Change in Vehicle Occupancy Used in Mobility Monitoring Efforts

Similar documents
M E M O R A N D U M. Texas Department of Transportation Construction Division

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 7/31/2013

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

American Driving Survey: Methodology and Year One Results, May 2013 May Saving lives through research and education.

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Public Transit in America:

U.S. Census Bureau News Joint Release U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL SALES, SEPTEMBER 2018

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 5: UPDATE THROUGH 2012

U.S. Census Bureau News Joint Release U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

U.S. Census Bureau News Joint Release U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

U.S. Census Bureau News Joint Release U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL SALES, AUGUST 2017

Transportation Demand Management Element

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL SALES, APRIL 2017

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, JULY 2017

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, FEBRUARY 2017

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, APRIL 2017

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, AUGUST 2017

MONTHLY NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, NOVEMBER 2017

WHITE PAPER. Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard

American Driving Survey,

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 9: VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND DISTANCE DRIVEN, 1984 TO 2015

SH 249 PUBLIC MEETING DESIGN CHANGES FROM FM 2920 TO HARDIN STORE ROAD

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

OZARKS TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATION

Road User Cost Analysis

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

Motorcoach Census. A Study of the Size and Activity of the Motorcoach Industry in the United States and Canada in 2015

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

Large Sample Ecodriving Experiment Preliminary Results

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Trip and Parking Generation Study of the Peaks Ice Arena

Address Land Use Approximate GSF

Ambient PM 10 Monitoring Sechelt, B.C Update

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Use of National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Data in Assessment of Impacts of PHEVs on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions and Electricity Demand

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LOAD EXPERIENCE OF A HIGHWAY AS CONTRIBUTED BY CARGO VEHICLES

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Mobile Area Transportation Study Urban Area and Planning Boundary

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy Duty Trucks: Understanding Key Trends,

Department of Civil Engineering (Transportation Engineering), Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalay Engineering College, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Executive Summary. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through EPA420-S and Air Quality July 2006

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, FRIDAY, JANUARY 30, 2015 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2014 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Location Tool and Visualization Map. July 17, 2018

Future Freight Transportation

May ATR Monthly Report

Bob Costello Chief Economist & Vice President American Trucking Associations. Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute October 30, 2012

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

C-BOA Tool. Comparison of Peak Demand Savings Estimation Methods. February 7, of 14

The Future is Bright! So how do we get there? Council of State Governments West Annual Meeting August 18, 2017

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

Transcription:

Change in Vehicle Occupancy Used in Mobility Monitoring Efforts By Phil Lasley, PhD, AICP, PMP Assistant Research Scientist Mobility Analysis Program Texas A&M Transportation Institute August 2017

Summary Virtually all measures of delay that the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) incorporate some form of average vehicle occupancy, or how many people, on average, are in any vehicle at any given time on our nation s roadways. In an effort to continually improve the methods and data used and produced by all of TTI s mobility-monitoring efforts, researchers reexamined and updated this factor. Researchers now estimate the average vehicle occupancy from 1.25 persons per vehicle to 1.50 persons per vehicle, based on data from the National Household Travel Survey for all trips. This change will be effective as of July 1, 2017. What Changed and Why? Conservatively, TTI researchers have traditionally used an average vehicle occupancy number of 1.25 for mobility monitoring efforts, including the Urban Mobility Report (UMR) 1, since the mid-1980 s. Researchers based this original number on data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Personal Travel Survey (NPTS), focusing on work trips, generally thought to be the primary trip purpose during the peak-congested hours. In 1983, the NPTS reported an average vehicle occupancy of 1.29. However, as new data emerged and the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) produced several iterations, more accurate vehicle occupancy data emerged. In the 2009 NHTS the latest survey to date the total average vehicle occupancy for all trip types and times increased to 1.67 (down from 1.75 in 1983 when the UMR first began). 2 Occupancy for trips only to work (not including chained trips) decreased to 1.13 persons per vehicle. At this point though, researchers now know more about the type and number of trips made during the peak hour (6:00 AM to 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM to 7:00 PM), which include many other purposes other than going to and from work. Figure 1 shows a distribution of trip types by time of day. 1

Figure 1. NHTS Distribution of Trips by Hour Note that while work trips make up a dominant portion of the trips during the peak hour, they do not make up the majority (even when excluding social trips). Therefore, it would be unwise to use an overly low constant for vehicle occupancy heavily skewed towards trips to and from work. It would also be inappropriate to use the average vehicle occupancy number for the entire day (1.67), as certain types of trips not made during the peak period (the most congested times of the day, and therefore of most concern to policy makers, practitioners, and planners) but with higher average occupancy would skew the relevant value in the opposite direction. Again in Figure 1, social trips, visiting friends, and vacations predominantly lie outside of peak hours, but hold significantly higher vehicle occupancy rates of 2.20, 2.08, and 2.70, respectively. 3 Instead, researchers believe it would be more appropriate to use the average vehicle occupancy of all trip types during the peak hours. Researchers calculated this new average occupancy using a weighted average from a custom tabulation created from the 2009 NHTS dataset. 4 This resulted in a new average vehicle occupancy factor of 1.51. However, the more conservative occupancy factor of 1.50 will be used to assist in quick conversions and to account for potential error in the data. Table 1 displays the custom NHTS tabulation, highlighting occupancy by peak hour. 2

Table 1. Average Vehicle Occupancy by Hour Trip Start Time Vehicle Occupancy Sample Size Mean Hour of 00:00 1,521 1.99 Hour of 01:00 741 1.61 Hour of 02:00 481 1.42 Hour of 03:00 318 1.16 Hour of 04:00 2,834 1.57 Hour of 05:00 8,025 1.41 Hour of 06:00 21,231 1.34 Hour of 07:00 44,856 1.39 Hour of 08:00 43,476 1.54 Hour of 09:00 47,123 1.70 Hour of 10:00 53,536 1.73 Hour of 11:00 58,384 1.77 Hour of 12:00 61,175 1.89 Hour of 13:00 55,915 1.77 Hour of 14:00 55,501 1.73 Hour of 15:00 59,435 1.66 Hour of 16:00 58,812 1.59 Hour of 17:00 56,805 1.60 Hour of 18:00 40,841 1.79 Hour of 19:00 27,170 1.89 Hour of 20:00 19,271 2.09 Hour of 21:00 12,390 1.79 Hour of 22:00 6,807 1.65 Hour of 23:00 3,663 1.61 Total 741,173 1.67 3

References 1 Schrank, D., W. Eisele, and T. Lomax. Appendix A: Methodology for the 2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, 2016. https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobilityscorecard-2015-appx-a.pdf. Accessed July 2017. 2 Santos, A., N. McGuckin, H.Y. Nakamoto, D. Gray, and S. Liss. Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Report FHWA-PL-11-022. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, 2011. 3 Average Vehicle Occupancy (Persons) by Trip Purpose. National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Tabulation created on the NHTS website. Federal Highway Administration, 2019. http://nhts.ornl.gov. Accessed July 2017. 4 Average Vehicle Occupancy (Persons) and Average Occupancy by Trip Purpose by Hour of Day. National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Tabulation created on the NHTS website. Federal Highway Administration, 2019. http://nhts.ornl.gov. Accessed July 2017. 4