Rideshare and TDM Part of the Transportation System

Similar documents
IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

The Future of TDM History can help us understand the present, and predict the future!

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Changing Behavior and Achieving Mode Shi2 Goals

The TDM Plan for Fort Washington Office Park NOVEMBER 1 6, 2017 FORT WASHINGTON OFFICE PARK STAKEHOLDERS

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

Transportation Demand Management Element

Getting Parking Right in Emerging Mixed Use Environments

Parking Management Element

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview July 2017

CONNECTED AND AUTOMATED TRANSPORTATION AND THE TEXAS AV PROVING GROUNDS PARTNERSHIP

Optimizing Community Benefits with Shared Mobility. Susan Shaheen, Ph.D

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee

Presentation Overview

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Starting and Growing Rural Vanpool Programs: From Financing to Vehicle Procurement

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

Alamo Natural Gas Vehicle Consortium

Emergency Ride Home Program Survey

WELCOME TO TECH. talks TECHNOLOGY ENERGIZES

DART Capital Program Update

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

San Francisco s Scooter Share Pilot Program

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Click to edit Master title style

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

USF Tampa Campus Percent Mode Share 2010

Making Mobility Better, Together

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

Evolution in Multi-Modal Transportation

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

Emerging Technologies & Autonomous Vehicle Readiness Planning. Georgia Planning Association Conference Jekyll Island, GA September 5, 2018

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Shared Mobility: Past, Present, and Future. Susan Shaheen, PhD Twitter: SusanShaheen1 LinkedIn: Susan Shaheen

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Seattle and King County Mobility Services Planning and Alternative Services Program 2016 APTA Annual Meeting. City of Seattle

Parking Management Strategies

CSU Fullerton Commuter Choice Programs: Supporting Sustainable Commutes by Campus Employees

Transportation 2040 Update: Technology. Transportation Policy Board April 14, 2016

EVALUATION OF MTC S CLIMATE PROGRAM. May 7, 2015 TRB Sustainability for Transportation

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

North Front Range Regional Commuter Rail Concept Discussion North Front Range MPO Technical Advisory Committee. Windsor, CO June 20, 2018

SHARED MOBILITY: FROM DEFINITIONS TO MARKET TRENDS & IMPACTS

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Disruptive Innovations in Ridesharing:

TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Incentives for Green Fleets

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORT 2017

Sustainable Transportation Award Winner. UC/CSU Sustainability Conference Santa Barbara, 2006

Strategic Plan

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Case Study: City of San Diego

Thinking Outside the Bus: New Approaches to Commuter Transportation

It s easy to understand why ridesharing is increasing in

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

CTR Employer Survey Report

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS

2018 Federal Priorities One Region One Voice

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Demand Management. Overview of Tools and Strategies

CTR Employer Survey Report

Energy Technical Memorandum

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

Travel Demand Management: Strategies and Experiences from Metro Transit. Kelly Morrell Commuter Program Specialist December 13, 2016

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Building Equitable Sustainable Transit OPEN HOUSE

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

The Status of Transportation Funding, Road Charge and Vehicle Miles Traveled in California

Vanpool in Atlanta: Accommodating a 10% Mode Shift for Coca-Cola. Prepared for CEE 6625 by Calvin Clark Daejin Kim Yu Chen

APPROVE VANPOOL VEHICLE SUPPLIER BENCH CONTRACTS

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Transcription:

Rideshare and TDM Part of the Transportation System 2014 TexITE Fall Meeting September 25, 2014 David McMaster Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Texas

Ridesharing A large factor in Transportation Demand Management Ridesharing - sharing a ride - for commute trips appears primarily in the form as carpooling and vanpooling. 1910 s Hitching a ride with spread of personal auto 1940 s Official carpool clubs during WWII 1970 s Employee rideshare due to energy crises 1980 s Funding for Carpool and Vanpool Projects 1990 s Reliable ridesharing systems 2000 s Technology-enabled ridematching Current Confusing usage of rideshare terminology

Ridesharing Technology Rideshare programs (local governments, organizations, employers) often employ a ridematching software RidePro, RideShark, RideAmigos, etc. Consumers often use web- and app-based resources to help with ridesharing Craigslist icarpool Ridejoy Carpoolworld Ridescout Carma Zimride Hitch

Ridesharing Support Rideshare programs often rely upon supporting functions: Ridematching systems Emergency ride home programs Preferred parking options HOV / HOT lane access Favorable employer policies Scheduling accommodations On-time departure commitments Transit benefits Park and pool lots Incentive programs Availability of bikeshare, carshare, transit, etc. On-site consumer services

Houston Regional Vanpool History 1970 s Employer-sponsored vanpools prosper 1980 s METRO opens transit-way to vanpools 1980 s METRO offers ridematching to find riders 1990 s METRO adds financial incentive for riders 1990 s H-GAC (MPO) launches TDM initiatives 1996 CMAQ funding makes vanpool regional 2004 H-GAC launches minipool project 2007 METROVan and minipool consolidated 2008 STAR is new Regional Vanpool brand 2009 STAR promotes new business model

METRO STAR Vanpool Unique public-private partnership of FHWA, TxDOT, H-GAC, METRO, private contractors, private vehicle providers and employers Regional program covers 8-county Houston-Galveston- Brazoria commute to work trips 80/20 FHWA/Local (METRO) funding for vehicle capital (STP) and program marketing (CMAQ) (past FTA JARC) Employer (destination) based outreach and marketing Groups of 5-15 individuals sharing costs and responsibility in STAR-provided vehicle Supported with vehicle arrangements, ridematching, emergency ride home, and customer assistance

METRO STAR Vanpool Urban, suburban and rural worksites can benefit from vanpool Over 90% of STAR routes serve areas outside the CBD Typical commutes via STAR are over 25 miles one-way Parking demand is a significant influencer for employers: Harris County Appraisal District reduced employee parking 10% Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Regional office reduced parking demand by over 600 spaces Corporate relocations motivate employers as retention tool: Baker Hughes employees formed more than 50 vanpool routes in consolidating to their North Houston facility ExxonMobil implemented commuter choice transit benefits in support of employee migration to new campus in Spring Attractiveness of employee benefits affect hiring and retention Tax advantages of transit benefits are win-win for employers and staff

TDM in the H-GAC Region Transit Services HOV/HOT/Managed Lanes METRO STAR Regional Vanpool NuRide Incentives for Transit, Rideshare, Telework, Bike/Ped Commute Solutions Telework Alternative Work Arrangements (flex-time) Transit Pilot Projects Program Carsharing and Bikesharing Real-Time Ridematching

Commute Solutions 2013 Impacts Transit Usage (all providers) 541.5 million passenger miles traveled METRO STAR Regional Vanpool 60,753,527 vehicle miles traveled reduction 51.0 tons NOx emissions reduction NuRide Carpool Incentivies 49,278,824 vehicle miles traveled reduction 25.8 tons NOx emissions reduction Commute Solutions Telework 8,242,810 vehicle miles traveled reduction 1,800 teleworkers in supported programs

TDM in the Transportation System Transportation Demand Management - taking fewer trips and choosing wisely how to take the ones we do The Clean Air Act originally included mandatory employee trip reduction rules, repealed in 1977 An expansion of local trip reduction rules and TDM ordinances is now occurring across the nation IRS Code provides for transit benefits for employees FHWA, FTA and EPA have federal funds for TDM Local and regional governments and districts support TDM initiatives Planning and development guidelines support TDM Employers support TDM programs in many places.

Planning Resources CUTR/NCTR National Center for Transportation Research at the Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida (www.nctr.usf.edu; www.cutr.usf.edu) Research into TDM practices and impacts, including: Worksite Trip Reduction Model & Manual predicts extent incentives, disincentives and programs will impact worksite trips An Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment found the correlation of TDM policies with reduction in congestion, time delay and fuel consumption on I-5 segment in Seattle Trip Reduction Impacts of Mobility Management Strategies ( TRIMMS ) available at http://trimms.com

Planning Resources TSRC Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California at Berkeley (www.tsrc.berkeley.edu) Research into Rideshare and Shared Use Mobility, including: Shared Use Mobility Summit the first national summit on the convergence of shared use options including transit, carshare, bikeshare, and rideshare, and resulting report on the current state of shared use Ridesharing in North America Past, Present & Future a short history of ridesharing to the present with current influences that will affect the future

Planning Resources CNT The Center for Neighborhood Technology (www.cnt.org) Research into relationships with land use, transit and walk access for parking: Locations that support transportation needs without a personal auto are increasingly attractive Parking pricing and supply policies will impact actual parking per unit For more on this study, see the Feb 2013 ITE Journal

Implementation Resources ACT The Association for Commuter Transportation (actweb.org) - an international trade association and leading advocate for commuter transportation and transportation demand management Public TDM Programs TDM Service Providers TDM Consultants Metropolitan Planning Organizations Transportation Management Associations Management Districts Universities Local Governments

Implementation Resources ACT Association members in Texas: - Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization - Car2go N.A., LLC - Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority - Commute Solutions Coalition - Dallas Area Rapid Transit - Energy Corridor District - Enterprise Rideshare - Houston-Galveston Area Council - Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Texas - Movability Austin - North Central Texas Council of Governments - NuRide - Rice University - Texas A&M University - Texas Tech University - TREK Transportation Management Organization - 2Plus of Texas, Inc. - University of Texas at Austin - vride

Questions? David McMaster Director of Commuter Services Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Texas 1900 Main Street, 4 th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 713-739-3895 David.McMaster@RideMETRO.org