Table of Contents. Page 1 of 15

Similar documents
Berkeley Unified School District Transportation Guide for Special Needs Students

Berkeley Unified School District Transportation Guide for Regular & Special Ed Students

Pupil Transportation. SOCSD Informational Session Presented by Ann Vaccaro Teich, Deputy Superintendent May 13, 2015

Transportation Of Students with Special Needs BUS

Transportation Information (Modified February 2014)

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Transportation Written Plan

Mt. Diablo Unified School District

Cherry Hill Public Schools Transportation Department 45 Ranoldo Terrace Cherry Hill, New Jersey (856)

6 Mobility Plus Annual Service Plan

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

Student Transportation Handbook

STUDENT TRANSPORTATION

RURAL ROAD MAINTENANCE POLICY

San Ramon Valley Unified School District

Appendix C. Parking Strategies

Car Sharing at a. with great results.

Section Sixteen. Transportation

Shepherd I.S.D Transportation Handbook

Paratransit Overview O & O Presentation January 11, 2018

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Worcester Public Schools Student Transportation Contract Proposed Bid Specification Change Summary Sheet

FAQ-Frequently Asked Questions

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

Wyoming School Funding Model Recalibration: Transportation Reimbursement Model Study

2011 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Autonomous Urban Mobility

SMETHPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT Smethport, Pennsylvania TRANSPORTATION

NEW YORK CITY CARSHARE PILOT

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Transportation Update. Binford Sloan, Director of Transportation, October 9, 2018 Presented to School Board

Frequently Asked Questions about Bus Transportation

JARED CHOC, MANAGER OF PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY STEVE DICKEY, DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT

Compressed Natural Gas Snow Plows

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

Pupil Transportation Routing Study

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Florida Strategic Highway Safety Planning Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Performance Overview

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

Background. Request for Decision. Pedestrian Lighting Standards for Road Right-of-ways. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Mar 17, 2014

Dear New Clean Cities Stakeholder:

Prepared by Transportation Workgroup members: Derek Lewis, Lisa Wells, Chuck Saylors, Lynda Leventis-Wells

What We Heard. Edmontonians in communities Northwest of City Centre share their vision of the Metro Line NW LRT Expansion

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

History of Fare Systems

DATE ISSUED: 11/17/ of 5 UPDATE 109 CNC(LEGAL)-P

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

2018 NDE Pupil Transportation Reminders

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

POLICIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS (Amended May 23, 2011)

2019 New Transit Service Plan

HOLY SPIRIT RCSRD NO.4 BUS DRIVER S GUIDE

Inventory of Best Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education

St. Catharines Transit Commission Accessibility Plan. St. Catharines Transit Commission Accessibility Plan

SCAT PASSENGER NO-SHOW/LATE CANCELLATION POLICY

DeForest Area School District Administrative Regulation TITLE: TRANSPORTING STUDENTS IN OTHER THAN A SCHOOL BUS. NUMBER: AR 6.

Carroll County Public Schools Transportation Services Department

AGENDA INTERCITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION January 20, :30 P.M. 1) APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1 min.

EL DORADO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION

YUKON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Draft Marrickville Car Share Policy 2014

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

The National Association of State Motorcycle Safety Administrators (SMSA) Strategic Plan

April 10, Mr. Artis Smith Merced County Association of Governments 369 W. 18 th Street Merced, CA 95340

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE TOWN OF NEWMARKET

Designation of a Community Safety Zone in Honey Harbour in the Township of Georgian Bay

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Goals, Objectives, Performance Measurements. Mayor s Transition Team Public Input Session: Finance & Budget/Pensacola Energy 1/22/2019

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Vehicles and Road Safety Policy Number: Effective Date: May 20, 2012 Revision Approval Date: Jun. 28, 2015

Business and Noninstructional Operations

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

Mysuru PBS Presentation on Prepared by: Directorate of Urban Land Transport

Transportation Demand Management Element

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

An Overview of Transportation Responsibility

Report Number: Date: June 12, 2012 INFORMATION FOR DECISION

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

Parking Management Element

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

BCA Bus Information. Stop Locations. Bus stop locations are selected by BCA, subject to final approval by the School Leader.

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Prepared for the Mobile Source Air Pollution Review Committee (MSRC) under the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program

Public transit, automobile traffic and loading

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

and Members of Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Mewburn Road Speed Control Review

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Transcription:

Annual Report 2016 2017

Table of Contents CAO and Governance Committee Update... 2 Governance Committee Members... 3 Mission Statement... 3 Vision Statement... 3 2016 2017 Highlights... 4 Route/Operator Statistics... 4 Start Up Communication... 4 Student Safety Programs... 5 Rationale of Distance Measurement used by DSTS... 6 Request to Review or Reconsider Transportation Arrangements... 7 School Bus Weather Zones... 8 Annual Kilometers Travelled by DSTS School Buses... 8 Key Performance Indicators (KPI s)... 9 Transportation Costs by Board... 9 Transported Students by Board... 9 Vehicle Utilization... 11 Route Sharing and Vehicle Tiering... 13 Average Ride Time... 14 Page 1 of 15

CAO and Governance Committee Update The 2016 2017 Durham Student Transportation Services (DSTS) Annual Report highlights DSTS successes and ongoing initiatives as it continually strives to fulfill its mandate and improve the level of service to all transported students in Durham Region. DSTS continues to focus on providing safe and customer service oriented services to and from school every day. A few highlights from our 2016 2017 school year include: Routing and Technology continued to be a priority through advanced use of the routing software to further optimize current bus routes for efficiency, bell times, and bus capacity utilization. Further expanded use of GPS technology allowing for additional monitoring of bus routes and bus timings. Upgrades to the DSTS website have further enhanced the amount of website traffic which is particularly important on inclement weather days. Continued emphasis on expanding communications to all stakeholders, this included further development of the DSTS website, including expansion of parent user delay notification and public portal to nearly 7,000 users. DSTS is also experiencing growth in our Twitter followers to over 2,800 followers. Updated School Bus Safety Training programs were provided to every elementary school for both the Durham District School Board and the Durham Catholic District School Board. Introduction of a new First Rider Bus Orientation video shown at all First Rider training sessions. Further expansion of Safety reviews, including school site visits to review traffic flow and school bus operator in and out of the school site. Page 2 of 15

Governance Committee Members Chair of the Board, DDSB Chair of the Board, DCDSB Director of Education, DDSB Director of Education, DCDSB Mission Statement The Durham Student Transportation Services is committed to supporting the education of students by providing safe, equitable, effective and efficient transportation to its Member Boards. Vision Statement DSTS, with its partners, will enhance each student s school day by providing safe and customer service oriented services to and from school every day. Page 3 of 15

2016 2017 Highlights Route/Operator Statistics DSTS has contract services with five bus operators companies. A total of 632 routes were contracted to the following bus operators: Century Transportation Durhamways Bus Lines First Student of Canada (Ajax, Bowmanville, and Brooklin divisions) Scugog Transit Stock Transportation (Sunderland Division) Start Up Communication DSTS understands that today s stakeholders require many different communication options in order to stay informed of School Bus information for their students. DSTS offers the following communication tools to our schools and family community: Interactive Voice Relay System for both inbound and outbound communications. DSTS Website that has undergone multiple improvements and integrations with our transportation routing solution. Parents can log in using student info to view transportation data. Subscription services for Route delays. Parents can choose to receive email notifications when their student s route is running late. Twitter, all delays and cancelations are posted to our twitter feed. DSTS currently has over 2,800 followers and growing. Page 4 of 15

Student Safety Programs Student Safety is a paramount priority for DSTS. In 2016 2017 DSTS provided the following safety programs. Young Riders Orientation Day (provided to all first time students) The Safe Rider Program Buster The Bus (JK 3) The Rider Role Model to Volunteer Program (Grade 4 8) School Bus Evacuation Program (Available to all schools/grades) The safety of transported students is the highest priority for DSTS. In all aspects of school bus service, from route planning and design through daily operations, safety is always the first consideration. As an extension of the classroom, students play a large role in contributing to safety of the bus. The same conduct expected by the school is also expected by the bus driver. Page 5 of 15

Rationale of Distance Measurement used by DSTS Durham Student Transportation Services (DSTS) uses Durham Regional digital maps that are imported into our routing software Bus Planner. Distances are calculated through our routing software based on the walking properties set to each individual regional road segment. Walkability is managed by DSTS staff using geographic knowledge of the areas and database information obtained from the Region. The database shows all of the sidewalks and pedestrian walkways within the Region. DSTS consistently reviews areas to ensure walkability and distance calculations are accurate. Accurate distance measurements are key to ensuring our walk policy is applied in a fair and consistent manner for all schools of the Durham District and Durham Catholic school board students. In order to ensure consistency in distance measurement DSTS utilizes one measurement obtained from Bus Planner. Page 6 of 15

Request to Review Bus Stop Location DSTS is responsible for selecting bus stop locations within the service area in accordance with the walk to stop distance procedures. DSTS is not responsible for providing door to door transportation. Whenever possible, community collector stops are used. DSTS maintains an average walk to stop distance of 400 meters to a maximum walk to stop distance of 800 meters where possible. The distance is calculated on DSTS geometrics software between the place of residence and the bus stop based on the shortest distance on a road network and may include municipal walkways. Generally, school bus stops will not be located in areas such as cul de sacs or dead end streets. DSTS does not enter private property and roads, such as long rural driveways, gated communities and townhouse/apartment complexes. DSTS reserves the right to determine if the roadway is suitable for travel, given road conditions and necessary space requirements factoring in turning radius of large school vehicles. Parents may request a review of bus stop location through the DSTS website at www.dsts.on.ca Request to Reconsider Transportation Arrangements Parents or guardians who may disagree with an application of the Transportation Policy have the opportunity to request a reconsideration of transportation arrangements. The process by which to file a request for reconsideration is outlined on the Durham Student Transportation Services website at www.dsts.on.ca. Requests for reconsideration must be made in writing by a parent or guardian directed to the Chief Administrative Officer of DSTS. The request should include a detailed description of the situation and/or events. If the parent or guardian is not satisfied with the response from the Chief Administrative Officer, he or she may request reconsideration of the decision in writing to the Administrative Committee of DSTS. If a parent/guardian disagrees with the decision of the CAO and Administrative Committee they may petition in writing to the DSTS Governance Committee. The Governance Committee is responsible for ensuring that the school board approved transportation policy is applied correctly and consistently for all families. The Governance Committee cannot overturn or amend the school board approved policy. Page 7 of 15

School Bus Weather Zones For transportation purposes, the Durham Region has been divided into four zones outlined in the illustrated map. Depending on the location and type of weather occurrence, transportation may be cancelled for a specific zone. Any weather related bus cancellations are announced in the early morning hours to local radio and TV stations. All cancellation information is also posted to the DSTS and School Board websites. Annual Kilometers Travelled By DSTS School Buses Annual Kilometers Travelled by DSTS in the 2016 2017 school year was 43,218 km daily this equates to approximately 8,124,984 km on an annual basis. For some perspective, the circumference of the earth is 40,075 kilometers, meaning DSTS vehicles made this trip 203 times in the 2016 to 2017 school year. Page 8 of 15

Key Performance Indicators (KPI s) Transportation KPI s contained within the report are based on a snap shot of data exported on June 29 th, 2017 from the DSTS student transportation routing software Bus Planner. Student data is provided to DSTS through regular downloads from each board s student information system, PowerSchool. Transportation Costs by Board The chart below outlines the 2016 2017 transportation costs by member board: Transportation Coast By Board Total Cost ~ $ 25,854,342.00 26% $6,832,639.00 74% $19,021,703.00 Durham District School Board Durham Catholic District School Board *Transportation costs only, administration costs are excluded. Page 9 of 15

Transported Students by Board In the 2016 2017 school year, DSTS transported at total of 26,702 students. The chart below outlines the number of students transported by member board by panel. Number of Students 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Riders By School Board DDSB DCDSB DDSB DCDSB DDSB DCDSB Elementary Scondary Special Ed 2016 12555 6592 3556 2439 1407 153 2015 12497 6505 3478 2494 1442 161 2014 12188 6652 4075 2552 1554 159 2013 11788 6717 4199 2758 1485 184 2012* 12033 6443 2843 667 1409 193 Page 10 of 15

Vehicle Utilization The vehicle utilization percentage indicates how efficiently each vehicle type is used. The calculation is based on the vehicle capacity divided by riders, total routes and vehicle types. Below is a graph that illustrates the Capacity utilization by the entire route taking an average load of all the tiers on a given bus throughout the day and dividing it by the total capacity of the vehicle. Smaller vehicles including the 18 passenger, six passenger and wheelchair accessible provide service predominately to students with special needs. Given the specialized nature of this type of transportation utilization rates are usually lower due to distance travelled to program and/or needs of the students. The following graph outlines the capacity ratio by all vehicle types: Overall Capacity Utilization by Vehicle Type 34% 67% 37% 46% Full Size Mini Size Mini Van PDPV Page 11 of 15

The next graph shows the breakdown by municipality and vehicle type. 90% Capacity Utilization by Vehicle Type and Geopraphical Area 80% 75% 77% 70% 60% 69% 63% 66% 61% 50% 40% 30% 34% 34% 32% 33% 46% 41% 41% 41% 36% 32% 32% 27% 20% 19% 10% 0% Ajax Northern Oshawa Pickering Whitby 0% 70 Passenger 18 Passenger 6 Passenger Wheelchair Vehicles Page 12 of 15

Route Sharing and Vehicle Tiering Tiering and route sharing are approaches taken to maximize usage of a vehicle by sending a vehicle out on multiple runs or sharing the vehicle for multiple school locations. The following graphs illustrates the percentage of tiered or shared routes. Pick Up Routes Single Dedicated Vs Multiple Schools Serviced 31% 69% Single Dedicated Multiple Schools Drop Off Routes Single Dedicated Vs Multiple Schools Serviced 33% 67% Single Dedicated Multiple Schools Page 13 of 15

Average Ride Time DSTS operates under a maximum ride time one way of sixty minutes where ever possible. Below is a breakdown of the Average ride time for DSTS students. The majority of students ride less than 30 minutes, many of the longer rides are due to the location of program from the residential address. 45.00% 40.00% Student Average Ride Time Percentage of Total Ridership 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 0 10 min 11 20 min 21 30 min 31 40 min 41 50 min 51 60 min > 60 min Average Ride Times by Area 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 10 min 11 20 min 21 30 min 31 40 min 41 50 min 51 60 min > 60 min Ajax Northern Oshawa Pickering Whitby Page 14 of 15

Contact DSTS: 24 Hour Automated Info Line: 1-866-908-6578 or 905-666-6979 Office Line: 1-800-240-6943 or 905-666-6395 Follow us on Twitter @DurhamSTS Page 15 of 15