EVALUATION OF CARROT CULTIVARS AND BREEDING SELECTIONS TO IDENTIFY RESISTANCE TO FOLIAR BLIGHTS,

Similar documents
2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris. Abstract

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Trial Report: Bell Pepper Variety Evaluation Spring 2017

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Hybrid Performance from Male-Sterile and Pollinator Inbred Onion Lines

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

I~I. Horticulture Series No. 631

Mini Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial Results 2018

VEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS 2006

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

Report to the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission Title: Green Bean Breeding and Evaluation

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg.

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee

Pumpkin Germplasm Evalua1on

Project Title: UCCE Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2003

A spring broccoli variety trial was conducted in 2017 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Pennsylvania Potato Research Report, 2013

EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

Section 4: Wheat Varieties

Weed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon.

Trial Report: Supersweet Corn Variety Evaluation Spring 2014

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2002

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

2005 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT

OHIO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATICN Northwestern Substation, Hoytville, Ohio. Department of Horticulture Mimeograph Series No. 204 March 29, 1960

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

AFNS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA W. H. Gay - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

Potato Variety Trials

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

Triticale and Rye Forage

NC State Cucumber Trials Summary 2000

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Varietal Trials Results

2014 Hard Red Spring Wheat Field Crop Trials Results

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

Potato Breeding Program Research Update 2009

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

High Plains Root-Knot Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion

Test Weight. Plant Height**

2009 Table Beet Weed Control Trials Methods: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2: Results: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2:

Alfalfa (06-7) Southern Illinois University. Roundup Ready Alfalfa Evaluation. Investigator: Bryan Young

All treatments injured soybean on at least one evaluation. POST1 Synchrony STS plus Flexstar plus Assure II caused 15% injury on July 11.

2017 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

Michigan Potato Research Report

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Report of Progress 877

1974 EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTlVARS West Lane Avenue Columbus, Ohio

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( )

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS GROWING THE BEST SUGARBEETS

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT

Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]

UCCE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ASPARAGUS RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, 2013

2016 GEM Midwest Trial Results & New 2017 Releases

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Data 2-Year Average 3 Rank Yield 1 Wt Ht Lodg.

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003

Switchgrass in Québec

PEANUT. Average LSD at 10% Level CV %

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

Transcription:

CARROT (Daucus carota subsp. sativus) Alternaria Leaf Blight; Alternaria dauci Cercospora Leaf Blight; Cercospora carotae R. V. James and W. R. Stevenson Department of Plant Pathology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 EVALUATION OF CARROT CULTIVARS AND BREEDING SELECTIONS TO IDENTIFY RESISTANCE TO FOLIAR BLIGHTS, 1998: A trial was established at a commercial muck farm near Portage, WI on May 18 to evaluate fifty carrot cultivars and breeding s for reaction to Alternaria and Cercospora leaf blights. Seeds were planted at approximately 24 seeds per foot (slicing type) or 10 seeds per foot (dicing type) using a cone seeder. The soil type was Adrian Muck with ph of 5.3 Each plot consisted of two 12-foot-long rows planted 1 foot apart in the center portion of a raised bed which was 54 inches wide. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used. To minimize interplot interference and provide a uniform source of inoculum throughout the trial, a row of Lucky B, susceptible to both blights, was planted on each side of each test plot. Test plots were separated within the bed by 3 foot open buffer spaces. Fertilizer consisted of preplant application of 240 lb/a of 40-0-0 + 1.5 lb/a of Boron. Asana XL (5.8 fl oz./a) was applied to the foliage June 17 for insect control and weeds were controlled with application of Fusilade DX (12 fl oz./a on June 6; 8 fl oz./a on July 20) and Linex 50 DF, 1.1 lb/a + Sencor 75 DF, 1.8 oz/a on June 21. Fungicide was inadvertently applied once at the beginning of the season when the adjacent commercial field was treated (Terranil 90 DF, 1.4 lb/a, July 7) but no additional fungicide was applied during the rest of the season. Disease severity was rated August 3, August18, September 3, September 21 and September 30 using the Horsfall- Barratt system. A five-foot-long section of row was hand dug from each plot on October 1 and the yield was graded into five size classes (based on diameter) and culls. The size classes were then grouped appropriately to conform to standards for dicing or slicing carrot contracts. values were calculated for each cultivar and breeding based on typical processing contracts. Rainfall measured at the nearest recording weather station (Hancock, WI) was May (18-31) - 0.7", June - 6.4", July - 2.5", August - 6.5" and September 2.3" for a total of 18.4". Alternaria and Cercospora leaf blights were slow to develop in this trial, with low disease severity recorded through the August 18 rating. Disease development accelerated in late August and September with the susceptible standard, Lucky B, exhibiting 55% foliage infection in the final rating (September 30) and a number of test lines showing higher percent foliage infection. A number of lines exhibited significantly lower levels of disease at this rating. Lines with a final disease rating significantly lower than the susceptible check include: 536-2 (7241A), 620-2 (W2-HC4), 94-668, Apache, Blaze, Carson, Cheyenne, Coral II, CXC 2589, Enterprise, Fullback, Halfback, Indiana, Newport, Prospector, PSR 306796, XPH18031 and Xph95W94. Lines with area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) significantly lower than the susceptible check include: 536-2 (7241A), 620-2 (W2-HC4), 728-1 (5280B), 94-668, 97-711, Apache, Blaze, Bolero, Canada, Carson, Cheyenne, Coral II, Danvers 126, Enterprise, Fullback, Halfback, Indiana, Newport, Prospector, PSR 306796, XPH18029, XPH18031, XPH18085 and Xph95W94. The ten lines with the highest total yield value (graded for slicing) were: Bolero, Blaze, Carson, Eagle, Heritage, Napa, Prospector, Protégé, Rogers 1851A and Scarlet Nantes. The ten lines with the highest total yield value (graded for dicing) were: CXC 2589, 97-711, Canada, Carson, Cascade, Danvers 126, Early Gold, Fullback, Halfback and XPH18031 (Table 4). Lines which exhibited relatively low levels of disease (as measured by final disease or AUDPC) and good yield value include: Apache, Blaze, Bolero, Canada, Carson, Coral II, CXC 2587, Danvers 126, Enterprise, Fullback, Halfback, Prospector, PSR 306796, XPH18029, XPH18031 and XPH18085. Three of the industry standards included in the trial -- Bolero and Prospector (slicer standards) and Danvers 126 (dicer standard) are included in this group and a number of other lines also show promise with good yield, calculated crop values exceeding $1,000 per acre, and low disease development. This indicates that progress is being made

toward development and acceptance of cultivars that could grow and yield well without application of fungicide or with significantly reduced fungicide application. Data collected by Steve Keil, Agrilink Foods Vegetable Co., provide additional valuable information on root quality. Those cultivars and breeding lines having minimal root defects and greatest root length combined with being top performers in other categories such as disease resistance, yield and value of yield would appear to have the greatest potential for Wisconsin production.

Table 1. Processing type and source of seed for cultivars and breeding lines used in this trial. # Cultivar or line Source Use Type Dice Slice Mini Slicer Standards 1 Bolero 1 Vilmorin 2 Prospector 1 Peto 3 PY-60 1 Peter-Edward Dicer Standards 4 Danvers 126 Rogers 5 Gold King Rogers Test Lines 6 Apache 1 Sun 7 Blaze 1 Rogers 8 Canada Bejo 9 Carson 1 Bejo 10 Cascade Bejo 11 Cheyenne 1 Sun 12 Coral II 1 Seeds Garden City 13 Eagle 1 Sun 14 Early Gold 1 Peto 15 Enterprise 1 Peto 16 Falcon 1 Sun 17 Fullback 1 Rogers/ Novartis 18 Halfback Novartis 19 Heritage 1 Asgrow 20 Idaho Bejo 21 Indiana 1 Bejo 22 Lucky B Chrisseed 23 Napa 1 Bejo # Cultivar or line Source Use Type Dice Slice Mini 24 Newport 1 Bejo 25 Oranza 1 Bejo 26 Protégé 1 Asgrow 27 PY-60 Improved 1 Rispens 28 Scarlet Nantes 1 various 29 005-1 (3475M) USDA/Simon 3 30 536-2 (7241A USDA/Simon 3 31 620-2 (W2-HC4) USDA/Simon 3 32 728-1 (5280B) USDA/Simon 3 33 906-98 (WAY247B) Goldman 2 34 908-98W279B) Goldman 2 35 910-98 (W280B) Goldman 2 36 97-711 Chriseed 37 94-668 Chriseed 38 97-712 Chriseed 39 CXC 2589 1 Chriseed 40 HMX 4302 Harris-Moran 41 HMX 4303 Harris-Moran 42 PSR 306796 Peto 43 Rogers 1851A 1 Rogers 44 Xph87W341 Crookham 45 Xph95W94 Crookham 46 XPH18029 Asgrow 47 XPH18031 Asgrow 48 XPH3910 Asgrow 49 XPH18085 Asgrow 50 XPH18032 Asgrow 1. Requested by WI Carrot Growers Association Cooperative to be included in this trial 2. Inbred line from UW Department of Horticulture carrot and onion breeding program 3. Line from USDA carrot breeding program, UW Department of Horticulture Table 2. Severity of leaf blight on carrot cultivars and breeding s. Percent foliage infection 1 Relative Cultivar or breeding 8/3 8/18 9/3 9/21 AUDPC 2 Slicer Standards 1 Bolero... 0.0 1.0 3.3 41.1 39.1 0.14 2 Prospector... 0.6 2.1 5.1 31.8 37.0 0.12 3 PY-60... 0.4 2.0 12.1 55.7 63.5 0.22 Dicer Standards 4 Danvers 126... 1.2 1.8 4.5 33.1 43.2 0.13 5 Gold King... 1.0 2.5 9.0 60.9 60.4 0.22 Test Lines 6 Apache... 0.4 2.1 11.7 21.1 29.2 0.11 7 Blaze... 1.0 2.0 5.7 14.1 12.1 0.07 8 Canada... 0.4 1.4 5.5 32.0 41.7 0.13 9 Carson... 0.2 1.8 3.5 13.3 11.3 0.05 10 Cascade... 0.2 2.0 16.4 70.3 77.3 0.28

Percent foliage infection 1 Relative Cultivar or breeding 8/3 8/18 9/3 9/21 AUDPC 2 11 Cheyenne... 0.4 2.1 4.3 12.9 15.6 0.06 12 Coral II... 0.6 1.4 9.6 24.2 27.1 0.11 39 CXC 2589... 1.4 2.7 18.6 40.6 18.7 0.17 13 Eagle... 1.0 2.0 17.1 32.8 39.6 0.16 14 Early Gold... 0.4 2.7 10.0 57.3 74.2 0.23 15 Enterprise... 0.0 2.1 6.0 21.9 29.7 0.10 16 Falcon... 1.0 2.5 25.8 68.8 71.9 0.30 17 Fullback... 0.8 2.0 6.0 19.5 20.3 0.09 18 Halfback... 0.8 2.7 9.0 27.9 28.1 0.12 19 Heritage... 1.4 2.7 14.8 52.1 60.9 0.22 40 HMX 4302... 1.8 3.3 24.0 47.9 42.7 0.23 41 HMX 4303... 2.5 3.5 21.9 59.9 56.8 0.26 20 Idaho... 0.4 2.1 26.2 31.5 43.0 0.19 21 Indiana... 0.4 2.1 6.2 20.3 22.8 0.09 22 Lucky B... 1.4 4.1 24.7 45.3 54.7 0.23 23 Napa... 1.6 2.9 10.5 59.9 65.1 0.23 24 Newport... 1.0 2.1 6.2 23.4 26.6 0.10 25 Oranza... 0.2 2.5 22.4 56.3 62.5 0.25 26 Protégé... 1.6 3.1 29.2 52.1 58.3 0.26 42 PSR 306796... 0.8 2.5 14.3 31.8 36.2 0.15 27 PY-60 Improved... 1.0 1.8 22.5 69.5 72.7 0.29 43 Rogers 1851A... 2.0 3.9 42.7 51.6 57.8 0.30 28 Scarlet Nantes... 1.2 3.1 29.9 67.2 65.6 0.30 46 XPH18029... 1.2 2.0 6.4 28.6 37.5 0.12 47 XPH18031... 0.2 1.0 3.3 20.3 35.9 0.09 50 XPH18032... 0.4 2.7 17.2 28.6 39.1 0.16 49 XPH18085... 1.6 2.3 7.4 31.5 38.0 0.13 48 XPH3910... 1.0 2.7 9.0 50.0 44.8 0.19 44 Xph87W341... 0.4 2.3 9.4 62.5 65.6 0.23 45 Xph95W94... 0.8 2.0 7.0 21.1 17.2 0.09 29 005-1 (3475M)... 0.8 2.3 30.2 68.8 81.3 0.32 30 536-2 (7241A... 0.4 1.8 3.7 18.0 25.8 0.08 31 620-2 (W2-HC4)... 0.8 1.6 4.3 12.5 12.1 0.06 32 728-1 (5280B)... 0.2 1.6 3.7 40.6 49.0 0.15 33 906-98 (WAY247B)... 1.4 3.5 34.9 81.3 84.4 0.37 34 908-98W279B)... 0.8 3.5 32.6 71.9 67.2 0.33 35 910-98 (W280B)... 2.5 2.1 46.9 75.8 80.5 0.39 37 94-668... 1.4 2.9 7.0 15.2 18.0 0.08 36 97-711... 1.2 2.1 5.5 34.9 39.6 0.14 38 97-712... 1.0 2.5 11.9 51.6 65.1 0.21 Pr > F 3... <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 LSD 3... 1.2 1.2 17.8 17.4 17.3 0.08 1 Severity of leaf blight symptoms was rated on a Horsfall-Barratt scale of 0 (no infection) to 11 (all foliage dead). No attempt was made to evaluate symptoms of Alternaria and Cercospora blights separately. Ratings were converted to percent foliage infection. 2 Relative area under the disease progress curve. Data for each date were plotted on a graph and the area under the line was calculated for each treatment providing a measure of the relative severity of disease throughout the season. A disease rating of 100% foliage infection for the entire season would produce a value of 1.0. All relative AUDPC values are expressed as the proportion of this value. Either decreased disease severity or later disease development will contribute to lower relative areas under the disease progress curve. 3 Analysis of variance was performed on data, and Fisher's protected least significant difference (LSD) was calculated. NS = not significant at the P = 0.05 level.

Table 3., size distribution and gross value for carrot cultivars and breeding s. Cultivar or Breeding Selection (Ton/ A) 1 < ¾ Percentage of yield for carrot Graded as Slicers 2 Graded as Dicers 2 diameter (inches) Percentage of Gross Percentage of Price/ of Price/ ¾ - 1 ¼ - 1 5/8 - % ¾ - > Discards 2 > 2 cards Ton 1 ¼ - Dis- Ton 1 ¼ 1 5/8 2 > 2 culls 1 5/8 1 5/8 Gross of # of carrots with aster yellows symptoms Slicer Standards Bolero... 33.3 0.9 30.1 48.5 11.4 0.0 9.0 78.7 11.4 10.0 53.7 1600.8 59.9 0.0 40.1 43.8 771.7 0.3 Prospector... 26.2 4.6 59.0 28.6 1.4 0.0 6.4 87.6 1.4 11.0 54.7 1276.1 30.0 0.0 70.0 43.8 337.1 0.0 PY-60... 18.3 3.0 30.8 27.0 10.4 0.0 28.8 57.8 10.4 31.8 53.9 695.7 37.5 0.0 62.5 43.8 301.0 0.0 Dicer Standards Danvers 126... 28.0 0.1 1.1 6.6 32.1 48.7 11.4 7.7 80.8 11.5 43.6 1091.0 38.7 48.7 12.6 46.6 1160.8 1.3 Gold King... 21.1 0.0 2.0 23.6 23.9 31.9 18.5 25.7 55.9 18.5 44.6 739.7 47.6 31.9 20.5 43.8 710.2 0.0 Test Lines Apache... 24.8 5.9 46.7 26.9 13.1 0.0 7.4 73.7 13.1 13.2 58.4 1267.5 40.1 0.0 59.9 43.8 451.5 1.0 Blaze... 26.2 3.0 27.5 42.5 11.2 3.2 12.6 70.0 14.4 15.5 58.9 1310.6 53.8 3.2 43.0 43.8 669.9 0.0 Canada... 29.7 0.2 2.6 19.5 31.4 41.4 4.9 22.1 72.8 5.1 44.6 1259.5 51.0 41.4 7.7 44.5 1239.6 1.0 Carson... 32.6 0.0 7.3 19.0 28.8 37.0 8.0 26.3 65.8 8.0 43.6 1309.4 47.8 37.0 15.3 43.8 1205.2 1.3 Cascade... 30.1 0.0 4.2 21.2 35.1 33.7 5.7 25.4 68.9 5.7 43.6 1236.6 56.3 33.7 9.9 43.8 1189.3 0.0 Cheyenne... 24.0 7.2 41.6 14.8 1.7 0.0 34.8 56.4 1.7 41.9 59.5 822.9 16.5 0.0 83.5 43.8 173.8 0.0 Coral II... 26.2 0.5 2.7 18.4 31.7 22.9 23.7 21.1 54.7 24.2 46.5 901.1 50.1 22.9 26.9 43.8 811.9 0.3 CXC 2589... 31.7 0.0 2.0 8.7 25.5 53.0 10.9 10.6 78.5 10.9 43.6 1238.7 34.1 53.0 12.8 46.6 1318.3 1.0 Eagle... 32.7 3.0 44.0 28.6 6.7 7.6 10.1 72.6 14.3 13.1 53.7 1521.3 35.3 7.6 57.1 43.8 655.1 1.7 Early Gold... 27.2 0.0 1.7 15.2 32.8 47.4 2.8 16.9 80.3 2.8 43.6 1154.3 48.0 47.4 4.6 46.6 1217.6 0.3 Enterprise... 25.2 7.9 43.0 28.3 8.2 0.0 12.6 71.3 8.2 20.5 59.2 1185.8 36.5 0.0 63.5 43.8 398.5 0.3 Falcon... 22.3 1.0 41.6 32.2 14.4 0.0 10.7 73.9 14.4 11.7 53.7 1045.9 46.7 0.0 53.3 43.8 464.3 0.3 Fullback... 28.7 0.0 4.7 21.2 31.0 27.2 15.8 25.9 58.3 15.8 44.6 1079.7 52.2 27.2 20.5 43.8 1004.8 1.0 Halfback... 36.9 0.1 4.8 14.1 26.8 28.4 25.8 18.9 55.2 25.9 44.6 1203.0 41.0 28.4 30.6 43.8 1106.6 1.3 Heritage... 27.0 4.0 45.1 35.4 7.7 2.2 5.5 80.5 10.0 9.6 53.9 1313.2 43.2 2.2 54.6 43.8 544.8 1.3 HMX 4302... 25.1 13.1 71.3 10.4 2.9 0.0 2.3 81.7 2.9 15.4 54.7 1157.0 13.3 0.0 86.7 43.8 144.2 0.0 HMX 4303... 23.5 15.6 63.3 8.7 4.4 0.0 8.0 72.0 4.4 23.6 54.7 990.2 13.1 0.0 86.9 43.8 120.8 0.0 Idaho... 27.2 4.5 42.1 33.9 9.0 0.0 10.5 76.0 9.0 15.0 54.4 1253.0 42.9 0.0 57.1 43.8 519.4 0.0 Indiana... 24.2 10.8 46.2 21.2 7.3 0.0 14.5 67.5 7.3 25.3 59.2 1084.2 28.5 0.0 71.5 43.8 311.6 0.7 Lucky B... 25.2 1.6 42.8 36.7 8.4 0.0 10.5 79.4 8.4 12.1 54.2 1204.6 45.1 0.0 54.9 43.8 502.4 1.0 Napa... 28.7 1.6 38.8 35.6 8.9 4.8 10.3 74.5 13.6 11.9 58.9 1491.1 44.5 4.8 50.7 43.8 623.3 0.0 Newport... 27.2 13.9 54.9 18.6 1.5 0.0 11.0 73.5 1.5 25.0 54.7 1117.2 20.1 0.0 79.9 43.8 241.7 0.0 Oranza... 24.9 3.5 49.2 27.1 4.7 0.0 15.5 76.3 4.7 19.0 54.4 1099.8 31.8 0.0 68.2 43.8 345.6 1.7 Protégé... 29.2 5.4 50.8 31.4 6.4 0.0 6.0 82.2 6.4 11.5 54.4 1410.7 37.7 0.0 62.3 43.8 491.8 2.0 PSR 306796... 25.7 0.5 14.0 31.8 30.3 5.9 17.5 45.8 36.2 18.0 48.5 1012.8 62.1 5.9 32.0 43.8 782.3 0.7 PY-60 Improved... 24.4 1.2 32.5 41.6 15.1 4.9 4.7 74.2 20.0 5.8 52.7 1200.8 56.8 4.9 38.4 43.8 672.0 1.0 Rogers 1851A... 27.6 0.9 50.1 32.4 4.3 1.6 10.7 82.5 5.9 11.6 54.4 1314.1 36.7 1.6 61.7 43.8 481.2 0.0

Cultivar or Breeding Selection (Ton/ A) 1 < ¾ Percentage of yield for carrot Graded as Slicers 2 Graded as Dicers 2 diameter (inches) Percentage of Gross Percentage of Price/ of Price/ ¾ - 1 ¼ - 1 5/8 - % ¾ - > Discards 2 > 2 cards Ton 1 ¼ - Dis- Ton 1 ¼ 1 5/8 2 > 2 culls 1 5/8 1 5/8 Gross of # of carrots with aster yellows symptoms Scarlet Nantes... 28.6 3.5 50.3 38.3 4.8 0.0 3.1 88.6 4.8 6.6 54.7 1461.4 43.0 0.0 57.0 43.8 540.6 0.7 XPH18029... 26.0 0.2 1.6 15.3 14.3 38.3 30.3 16.9 52.7 30.5 45.5 823.6 29.6 38.3 32.0 44.5 798.4 0.3 XPH18031... 27.5 0.3 2.1 2.9 11.9 60.2 22.6 5.0 72.2 22.9 43.6 936.5 14.8 60.2 25.0 46.6 967.9 0.0 XPH18032... 25.0 0.4 14.3 20.0 33.5 19.6 12.1 34.4 53.1 12.5 43.6 951.7 53.5 19.6 26.8 43.8 797.1 0.7 XPH18085... 25.9 0.2 6.0 27.2 28.4 24.5 13.8 33.1 52.9 14.0 45.5 1013.7 55.6 24.5 19.9 43.8 909.5 1.3 XPH3910... 28.2 0.3 7.8 22.1 16.3 32.5 21.1 29.9 48.8 21.3 45.5 1013.2 38.4 32.5 29.1 43.8 877.7 0.7 Xph87W341... 20.7 0.5 2.3 25.9 30.5 32.4 8.3 28.2 63.0 8.9 45.5 870.6 56.4 32.4 11.1 45.9 836.0 1.0 Xph95W94... 21.0 4.4 62.0 20.1 3.7 0.0 9.8 82.1 3.7 14.2 54.7 984.9 23.8 0.0 76.2 43.8 216.2 0.0 005-1 (3475M)... --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 536-2 (7241A... --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 620-2 (W2-HC4)... 12.0 10.9 34.4 11.1 3.2 0.0 40.4 45.5 3.2 51.3 54.7 317.7 14.3 0.0 85.7 43.8 74.2 0.0 728-1 (5280B)... 12.9 3.0 42.0 33.3 4.6 0.5 16.5 75.4 5.2 19.4 54.7 569.7 38.0 0.5 61.5 43.8 216.7 2.0 906-98 (WAY247B)... 14.5 1.0 44.3 44.2 1.8 0.0 8.7 88.5 1.8 9.7 54.7 714.8 46.0 0.0 54.0 43.8 288.3 0.7 908-98W279B)... 19.3 2.0 30.3 43.6 16.1 2.5 5.5 73.9 18.6 7.5 53.4 947.5 59.7 2.5 37.8 43.8 521.5 0.7 910-98 (W280B)... 12.2 2.5 59.8 25.8 0.9 0.0 11.1 85.6 0.9 13.6 54.7 571.9 26.6 0.0 73.4 43.8 139.1 1.5 94-668... 24.2 2.2 46.9 32.2 7.4 0.0 11.3 79.1 7.4 13.5 54.4 1146.8 39.6 0.0 60.4 43.8 419.7 1.0 97-711... 23.9 0.2 1.7 13.4 33.1 38.2 13.5 15.1 71.3 13.6 44.6 915.2 46.5 38.2 15.3 45.9 924.0 0.7 97-712... 25.6 0.2 7.5 25.4 34.4 17.1 15.4 32.9 51.5 15.6 45.5 986.3 59.8 17.1 23.2 43.8 886.1 0.0 Pr > F 3... <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.44 LSD 3... 8.3 4.1 17.5 18.6 15.7 19.6 13.6 19.4 18.9 14.2 2.5 388.2 24.3 19.6 20.9 1.8 370.4 NS 1 A 5-foot section of row was hand dug in each plot and yield was converted to tons/a. Hand digging is likely to result in a higher apparent yield as fewer carrots are lost than when mechanically dug. Carrots were graded into five size classes or culls (misshapen or rotted). The size classes were then grouped appropriately to conform to standards for dicing or slicing carrots. --- indicates extremely poor stand. No yield data were taken for these entries in trial. 2 s are calculated based on typical 1998 processing contracts for uncrowned carrots. Dicing carrot contract: Minimum size accepted is 1 1/4 inch; discard class includes culls and carrots below the minimum diameter. Dicing base price per ton is: >90% of crop over 2 diameter - $51.70; 81-90% > 2 - $51.30; 71-80% > 2 - $50.10; 61-70% > 2 - $48.00; 51-60% > 2 - $45.90; < 51% > 2 - $43.80. Slicing carrot contract: Minimum size accepted is 3/4 inch diameter; discard class includes culls and carrots below the minimum diameter. Slicing base price per ton is: < 10% over 1 5/8 diameter - $54.70; 10-19% > 1 5/8 - $53.90; 20-29% > 1 5/8 - $52.40; 30-39% > 1 5/8 - $49.40; 40-49% > 1 5/8 - $46.45; >49% > 1 5/8 - $43.60. Prices listed in the table include a $4.75 per ton variety premium, added to the base price, for : Apache, Blaze, Cheyenne, Enterprise, Indiana and Napa. 3 Analysis of variance was performed on data, and Fisher s protected least significant difference (LSD) was calculated. NS = not significant at the P = 0.05 level.

Table 4. Ranking of cultivars and breeding s according to several criteria. % foliage infection significantly below that observed for the susceptible check, Lucky B (ranked by % foliage infection) Cultivar or breeding % foliage infection AUDP C (Ton/A) of As As Slicers Dicers 9 Carson... 11.3 0.05 32.6 1309.4 1205.2 7 Blaze... 12.1 0.07 26.2 1310.6 669.9 31 620-2 (W2-HC4)... 12.1 0.06 12.0 317.7 74.2 11 Cheyenne... 15.6 0.06 24.0 822.9 173.8 45 Xph95W94... 17.2 0.09 21.0 984.9 216.2 37 94-668... 18.0 0.08 24.2 1146.8 419.7 39 CXC 2589... 18.7 0.17 31.7 1238.7 1318.3 17 Fullback... 20.3 0.09 28.7 1079.7 1004.8 21 Indiana... 22.8 0.09 24.2 1084.2 311.6 30 536-2 (7241A)... 25.8 0.08 --- --- --- 24 Newport... 26.6 0.10 27.2 1117.2 241.7 12 Coral II... 27.1 0.11 26.2 901.1 811.9 18 Halfback... 28.1 0.12 36.9 1203.0 1106.6 6 Apache... 29.2 0.11 24.8 1267.5 451.5 15 Enterprise... 29.7 0.10 25.2 1185.8 398.5 47 XPH18031... 35.9 0.09 27.5 936.5 967.9 42 PSR 306796... 36.2 0.15 25.7 1012.8 782.3 2 Prospector... 37.0 0.12 26.2 1276.1 337.1 AUDPC significantly below that calculated for the susceptible check, Lucky B (ranked by AUDPC) Cultivar or breeding % foliage infection AUDP C (Ton/A) of As As Slicers Dicers 9 Carson... 11.3 0.05 32.6 1309.4 1205.2 31 620-2 (W2-HC4)... 12.1 0.06 12.0 317.7 74.2 11 Cheyenne... 15.6 0.06 24.0 822.9 173.8 7 Blaze... 12.1 0.07 26.2 1310.6 669.9 37 94-668... 18.0 0.08 24.2 1146.8 419.7 30 536-2 (7241A... 25.8 0.08 --- --- --- 45 Xph95W94... 17.2 0.09 21.0 984.9 216.2 17 Fullback... 20.3 0.09 28.7 1079.7 1004.8 21 Indiana... 22.8 0.09 24.2 1084.2 311.6 47 XPH18031... 35.9 0.09 27.5 936.5 967.9 24 Newport... 26.6 0.10 27.2 1117.2 241.7 15 Enterprise... 29.7 0.10 25.2 1185.8 398.5 12 Coral II... 27.1 0.11 26.2 901.1 811.9 6 Apache... 29.2 0.11 24.8 1267.5 451.5 18 Halfback... 28.1 0.12 36.9 1203.0 1106.6 2 Prospector... 37.0 0.12 26.2 1276.1 337.1 46 XPH18029... 37.5 0.12 26.0 823.6 798.4 49 XPH18085... 38.0 0.13 25.9 1013.7 909.5 8 Canada... 41.7 0.13 29.7 1259.5 1239.6 4 Danvers 126... 43.2 0.13 28.0 1091.0 1160.8 1 Bolero... 39.1 0.14 33.3 1600.8 771.7 36 97-711... 39.6 0.14 23.9 915.2 924.0 42 PSR 306796... 36.2 0.15 25.7 1012.8 782.3 32 728-1 (5280B)... 49.0 0.15 12.9 569.7 216.7 "Top 20", ranked by total value of yield - as slicing carrots Cultivar or breeding % foliage infection AUDP C of As As Slicers Dicers 1 Bolero......39.1 0.14 33.3 1600.8 771.7 13 Eagle......39.6 0.16 32.7 1521.3 655.1 23 Napa...65.1 0.23 28.7 1491.1 623.3 28 Scarlet Nantes...65.6 0.30 28.6 1461.4 540.6 26 Protégé......58.3 0.26 29.2 1410.7 491.8 43 Rogers 1851A...57.8 0.30 27.6 1314.1 481.2 19 Heritage...60.9 0.22 27.0 1313.2 544.8 7 Blaze......12.1 0.07 26.2 1310.6 669.9 9 Carson...11.3 0.05 32.6 1309.4 1205.2 2 Prospector...37.0 0.12 26.2 1276.1 337.1 6 Apache......29.2 0.11 24.8 1267.5 451.5 8 Canada......41.7 0.13 29.7 1259.5 1239.6 20 Idaho......43.0 0.19 27.2 1253.0 519.4 39 CXC 2589......18.7 0.17 31.7 1238.7 1318.3 10 Cascade......77.3 0.28 30.1 1236.6 1189.3 22 Lucky B...54.7 0.23 25.2 1204.6 502.4 18 Halfback......28.1 0.12 36.9 1203.0 1106.6 27 PY-60 Impr......72.7 0.29 24.4 1200.8 672.0 15 Enterprise...29.7 0.10 25.2 1185.8 398.5 40 HMX 4302......42.7 0.23 25.1 1157.0 144.2 "Top 20", ranked by total value of yield - as dicing carrots Cultivar or breeding % foliage infection AUDP C (Ton/A) of As As Slicers Dicers 39 CXC 2589......18.7 0.17 31.7 1238.7 1318.3 8 Canada......41.7 0.13 29.7 1259.5 1239.6 14 Early Gold...74.2 0.23 27.2 1154.3 1217.6 9 Carson...11.3 0.05 32.6 1309.4 1205.2 10 Cascade......77.3 0.28 30.1 1236.6 1189.3 4 Danvers 126......43.2 0.13 28.0 1091.0 1160.8 18 Halfback......28.1 0.12 36.9 1203.0 1106.6 17 Fullback...20.3 0.09 28.7 1079.7 1004.8 47 XPH18031...35.9 0.09 27.5 936.5 967.9 36 97-711......39.6 0.14 23.9 915.2 924.0 49 XPH18085...38.0 0.13 25.9 1013.7 909.5 38 97-712......65.1 0.21 25.6 986.3 886.1 48 XPH3910...44.8 0.19 28.2 1013.2 877.7 44 Xph87W341......65.6 0.23 20.7 870.6 836.0 12 Coral II...27.1 0.11 26.2 901.1 811.9 46 XPH18029...37.5 0.12 26.0 823.6 798.4 50 XPH18032...39.1 0.16 25.0 951.7 797.1 42 PSR 306796...36.2 0.15 25.7 1012.8 782.3 1 Bolero......39.1 0.14 33.3 1600.8 771.7 5 Gold King......60.4 0.22 21.1 739.7 710.2

Table 5. Summary Table - "Top performers" for at least one criterion (entries are listed in alphabetical order). "Boxed" numbers indicate: Foliage infection (final rating, ), significantly lower than susceptible check (Lucky Slicer - value of yield - top 20 in value B) Dicer - value of yield - top 20 in value AUDPC - significantly lower than susceptible check (Lucky B) Cultivar or breeding % Foliage Infection AU DPC (Ton / A) 1 of Slicer of Dicer 6 Apache 29.2 0.11 24.8 1267.5 451.5 7 Blaze 12.1 0.07 26.2 1310.6 669.9 1 Bolero 39.1 0.14 33.3 1600.8 771.7 8 Canada 41.7 0.13 29.7 1259.5 1239.6 9 Carson 11.3 0.05 32.6 1309.4 1205.2 10 Cascade 77.3 0.28 30.1 1236.6 1189.3 11 Cheyenne 15.6 0.06 24.0 822.9 173.8 12 Coral II 27.1 0.11 26.2 901.1 811.9 39 CXC 2589 18.7 0.17 31.7 1238.7 1318.3 4 Danvers 126 43.2 0.13 28.0 1091.0 1160.8 13 Eagle 39.6 0.16 32.7 1521.3 655.1 14 Early Gold 74.2 0.23 27.2 1154.3 1217.6 15 Enterprise 29.7 0.10 25.2 1185.8 398.5 17 Fullback 20.3 0.09 28.7 1079.7 1004.8 5 Gold King 60.4 0.22 21.1 739.7 710.2 18 Halfback 28.1 0.12 36.9 1203.0 1106.6 19 Heritage 60.9 0.22 27.0 1313.2 544.8 40 HMX 4302 42.7 0.23 25.1 1157.0 144.2 Cultivar or breeding % Foliage Infection AU DPC (Ton / A) 1 of Slicer of Dicer 20 Idaho 43.0 0.19 27.2 1253.0 519.4 21 Indiana 22.8 0.09 24.2 1084.2 311.6 22 Lucky B 54.7 0.23 25.2 1204.6 502.4 23 Napa 65.1 0.23 28.7 1491.1 623.3 24 Newport 26.6 0.10 27.2 1117.2 241.7 2 Prospector 37.0 0.12 26.2 1276.1 337.1 26 Protégé 58.3 0.26 29.2 1410.7 491.8 42 PSR 306796 36.2 0.15 25.7 1012.8 782.3 27 PY-60 Imp 72.7 0.29 24.4 1200.8 672.0 43 Rogers 1851A 57.8 0.30 27.6 1314.1 481.2 28 Scarlet Nantes 65.6 0.30 28.6 1461.4 540.6 46 XPH18029 37.5 0.12 26.0 823.6 798.4 47 XPH18031 35.9 0.09 27.5 936.5 967.9 50 XPH18032 39.1 0.16 25.0 951.7 797.1 49 XPH18085 38.0 0.13 25.9 1013.7 909.5 48 XPH3910 44.8 0.19 28.2 1013.2 877.7 44 Xph87 W341 65.6 0.23 20.7 870.6 836.0 45 Xph95 W94 17.2 0.09 21.0 984.9 216.2 Cultivar or breeding % Foliage Infection AU DPC (Ton / A) 1 of Slicer of Dicer 30 536-2 (7241A) 25.8 0.08 --- --- --- 620-2 (W2-31 HC4) 12.1 0.06 12.0 317.7 74.2 32 728-1 (5280B) 49.0 0.15 12.9 569.7 216.7 37 94-668 18.0 0.08 24.2 1146.8 419.7 36 97-711 39.6 0.14 23.9 915.2 924.0 38 97-712 65.1 0.21 25.6 986.3 886.1 Slicer standards (for comparison) 1 Bolero 39.1 0.14 33.3 1600.8 771.7 2 Prospector 37.0 0.12 26.2 1276.1 337.1 3 PY-60 63.5 0.22 18.3 695.7 301.0 Dicer standards (for comparison) 4 Danvers 126 43.2 0.13 28.0 1091.0 1160.8 5 Gold King 60.4 0.22 21.1 739.7 710.2 Table 6. Carrot length, count and quality observations (Data from S. Keil, Agrilink Foods Vegetable Co.) # of Root length (in) Count Defects reps Range Range Forks Cracks Rot Aster Yellows Curve/twist Cultivar or harvested (over all Aver- (over all Aver- Breeding Line reps) age reps) age all reps) age all reps) age all reps) age all reps) age all reps) age Apache 3 3-11 6.7 53-73 61.7 1-6 4 0-1 0.3 0-2 0.7 1-2 1.3 0-4 2.3 Blaze 3 3-10 6.3 49-59 52.3 1-6 4.3 0-1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0-3 1.7 Bolero 3 3-8 6 28-114 64 1-8 5 0 0 0 0 0-2 1 0-4 2.7 Canada 3 3-9 6.1 23-27 25 0-2 0.7 0 0 0 0 0-3 1.7 0-1 0.3 Carson 3 3-8 5.5 40-49 43.7 0-3 1.3 0-2 0.7 0-1 0.3 0-4 2.3 0 0 Cascade 3 3-7.5 4.9 40-44 42 0-3 1.7 0-2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cheyenne 3 3-11 7.2 39-87 63 6-32 18.7 0-1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0-7 3.3 Coral II 3 3-7 5.5 22-47 34 1-3 1.7 0-10 4.7 0-1 0.3 0-1 0.3 0-1 0.3 CXC 2589 3 3-8 6.3 20-31 25 1-2 1.3 1-3 2 0-1 0.3 0-2 0.7 0 0

# of Root length (in) Count Defects reps Range Range Forks Cracks Rot Aster Yellows Curve/twist Cultivar or harvested (over all Aver- (over all Aver- Breeding Line reps) age reps) age all reps) age all reps) age all reps) age all reps) age all reps) age Danvers 126 3 3-9.5 6.3 20-30 24.7 1-4 2.7 0 0 0 0 1-2 1.7 0-1 0.3 Eagle 3 3-12 6.7 52-82 64.3 3-12 7 0 0 0-2 0.7 0-5 1.7 0-7 2.7 Early Gold 3 4-8.5 6.2 23-34 26.7 0-1 0.7 0-1 0.3 0 0 1-2 1.3 0-2 0.7 Enterprise 3 3-10 6.7 40-77 62 1-7 3.7 0 0 0 0 0-1 0.3 0-7 3.7 Falcon 3 3-9.5 6.3 24-52 42.3 2-9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 1.3 Fullback 3 3-8 5.7 25-42 33 0-3 1 0-2 1 0-1 0.7 0-3 1.3 0-1 0.3 Gold King 3 3-7 4.9 15-32 23.7 1-7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Halfback 3 3-8 5.3 30-49 40.3 2-10 5.3 0-1 0.3 1-3 2.3 0-4 1.3 0-3 1.7 Heritage 3 3-10 6.4 59-70 64.3 2-6 3.7 0-1 0.3 0 0 2 2 0-6 3.7 HMX 4302 3 3-11 7.3 53-99 82 0-2 1 0 0 0-1 0.3 0-1 0.3 4-19 9.7 HMX 4303 3 3-11 7.3 65-95 76 1-7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-7 5.3 Idaho 3 3-9 5.7 57-85 72 3-6 5 0-1 0.3 0-1 0.3 0 0 0-7 2.3 Indiana 3 3-12 6.7 52-84 69.3 3-10 6.7 0-2 0.7 0 0 0-1 0.7 2 2 Lucky B 3 3-8 5.8 56-65 60.7 2-8 5 0-2 0.7 0 0 1-3 1.7 1-2 1.7 Napa 3 3-8 6.1 45-61 55 2-5 3.3 0-1 0.7 0 0 0 0 0-4 3 Newport 3 3-11 7.3 54-92 76.7 1-5 3.3 0-1 0.7 0-2 0.7 0-1 0.3 2-7 5 Oranza 3 3-8 5.5 40-88 66.3 2-6 3.7 0-1 0.3 0-1 0.3 0-3 1.7 2-5 3.3 Prospector 3 3-11 6.8 55-79 60 1-7 5 0 0 0-1 0.3 0 0 0-5 3.3 Protégé 3 3-10.5 6.3 68-81 76.3 2-4 3 0-1 0.3 0-1 0.3 0-3 1.7 2-7 4.3 PSR 306796 3 3-8 6.3 33-43 38.3 3-9 5.3 0-1 0.7 0-1 0.3 0-2 0.7 1-2 1.3 PY 60 3 3-9 5.8 18-89 41.7 6-10 7.7 0 0 0 0 0-1 0.3 0-2 0.7 PY 60 Improved 3 3-9 6.4 43-44 43.3 2-4 2.7 0 0 0 0 0-3 2 2-4 2.7 Scarlet Nantes 3 3-8 5.5 69-90 82 0-1 0.7 0-3 1 0 0 2 2 0-9 3 XPH 18032 3 3-9 5.3 34-53 41 0-3 2 0-1 0.7 0-1 0.3 0-1 0.3 0-3 2 XPH 18085 3 3-9 5.7 30-37 33.3 2-5 3.3 1-2 1.3 0 0 0-4 1.3 0-1 0.7 XPH 3910 3 3-8 5.3 27-51 40.3 2-8 5 0-4 1.7 0 0 0-2 1 0-1 0.3 XPH 87W341 1 3-8 5.5 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 XPH 95W94 2 3-9 6.3 43-58 50.5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 1.5 XPH 18029 3 3-8 5.5 19-26 23.7 2-6 4 1 1 0 0 0-1 0.3 0-2 1.3 XPH 18031 2 3.5-10 6.5 10-22 16 0-3 1.5 1-3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1851A 3 3-10 6.2 45-63 55 1-10 4.3 0-1 0.7 0 0 0 0 0-5 2.7 620-2 (W2-HC4) 3 4-12 7.5 27-42 35 1-3 2 0 0 0 0 0-1 0.3 0-2 0.7 728-1 (5280-B) 2 3-11 7.8 24 24 1-5 3 0-1 0.5 0 0 0-2 1 1-2 1.5 87W341 2 3-9.5 5.5 12-32 22.5 0-5 2.5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 906-98 3 3-8 5.6 28-44 35.3 1-2 1.3 0-3 1 0 0 1-8 4 0-1 0.7 908-98 (W879B) 3 3-7.5 5.2 41-69 54.6 1-2 1.3 0-1 0.3 0 0 0-2 0.7 0 0 910-98 (W280B) 2 3-7.5 5.5 33-38 35.5 1-2 1.5 0 0 0-1.5 1-2 1.5 0-1 0.5 94-668 3 3-10 7.7 43-61 49.7 1-6 3.3 0-2 1 0-1 0.7 0 0 0-10 4.3 95W94 1 3-7.5 5.5 79 79 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 12 97-711 3 3-8 6 14-36 26 1-4 2.3 0 0 0-2 0.7 1-2 1.3 0-3 1 97-712 3 3-8 5.7 26-45 33.3 0-8 3.7 0-3 1 0 0 0-1 0.3 0-2 1