Traffic Signal Timing Diamond Operation. Innovation for better mobility

Similar documents
Texas Diamond Signalized Operations. Dave Holstein Administrator, Office of Traffic Engineering

Project Working Group Meeting #5

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 FLASHING YELLOW ARROW SIGNALS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

The Design-Builder shall meet local road criteria provided by the local governing agencies.

S.M. Wright Project (I-45, US 175, SH 310) and Road to Work Opportunity Program. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee May 23, 2016

Advance Warning System with Advance Detection

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

What is ELToD and Why Use it? Toll Choice Key Concepts. ELToD Applications. SW 10 th Street. ELToD Future Enhancements

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

Metro Highway Program

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Existing Conditions Belmont Circle Bourne, MA. Belmont Circle Improvements

US 67 WIDENING PROJECT

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Corridor Sketch Summary

DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

2013 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD, Part 6 September 2013

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Alternatives Considered

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Technical Feasibility Report

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

Interchange Operations Study

CONVERSION OF TWO-WAY FRONTAGE ROADS TO ONE-WAY

Jihong Cao, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Arnab Gupta, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Jay Yenerich, PE, Valley Metro

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

Procedure Effective date Rescinds Vehicle Placement In or Near Moving Traffic 17 November January 2005

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation

A Gap-Based Approach to the Left Turn Signal Warrant. Jeremy R. Chapman, PhD, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer American Structurepoint, Inc.

FIELD APPLICATIONS OF CORSIM: I-40 FREEWAY DESIGN EVALUATION, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. Michelle Thomas

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

WRONG WAY DRIVING. Ugonna U. Ughanze, P.E. Houston District

Request for Design Exception (#1) S.M. Wright Phase IIB

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Existing Traffic Conditions

NEWS RELEASE November 8, 2017

Fire Department Access & Water Supply

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Moving Operations. Introduction by. National Traffic Management & Work Zone Safety Conference March 2009

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Access Management Standards

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009

Table Common AREMA Lateral Turnouts Currently in Use in Passenger Rail Systems

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

I-35 Access Justification Report Kearney/Clay County

STATE ND PROJECT NO. CP 0883 (14) & CP 1152 (14) SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 9 31 SIGN NUMBER SIGN SIZE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REQUIRED UNITS PER AMOUNT UNITS

Traffic Feasibility Study

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Thinking Through Roundabouts

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2.1.5 Traffic and Circulation. Table Level of Service Criteria for Highway Segment Regulatory Setting Affected Environment

CHAPTER 15 STREET LIGHTING TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

PUBLIC MEETING. Bear Creek Park Community Center. January 24, :30 pm to 7:30 pm

LADOT Railroad Preemption Form Instructions

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

Skills and Sequences for In-Car Instruction

Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) Intersection Concept, Case Studies, and Design Guide ITE Midwest Annual Meeting June 30, 2015 Branson, MO

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT MOUNT EDEN ROAD, MOUNT EDEN

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village

Streetcar Level Boarding Background Memo

14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

Support: The Crossbuck (R15-1) sign assigns right-of-way to rail traffic at a highway-rail grade crossing.

2016 Congestion Report

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

TRAFFIC IMPACT DATA. Dillons #98 On-Site Relocation

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Mobile Barrier Trailer

Transcription:

Traffic Signal Timing Diamond Operation

Classic Diamond Interchange Page 2 2

What is a Diamond? Page 3 3

What is a Diamond? (Signal Terms) Two closely spaced signalized intersections of an arterial with a one way pair of frontage roads (Works more efficiently with one controller than two) Arterial Interior Frontage Road Page 4 4

Diamond Interchange Operation Phasing Options 4 Phase 3 Phase Separate Intersection Mode Page 5 5

Phasing Considerations Make it Efficient: run the heaviest movements together Three Phase Allows the main street phases (2+6) or (4+8) Four Phase Allows limited time for the Arterial and opposite side ramp Page 6 6

Phasing Considerations Lane Use Interchange Geometry Width of the Interchange (Internal Storage Capacity) Number of Lanes on The Approach Capacity Entering vs Capacity Inside Volume Distribution Origin Destination Page 7 7

Phasing Considerations Selection of Left Turn Treatment Hardware available Accident history Number of lanes Permissive should not be used with dual left turn lanes. Conflicting Vehicle Speeds Permissive should not be used with approach speeds over 40. Number of Lanes to Cross Permissive should not be used when crossing 3 or more lanes. Page 8 8

Classic Three Phase Arterial Interior Frontage Road Arterial Interior Clearance Frontage Roads Page 9 9

Three Phase Applications Most Effective: Wide Interchanges Provide adequate internal storage Rural Areas with Light Overall Traffic Fewer movements shorter cycle lengths Heavy Through Movements Will be ran simultaneously without having to cross each other Page 10 10

Classic Four Phase Right Arterial Right Frontage Left Arterial Left Frontage Page 11 11

Four Phase Applications Most Effective: Tightly Spaced Interchanges No adequate internal storage Urban Areas More movements longer cycle lengths Heavy Turning Movements Each exterior movement runs independently Page 12 12

Three Phase Examples Wide Intersection Spacing Rural Area (Light Traffic) Page 13 13

Three Phase Examples Wide Intersection Spacing Rural Area (Light Traffic) Page 14 14

Three Phase Examples Freeway not built yet (heavy through traffic) Page 15 15

Four Phase Examples Narrow Urban Diamonds Heavy Turning Traffic Page 16 16

Four Phase Examples Narrow Urban Diamonds Heavy Turning Traffic Page 17 17

Four Phase Examples Narrow Urban Diamonds Heavy Turning Traffic Page 18 18

Four Phase Examples Narrow Urban Diamonds Heavy Turning Traffic Page 19 19

Basic Three Phase Sequence Very efficient under light, even volume distribution. Problem: Does not handle uneven traffic volumes well. Page 20 20

Texas Three Phase Allows shorter, more efficient cycles Flexible Phasing in free and coordination Interior clearance after arterial phases Conditional Service allows backup to re-service interior with frontage road Conditional Service Intervals Page 21 21

Texas Diamond 3 Phase OL K=4+12 OLA=1+2+9+10 6 OLI-1+9+10 2 OLL=5+13+14 OLB=5+6+13+14 OLN=8+16 Page 22 22

Basic Four Phase Sequence Attempts to provides progression for every entering vehicle. Problem: Tends to have long cycle lengths. Page 23 23

Texas Four Phase Adds two travel time (fixed time) phases into 4-phase cycle Increases efficiency Shortens Cycle Lengths Minimizes interior stops by providing internal clearances for every entering movement Travel Time Right Arterial Right Front. Rd Fixed Time Phase Left Arterial Left Front. Rd Travel Time Fixed Time Phase Page 24 24

Classic Four Phase Sequential Phasing Progresses every movement 25% 25% 25 s 25 s 25 s 25% 25 s 25% 100 Second Cycle Page 25 25

Texas Four Phase Same Splits 31 % 25 s 15 s 20% Shorter Cycle 31 % 25 s 15 s 10 s 25 s 31% 15 s 15 s 25 s 31% Wraps around 10 s 80 Second Cycle Page 26 26

Texas Diamond TTI 4 Phase Provides One Stop Operation Always keeps the interior clear Allows fully actuated operation Page 27 27

Texas Diamond Overlap Assignments OL K=4+12 OLA=1+2+9+10 6 OLI-1+9+10 2 OLL=5+13+14 OLB=5+6+13+14 OLN=8+16 Page 28 28

Texas Diamond: 3 Phase - 4 Phase Both use the same load switch assignments Both use the same detector assignments Ring Structures are Different They have a common phase which is used when switching between 3 and 4 phase operation Page 29 29

Ring Structures Texas Three Phase 10 4 2 1 14 8 6 5 Texas Four Phase 2 16 5 4 12 1 6 8 Page 30 30

Diamond Detector Layout Page 31 31

Ramp Detector Placement T = Travel Time for Phase 2 D = Detector Setback = Distance traveled during T+2 Phase 8 D Example: T = 8 seconds Phase 8 approach speed = 40MPH D = (8+2) x (40x1.47) = 588 Travel Time Phase 2 Page 32 32

The Magic of a Diamond Interchange Controller There is none! Pre-programmed controller for standardization Uses standard controller features Same programming rules apply Minimum Green Maximum Green Extension Page 33 33

Modifying a Diamond Pre-Assigned detectors (1 18) are NOT programmable Detectors above #19 are programmable Overlaps are programmable Page 34 34

Customizing Diamond Phasing Overlaps Are Programmable Allow you to customize odd intersections Suggestion: Standard Diamonds Use Default Ring Structure Add/Alter Overlaps Where Needed Suggestion: Unique Applications Sequential Phasing All Overlaps Page 35 35

Problem Heavy Right Turn Driving the Ramp Time Page 36 36

Heavy Right Turn Driving the Ramp Time: How the movements work together Phase 4 and 5 Progressing the SB Movement Phase 12 and 6 Right to Left Travel Time Phase 1 and 6 WB green till gap termination NOTE: After first 8 seconds, no one flows EB Phase 1 and 8 NB Ramp - Right turn finally gets a green Page 37 37

Phasing: Diamond Mode with Additional Overlaps Frontage Road Right Turn Page 38 38

Phasing Modifications Texas Four Phase Available Phase 2 3 16 5 4 12 1 6 7 8 Available Phase 6? 8 Page 39 39

Overlap Assignments with Right Turn Overlap OL K=4+12 OLA=1+2+9+10 OLC=6+7 OLI-1+9+10 2 OLL=5+13+14 OLB=5+6+13+14 OLN=8+16 Phase 7 Page 40 40

Problem Two Way Ramp Needing Left Turn Protection Page 41 41

Phasing : Diamond Mode with Additional Overlaps Exterior Left for 2-Way Frontage Road Page 42 42

Phasing Modifications Texas Four Phase Available Phase 2 3 16 5 4 12 1 6 7 8 Available Phase 6? 8 Page 43 43

Overlap Assignments with Right Turn Overlap OL K=4+12 OLA=1+2+9+10 OLC=6+7 OLI-1+9+10 Phase 7 2 OLL=5+13+14 OLB=5+6+13+14 OLN=8+16 Page 44 44

Problem Closely Spaced Intersection to a Diamond OL K=4+12 2 OLA=1+2+9+10 OLI-1+9+10 OLL=5+13+14 OLB=5+6+13+14 6 OLN=8+16 Page 45 45

Phase Sequence Diagram - Diamond Mode with Adjacent Intersection OL K=4+12 OLA=1+2+9+10 OLI-1+9+10 2 OLL=5+13+14 OLB=5+6+13+14 OLN=8+16 Page 46 46

Overlap Assignments Diamond Mode with Adjacent Intersection 5 2 OL K=4+12 4 2 OLD=4+6+8+16 OLO=6 OLA=1+2+9+10 OLI-1+9+10 6 12 6 OLC=2+8 2 OLL=5+13+14 OLB=5+6+13+14 1 6 OLP=4 OLN=8+16 1 8 2 16 Page 47 47

Split Diamond: Diamond Mode with modified Overlaps Page 48 48

Texas Four Phase Texas Three Phase Right Arterial Right Front. Rd Travel Time Fixed Time Phase Left Arterial Left Front. Rd Travel Time Fixed Time Phase Conditional Service Intervals Page 49 49

Modified Three Phase Diamond Advantages: Runs through movements together Provides progression for left turns Design the Ring Structure A D Ph 2 B Ph 4 D B Ph 5 Ph 7 1 2 4 3 6 5 7 8 Assign the Overlaps A - 1 2 3 B - 5 6 7 C - 1 3 D - 5 7 Ph 4 Ph 8 A Ph 3 C Ph 8 A Ph 1 C Ph 6 B A Ph 2 B Ph 6 Page 50 50

Modified Three Phase: Overlap Assignments 4 OLA OLC 6 2 OLD OLB 8 Page 51 51

Diamond Operation with coordination Coordination rule changes for diamond controllers Dependent on ring structure 10 4 2 1 2 4 12 1 14 8 6 5 16 5 6 8 Still a traffic signal controller Page 52 52

Three Phase Diamond Coordination Phases not serviced in the normal sequence 10 4 2 1 14 8 6 5 Rules: 4=8 1+2=5+6 Cycle Length = 1+2+4 or 5+6+8 Coordinated phase in each ring, on the same side of the barrier (4+8, 2+6, 1+6, 2+5, 1+5) Page 53 53

Four Phase Diamond Coordination Service road time is a combination of two phases 2 4 12 1 16 5 6 8 Rules: 5 must be shorter than 4 and 2 s min time 1 must be shorter than 8 and 6 s min time Cycle Length = 2+4+6+8 Coordinated phase in each ring, on the same side of the barrier (2+5, 4+5, 1+6, 1+8) Page 54 54

Innovative Intersection Designs Based on intersection geometry Goals Reduces the number of phase intervals Reduces cycle length Options Diverging Diamond Displaced Left Turn Diamond Page 55 55

Diverging Diamond Page 56 56

Round Rock Diverging Diamond Field Observation: Made best use of existing bridges The original phase sequence created multiple stops for the left service roads that the city wanted to change Driver routes were not as anticipated Created weaving issue with downstream intersection Page 57 57

Displaced Left Turn Diamond Page 58 58

San Marcos Displaced Left Turn Diamond Field Observation: Took advantage of existing number of lanes under the bridge Internal storage not adequate for the 3 phase operation Single left turn lane was not adequate WB Multiple pedestrian crossing point affected phasing Page 59 59

Hybrid Diamond????? Page 60 60

Questions and Comments www.iteris.com Page 61 61