790 adj 15% for accuracy '06-'07 145 534,348 adj total by 15% 49,209 adj for campus growth 10% 159 587,782 further adj by 10% ('08-'09) 54,129 Instructions Notes/Comments Potential for Biofuels Expansion Fill out all information (exception - miles if N/A) Used best estimate for miles Location Space Tk Size Fuel Complete with data from fiscal year 2004-2005 PP Lot 40'x40' 3000 E-10 Please note if fuel includes more than State Vehicles alternate contact: PP Lot 40'x40' 3000 B-20 Count hybrids and FFV's only once in the breakdown, do not count them as gasoline vehicles 10% Eligible vehicles include police & emergency 10% eligible educational vehicles must have specific modifications for instructional purposes making Note of modified '06-'07 adj for better accuracy Potential Reduction in use for your organization; Projected Reduction Conservation Reduce speeds, efficient cars, task pooling 1,284 gallons = 3.00% Displacement E10 Using E10 for all gasoline vehicles 4,224 gallons = 9.87% Goal : 20.0% E85 Using E85 for all flex-fueled vehicles - gallons = 0.00% 8,558 gallons B5 Using B5 for all diesel vehicles 19 gallons = 0.05% B20 Using B20 for all diesel vehicles 78 gallons = 0.18% B100 Using B100 in 1/10th of your diesel vehicles 39 gallons = 0.09% FFV Substituting one FFV using E85 231 gallons = 0.54% CNG/Propane Replacing one vehicle with a CNG/LPG car 340 gallons = 0.79% Electric Replacing one vehicle with an electric car 340 gallons = 0.79% Syn & Rec Oils Using all synthetic and recycled motor oils 664 quarts = 0.39% adjustment for improved accuracy applies to 2006-'07, '07-'08 adjustment for student body growth applies to 2008-'09

University of North Carolina at Wilmington Displacement 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 Initial Cost Yearly Cost Totals Possible additional vehicle purchases from 2006-2010 Year Quantity, Vehicle Type and Description Purpose Fuel / Hybrid Additional Cost

University of North Carolina at Wilmington Fleet and Fuel Reporting Fleet Information 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 Vehicle Type Total # Miles Total # Miles Total # Miles Total # Miles Total # Miles Total # Miles Gasoline 139 475,915 156 526,293 159 540,710 154 531,763 156 512,495 155 502,400 Diesel 3 3,219 3 6,284 3 1,099 3 1,753 3 2,359 3 4,513 Hybrid - - 2 5,737 2 3,698 2 4,467 Flex-fueled Vehicles - - Comp Natural Gas - - Propane - - Electric - - 1 Emergency/Ed (10%) - - Totals 142 479,134 159 532,577 162 541,809 159 539,253 162 518,552 160 511,380 13% 3% 10% 0% 12% 1% 0% -8% 2% -12% 0% -13% Fuel Information 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 Fuel Type Gal Petr. Gal Petr. Gal Petr. Gal Petr. Gal Petr. Gal Petr. Gasoline 41,860 41,860 48,128 48,128 49,158 49,158 47,086 47,086 41,771 41,771 41,882 41,882 E10 - - - 5,232 4,709 4,641 4,177 4,654 4,189 E85 - - - - - - - Diesel 464 464 723 723 240 240 516 516 924 924 704 704 Off-road Diesel - - - - - - B5 - - - - - - B20 - - - - - - - B100 - - - - - - CNG - - - - - - Propane - - - - - - Qrts Qrts Qrts Qrts Qrts Qrts Motor Oils 836 209 843 211 986 247 927 232 1,037 259 981 245 Syn & Rec Motor Oils - - - - - - Total Use 42,533 49,062 49,645 52,543 47,131 47,020 % Change in PDP -1% 0% 1% -3% -12.9% -13.1% JO'N ref line # 38 10% adj for campus growth reflected by modified baseline applies '08-'09 and '09-'10 Info on Titled vehicles only (equipment not included) PDP goal by 2011: -20.0%

University of North Carolina at Wilmington Plan for FY 2011-12 all PDP participating fleets results to 2009-10 FY 2004-05 Overall Results from all participating fleets Fuel Type thousand of gallons thousand of gallons % change Vehicle Types # # % change Gas 14,935 3,165-79% Gasoline 10,816 9,436-13% E10 598 11382 1803% Hybrid 78 129 65% E85 242 398 64% Flex-fueled Vehicles 4,752 7,018 48% Diesel 8,526 1602-81% Comp Natural Gas 14 5-64% B5-7 Diesel 4,498 5,066 13% B20 1,870 8157 336% Propane 192 150-22% B100-2 Emergency/Ed (10%) 6,007 5,871-2% Total Biodiesel as B20 1,870 8,167 337% Electric 13 199 1431% CNG 3 0-92% Total 26,370 27,874 6% Propane 56 5-91% Motor Oils 48 35-27% Syn & Rec Motor Oils 3 6 115% Total Fuel 26,283 24,760-5.8% Total 25,581 21,638-15.4% Results Noted (by FY 2009-10) as relate to your PLAN vehicles reported in PDP FY 2009-2010 FY 2004-05 FY 2009-2010 Of the Overall 17.5 % petroleum reduction: 3.95% displaced by reduced mileage (conservation) 4.01% displaced through E10 use 0.49% displaced through E85 use T.Fuel (adj. for growth) 26,877 24,760-7.88% 4.7% displaced through biodiesel use T.Petro (adj for growth) 26,153 21,638-17.26% 4.3% displaced through efficiency Your organization result to date University of North Carolina at Wilmington results to date (2009-10) % Reductions Caused by PDP Actions (by FY 09-10) as reported % of Goal State Organization Petro Use Displacement Achievements PDP Actions ( Reduction) Miles E10 E85 B5 B20 B100 CNG Prop Syn Moil making progress, has not reached Goal fleet increase, slight mileage increase, proportionate fuel increase 64% UNC Wilmington -12.72% -12% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% your organization plan to date University of North Carolina at Wilmington report progress plan next year and forward Displacement Actual 2005 thru2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 beyond 2011-12.0% 1.0% decrease in mileage (against adjusted baseline) helps PDP Use of E10 has contributed toward PDP Increase max/min inventories of maintenance parts in onsite warehouse to reduce driving required to pick up needed parts around town. Work with vendors to deliver Housekeeping supplies directly to individual buildings to reduce driving requirements of UNCW employees. Continue to increase inventories as budget and space allow. Continue efforts with Grainger to increaes amount of deliveries made directly to individual buildings instead of to on-site Warehouse. Continue to increase inventories as budget and space allow. Continue efforts with Grainger to increaes amount of deliveries made directly to individual buildings instead of to on-site Warehouse. PLAN Purchase electric golf carts to displace purchase of gasoline-powered trucks and other vehicles. Request funding to modify tankage to allow purchase of alternative fuels. Continue purchase of golf carts and other utility vehicles in lieu of gasoline-powered trucks. Funding has been approved to modify tank farm. Continue purchase of golf carts and other utility vehicles in lieu of gasolinepowered trucks. Continue trend of purchasing smaller vehicles. Ensure proper tire inflation is maintained. Two new vehicles planned for purchase this year will be smaller than historical purchases; 1 new vehicle will be a hybrid vehicle. Continue the practice of maintaining correct tire inflation. Continue the practice of maintaining correct tire inflation. Continue to reinforce efficient driving practices. space for Plan notes Reinforced efficient driving practices with employees (don't accelerate unnecessarily, cut off car instead of leaving it idling, etc. Continue to reinforce efficient driving practices. Maximize the use of phone and video conferences; held training workshops on campus instead of out-of-town indicates adjustment for growth as applied '08-'09, continued subsequent years

University of North Carolina at Wilmington Conservation and Efficiency defining steps taken to reduce petroleum consumption baseline efficiency factor efficiency factor change indicated your fleet efficiency appears to be consistent with baseline efficiency 08-'09 09-'10 10-'11 10.86 10.86 10.16 10.900-6.45% 0.37% In the process of reporting PDP results we have been able to directly attribute petroleum use changes due to: mileage; alternative fuel use; number of vehicles; use of synthetic or recycled motor oil. Indirectly we have been attributing any other change to "change in efficiency", a positive change may be called "conservation". To better define what portion of PDP performance is due to "change in efficiency or conservation" Please answer the following: Has your agency/ department/ organization initiated any steps, not previously reported, intended to improve fleet vehicle efficiency? Please place "X" as appropriate 2009-'10 2010-'11 2009-'10 2010-'11 YES X X NO what did you change? Place "X" in appropriate box(es) examples: a mechanical change could include equipment changes to vehicles or fueling infrastructure to make them more efficient. New hybrid autos or new fuel card reader systems would be mechanical. Process change could be an accounting system change, vehicle reassignment, or a carpooling system. Behavior could be drivers improving fuel economy by driving more efficiently or drivers combining errands or carpooling to reduce mileage. 2009-'10 2010-'11 2009-'10 2010-'11 2009-'10 2010-'11 mechanical X process X behavior X yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no changed fuel accounting trained drivers on 1a changed vehicle types X X 2a system X 3a economical driving X X use fuel management reduced on-board reminded drivers to save 1b system X 2b weight X 3b fuel X X use on-board idle reduction set policy on idle 1c mechanism X 2c set carpooling policy X 3c reduction X X reassigned vehicles to evaluate driver behavior 2d reduce fuel use X 3d (on economy) check tire pressure carefully observe speed 2e routinely X X 3e limit X X reward economical evaluate MPG driving or punish 2f performance by vehicle X 3f inefficient driving other mechanical system other process system 1d change 2g change 3g other behavior change X when did you first change it? Place "question #" in box best marking when process began. There may be multiple marks. mechanical process behavior before 2005 before 2005 x before 2005 x FY 04-05 FY 04-05 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 05-06 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 1a FY 06-07 FY 06-07 3a,b,c FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 08-09 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 09-10 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 10-11 FY 10-11 3g How did you change it? Please note question # you are referring to. examples may include new procedures, training, or directives affecting vehicle choice or vehicle use; installation of new equipment to dispense fuel or account for its use. mechanical new in FY 2010-'11: process new in FY 2010-'11: behavior new in FY 2010-'11: Limited travel for training by use of tele-conferencing, video-conferencing, and conducting group training on-site. From your Results Noted tab you are now aware of what portion of your PDP performance change (positive or negative) was attributed to efficiency and conservation last year. Your '09-'10 PDP report indicated 0.37% was attributed to change in efficiency. Of the noted changes in each of these three categories what part will you attribute to current and future activities in each? Your answers may total 0% if not applicable, otherwise the total will be 100%. FY 2009-10 mechanical FY 2009-10 process FY 2009-10 behavior FY 2010-11 mechanical 0 FY 2010-11 process 0.00% FY 2010-11 behavior 0.10% FY 2011-12 mechanical FY 2011-12 process FY 2011-12 behavior